Available now! Telegram Research 2025 โ the year's key insights 
Robert W Malone, MD
Open in Telegram
Inventor of mRNA vaccines and RNA as a drug, Bench to Bedside vaccines and biologics consulting. Moderated by @MarioLopezG
Show more๐ Analytical overview of Telegram channel Robert W Malone, MD
Channel Robert W Malone, MD (@rwmalonemd) in the English language segment is an active participant. Currently, the community unites 110 254 subscribers, ranking 93 in the Medicine category and 204 in the USA region.
๐ Audience metrics and dynamics
Since its creation on ะฝะตะฒัะดะพะผะพ, the project has demonstrated rapid growth, gathering an audience of 110 254 subscribers.
According to the latest data from 20 June, 2026, the channel demonstrates stable activity. Although there has been a change in the number of participants by -1 750 over the last 30 days and by -60 over the last 24 hours, overall reach remains high.
- Verification status: Not verified
- Engagement rate (ER): The average audience engagement rate is 5.01%. Within the first 24 hours after publication, content typically collects 2.98% reactions from the total number of subscribers.
- Post reach: On average, each post receives 5 526 views. Within the first day, a publication typically gains 3 283 views.
- Reactions and interaction: The audience actively supports content: the average number of reactions per post is 149.
- Thematic interests: Content is focused on key topics such as vaccine, decade, measle, patient, drug.
๐ Description and content policy
The author describes the resource as a platform for expressing subjective opinions:
โInventor of mRNA vaccines and RNA as a drug, Bench to Bedside vaccines and biologics consulting.
Moderated by @MarioLopezGโ
Thanks to the high frequency of updates (latest data received on 21 June, 2026), the channel maintains relevance and a high level of publication reach. Analytics show that the audience actively interacts with content, making it an important point of influence in the Medicine category.
110 254
Subscribers
-6024 hours
-3977 days
-1 75030 days
Data loading in progress...
Similar Channels
Tags Cloud
Incoming and Outgoing Mentions
---
---
---
---
---
---
Attracting Subscribers
June '26
June '26
+13
in 56 channels
May '26
+51
in 63 channels
Get PRO
April '26
+25
in 78 channels
Get PRO
March '26
+22
in 95 channels
Get PRO
February '26
+59
in 44 channels
Get PRO
January '26
+42
in 75 channels
Get PRO
December '25
+62
in 90 channels
Get PRO
November '25
+41
in 45 channels
Get PRO
October '25
+32
in 75 channels
Get PRO
September '25
+23
in 83 channels
Get PRO
August '25
+25
in 68 channels
Get PRO
July '25
+27
in 62 channels
Get PRO
June '25
+45
in 96 channels
Get PRO
May '25
+22
in 80 channels
Get PRO
April '25
+18
in 82 channels
Get PRO
March '25
+25
in 123 channels
Get PRO
February '25
+40
in 60 channels
Get PRO
January '25
+110
in 88 channels
Get PRO
December '24
+131
in 63 channels
Get PRO
November '24
+250
in 70 channels
Get PRO
October '24
+284
in 118 channels
Get PRO
September '24
+436
in 70 channels
Get PRO
August '24
+309
in 126 channels
Get PRO
July '24
+150
in 72 channels
Get PRO
June '24
+118
in 77 channels
Get PRO
May '24
+212
in 87 channels
Get PRO
April '24
+183
in 60 channels
Get PRO
March '24
+115
in 70 channels
Get PRO
February '24
+124
in 106 channels
Get PRO
January '24
+86
in 107 channels
Get PRO
December '23
+177
in 195 channels
Get PRO
November '23
+56
in 157 channels
Get PRO
October '23
+41
in 71 channels
Get PRO
September '23
+38
in 0 channels
Get PRO
August '23
+38
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '23
+13
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '23
+15
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '23
+28
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '23
+17
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '23
+64
in 0 channels
Get PRO
February '23
+49
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '23
+136
in 0 channels
Get PRO
December '22
+104
in 0 channels
Get PRO
November '22
+104
in 0 channels
Get PRO
October '22
+46
in 0 channels
Get PRO
September '22
+45
in 0 channels
Get PRO
August '22
+321
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '22
+682
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '22
+319
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '22
+785
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '22
+1 638
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '22
+338
in 0 channels
Get PRO
February '22
+4 900
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '22
+48 384
in 0 channels
Get PRO
December '21
+101 269
in 0 channels
Get PRO
November '21
+31 891
in 0 channels
Get PRO
October '21
+13 830
in 0 channels
Get PRO
September '21
+10 481
in 0 channels
Get PRO
August '21
+8 110
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '21
+1 834
in 0 channels
| Date | Subscriber Growth | Mentions | Channels | |
| 21 June | 0 | |||
| 20 June | 0 | |||
| 19 June | +2 | |||
| 18 June | +2 | |||
| 17 June | +1 | |||
| 16 June | 0 | |||
| 15 June | +1 | |||
| 14 June | +3 | |||
| 13 June | 0 | |||
| 12 June | 0 | |||
| 11 June | 0 | |||
| 10 June | 0 | |||
| 09 June | 0 | |||
| 08 June | 0 | |||
| 07 June | 0 | |||
| 06 June | 0 | |||
| 05 June | +1 | |||
| 04 June | +2 | |||
| 03 June | 0 | |||
| 02 June | 0 | |||
| 01 June | +1 |
Channel Posts
| 2 | Genome. Algorithm. Asteroid. Digital ID.
One firewall, four frontiers. The word that protects us is "person," and it has to be defended on all of them.
We are running out of time to do it.
Full essay, by Guest Author Sofia Karstens:
https://www.malone.news/p/fortifying-rights-at-the-edge-of
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD | 2 819 |
| 3 | Coerced medical intervention does not fit the trafficking definition neatly. But it collides head-on with the law of consent. The Nuremberg Code. The UNESCO Bioethics Declaration.
Employment termination, movement restrictions, social exclusion, used as leverage. Coerced consent is not consent.
---
The frontier keeps moving.
Ships on the high seas sit in a sovereignty gap. Investor-state arbitration answers to no electorate or constitution. Both models are now being repurposed to manufacture property rights in space, for entities no treaty authorizes to hold them.
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD | 2 662 |
| 4 | Our species survived hundreds of thousands of years without a daily warning about the next existential pathogen. Now every outbreak is a potential global catastrophe, and the language of emergency has become permanent.
David Bell asks a simple question: why?
---
His answer is uncomfortable. What happens when fear itself becomes an economic asset?
As real infectious disease mortality declines, a pandemic-preparedness industry has grown up around the endless search for new threats, and new markets.
---
The Infectious disease industry faces a built-in market failure. An aging, heavier population guarantees a growing cardiac market. But infectious disease mortality has fallen for a century, driven by sanitation, nutrition, antibiotics, and better living conditions.
---
Vaccines became the bright spot: the golden egg you sell to the healthy instead of a shrinking market of the sick.
modRNA platforms now let companies print new "vaccines" in months. The catch is you still have to convince people under no real threat to buy.
---
Covid proved you do not need bodies in the street. You just need fear.
So you do not need a genuinely dangerous new disease, which is hard to come by. You just need something the public has never paid attention to before.
---
Consider the succession since Covid:
Mpox. Avian flu. Marburg. Nipah. Hantavirus. Ebola.
Combined global mortality from the entire list: under 1,000 people. Out of more than 8 billion. Each one sold with a warning that this time it might go global.
---
The cost is not abstract.
US funding for the current Ebola outbreak rivals the combined malaria budgets of ten central African countries. Ebola has killed roughly 150 so far. Malaria kills about 120,000 children every year in that same region.
---
This is the heart of it. The hype is not about a real threat. It is about market creation. Fear is profitable. The poverty, malnutrition, and diseases that actually kill millions are not.
Have we built a system better at marketing fear than at measuring risk?
---
Read David Bell's full essay, "The Infectious Disease Frenzy," on Malone News:
https://www.malone.news/p/the-infectious-disease-frenzy
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD | 2 884 |
| 5 | Fauci funded the Wuhan research. Then he helped steer the intelligence that cleared it.
Gabbard's final act as DNI was to declassify the proof. And it confirms what a CIA whistleblower had already sworn to Congress weeks earlier.
What the documents actually show. ๐งต
---
Start with the conflict of interest, because everything grows from it.
Fauci ran NIAID, which funded the Wuhan coronavirus work through EcoHealth. He then advised the intelligence community on the virus origins. And he was the public voice calling the lab leak a conspiracy theory.
Funder. Adviser. Spokesman. One man.
---
He never had to dictate a conclusion. He only had to pick the experts.
The documents show Fauci handing the IC a list of scientists to consult, many funded by his own institute. The IC took the list. Their input became "the assessment." That assessment was then sold to the public as independent consensus.
A closed loop.
---
The same trick built the scientific cover.
In February 2020 Fauci took part in the call that produced "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2," the paper used for years to declare the lab leak debunked.
Privately, its authors told each other the virus features "(potentially) look engineered." Nature Medicine still refuses to retract it.
---
Then there is the part said under oath.
In 2024 Fauci was asked if he had ever discussed viral research with the FBI, CIA, DIA, or any intelligence agency. He answered: "not to my knowledge about COVID."
The files include the dated readouts of those exact briefings. His testimony was untrue.
---
And the analysts who saw through it paid for it.
A contractor fired days after coming forward. Promotions tied to toeing the line. Whistleblower anonymity stripped. All referred to the Inspector General.
The view they were punished for is the one the FBI, DOE, CIA, and Congress all later adopted. It was never a conspiracy theory.
---
Here is the part almost no one is discussing.
Five weeks before this release, CIA officer James Erdman, who led ODNI's own origins investigation, testified to all of this under oath. Same meeting. Same emails. Same fired contractor.
The testimony came first. Gabbard's documents proved him right.
---
And one of his claims reaches higher than Fauci.
Erdman testified that the CIA obstructed the declassification and surveilled the investigators themselves. The release does not address that allegation. It rests, for now, on his sworn word.
If it holds, this stops being about one man.
---
We read the primary documents so you do not have to take anyone's word for it. The full analysis, every source linked.
Read it, then decide who lied to you.
https://www.malone.news/p/manufactured-consensus
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD | 6 502 |
| 6 |  Most people think alpha-gal is a red-meat allergy. It is bigger than that. The same sugar is in drugs, gelatin, implants, and gelatin-containing vaccines. It surfaced when cancer patients reacted to a monoclonal antibody, not when anyone reacted to steak. Route of exposure matters.
https://www.malone.news/p/alpha-gal-syndrome-beyond-the-tick
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD | 3 161 |
| 7 | The official story of alpha-gal syndrome is tidy. A lone star tick bites you, and months later you can no longer eat red meat. Tidy stories should make you suspicious. Here is what the tidy version leaves out. ๐งต
---
Full essay here. The tick may not be the whole story.
https://www.malone.news/p/alpha-gal-syndrome-beyond-the-tick
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD | 3 293 |
| 8 | BREAKING NEWS: If the current criteria for "Truth" in HHS-related messaging is that nothing is true until officially confirmed by the appropriate HHS communications official (are there any left?), then consider this another "rumor" originating from a senior HHS official: The reported 1+B$ contract purchase agreement between CDC and Pfizer for adult and pediatric COVID mRNA vaccines is unfunded, and should be considered "fake news".
---
"The story is governance.
If the contracts are dead, HHS should say so publicly as Siri suggested.
If the contracts are alive, taxpayers deserve to know why more than $1 billion is being committed amid historically low vaccine uptake and ongoing debate over pediatric COVID-19 vaccination policy.
Until CDC, HHS, the White House, or Pfizer provide definitive answers, the public is left with two competing realities: a billion-dollar federal contract that exists on paper and reports from senior figures (including Kennedy himself) that it may never be funded.
Those two realities cannot coexist forever."
https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/pfizers-1.24-billion-covid-19-vaccine-award-real-contract-fake-news-real-controversyand-still-no-answers-030a8504
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD | 3 925 |
| 9 | Friday Funnies: All Bob's Money
I will give to you
https://www.malone.news/p/friday-funnies-all-bobs-money
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD | 3 073 |
| 10 | How the machine worked:
Fauci handed the IC his own NIAID-funded scientists to consult. Their input shaped the "intelligence." That intelligence was then sold to the public as independent scientific consensus against a lab leak.
A closed loop. He fed the machine, then cited the machine.
---
Under oath in 2024, Fauci was asked whether he had ever spoken with the FBI, CIA, DIA, or any intelligence agency about viral research.
His answer: "not to my knowledge about COVID."
The declassified files include the readouts of those exact briefings. By name. By date.
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD | 3 024 |
| 11 | ๐๐๐
True story:
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD | 2 738 |
| 12 |  Senator Ron Johnson finally got @SecKennedy
to release previously redacted documents on the COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Signals cover-up. The report reveals that senior FDA and CDC officials were warned of serious COVID vaccine safety signals in 2021, yet the public was kept in the dark. If true, millions were denied fully informed consent. @RWMaloneMD
Join @TheHigh_Wire | 2 659 |
| 13 | Victimhood is the highest paying content on the internet. The system rewards it, the reward selects for it, and most of the people running the play have no idea it is happening. Including, on plenty of days, me. A thread on mechanics most of us would rather not look at. ๐งต
---
Somewhere in the last fifteen years, being wronged became a business model. Show an audience that someone harmed you and that you bear it with dignity, and that post will travel farther than your best argument, raise more than your best work, and bind followers tighter than being right ever could. Most of the people doing it are not frauds. They believe every word. That is the unsettling part.
---
Attention online is not distributed evenly or anything close. Most good work, including careful and accurate work, is seen by almost no one and vanishes. So the hard problem is not producing good content. It is getting noticed at all. And what reliably breaks an unknown account through is not analysis. It is moral and emotional charge, and grievance is built almost entirely from it (Brady et al. 2017).
---
The mechanism is specific. To break through, a small account borrows a big one's audience. You find someone larger, argue they harmed you, and their response carries your name into a crowd you could never reach alone. A public feud is audience acquisition. A villain is a growth strategy. You mostly see the people this worked for. The fair-minded ones who never broke through stopped posting and disappeared.
---
I know this from both sides. At the end of 2021 Twitter removed more than half a million of my followers in an afternoon and LinkedIn banned me for good. Days later I sat down with Joe Rogan for the most-watched conversation of my life. The censorship was real. The injury was real. It was also the single largest breakthrough in reach I have ever had. The wound became the launch. I am not standing outside the thing I am describing.
---
This is why the old controls now backfire. The flat official denial, the "this is false," the "Total BS," was built for a world where the institution controlled distribution. Today it signals the topic is worth discussing and hands the target a fresh grievance. The denial amplifies the question instead of closing it. And the medium does not care whether the wound is real. A genuine injury and a manufactured one spread the same way.
---
Then follow the money. Reach becomes subscriptions, donations, speaking fees, book sales. An audience built around a victim narrative is one of the most durable revenue streams there is, because the followers no longer see themselves as customers. They see themselves as participants in a struggle. A paragraph about censorship sitting directly above a subscribe button is not hypocrisy. It is the design. Grievance is not adjacent to the business model. It is the business model.
---
This is not a left or right phenomenon. The research finds little tie to political affiliation. Marjorie Taylor Greene, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Kari Lake. No shared ideology, only shared incentives. The exception proves it: Thomas Massie endured the most expensive House primary in history, kept his message on the Constitution rather than his grievances, and lost. Genuine victimization does not require victim-signaling.
---
"Our side" is not exempt, and pretending otherwise would make this worthless. Real COVID grievances built huge audiences, then those audiences became markets. The company that sold ivermectin against COVID now sells it as an antiparasitic for "gut balance." As a pathologist who has examined thousands of American samples, parasites are not a meaningful problem here. When I read that from our own side, it makes my skin crawl. An analysis that sees only one side is not analysis. It is advocacy.
---
The way out is not "the system made me do it." That is the victim's argument in a lab coat. The system selects for behavior. It does not force it. A true claim stays open to evidence that would change your mind. When nothing is allowed to count against it, the injury may still be real, but the story on top has taken on a life of its own. I have caught myself failing that test while insisting I never would. McLuhan said the medium is the message. In 2026, the wound is the product.
---
Full essay. Share it widely. These incentives belong to the left and the right alike, which is exactly why they are worth discussing.
https://www.malone.news/p/the-wound-is-the-product
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD | 2 803 |
| 14 | The censorship was real. The injury was real. It was also the single largest breakthrough in reach I have ever had. One door slammed shut, the other was thrown wide open. The wound became the launch, not the setback. I am not standing outside the thing I am describing.
---
This is why the old controls now backfire. The system that can injure you and the system that distributes you used to be the same people. Silence you and the audience had nowhere to go. That is over. So the flat official denial, the "this is false," the "Total BS," now signals the topic is worth discussing and hands the target a fresh grievance. The denial amplifies the question instead of closing it.
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD | 2 715 |
| 15 | The mechanism is specific. To break through, a small account borrows a big one's audience. You find someone larger, argue they harmed you or the people watching, and their response carries your name into a crowd you could never reach alone. A public feud is audience acquisition. A villain is a growth strategy.
---
The mechanism is specific. To break through, a small account borrows a big one's audience. You find someone larger, argue they harmed you or the people watching, and their response carries your name into a crowd you could never reach alone. A public feud is audience acquisition. A villain is a growth strategy.
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD | 3 127 |
| 16 | Ticks: An over population of deer/small mammals from lack of predators and hunters as well as more undergrowth (re-foresting of pasture land), not climate change is driving tick populations to increase.
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD | 3 194 |
| 17 | If we permit a great forgetting, we enable and functionally endorse the same behavior in the future. Senator Ron Johnson is one of the only people in federal leadership willing to reject that forgetting. Here is what he has documented, and what the legacy media will not touch. ๐งต
---
In his own words, from the report he released and the hearing he chaired:
---
On April 29, 2026, as Chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, I held a hearing and released a report: "Unmasked: How Biden Health Officials Purposely Turned a Blind Eye Toward COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Signals."
---
In March 2021, Peter Marks, director of the FDA center that approves vaccines and runs safety surveillance (CBER), was briefed on a problem. The algorithm his team used to analyze the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System would mask COVID-19 vaccine safety signals.
---
Twenty-six days later, with an updated algorithm, senior FDA officials were shown 25 safety signals. Among them: sudden cardiac death, pulmonary infarction, cerebral artery occlusion, basal ganglia stroke, agonal rhythm, and Bell's palsy.
---
For the next three months they received updates showing more serious signals. Their response was not to warn anyone. They ordered the data analyst to "cease and desist," then told Americans they "weren't seeing safety signals" and that adverse events were "rare and mild."
---
Understand what VAERS algorithms are for. They exist to find needles in a haystack, the nonobvious harms that doctors and patients deserve to know about. With these injections we did not even need them. The sheer volume of reports overwhelming VAERS was enough to trigger my oversight.
---
We were stonewalled at every turn. That changed when Secretary Kennedy's commitment to radical transparency gave my Subcommittee 11 million pages of documents.
---
Those documents are clear. FDA and CDC officials did not err on the side of caution. They demanded definitive proof of causation, a standard they knew would never be met, and they used it as an excuse to tell the public nothing.
---
They were more worried about causing vaccine hesitancy than about informing the public. The goal was full licensure, so that President Biden could mandate the shots for the military and millions of civilians, including healthy college students.
---
The most egregious coercion involved healthy children, who had virtually zero chance of serious harm from COVID-19. It rested on another false claim, that the injections would stop transmission. Some children were killed. Others were permanently disabled.
---
Imagine being the parent who believed every assurance they were given, and chose to have their child injected. That child is now dead or disabled.
---
There is more. In March 2021, Dr. Avindra Nath, clinical director at NINDS, led a team diagnosing and treating people with serious injection injuries. Twenty-three participants were treated, then instructed "not to talk about the study" until NIH released its findings.
---
Nath himself held that early recognition and intervention were crucial. Yet no guidance was ever issued to physicians. As one participant put it, the NIH scientists had "taken the data and left us hanging."
---
In April 2021, the CDC published a report claiming similar adverse events were "anxiety," not a problem with the shots. NIH only posted its own study, quietly, to a preprint server almost no one read, and only after participants began speaking publicly in 2022. Medical teams nationwide were left in the dark. The injured were left untreated.
---
We will never know the full extent of the harms, or the benefits. But we know federal health officials were aware that serious harm was being done within months of granting Emergency Use Authorization, and they refused to warn the public that pays their salaries.
---
Currently VAERS shows 1,676,100 cumulative worldwide adverse events and 39,099 deaths associated with the COVID-19 injection, with 9,332 of those deaths, 24 percent, occurring within two days of injection.
---
Most of those reports came in well after officials should have informed the public of risks they already knew existed. Instead they hid or downplayed them. Millions were harmed after being denied their right to fully informed consent.
---
How many deaths and injuries could have been avoided had federal health officials simply done the job we pay them to do? That is why I call this the biggest government scandal of my lifetime, and one crying out for full media coverage.
---
Here is the part that proves it. The Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Washington Post, USA Today, and Fox Digital all declined or ignored requests to run this as an op-ed. NBC, ABC, PBS, CNN, and MSNow all refused to cover the report.
---
So he is bringing it to you directly, and so am I. Read the full report here.
https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Senate-PSI-Majority-Staff-Interim-Report-April-29-2026-FINAL.pdf
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD | 3 949 |
| 18 | ๐๐๐
If we permit a great forgetting, then we enable and functionally endorse the same behavior and actions in the future. Senator Ron Johnson is one of the only people in a federal leadership position to reject this great forgetting.
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD | 3 368 |
| 19 | We will never know the full extent of the harms (or the benefits) of the COVID-19 injections. But we do know that federal health officials were aware that serious harm was being done within months of them granting Emergency Use Authorization. We also know that those same officials turned a blind eye toward the safety signals that were screaming at them, but they refused to warn the public. The public pays federal health officials to evaluate drugs for safety and efficacy, and we have the right to be informed.
How many deaths and injuries could have been avoided had federal health officials simply done the job we paid them to do?
Currently, VAERS shows 1,676,100 cumulative worldwide adverse events and 39,099 deaths associated with the COVID-19 injection, with 9,332 (24%) of the deaths occurring within 2 days of injection. Most of these tragic adverse events occurred well after federal health officials should have informed the public about the risks they knew existed. Instead, they hid or downplayed those risks. As a result, millions were harmed after being denied their right to fully informed consent.
Thatโs why I consider this to be the biggest government scandal in my lifetime, and one that is crying out for full media attention and coverage.
. . .
The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, The Washington Post, USA TODAY, and Fox Digital have all declined or ignored requests to publish this op-ed.
NBC, ABC, PBS, CNN, and MSNow have all refused to cover my report.
Read the full report here.
Subscribe and share๐ @SenRonJohnsonUS | 3 179 |
| 20 | The story the media โ and the government โ don't want you to hear
Read about the biggest government scandal that legacy newspapers wonโt touch.
On April 29, 2026, as Chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, I held a hearing and released a report titled "Unmasked: How Biden Health Officials Purposely Turned a Blind Eye Toward COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Signals." There has not been a bigger government scandal during my lifetime, and yet even now that we have documented proof of corruption, most of the legacy media refuses to report on it.
My report details how in March 2021, Peter Marks โ director of the FDA center that approves vaccines and is responsible for safety surveillance (CBER) โ was briefed that the algorithm they were using to analyze the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) would mask or hide COVID-19 vaccine adverse event safety signals. Twenty-six days later, using an updated algorithm, senior FDA officials were shown 25 safety signals, including sudden cardiac death, pulmonary infarction, cerebral artery occlusion, basal ganglia stroke, agonal rhythm, and Bellโs palsy.
For the next three months, they received updates showing more serious safety signals. Instead of warning or informing the public, they ordered the data analyst to "cease and desist" and then lied to the American public that "they werenโt seeing safety signals" and that any adverse events were "rare and mild." The whole point of using sophisticated algorithms to analyze VAERS is to find needles in the haystack โ nonobvious potential harms that doctors and patients should be alerted to.
With the COVID-19 injections, we didnโt need sophisticated algorithms. The sheer volume of adverse event reports overwhelming VAERS was enough to trigger my oversight efforts. We faced impenetrable stonewalling until Secretary Kennedyโs commitment to radical transparency provided my Subcommittee with 11 million pages of documents. The documents make clear that FDA and CDC officials did not use an "err on the side of caution" standard to alert the public. Rather, they insisted on definitive proof of causation โ a standard they knew would never be met.
They were far more concerned about not causing vaccine hesitancy than they were about informing the public of adverse events. They wanted to ensure that the injections would receive full licensure approval so that President Biden could mandate them to the military and millions of civilians, including healthy college students.
Perhaps the most egregious coercion involved healthy children who had virtually zero chance of serious harm from COVID-19. That coercion was based on another false claim that the injections would stop transmission. Some children were killed and others have been permanently disabled from the COVID-19 injections. Imagine being the parent who believed all the lies they were told and decided to have their now deceased or injured child injected.
Also in March 2021, Dr. Avindra Nath, clinical director at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), began leading a team of clinical researchers who were diagnosing and treating individuals with serious COVID-19 injection injuries. Twenty-three study participants were diagnosed and treated, then instructed to "not talk about the study" until the NIH could release its findings and conclusions. Dr. Nath maintained that early recognition and intervention were crucial for effective treatment. Yet no guidance was provided to physicians โ one participant remarked that the NIH scientists had "taken the data and left us hanging."
Adding insult to injury, in April 2021 the CDC published a report stating that similar adverse events were "anxiety" โ not a problem with the shots. It was not until study participants began speaking publicly in 2022 that the NIH quietly posted its study on a preprint server that virtually no one read, leaving medical teams nationwide in the dark and the injection-injured left untreated.
Subscribe and share๐ @SenRonJohnsonUS | 3 309 |
