Robert W Malone, MD
Inventor of mRNA vaccines and RNA as a drug, Bench to Bedside vaccines and biologics consulting. Moderated by @MarioLopezG
Показати більше📈 Аналітичний огляд Telegram-каналу Robert W Malone, MD
Канал Robert W Malone, MD (@rwmalonemd) у мовному сегменті Англійська є активним учасником. На даний момент спільнота об'єднує 110 713 підписників, посідаючи 95 місце в категорії Медицина та 204 місце у регіоні США.
📊 Показники аудиторії та динаміка
З моменту свого створення невідомо, проект продемонстрував стрімке зростання, зібравши аудиторію у 110 713 підписників.
За останніми даними від 12 червня, 2026, канал демонструє стабільну активність. Хоча за останні 30 днів спостерігається зміна кількості учасників на -1 775, а за останні 24 години на -82, загальне охоплення залишається високим.
- Статус верифікації: Не верифікований
- Рівень залученості (ER): Середній показник залученості аудиторії становить 5.07%. Протягом перших 24 годин після публікації контент зазвичай збирає 2.90% реакцій від загальної кількості підписників.
- Охоплення публікацій: В середньому кожен допис отримує 5 614 переглядів. Протягом першої доби публікація в середньому набирає 3 212 переглядів.
- Реакції та взаємодія: Аудиторія активно підтримує контент: середня кількість реакцій на один пост – 151.
- Тематичні інтереси: Контент зосереджений навколо ключових тем, таких як vaccine, decade, measle, patient, drug.
📝 Опис та контентна політика
Автор описує ресурс як майданчик для висловлення суб'єктивної думки:
“Inventor of mRNA vaccines and RNA as a drug, Bench to Bedside vaccines and biologics consulting.
Moderated by @MarioLopezG”
Завдяки високій частоті оновлень (останні дані отримано 13 червня, 2026), канал підтримує актуальність та високий рівень охоплення публікацій. Аналітика показує, що аудиторія активно взаємодіє з контентом, що робить його важливою точкою впливу в категорії Медицина.
Триває завантаження даних...
| Дата | Залучення підписників | Згадування | Канали | |
| 14 червня | +1 | |||
| 13 червня | 0 | |||
| 12 червня | 0 | |||
| 11 червня | 0 | |||
| 10 червня | 0 | |||
| 09 червня | 0 | |||
| 08 червня | 0 | |||
| 07 червня | 0 | |||
| 06 червня | 0 | |||
| 05 червня | +1 | |||
| 04 червня | +2 | |||
| 03 червня | 0 | |||
| 02 червня | 0 | |||
| 01 червня | +1 |
| 2 | 👆👆👆
On target.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 2 284 |
| 3 | Robert Kennedy Jr. has done more as HHS Secretary than any HHS Secretary in my lifetime. He is cleaning up the food supply. He is removing chemical dyes from children's food, pulling heavy metals out of baby food, investigating microplastics and forever chemicals. And he is working to bring the childhood vaccine schedule down from 54 vaccines to 26.
That isn't a small thing.
Join @TheHigh_Wire | 2 134 |
| 4 | The most advanced AI is now "too dangerous" for the public to use.
Too dangerous for independent scientists. For small labs. For you.
But safe for government and its approved partners.
The same government that funded gain-of-function research and hid it.
🧵
---
Strip away the language about safety and a doctrine appears:
Powerful capabilities, restricted for the public.
The same capabilities, retained for governments and the institutions they choose to trust.
The stated reason is biosecurity. The real effect is something else.
---
Before we hand control of these technologies to the government and its preferred partners, one question:
What is the track record of the institutions demanding that trust?
It is worth looking, because we already have years of evidence.
---
For years the federal apparatus funded, oversaw, defended, and obscured risky virology.
NIH money moved through a maze of grants, subcontracts, and foreign labs. EcoHealth. Wuhan.
Getting basic facts took subpoenas, whistleblowers, and litigation.
@SenRonJohnsonUS
@ RandPaul
---
Emails withheld. Records slow-walked. Definitions quietly changed.
That is not a system built for openness.
It is a system built to resist oversight. And it is the same system now asking for exclusive access to biological AI.
---
Congress held the hearings. Wrote the letters. Issued the subpoenas.
And the architecture is still standing. Same agencies. Same grant mechanisms. Same failures.
Congress has proven it can investigate. It has not proven it can govern.
---
This year NIH researchers were criminally charged over smuggling biological materials into the country, including mpox samples.
Institutions that cannot control pathogens already inside their own labs now ask to be trusted with AI that accelerates biology.
Why?
---
The biosecurity argument pretends "the government" is one careful actor.
It is not. It is a sprawl of agencies, contractors, universities, military and intelligence labs, and foreign partners.
Assigning the risk to "the government" does not solve it. It just moves it.
---
It gets worse. Intelligence officials have acknowledged biological research run through overseas partner labs, often sitting in conflict zones.
"Dual-function" is the polite word. It means work that serves biodefense or biowarfare, depending on who is asking.
---
Here is the part no one wants to say out loud:
Restricting Americans stops no one else. DeepSeek already proved frontier AI cannot be locked inside a few U.S. companies.
Knowledge crosses borders. China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea will not wait for permission.
---
So the policy does not remove the danger.
It concentrates the capability among states and large institutions, and hopes our rivals play along.
Americans and independent researchers get the restrictions. Foreign programs get the head start.
---
The public rationale is safety. The practical effect is the concentration of power.
Before surrendering these tools to the governing class, ask what it has done to earn the trust.
The honest answer: not much.
Full essay:
https://www.malone.news/p/the-ai-they-dont-want-you-to-have
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 2 552 |
| 5 | 👆👆👆
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 2 404 |
| 6 | In Washington, people are rarely fired. They simply discover an overwhelming desire to spend more time with their family shortly after the President decides he would like someone else in the job.
---
A recurring feature of both Trump administrations has been the curious tendency for officials to leave shortly after reports emerge that the President has lost confidence in them. Officially, many departures are described as resignations, personal decisions, family considerations, or opportunities to pursue other interests. Unofficially, the timing often tells a different story.
---
Examples follow:
Kirstjen Nielsen
Faced repeated criticism from Trump over border policy.
Reports circulated that Trump was dissatisfied with DHS leadership.
Resigned shortly after a White House meeting.
Official narrative: resignation.
Widely viewed as a forced departure.
---
H.R. McMaster
Reports emerged that Trump wanted a different National Security Advisor.
Departed after months of speculation.
Official narrative: transition and resignation.
Widely viewed as a leadership change initiated by Trump.
---
John Kelly
Relationship with Trump reportedly deteriorated over time.
Persistent reports that Trump wanted new leadership in the Chief of Staff role.
Departure announced as a resignation.
Widely viewed as an exit requested by the President.
---
Jim Mattis
Publicly resigned following disagreements over Syria policy.
Official narrative: policy disagreement and resignation.
Reality: Trump and Mattis had fundamentally diverged on national security issues.
---
Tulsi Gabbard
Official explanation centered on her husband's serious health condition and a desire to care for family.
Simultaneously, reports emerged of disagreements over Iran policy and growing friction within the administration.
Additional reporting suggested some White House officials favored an accelerated transition.
Official narrative: family considerations.
Open question: purely personal decision, or personal reasons coinciding with political pressure?
---
Jeff Sessions
Trump publicly criticized him for months over Russia-related recusal decisions.
Reports repeatedly suggested Trump wanted him out.
Sessions submitted a resignation letter after the 2018 midterms.
Official narrative: resignation.
Widely understood: Trump wanted a new Attorney General.
---
Category A: Trump clearly wanted them out
Jeff Sessions
Kirstjen Nielsen
John Kelly
H.R. McMaster
Category B: Officially personal, but political tensions were obvious
Tulsi Gabbard
Dan Bongino
Jim Mattis
Category C: Direct firing, no "personal reasons" cover story
Pam Bondi
Rex Tillerson
Mike Waltz
---
HHS is denying the robust rumors that RFKjr is on his way out - given the pattern above, I am not ready to concede the strong possibility the July will see transition to a new Secretary. But as I originally posted, this must be considered a rumor at this time.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 3 528 |
| 7 | BREAKING- Very active rumor mill currently with specifics from senior USG (government) employees that RFKjr will be leaving as Secretary HHS in July, after the 4th. Meeting was apparently held last Monday. Oz to head transition team.
---
Reportedly widely and openly discussed during last Wednesday's Congressional baseball game.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 3 300 |
| 8 | DNI Gabbard Reveals Evidence of U.S. Taxpayer-Funded Global Biolab Program
Press Release copied from the DNI Website
https://www.malone.news/p/dni-gabbard-reveals-evidence-of-us
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 3 496 |
| 9 | DNI GABBARD REVEALS EVIDENCE OF U.S. TAXPAYER-FUNDED GLOBAL BIOLAB PROGRAM
Subscribe and share ➡️➡️ @TrumpSource | 2 765 |
| 10 | 👆👆👆
In March 0222, I wrote about the Ukraine biolabs- I was labelled as spreading misinformation by various news sources.
Today, Tulsi Gabbard released the hard evidence that I had uncovered in 2022 - there were many, many biolabs in Ukraine.
I also heard first hand accounts that we personally took these labs out, once the war started - as we didn't want Russia to get hold of them.
Russia had every right to not want Ukraine to have US biolabs on their border.
The start of this war was built on lies and more more lies.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 3 279 |
| 11 | Friday Funnies: Tickman cometh
The realities of herd-poisoning
https://www.malone.news/p/friday-funnies-tickman-cometh
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 3 486 |
| 12 | Stand with Mike Lee - demand your senators stand up and debate to save the SAVE America Act!
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 3 622 |
| 13 | 👆👆👆
True story...
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 3 606 |
| 14 | Don't make it hard - just take care of yourself and your family. Eat healthy food, cut out the junk, don't over indulge (limited intake), exercise, don't drink too much, get outside, and enjoy life. #MAHA
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 4 504 |
| 15 | 👆👆👆
Thune needs to be gone from his position as senate leader - like yesterday.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 4 171 |
| 16 | Every season brings a new health scare. This spring it is ticks.
The headlines say America is facing a record tick season. The "evidence" is the CDC's Tick Bite Tracker.
Look at what that tracker actually measures and the whole story falls apart. 🧵
---
Instead the public is asked to infer a biological conclusion from a behavioral metric.
That is a weak foundation for such confident headlines.
Lyme is real. Alpha-gal is real. But healthcare utilization is not the same as biological risk.
---
Instead the public is asked to infer a biological conclusion from a behavioral metric.
That is a weak foundation for such confident headlines.
Lyme is real. Alpha-gal is real. But healthcare utilization is not the same as biological risk.
10/ So the question nobody in public health wants to ask:
Are we measuring ticks? Or are we measuring fear of ticks?
Full essay here 👇
https://www.malone.news/p/are-we-measuring-ticks-or-measuring
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 4 150 |
| 17 | Homesteading: The Filly, the Freeze, and the Sourdough Experiment.
"Summer is almost upon us, although here it still feels more like spring. Some big jobs have been accomplished, while others continue to languish. Such is life on a farm.
The biggest news is that yesterday we welcomed a healthy filly out of our homebred mare, Tantra. She is a lovely buckskin, or perhaps a bay. At this point, only color testing will settle the question. If she moves as well as she looks, I suspect she will be a keeper."
- by JGM.
Read more at:
https://www.malone.news/p/homesteading-the-filly-the-freeze
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 4 613 |
| 18 | Having been together for 50 years, with my amazing wife of 47 years... here is my advice to younger folk.
Find someone special, who is your best friend and jump in. Commit to being devoted.
If you chose wisely, you won't regret it - ever.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 4 000 |
| 19 | 👆👆👆
Is this the path forward for AI?
Are data centers already outdated?
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 3 715 |
| 20 | Okay this is genuinely insane.
SpaceX just unveiled a satellite whose only job is to run AI. Not internet. Not GPS. Just compute, floating in orbit.
It's called AI1, and the reason behind it breaks your brain.
AI data centers on Earth are hitting a wall, not a chip wall, a physics wall.
They need staggering amounts of power and water just to stay cool, and we're running out of grid and land to build them.
So Musk's answer is: stop building them on Earth.
In orbit, the sun never sets. Free power, 24/7. No water for cooling, you just radiate heat into the vacuum of space. The two things choking AI on the ground barely exist up there.
And here's the wild part: Musk says it's easier to build than a Starlink satellite. Strip out the complex antennas and it's "a lot of solar cells, a radiator, and some laser links."
One AI1 carries the compute of an Nvidia GB300 rack, the same hardware data centers fight over down here.
AI1 is just the first one. The plan is a constellation of up to a million of them.
And the timing isn't an accident, SpaceX goes public this week at a ~$1.75 trillion target. This isn't a rocket company anymore. It's positioning itself as the power grid for AI, in space.
The race for AI compute just left the planet. Literally.
❤️ @chatgpt5 | 🤖ChatGptBot | 🤖 Our Bots | 3 552 |
Вже доступно! Дослідження Telegram за 2025 — головні інсайти року 
