en
Feedback
LadyDraza

LadyDraza

Open in Telegram

Show more
The country is not specifiedPolitics6 172
8 375
Subscribers
-124 hours
-557 days
-15530 days
Posts Archive
EXPOSED: RICO ELECTION CRIMES IN WASHINGTON STATE - PART 2 https://billbruch.substack.com/p/exposed-rico-election-crimes-in-washington-99d

BREAKING: O’Keefe Media Group Uncovers Potential MASSIVE Money Laundering into Political Campaigns #FollowTheMoney @OKeefeMediaGroup

Repost from Dr. D. Presents
SPECIAL TWITTER SPACE AUDIO PODCAST ON ELECTIONS Saturday, March 11 5:00-8:00 P.M. CST (check your time zone) Featuring Dr. Douglas Frank, Dr. Walter Daugherity, and Lori Gallagher, plus other guests; hosted by Zak Paine. Go to https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1ZkKzXyrkgdJv now to set a reminder for Saturday.

https://frankspeech.com/video/fake-voters-and-fake-donors-data-exposing-steal Fake Voters and Fake Donors: Data Is Exposing the Steal

There exist just four plausible pathways to victory in 2024, with their differing assignments, difficulties, and probabilities. Inside why we can't allow Texas, North Carolina, and Alaska to be "Georgia'd", and why the Peach State is the most important "swing state" in the nation. Thank you for reading and supporting my work. https://skeshel.substack.com/p/four-pathways-to-save-america

Repost from Election Education
Never give up and never give in! We are winning! You have to believe it to see it!
Never give up and never give in! We are winning! You have to believe it to see it!

We need more than term limits. We need laws that say you cannot spend more than 12 years ( or pick your own term) in an elected office that is funded by American taxpayers. Lifelong politicians should longer be a career path.

Repost from Election Education
What we understand so far about the criminal activity that exists within US politics and why election fraud is necessary to a
What we understand so far about the criminal activity that exists within US politics and why election fraud is necessary to allow their money laundering & racketeering crimes to go unpunished.

photo content

This os well worth watching - but - if you don't havw time for it all, please watch Jacqueline Breger's report, starting at 6:42:00. Understand the methods of money laundering she is describing. This is so important and will become more so very soon, I believe. https://rumble.com/v2al7mk-arizona-legislation-joint-election-hearing-coverage-thur-1100-am-et-.html

After the Florida SOEs complained about our first 'Bad Address Report" saying the voters will have a good mailing if the residential address was bad, we thought we would do them a favor and run that analysis on the entire state. BAD NEWS! They still have 408,848 Active Voter with NO DELIVERABLE ADDRESS on our voter rolls. https://www.theepochtimes.com/400000-questionable-addresses-remain-on-florida-voter-rolls-watchdog-group-says_5070448.html

Repost from Dr. D. Presents
SOUTH CAROLINA NEWS - Tune in at 9:30am EST February 14th for the court hearing on getting CVRs in South Carolina. Go to scsafeelectionsgroup . substack . com / p / hot-news (remove the spaces) for the Webex link information. (You don't need the Webex appβ€”you can use your browser to watch as a "Webinar" instead.). My declaration is attached.

This is the "root of the tree" of election fraud. A 1978 NIST publication that eventually gave birth to the FEC standards, HA
This is the "root of the tree" of election fraud. A 1978 NIST publication that eventually gave birth to the FEC standards, HAVA and EAC. It is the source of all the problems we have today and guess what? Nothing has changed since the data was gathered in 1974 and finalized for publication in 1978. We still have not figured out how to use computers to tally votes....yet it continues. Go to the summary findings if you don't want to read the whole document. The list of problems in 1974 will sound very familiar. They never even questioned IF we SHOULD be using computers. It is a forgone conclusion. 1978....mark it down...A turning point for the worst. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nbsspecialpublication500-30.pdf

Repost from Lone Raccoon Chat
All good questions. And all I can say is that if you have a truly unpopular candidate, the voting machines cannot make votes appear out of thin air or the cover up is impossible. Here is a "childish" example to try to get my point across. Billy and Mary are running for 2nd grade class president, and there are 20 children in the class. Now, Billy is the charmer in the class and at any given recess has at least 12 of the other kids hanging with him. Mary, on the other hand, eats bugs and has Tourrette's syndrome. The teacher likes Mary better because he also eats bugs and wants to make a move on Mary's hot mother. So he decides to cheat the election. (Let's call him Leslie Dominion III). He has a problem however. Even a 11-9 win for Mary is going to cause a class disruption because that means that some of Billy's besties voted for the bug eater who regularly calls them doodie-heads? No, the only way to do this is to bribe the principal to add 10 more kids to the class. Funny that they never show up, but maybe they are still afraid of Covid, who knows. But they are on the class roster and get their name called during roll each morning. And what do you know, bug eating, expletive spewing Mary ekes out a 16-14 win. Sucks to be Billy, but the class has spoken. After the election, all 10 of the added students are found to have cooties and are transferred to the other local school for kids who don't play well with others. And that, my friends, is as childish an example as I can come up with.

🚨FRA CALL TO ACTION🚨 Tell your REP to VOTE NO! on FL leaving the elector college. Ethics, Elections & Open Government Subcommittee is reviewing HB 53 (2023), which is an Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote. THIS IS A VERY BAD IDEA! PLEASE CALL & EMAIL OUR REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVES AND LET THEM KNOW THAT OUR FOUNDING FATHERS INTENTIONALLY CAME UP WITH ELECTORAL COLLEGE SYSTEM THAT GIVES SMALLER STATES A VOICE AND A NATIONAL POPULAR VOTE SYSTEM WOULD DISENFRANCHISE STATES WITH SMALL POPULATION. THEREFORE, VOTE NO ON HB 53 (2023). Juan Alfonso Fernandez-Barquin @ (850) 717-5118 Rick Roth @ (850) 717-5094 Mike Beltran @ (850) 717-5070 Michael A. "Mike" Caruso @ (850) 717-5087 Philip Wayne "Griff" Griffitts, Jr. @ (850) 717-5006 Jeff Holcomb @ (850) 717-5053 Berny Jacques @ (850) 717-5059 Sam H. Killebrew @ (850) 717-5048 Juan Carlos Porras @ (850) 717-5119 Alex Rizo @ (850) 717-5112 Tyler I. Sirois @ (850) 717-5031 Chase Tramont @ (850) 717-5030 Taylor Michael Yarkosky @ (850) 717-5025 https://www.myfloridahouse.gov/Sections/Committees/committeesdetail.aspx?SessionId=99&CommitteeId=3224