en
Feedback
D MAN LOVES ME!

D MAN LOVES ME!

Open in Telegram

Discussion so we don't bother the big crowd... D Man

Show more

πŸ“ˆ Analytical overview of Telegram channel D MAN LOVES ME!

Channel D MAN LOVES ME! (@dmanupdates) in the English language segment is an active participant. Currently, the community unites 14 176 subscribers, ranking 3 911 in the Politics category and 2 696 in the USA region.

πŸ“Š Audience metrics and dynamics

Since its creation on Π½Π΅Π²Ρ–Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠΎ, the project has demonstrated rapid growth, gathering an audience of 14 176 subscribers.

According to the latest data from 11 June, 2026, the channel demonstrates stable activity. Although there has been a change in the number of participants by -174 over the last 30 days and by -4 over the last 24 hours, overall reach remains high.

  • Verification status: Not verified
  • Engagement rate (ER): The average audience engagement rate is 23.67%. Within the first 24 hours after publication, content typically collects N/A% reactions from the total number of subscribers.
  • Post reach: On average, each post receives 3 356 views. Within the first day, a publication typically gains 0 views.
  • Reactions and interaction: The audience actively supports content: the average number of reactions per post is 100.
  • Thematic interests: Content is focused on key topics such as propaganda, cheer, soldier, fu*k, jake.

πŸ“ Description and content policy

The author describes the resource as a platform for expressing subjective opinions:
β€œDiscussion so we don't bother the big crowd... D Man”

Thanks to the high frequency of updates (latest data received on 12 June, 2026), the channel maintains relevance and a high level of publication reach. Analytics show that the audience actively interacts with content, making it an important point of influence in the Politics category.

14 176
Subscribers
-424 hours
-377 days
-17430 days
Posts Archive
We want no war. Is it mongol, checen, Ukrainian or American. Okay you can attack Indians... (joke!) Cheers!

And remember, all love here.

TY.

LY

Now, I answered all. I thank you all for arguments. I must go now prepare for markets open

It is not wrong when now even you admit it is planning to join NATO. Russia doesn't want that. It weakens it. And why should
It is not wrong when now even you admit it is planning to join NATO. Russia doesn't want that. It weakens it. And why should a more powerful dog risk safety of his puppies to keep smaller dog intact. He doesn't wish to attack a smaller dog, but if threatened in any way to puppies, it is natural response "fuck that smaller dog". Again, I summarize, I don't defend Russia attack at all here as I didn't go deep into research on that matter, minsk agreements and such. I only criticize how Ukraine reacted, in absolutely the MOST hurtful way for them possible. Time will tell and time already tells that the outcome will be absolutely worst for Ukrainians that they will wish they did something I suggested since day 1.

WOW. Respect!
WOW. Respect!

As I said, I agree with you regarding 'help' or casus belli, it's often fabricated. But NATO reason might be true. Rich Ukrai
As I said, I agree with you regarding 'help' or casus belli, it's often fabricated. But NATO reason might be true. Rich Ukraine, might be true which Russia wants. You and many mistaken my message for defending Russia, which was never the case. I don't know the real reason, and I don't try to defend it. I don't care about it. What I am sad about is ordinary people losing lives. So I get frustrated by that, when people are at hardship... and I knew that ukraine had many better plays than go 'manly' and tough with Russians, not talk, not show NO-NATO, not call IMMEDIATELY after the war for talks and negotiation. Not fucking organising visit Zelensky Putin immediately, etc etc. Too cocky for their OWN good. IMO.

30 day ceasefire is benefitting Ukrainians. Every side at war wants to WIN. You don't win, by pausing on good progressing adv
30 day ceasefire is benefitting Ukrainians. Every side at war wants to WIN. You don't win, by pausing on good progressing advance. 2) approval rate is questionable, for both Putin and Zelensky in these times. Both countries are very similar in that regard. You will see true Zelensky approval after the war. Some bigger experts than me (I am political noob) agree that Zelensky might be in fear for his life after the war Regarding who attacked who I already answered. I welcome also this constructive feedback. Respect!

... continued "they didn't start this fire, Russia did" - is another most common argument that means nothing brother. If you
... continued "they didn't start this fire, Russia did" - is another most common argument that means nothing brother. If you come and tell me you'll kill my dog and start coming to me, I might punch you first. I then attacked you first. Factually, Russia DID warn and did threat before attacking. Did warn about NATO joining. You must understand that Ukraine joining NATO is a security THREAT for Russia, as it cannot defend it's wide border as easily as it can from Ukraine. You wouldn't like your home unlocked, because tomorrow it can be broken into. Again, I am not here in position of Russia is right, I am in position of Ukraine did a wrong decision. And so far, with all the arguments I got, I stand by it. Open to change, of course, if proves needed. "Zelensky people not rioting him" - brother, this is the falsest argument possible. In WAR TIME, you cannot riot. 1. there are no men to riot. 2. Those who would, they would be jailed, or sent to the battlefield. Com'on "CNN has agenda, but so does your 'I told you so' crystal ball" - My crystal ball has 'agenda'? How the fuck I benefit from the war? My man, I made my predictions. It is happening years after, EXACTLY as I predicted. You can find it in this channel. when nobody believe, EVERYTHING AS SAID, happening. Russia will not lose. Russia will get their annexed territories. Kurks will be Russian. Result will be brutal instead of easy for Ukrainians.

Finally one man who gives me proper anti-thesis and arguments: 1. You are right "negotiating under such environments where yo
Finally one man who gives me proper anti-thesis and arguments: 1. You are right "negotiating under such environments where you have gun to head and history of bad faith is impossible.". This I agree with. Read my response re: chosing what is better outcome for YOU. 2. "Russia is not some unstoppable force". For Ukraine and this situation it is in this decade. 3. "gdp smaller than Italy". Russia has people, and has switched to war economy. Saudi Arabia has gdp larger than Ukraine yet Ukraine militarily if it would border with Saudis could take them over with half the force. It's military force that counts a lot here and people force and preparedness. 4. Now the most, I will not insult, but say COMMON argument I hear online "They wanted Kyiv in three days. Didn't happen". Yes. Against Ukraine, it would happen. Against Ukraine + US intelligence, it didn't happen. Ukrainians found out about it from Americans. 5. "Kursk?" - was so unimportant territory it was not defended. It is important now in negotiations for final phase of the war, it will be cleaned by Russians very fast. Mark my words. Check back in few months. 6. "annexed territories not thriving under russian boot?" - maybe because those territories are under heaviest of fire, between EXACTLY, territorially between Ukrainian and Russian army lol 7. "NATO" - yes, nato, Ukraine should have been LOUD about not joining NATO, not risk even if you say it is false casus belli to happen. Fuck NATO if you will lose millions of lives... why didn't you say publicly "we want neutrality, we will not join NATO." Russia would then be really bad guy if attacked, even to their own people (which is the most important. If they can't sell war to their own people it's fucked). Got my point? Thanks for the most argumented message I got from the 'counter' side.

"we"? Okay, this one seems to have more arguments, I appreciate, let me answer... * Ok, you fight back if injustice is done t
"we"? Okay, this one seems to have more arguments, I appreciate, let me answer... * Ok, you fight back if injustice is done to you... but do you STAKE lives of millions of people for X% of injustice? Or for any injustice you go all in? "russian propaganda is 100x worse" - this is false. Because for most western people, propaganda comes from sources Russia doesn't control. Facebook, previous Twitter (when war started), CNN group, etc. all same narrative. I don't talk about Russian people, they are also in full-on war propaganda. And of course they are also not told the truth. I don't say that Russians are right. I say Ukrainians made bad decision for THEMSELVES! I don't say also that Russians didn't completely made up casus belli, very possible, after all Putin is experienced KGB guy. However, it doesn't change the fact, Ukrainians lost so many lives over BS. And while their elite, richest have formed so called Monaco Brigade... where they parade their Bentleys, and they will later return and be loudest patriots, as it usually happens. Your last message is just a claim and insults. So let's ignore that one.

Thank you. Thank you. The honor is mine to have you as a follower brother.
Thank you. Thank you. The honor is mine to have you as a follower brother.

Zero argument in first message. Just insult. Again, zero arguments, exactly what to expect with cognitive dissonance in brain
Zero argument in first message. Just insult. Again, zero arguments, exactly what to expect with cognitive dissonance in brainwashed people. Always the same, you have one side thinking and another just saying no for no reason.

If you don't, I'll have to conclude I am right.

5 pussies. Because they didn't send any reason to Alfred, they just disagree) Oh maybe they don't know tg of Alfred it is @cryptoalfred submit response freely.

Cynical smile is not appreciated. What I think about WW 2. I answered in post after the first one. You should as ruler of you
Cynical smile is not appreciated. What I think about WW 2. I answered in post after the first one. You should as ruler of your country decide what is BEST OUTCOME for your country. If taking Russian flag would rape all your women and turn you into slavery, you fight to last breath, escape, do whatever you can. If it changes flag, saves your life, and even builds your economy, then think about making smarter decision than losing cripling millions of families. Good answer?

You mostly anonymous poll AGREE – 228 πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘ 91% DISAGREE – 17 πŸ‘ 7% DISAGREE (but I have already sent my reason why to Alfred) – 5 πŸ‘ 2% πŸ‘₯ 250 people voted so far.

I'll give you a new chance... (wow people are really interesting)

so 34 people here, and 4 sent me their comments and arguments. Now, in your face, I call the remaining 30 of you PUSSIES. Because a man openly, genuinely asks you to prove him wrong, but you won't. You won't do any 'good' that you believe in... instead, you just vote as a fucking sheep what you are conditioned to vote. At least I am thinking with my own head. Limited by my capabilities. However, trying MY best.