D MAN LOVES ME!
前往频道在 Telegram
📈 Telegram 频道 D MAN LOVES ME! 的分析概览
频道 D MAN LOVES ME! (@dmanupdates) 英语 语言赛道中的 是活跃参与者。目前社区聚集了 13 753 名订阅者,在 政治 类别中位列第 3 917,并在 美国 地区排名第 2 687 位。
📊 受众指标与增长动态
自 невідомо 创建以来,项目保持高速增长,吸引了 13 753 名订阅者。
根据 27 八月, 2026 的最新数据,频道保持稳定运转。过去 30 天订阅人数变化为 -156,过去 24 小时变化为 -5,整体触达仍然可观。
- 认证状态: 未认证
- 互动率 (ER): 平均受众互动率为 28.02%。内容发布后 24 小时内通常能获得 N/A% 的反应,占订阅者总量。
- 帖子覆盖: 每篇帖子平均可获得 0 次浏览,首日通常累积 0 次浏览。
- 互动与反馈: 受众积极参与,单帖平均反应数为 0。
- 主题关注点: 内容集中在 propaganda, cheer, soldier, fu*k, jake 等核心主题上。
📝 描述与内容策略
作者将该频道定位为表达主观观点的平台:
“Discussion so we don't bother the big crowd... D Man”
凭借高频更新(最新数据采集于 28 八月, 2026),频道始终保持新鲜度与高覆盖。分析显示受众积极互动,使其成为 政治 类别中的关键影响点。
13 753
订阅者
-524 小时
-367 天
-15630 天
帖子存档
13 750
China
Similar like UAE is overbuilt.
There is a lot of buildings no one to sell them to, triggering weakening real estate market.
China's government is doing a lot of interventions so macro speaking the market is on brink of recovery.
13 750
Trump
I see Trump as strategic, not crazy as dems try to portrait him, very methodical president.
Trump’s aggressive tariffs could lead to economic deterioration before improvement. High rise in tariffs exceeding historical levels from the Great Depression era, risk triggering a global recession. As other countries may retaliate. He is feeling them out here.
Very good president for THESE times.
13 750
Now you got the education you needed. You can't get it in hundred hours on CNN.
Some of you concluded this already. Many of you didn't have time.
I can and probably am somewhere wrong, however I think most of the picture I think I have right. Because my sources are higher quality ones than the mass media. And I know how to read.
I'd rather trust Ronaldo regarding football than hundred drunken fans.
13 750
Trump is a very smart president. Unlike Biden.
Trump has so many reasons more to favor now Russia over Ukraine.
And the main reason what I conclude is, believe it or not... CHINA!
Russia has lots of minerals China produces.
US is very dependent on China's materials. That's why Taiwan is problem.
You do the math now. Why Russia for any sane US president.
Russia and US united... didn't happen for century. It would be very powerful.
And among two wolves, I fear more the one I don't know.
China is very capable, very dangerous, currently actively suspended, passive by choice.
13 750
Putin, because you want me to talk about Putin (but the problem is, I don't know much about him. For western things there is structure you can trust as accurate, for Putin, I cannot know things with degree of confidence)... but I hear from multiple sources I tend to believe is:
Putin is actually seen in Russian military leadership as MILD leader.
Anyone who would come after Putin (because again, stupidly, many Ukrainians are yelling death to Putin) would be much harsher. I am actually afraid of Russia after Putin, as Russia is dangerous under dangerous leadership. The US could be led by demented president because it has structures that are well in place. Russia under different leadership is very dangerous, so Trump is coming in time.
The best thing for Russia and world with Russia is that Putin emerges post this war as a military winner, more powerful and richer than before war. What I am hearing repeatedly, he is having a hard time controlling the military top.
He controls the politics and structure and even people favors... but military elite works differently than the west, and they are his biggest problem. From what I read.
13 750
Most probable outcome of Ukraine war:
(again, you can shit on me now, time will show you I was right, you can ignore it until the next Covid, Ukraine war or something else comes, and I'll again be right and my followers who have learned how to think)
Russia keeps occupied territories (minus minor exceptions)
Russia keeps Kursk
You can think whatever, you'll see what happened.
MOST PROBABLE OUTCOME: Ukrainians will not get territories Russia has annexed, and most likely not even many others, again, except minor exceptions.
There is no win for Ukraine.
Again, you can hate, but you will see it coming true.
Then those 15% haters, or disagreers you can ask: "what was, looking back, better decision - to fight or to loudly say "okay, no NATO".
Yes, Russians won by force, but they had force, and Ukrainians bought stories.
It is interests.
Biden had interest to see Ukraine fight to last Ukrainian.
Now, not most likely, but very likely outcome is that immediately post war, Trump will actually do some business with Russians.
Ukraine will be paying the price for war for decades. Rebuilding contracts, lost population, migrated,...
Economy will actually not suffer. There will be a lot of new opportunities post war. Ukrainians are handy people, they will do big nice rebuilding with new motive etc, however everything else... was a terrible price to pay of proudness and of forcing "rightness".
IT is so easy to get two similar nations to fight. Just ignite the fire. I think the Ukrainian fire was ignited from the outside, by the plant of a President. Of course, he might be just a natural plant, but remember, his skillset lies in comedy. A mediocre one to add.
13 750
This is really the best channel.
I am so funny, educating, sometimes even valuable hey!
Yeah, thanks for following!
D Man
13 750
We want no war. Is it mongol, checen, Ukrainian or American.
Okay you can attack Indians... (joke!)
Cheers!
13 750
Now, I answered all. I thank you all for arguments.
I must go now prepare for markets open
13 750
It is not wrong when now even you admit it is planning to join NATO. Russia doesn't want that. It weakens it. And why should a more powerful dog risk safety of his puppies to keep smaller dog intact.
He doesn't wish to attack a smaller dog, but if threatened in any way to puppies, it is natural response "fuck that smaller dog".
Again, I summarize, I don't defend Russia attack at all here as I didn't go deep into research on that matter, minsk agreements and such. I only criticize how Ukraine reacted, in absolutely the MOST hurtful way for them possible.
Time will tell and time already tells that the outcome will be absolutely worst for Ukrainians that they will wish they did something I suggested since day 1.
13 750
As I said, I agree with you regarding 'help' or casus belli, it's often fabricated.
But NATO reason might be true.
Rich Ukraine, might be true which Russia wants.
You and many mistaken my message for defending Russia, which was never the case. I don't know the real reason, and I don't try to defend it.
I don't care about it. What I am sad about is ordinary people losing lives. So I get frustrated by that, when people are at hardship... and I knew that ukraine had many better plays than go 'manly' and tough with Russians, not talk, not show NO-NATO, not call IMMEDIATELY after the war for talks and negotiation. Not fucking organising visit Zelensky Putin immediately, etc etc. Too cocky for their OWN good. IMO.
13 750
30 day ceasefire is benefitting Ukrainians. Every side at war wants to WIN.
You don't win, by pausing on good progressing advance.
2) approval rate is questionable, for both Putin and Zelensky in these times. Both countries are very similar in that regard. You will see true Zelensky approval after the war. Some bigger experts than me (I am political noob) agree that Zelensky might be in fear for his life after the war
Regarding who attacked who I already answered.
I welcome also this constructive feedback. Respect!
13 750
... continued
"they didn't start this fire, Russia did" - is another most common argument that means nothing brother. If you come and tell me you'll kill my dog and start coming to me, I might punch you first.
I then attacked you first.
Factually, Russia DID warn and did threat before attacking. Did warn about NATO joining.
You must understand that Ukraine joining NATO is a security THREAT for Russia, as it cannot defend it's wide border as easily as it can from Ukraine.
You wouldn't like your home unlocked, because tomorrow it can be broken into.
Again, I am not here in position of Russia is right, I am in position of Ukraine did a wrong decision. And so far, with all the arguments I got, I stand by it. Open to change, of course, if proves needed.
"Zelensky people not rioting him" - brother, this is the falsest argument possible. In WAR TIME, you cannot riot.
1. there are no men to riot.
2. Those who would, they would be jailed, or sent to the battlefield.
Com'on
"CNN has agenda, but so does your 'I told you so' crystal ball" - My crystal ball has 'agenda'?
How the fuck I benefit from the war?
My man, I made my predictions. It is happening years after, EXACTLY as I predicted. You can find it in this channel.
when nobody believe, EVERYTHING AS SAID, happening.
Russia will not lose.
Russia will get their annexed territories.
Kurks will be Russian.
Result will be brutal instead of easy for Ukrainians.
13 750
Finally one man who gives me proper anti-thesis and arguments:
1. You are right "negotiating under such environments where you have gun to head and history of bad faith is impossible.". This I agree with.
Read my response re: chosing what is better outcome for YOU.
2. "Russia is not some unstoppable force". For Ukraine and this situation it is in this decade.
3. "gdp smaller than Italy". Russia has people, and has switched to war economy. Saudi Arabia has gdp larger than Ukraine yet Ukraine militarily if it would border with Saudis could take them over with half the force. It's military force that counts a lot here and people force and preparedness.
4. Now the most, I will not insult, but say COMMON argument I hear online "They wanted Kyiv in three days. Didn't happen". Yes. Against Ukraine, it would happen. Against Ukraine + US intelligence, it didn't happen. Ukrainians found out about it from Americans.
5. "Kursk?" - was so unimportant territory it was not defended. It is important now in negotiations for final phase of the war, it will be cleaned by Russians very fast. Mark my words. Check back in few months.
6. "annexed territories not thriving under russian boot?" - maybe because those territories are under heaviest of fire, between EXACTLY, territorially between Ukrainian and Russian army lol
7. "NATO" - yes, nato, Ukraine should have been LOUD about not joining NATO, not risk even if you say it is false casus belli to happen. Fuck NATO if you will lose millions of lives... why didn't you say publicly "we want neutrality, we will not join NATO." Russia would then be really bad guy if attacked, even to their own people (which is the most important. If they can't sell war to their own people it's fucked). Got my point?
Thanks for the most argumented message I got from the 'counter' side.
13 750
"we"?
Okay, this one seems to have more arguments, I appreciate, let me answer...
* Ok, you fight back if injustice is done to you... but do you STAKE lives of millions of people for X% of injustice?
Or for any injustice you go all in?
"russian propaganda is 100x worse" - this is false.
Because for most western people, propaganda comes from sources Russia doesn't control. Facebook, previous Twitter (when war started), CNN group, etc. all same narrative. I don't talk about Russian people, they are also in full-on war propaganda. And of course they are also not told the truth.
I don't say that Russians are right. I say Ukrainians made bad decision for THEMSELVES!
I don't say also that Russians didn't completely made up casus belli, very possible, after all Putin is experienced KGB guy. However, it doesn't change the fact, Ukrainians lost so many lives over BS. And while their elite, richest have formed so called Monaco Brigade... where they parade their Bentleys, and they will later return and be loudest patriots, as it usually happens.
Your last message is just a claim and insults. So let's ignore that one.
