Robert W Malone, MD
Inventor of mRNA vaccines and RNA as a drug, Bench to Bedside vaccines and biologics consulting. Moderated by @MarioLopezG
Show more📈 Analytical overview of Telegram channel Robert W Malone, MD
Channel Robert W Malone, MD (@rwmalonemd) in the English language segment is an active participant. Currently, the community unites 110 390 subscribers, ranking 95 in the Medicine category and 203 in the USA region.
📊 Audience metrics and dynamics
Since its creation on невідомо, the project has demonstrated rapid growth, gathering an audience of 110 390 subscribers.
According to the latest data from 18 June, 2026, the channel demonstrates stable activity. Although there has been a change in the number of participants by -1 756 over the last 30 days and by -52 over the last 24 hours, overall reach remains high.
- Verification status: Not verified
- Engagement rate (ER): The average audience engagement rate is 5.16%. Within the first 24 hours after publication, content typically collects 2.88% reactions from the total number of subscribers.
- Post reach: On average, each post receives 5 696 views. Within the first day, a publication typically gains 3 177 views.
- Reactions and interaction: The audience actively supports content: the average number of reactions per post is 148.
- Thematic interests: Content is focused on key topics such as vaccine, decade, measle, patient, drug.
📝 Description and content policy
The author describes the resource as a platform for expressing subjective opinions:
“Inventor of mRNA vaccines and RNA as a drug, Bench to Bedside vaccines and biologics consulting.
Moderated by @MarioLopezG”
Thanks to the high frequency of updates (latest data received on 19 June, 2026), the channel maintains relevance and a high level of publication reach. Analytics show that the audience actively interacts with content, making it an important point of influence in the Medicine category.
Data loading in progress...
| Date | Subscriber Growth | Mentions | Channels | |
| 19 June | +2 | |||
| 18 June | +2 | |||
| 17 June | +1 | |||
| 16 June | 0 | |||
| 15 June | +1 | |||
| 14 June | +3 | |||
| 13 June | 0 | |||
| 12 June | 0 | |||
| 11 June | 0 | |||
| 10 June | 0 | |||
| 09 June | 0 | |||
| 08 June | 0 | |||
| 07 June | 0 | |||
| 06 June | 0 | |||
| 05 June | +1 | |||
| 04 June | +2 | |||
| 03 June | 0 | |||
| 02 June | 0 | |||
| 01 June | +1 |
| 2 | How the machine worked:
Fauci handed the IC his own NIAID-funded scientists to consult. Their input shaped the "intelligence." That intelligence was then sold to the public as independent scientific consensus against a lab leak.
A closed loop. He fed the machine, then cited the machine.
---
Under oath in 2024, Fauci was asked whether he had ever spoken with the FBI, CIA, DIA, or any intelligence agency about viral research.
His answer: "not to my knowledge about COVID."
The declassified files include the readouts of those exact briefings. By name. By date.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 554 |
| 3 | 👆👆👆
True story:
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 764 |
| 4 | Senator Ron Johnson finally got @SecKennedy
to release previously redacted documents on the COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Signals cover-up. The report reveals that senior FDA and CDC officials were warned of serious COVID vaccine safety signals in 2021, yet the public was kept in the dark. If true, millions were denied fully informed consent. @RWMaloneMD
Join @TheHigh_Wire | 742 |
| 5 | Victimhood is the highest paying content on the internet. The system rewards it, the reward selects for it, and most of the people running the play have no idea it is happening. Including, on plenty of days, me. A thread on mechanics most of us would rather not look at. 🧵
---
Somewhere in the last fifteen years, being wronged became a business model. Show an audience that someone harmed you and that you bear it with dignity, and that post will travel farther than your best argument, raise more than your best work, and bind followers tighter than being right ever could. Most of the people doing it are not frauds. They believe every word. That is the unsettling part.
---
Attention online is not distributed evenly or anything close. Most good work, including careful and accurate work, is seen by almost no one and vanishes. So the hard problem is not producing good content. It is getting noticed at all. And what reliably breaks an unknown account through is not analysis. It is moral and emotional charge, and grievance is built almost entirely from it (Brady et al. 2017).
---
The mechanism is specific. To break through, a small account borrows a big one's audience. You find someone larger, argue they harmed you, and their response carries your name into a crowd you could never reach alone. A public feud is audience acquisition. A villain is a growth strategy. You mostly see the people this worked for. The fair-minded ones who never broke through stopped posting and disappeared.
---
I know this from both sides. At the end of 2021 Twitter removed more than half a million of my followers in an afternoon and LinkedIn banned me for good. Days later I sat down with Joe Rogan for the most-watched conversation of my life. The censorship was real. The injury was real. It was also the single largest breakthrough in reach I have ever had. The wound became the launch. I am not standing outside the thing I am describing.
---
This is why the old controls now backfire. The flat official denial, the "this is false," the "Total BS," was built for a world where the institution controlled distribution. Today it signals the topic is worth discussing and hands the target a fresh grievance. The denial amplifies the question instead of closing it. And the medium does not care whether the wound is real. A genuine injury and a manufactured one spread the same way.
---
Then follow the money. Reach becomes subscriptions, donations, speaking fees, book sales. An audience built around a victim narrative is one of the most durable revenue streams there is, because the followers no longer see themselves as customers. They see themselves as participants in a struggle. A paragraph about censorship sitting directly above a subscribe button is not hypocrisy. It is the design. Grievance is not adjacent to the business model. It is the business model.
---
This is not a left or right phenomenon. The research finds little tie to political affiliation. Marjorie Taylor Greene, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Kari Lake. No shared ideology, only shared incentives. The exception proves it: Thomas Massie endured the most expensive House primary in history, kept his message on the Constitution rather than his grievances, and lost. Genuine victimization does not require victim-signaling.
---
"Our side" is not exempt, and pretending otherwise would make this worthless. Real COVID grievances built huge audiences, then those audiences became markets. The company that sold ivermectin against COVID now sells it as an antiparasitic for "gut balance." As a pathologist who has examined thousands of American samples, parasites are not a meaningful problem here. When I read that from our own side, it makes my skin crawl. An analysis that sees only one side is not analysis. It is advocacy.
---
The way out is not "the system made me do it." That is the victim's argument in a lab coat. The system selects for behavior. It does not force it. A true claim stays open to evidence that would change your mind. When nothing is allowed to count against it, the injury may still be real, but the story on top has taken on a life of its own. I have caught myself failing that test while insisting I never would. McLuhan said the medium is the message. In 2026, the wound is the product.
---
Full essay. Share it widely. These incentives belong to the left and the right alike, which is exactly why they are worth discussing.
https://www.malone.news/p/the-wound-is-the-product
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 742 |
| 6 | The censorship was real. The injury was real. It was also the single largest breakthrough in reach I have ever had. One door slammed shut, the other was thrown wide open. The wound became the launch, not the setback. I am not standing outside the thing I am describing.
---
This is why the old controls now backfire. The system that can injure you and the system that distributes you used to be the same people. Silence you and the audience had nowhere to go. That is over. So the flat official denial, the "this is false," the "Total BS," now signals the topic is worth discussing and hands the target a fresh grievance. The denial amplifies the question instead of closing it.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 802 |
| 7 | The mechanism is specific. To break through, a small account borrows a big one's audience. You find someone larger, argue they harmed you or the people watching, and their response carries your name into a crowd you could never reach alone. A public feud is audience acquisition. A villain is a growth strategy.
---
The mechanism is specific. To break through, a small account borrows a big one's audience. You find someone larger, argue they harmed you or the people watching, and their response carries your name into a crowd you could never reach alone. A public feud is audience acquisition. A villain is a growth strategy.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 866 |
| 8 | Ticks: An over population of deer/small mammals from lack of predators and hunters as well as more undergrowth (re-foresting of pasture land), not climate change is driving tick populations to increase.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 857 |
| 9 | If we permit a great forgetting, we enable and functionally endorse the same behavior in the future. Senator Ron Johnson is one of the only people in federal leadership willing to reject that forgetting. Here is what he has documented, and what the legacy media will not touch. 🧵
---
In his own words, from the report he released and the hearing he chaired:
---
On April 29, 2026, as Chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, I held a hearing and released a report: "Unmasked: How Biden Health Officials Purposely Turned a Blind Eye Toward COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Signals."
---
In March 2021, Peter Marks, director of the FDA center that approves vaccines and runs safety surveillance (CBER), was briefed on a problem. The algorithm his team used to analyze the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System would mask COVID-19 vaccine safety signals.
---
Twenty-six days later, with an updated algorithm, senior FDA officials were shown 25 safety signals. Among them: sudden cardiac death, pulmonary infarction, cerebral artery occlusion, basal ganglia stroke, agonal rhythm, and Bell's palsy.
---
For the next three months they received updates showing more serious signals. Their response was not to warn anyone. They ordered the data analyst to "cease and desist," then told Americans they "weren't seeing safety signals" and that adverse events were "rare and mild."
---
Understand what VAERS algorithms are for. They exist to find needles in a haystack, the nonobvious harms that doctors and patients deserve to know about. With these injections we did not even need them. The sheer volume of reports overwhelming VAERS was enough to trigger my oversight.
---
We were stonewalled at every turn. That changed when Secretary Kennedy's commitment to radical transparency gave my Subcommittee 11 million pages of documents.
---
Those documents are clear. FDA and CDC officials did not err on the side of caution. They demanded definitive proof of causation, a standard they knew would never be met, and they used it as an excuse to tell the public nothing.
---
They were more worried about causing vaccine hesitancy than about informing the public. The goal was full licensure, so that President Biden could mandate the shots for the military and millions of civilians, including healthy college students.
---
The most egregious coercion involved healthy children, who had virtually zero chance of serious harm from COVID-19. It rested on another false claim, that the injections would stop transmission. Some children were killed. Others were permanently disabled.
---
Imagine being the parent who believed every assurance they were given, and chose to have their child injected. That child is now dead or disabled.
---
There is more. In March 2021, Dr. Avindra Nath, clinical director at NINDS, led a team diagnosing and treating people with serious injection injuries. Twenty-three participants were treated, then instructed "not to talk about the study" until NIH released its findings.
---
Nath himself held that early recognition and intervention were crucial. Yet no guidance was ever issued to physicians. As one participant put it, the NIH scientists had "taken the data and left us hanging."
---
In April 2021, the CDC published a report claiming similar adverse events were "anxiety," not a problem with the shots. NIH only posted its own study, quietly, to a preprint server almost no one read, and only after participants began speaking publicly in 2022. Medical teams nationwide were left in the dark. The injured were left untreated.
---
We will never know the full extent of the harms, or the benefits. But we know federal health officials were aware that serious harm was being done within months of granting Emergency Use Authorization, and they refused to warn the public that pays their salaries.
---
Currently VAERS shows 1,676,100 cumulative worldwide adverse events and 39,099 deaths associated with the COVID-19 injection, with 9,332 of those deaths, 24 percent, occurring within two days of injection.
---
Most of those reports came in well after officials should have informed the public of risks they already knew existed. Instead they hid or downplayed them. Millions were harmed after being denied their right to fully informed consent.
---
How many deaths and injuries could have been avoided had federal health officials simply done the job we pay them to do? That is why I call this the biggest government scandal of my lifetime, and one crying out for full media coverage.
---
Here is the part that proves it. The Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Washington Post, USA Today, and Fox Digital all declined or ignored requests to run this as an op-ed. NBC, ABC, PBS, CNN, and MSNow all refused to cover the report.
---
So he is bringing it to you directly, and so am I. Read the full report here.
https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Senate-PSI-Majority-Staff-Interim-Report-April-29-2026-FINAL.pdf
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 3 174 |
| 10 | 👆👆👆
If we permit a great forgetting, then we enable and functionally endorse the same behavior and actions in the future. Senator Ron Johnson is one of the only people in a federal leadership position to reject this great forgetting.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 2 652 |
| 11 | We will never know the full extent of the harms (or the benefits) of the COVID-19 injections. But we do know that federal health officials were aware that serious harm was being done within months of them granting Emergency Use Authorization. We also know that those same officials turned a blind eye toward the safety signals that were screaming at them, but they refused to warn the public. The public pays federal health officials to evaluate drugs for safety and efficacy, and we have the right to be informed.
How many deaths and injuries could have been avoided had federal health officials simply done the job we paid them to do?
Currently, VAERS shows 1,676,100 cumulative worldwide adverse events and 39,099 deaths associated with the COVID-19 injection, with 9,332 (24%) of the deaths occurring within 2 days of injection. Most of these tragic adverse events occurred well after federal health officials should have informed the public about the risks they knew existed. Instead, they hid or downplayed those risks. As a result, millions were harmed after being denied their right to fully informed consent.
That’s why I consider this to be the biggest government scandal in my lifetime, and one that is crying out for full media attention and coverage.
. . .
The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, The Washington Post, USA TODAY, and Fox Digital have all declined or ignored requests to publish this op-ed.
NBC, ABC, PBS, CNN, and MSNow have all refused to cover my report.
Read the full report here.
Subscribe and share👉 @SenRonJohnsonUS | 2 524 |
| 12 | The story the media — and the government — don't want you to hear
Read about the biggest government scandal that legacy newspapers won’t touch.
On April 29, 2026, as Chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, I held a hearing and released a report titled "Unmasked: How Biden Health Officials Purposely Turned a Blind Eye Toward COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Signals." There has not been a bigger government scandal during my lifetime, and yet even now that we have documented proof of corruption, most of the legacy media refuses to report on it.
My report details how in March 2021, Peter Marks — director of the FDA center that approves vaccines and is responsible for safety surveillance (CBER) — was briefed that the algorithm they were using to analyze the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) would mask or hide COVID-19 vaccine adverse event safety signals. Twenty-six days later, using an updated algorithm, senior FDA officials were shown 25 safety signals, including sudden cardiac death, pulmonary infarction, cerebral artery occlusion, basal ganglia stroke, agonal rhythm, and Bell’s palsy.
For the next three months, they received updates showing more serious safety signals. Instead of warning or informing the public, they ordered the data analyst to "cease and desist" and then lied to the American public that "they weren’t seeing safety signals" and that any adverse events were "rare and mild." The whole point of using sophisticated algorithms to analyze VAERS is to find needles in the haystack — nonobvious potential harms that doctors and patients should be alerted to.
With the COVID-19 injections, we didn’t need sophisticated algorithms. The sheer volume of adverse event reports overwhelming VAERS was enough to trigger my oversight efforts. We faced impenetrable stonewalling until Secretary Kennedy’s commitment to radical transparency provided my Subcommittee with 11 million pages of documents. The documents make clear that FDA and CDC officials did not use an "err on the side of caution" standard to alert the public. Rather, they insisted on definitive proof of causation — a standard they knew would never be met.
They were far more concerned about not causing vaccine hesitancy than they were about informing the public of adverse events. They wanted to ensure that the injections would receive full licensure approval so that President Biden could mandate them to the military and millions of civilians, including healthy college students.
Perhaps the most egregious coercion involved healthy children who had virtually zero chance of serious harm from COVID-19. That coercion was based on another false claim that the injections would stop transmission. Some children were killed and others have been permanently disabled from the COVID-19 injections. Imagine being the parent who believed all the lies they were told and decided to have their now deceased or injured child injected.
Also in March 2021, Dr. Avindra Nath, clinical director at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), began leading a team of clinical researchers who were diagnosing and treating individuals with serious COVID-19 injection injuries. Twenty-three study participants were diagnosed and treated, then instructed to "not talk about the study" until the NIH could release its findings and conclusions. Dr. Nath maintained that early recognition and intervention were crucial for effective treatment. Yet no guidance was provided to physicians — one participant remarked that the NIH scientists had "taken the data and left us hanging."
Adding insult to injury, in April 2021 the CDC published a report stating that similar adverse events were "anxiety" — not a problem with the shots. It was not until study participants began speaking publicly in 2022 that the NIH quietly posted its study on a preprint server that virtually no one read, leaving medical teams nationwide in the dark and the injection-injured left untreated.
Subscribe and share👉 @SenRonJohnsonUS | 2 633 |
| 13 | "The Titanic did not sink all at once. Most passengers remained calm because they did not yet understand what was happening."
Telegram's Pavel Durov just said this about modern Europe — and he's not wrong.
A thread 🧵
---
Last week at the Oslo Freedom Forum — theme: "Dismantling Dictatorship" — Durov gave a speech that should scare every person who takes free speech for granted.
It's titled: "Communication Technology and the Struggle for Freedom."
---
His warning: Censorship doesn't arrive as a dramatic event.
It comes incrementally. One exception. One emergency. One "reasonable restriction" at a time.
Until one day you look up and the iceberg is visible to everyone — and it's too late to turn.
---
This isn't abstract.
🇬🇧 UK: Thousands investigated or arrested each year over social media posts under Keir Starmer.
🇩🇪 Germany: Citizens face legal penalties for speech officials deem "politically unacceptable."
The erosion is already underway.
---
Durov isn't a pundit. He lived it.
He's faced government pressure from Russia, France, and the EU firsthand. He built Telegram specifically because he didn't trust governments with his users' data.
He knows what state control looks like up close.
---
Dr. Malone has the full breakdown — including Durov's talk and why this matters for anyone who values personal freedom in the West.
Read it here 👇
https://www.malone.news/p/telegram-founder-pavel-durov-and
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 6 986 |
| 14 | Heavy-handed "shoot the messenger" narrative control campaigns will not work in the 2026 decentralized social media ecosystem, and contradict "radical transparency", "integrity" and "free speech" self-descriptions.
Personally, I find this current campaign sparked by my "rumor" tweet both deeply disappointing and strangely intriguing as another lesson in the changes and challenges confronting historic methods of political message and narrative control.
I suggest that you pay attention. Lessons are being learned - or not. "Movements" built on cult of personality strategies are not sustainable.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 3 873 |
| 15 | On Tuesday, Chicago police arrested University of Illinois Chicago senior Merlin LU for the June 9 cross-burning in Grant Park.
Of course, this is a left-wing extremist, was trying to frame MAGA supporters for a hate crime - by doing a hate crime himself.
One could argue that this is like the SPLC crimes.
Left-wing radicals causing terrorist activities to make it appear that people who support Trump are the extremists.
We live in crazy times.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 3 854 |
| 16 | Why is the food most likely to make you sick also the cheapest on the shelf?
It is not an accident, and it is not the free market.
It traces to a farm policy set in the 1970s, summed up in four words from a Secretary of Agriculture: "get big or get out." 🧵
---
The policy redirected New Deal programs to maximize output of a few storable commodities, corn and soybeans above all, with the Treasury backstopping the price.
Every farmer heard one signal: grow as much as the land will bear, and we will cover the difference.
---
This was central planning that never called itself that.
It seized no land. It did something quieter and more corrosive: it reached into the price system and bent it.
And prices are the only instrument we have for knowing what anything actually costs.
---
Rig the price of corn and you do more than enrich corn growers. You decide what gets made.
Corn becomes the sweetener. Soybeans become the seed oil. Both become the cheapest, most calorie-dense, least nutritious product on the shelf, the rational default for everyone who sells food.
---
We now treat this as the natural condition of food. It is nothing of the kind.
It is the downstream effect of specific decisions by specific people, and the bill is arriving as an epidemic of obesity, type 2 diabetes, and heart disease that no one tallied at the time.
---
"Cheap food" was never cheap. Its full cost was shifted off the receipt and onto three parties who never agreed to pay it:
the soil, mined of its fertility,
the water, fouled and drawn down,
and above all the bodies of the people who eat it.
---
Counted honestly, with the degraded soil, the fouled water, and the deferred medical bill all entered in the ledger, the cheapest calorie on the shelf is among the most expensive foods a society can produce.
---
Then comes the second bill.
A vast medical and pharmaceutical complex now manages the diseases the food system reliably produces. Its logic favors management over cure, because a patient maintained is a market and a patient cured is not.
You pay twice: once for the farm, once for the clinic.
---
The answer is not a counter-plan from Washington mandating "good food." That just flips the central plan and invites the same capture and waste.
The answer is to remove the distortions and let honest prices return.
---
End the commodity subsidies. Level the regulatory field that crushes small producers under rules written for giants.
And where Congress stays captured and useless, the courts can act. Common-law liability makes polluters answer for the soil and water they ruin, case by case, on the facts.
---
The goal is not some target percentage of food labeled "local." That is a planner's metric.
The goal is a price that tells the truth, and a family free to choose its own health once it can finally see what it is buying.
---
The full essay, "Get Big or Get Out," lays out the economics, the Austrian-school argument, and the way out in full.
Read it, and send it to anyone still being told the industrial diet is the cheap one.
Full essay:
https://www.malone.news/p/get-big-or-get-out
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 4 327 |
| 17 | Hydroxychloroquine is safer than Tylenol and was FDA-approved for 65 years. The government’s move to ban it for COVID while allowing it for Lupus was proof of political "double speak" and control.
Subscribe and share ➡️➡️ @DrSimoneGoldLA | 3 609 |
| 18 | True story.
“The Southern Poverty Law Center is manufacturing racism to justify its existence,”
-Acting Attorney General, Todd Blanche
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 4 258 |
| 19 | For decades the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has been America's self-appointed watchdog of hate groups. A new federal superseding indictment suggests it may have spent years quietly funding them. The story is so strange Hollywood would have rejected the script as too implausible. 🧵
---
Per a New York Post report on the indictment, a senior SPLC official, identified by the Post as former Intelligence Project director Heidi Beirich, allegedly directed roughly $1.2 million in donor funds to a confidential informant embedded in the neo-Nazi National Alliance. The twist: prosecutors allege the informant was also her lover.
---
According to the indictment, the two shared a home and joint bank accounts. Around $140,000 in donor money allegedly flowed into those accounts between 2015 and 2021, reportedly about 66% of everything ever deposited there, and went toward the couple's personal living expenses.
---
Strip away the labels and the alleged scheme is simple. Donor money meant to fight neo-Nazis was allegedly paid to a neo-Nazi, deposited in a shared account, and spent on the couple's bills. In ordinary language that has names: theft, or money laundering.
---
And it allegedly was not one rogue actor. The DOJ accuses the SPLC of routing more than $4 million in tax-exempt funds to informants inside extremist groups, while using those same groups as fundraising targets. One alleged recipient was an Imperial Wizard of the United Klans of America.
---
Imagine donating to fight neo-Nazis only to learn your check may have helped pay one's mortgage. It is roughly like discovering your anti-smoking charity had quietly put the Marlboro Man on retainer.
---
This is bigger than the SPLC. Entire industries now exist to find threats, monitor threats, fundraise against threats, and publicize threats. If your business model depends on monsters under the bed, you have every incentive to make sure the monsters never disappear. Or to manufacture new ones. Another self-licking ice cream cone.
---
One thing is already clear. If a conservative group stood accused of funneling donor money through a romance to a neo-Nazi operative, we would have twenty-four-hour wall-to-wall coverage. Instead, much of the liberal press seems oddly incurious. Apparently some hate groups are more special than others.
---
There is a sequel. After leaving the SPLC in 2020, that same official co-founded a new anti-extremism outfit, funded not by small donors but by a familiar roster of foundations. Discovery has a funny way of turning career investigators into the ones suddenly answering questions.
---
To be clear: no one named has been convicted, and the successor group has not been charged. But the coming trial is really about accountability. At what point does infiltrating an organization become subsidizing it? This case may force a jury to decide exactly where that line sits.
---
Our full piece on the SPLC, the indictment, and the hate-industrial complex that grew up around it:
https://www.malone.news/p/the-neo-nazi-lovers-of-the-hate-industrial
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 4 315 |
| 20 | 🚨 WOW! JD Vance says it PERFECTLY
VANCE: "I was a critic of Trump in 2015 and 2016. Now I'm the VP of the US in the Trump admin."
JOY BEHAR: "Yeah, what happened?"
VANCE: "Well, Joy, a little HUMILITY. When you make predictions and those predictions turn out to be false, you got to ask yourself, well, what made me wrong about that? What did I not understand or not appreciate?"
"For example, I said that Donald Trump's economic policies would not lead to wage growth. They did in the first term. That was actually a major, major thing!" 🔥
"I said that we couldn't bring back any of those factory jobs because I kind of had given into this idea that those jobs were disappearing, but actually Donald Trump, you saw a manufacturing boom during that administration!"
"So there's a certain point where you say, you know, I made predictions about this. I ended up being wrong. And in politics and anything, I think it's important to just say, you know what, I got some things wrong and I was wrong about him."
Boom!
Subscribe and share ➡️➡️ @TrumpSource | 3 509 |
Available now! Telegram Research 2025 — the year's key insights 
