Nebraska Voter Accuracy Project

We are so thankful that David Clements has come through the surgery and he is doing well. We ask for complete healing of every part of David's body, that any effects of this massive heart attack return back to order in Jesus name! Amen! Amen!

NO, NO, NO! Software for signature verification! The last hearing I went to at the Capitol Bena was pushing for machines to verify signatures. I knew this was coming! Todd Wiltgen, our Lancaster County election commissioner and the commissioner from Hall County are with Bena!!! Remove the Machines DO NOT remove people we need NO Mail-in BALLOTS w/ exceptions!! https://www.3newsnow.com/lincoln/nebraska-officials-call-for-new-technology-and-legislation-to-combat-signature-fraud-on-ballot-petitions?fbclid=IwdGRzaAUJwFtjbGNrBQm_zHBkb2YFZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQMMzUwNjg1NTMxNzI4AAEewMQ_mYJdUaudhohvVTOAkeIkJBxYvSo4j8-IGDP2JLKrH2Kh4hQ7ZF0QNnI_aem_FwqEktxJi2Hy0ok32dgBjQ&sfnsn=mo

#BobKrist, the 2018 NE Dem. nominee for #Governor, claimed a few months ago that anyone who runs for a third party is "crazy" and that it was a "death sentence." Today, Bob Krist (D) announced his candidacy for #NE #Secretary of #State #SOS for the #AmericaLastParty. He also claimed that there are "no problems" with #elections in Nebraska while #ballot #petition and #notary #fraud runs rampant across the state. Link: https://x.com/PetersenForNE/status/2094935233816568166?s=20

In this clip from our live episode on 8/19/26… Shasta County ROV Clint Curtis explains his experience with the ballots and the steps he’s taken to secure them. The authorities have been notified and they are still waiting on someone to show up to inspect them before a threat gets carried out. Again, we are calling on Donald J. Trump, FBI – Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Homeland Security and The United States Department of Justice to follow through. Watch the whole episode here 👇 https://rumble.com/v7eb300-ttv-now-live-trapped-and-special-guest-clint-curtis.html https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1CHYkN8Knh/?mibextid=wwXIfr

A https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1XqUmDcfbY/

The County Convention can be reconvened upon the call of either the County Chairman or the Executive Committee. That means tonight’s adjournment does not necessarily force the party to wait until the next Spring Convention. The clean constitutional remedy is therefore for the Executive Committee to reconvene the County Convention for the limited purpose of resolving the disputed interpretation of Section 5 and determining whether the district caucuses should complete the election of District Representatives. That would put the question back where the Constitution says ultimate authority belongs while a convention is assembled: with the delegates.

From Jon Herms Facebook Post About Lancasters Special Meeting to Elect 7 District Reps It never ceases to amaze me how ridiculous things can be, and how tone deaf Republican "leadership" is, for example, at tonight's LCGOP special convention, Charwoman Mary Jane Truemper’s handling of tonight’s convention was extraordinary. The delegates had just passed an amendment specifically taking the power to appoint District Representatives away from the Chair and placing that authority with the district delegates through elections. The published agenda then expressly called for “District Caucus Meeting/Voting — Election of District Representatives.” Instead of allowing the convention to reach that scheduled business, Truemper became visibly angry during the dispute, seized on the words “Spring Convention” in Section 5, and treated her interpretation as though it conclusively ended the question. That is where the situation became almost absurd. The amendment was being considered at a County Convention. The very people newly empowered to elect District Representatives—the delegates—were sitting in the room. The election was printed on the agenda immediately after consideration of the amendment. Delegates were specifically arguing that the convention should finish the remaining scheduled business. Yet the Chair’s position effectively became: Yes, you just voted to take this appointment power away from the Chair and give it to the delegates—but the delegates cannot exercise that power tonight, even though their election is literally the next item on tonight’s agenda. There is a legitimate textual question because Section 5 says the paper-ballot caucus will occur “at the Spring Convention.” That language gives the Chair a plausible argument that the regular election cycle begins at a Spring Convention. But that interpretation was not necessarily hers alone to impose. The Constitution itself provides the governing hierarchy: while the County Convention is in session, the delegates constitute the governing body of the party. And the party Constitution adopts Robert’s Rules of Order for parliamentary procedure. That matters because a ruling by the Chair on the interpretation of the Constitution is not ordinarily the final word simply because the Chair announces it. Under Robert’s Rules, a member may raise a Point of Order, the Chair may rule on it, and that ruling may generally be appealed to the assembly. The delegates themselves can then decide whether to sustain or overturn the Chair’s ruling. The adjournment therefore raises a separate and potentially more serious procedural issue. A motion to adjourn was made and seconded. Delegates spoke specifically against ending the meeting because the scheduled election remained unfinished. If the Chair then treated her interpretation of Section 5 as dispositive and ended the convention without allowing the assembly to properly resolve the pending adjournment question or appeal her ruling, the problem goes beyond a disagreement over constitutional wording. A second does not adopt a motion. The assembly does. The delegates were the governing body while assembled. The election was on the published agenda. The interpretation of the newly adopted amendment was disputed. Robert’s Rules provided a mechanism for resolving that dispute through the assembly. Instead, the convention ended. The irony is difficult to miss: The delegates voted to reduce the Chair’s unilateral authority over District Representatives, and the immediate result was the Chair using her authority to prevent those same delegates from exercising the authority they had just voted to place in their own hands. Whether the election was absolutely required tonight remains debatable because of the words “Spring Convention.” Whether the delegates should have been permitted to decide that question through proper parliamentary procedure is much harder to dispute. And importantly, the Constitution appears to provide a remedy.

Celebrating a huge success last night as we passed all three amendments presented and immediately adopted into the Lancaster County Constitution to Elect 8 District Reps. 144 delegates attended out of 301 registered and credentialed from the spring convention. We had an overwhelming WIN more than 2/3 votes on all three amendments that were placed together as one!!! One word was added. "Legislative" before District Representative 🔥 🔥 Teamwork & God's favor was upon us thank you everyone and thank you Lord!

#WendyRogers #AZ #ElectionIntegrity