Robert W Malone, MD
Inventor of mRNA vaccines and RNA as a drug, Bench to Bedside vaccines and biologics consulting. Moderated by @MarioLopezG
Показати більше📈 Аналітичний огляд Telegram-каналу Robert W Malone, MD
Канал Robert W Malone, MD (@rwmalonemd) у мовному сегменті Англійська є активним учасником. На даний момент спільнота об'єднує 110 713 підписників, посідаючи 95 місце в категорії Медицина та 204 місце у регіоні США.
📊 Показники аудиторії та динаміка
З моменту свого створення невідомо, проект продемонстрував стрімке зростання, зібравши аудиторію у 110 713 підписників.
За останніми даними від 12 червня, 2026, канал демонструє стабільну активність. Хоча за останні 30 днів спостерігається зміна кількості учасників на -1 775, а за останні 24 години на -82, загальне охоплення залишається високим.
- Статус верифікації: Не верифікований
- Рівень залученості (ER): Середній показник залученості аудиторії становить 5.07%. Протягом перших 24 годин після публікації контент зазвичай збирає 2.90% реакцій від загальної кількості підписників.
- Охоплення публікацій: В середньому кожен допис отримує 5 614 переглядів. Протягом першої доби публікація в середньому набирає 3 212 переглядів.
- Реакції та взаємодія: Аудиторія активно підтримує контент: середня кількість реакцій на один пост – 151.
- Тематичні інтереси: Контент зосереджений навколо ключових тем, таких як vaccine, decade, measle, patient, drug.
📝 Опис та контентна політика
Автор описує ресурс як майданчик для висловлення суб'єктивної думки:
“Inventor of mRNA vaccines and RNA as a drug, Bench to Bedside vaccines and biologics consulting.
Moderated by @MarioLopezG”
Завдяки високій частоті оновлень (останні дані отримано 13 червня, 2026), канал підтримує актуальність та високий рівень охоплення публікацій. Аналітика показує, що аудиторія активно взаємодіє з контентом, що робить його важливою точкою впливу в категорії Медицина.
Триває завантаження даних...
| Дата | Залучення підписників | Згадування | Канали | |
| 13 червня | 0 | |||
| 12 червня | 0 | |||
| 11 червня | 0 | |||
| 10 червня | 0 | |||
| 09 червня | 0 | |||
| 08 червня | 0 | |||
| 07 червня | 0 | |||
| 06 червня | 0 | |||
| 05 червня | +1 | |||
| 04 червня | +2 | |||
| 03 червня | 0 | |||
| 02 червня | 0 | |||
| 01 червня | +1 |
| 2 | In Washington, people are rarely fired. They simply discover an overwhelming desire to spend more time with their family shortly after the President decides he would like someone else in the job.
---
A recurring feature of both Trump administrations has been the curious tendency for officials to leave shortly after reports emerge that the President has lost confidence in them. Officially, many departures are described as resignations, personal decisions, family considerations, or opportunities to pursue other interests. Unofficially, the timing often tells a different story.
---
Examples follow:
Kirstjen Nielsen
Faced repeated criticism from Trump over border policy.
Reports circulated that Trump was dissatisfied with DHS leadership.
Resigned shortly after a White House meeting.
Official narrative: resignation.
Widely viewed as a forced departure.
---
H.R. McMaster
Reports emerged that Trump wanted a different National Security Advisor.
Departed after months of speculation.
Official narrative: transition and resignation.
Widely viewed as a leadership change initiated by Trump.
---
John Kelly
Relationship with Trump reportedly deteriorated over time.
Persistent reports that Trump wanted new leadership in the Chief of Staff role.
Departure announced as a resignation.
Widely viewed as an exit requested by the President.
---
Jim Mattis
Publicly resigned following disagreements over Syria policy.
Official narrative: policy disagreement and resignation.
Reality: Trump and Mattis had fundamentally diverged on national security issues.
---
Tulsi Gabbard
Official explanation centered on her husband's serious health condition and a desire to care for family.
Simultaneously, reports emerged of disagreements over Iran policy and growing friction within the administration.
Additional reporting suggested some White House officials favored an accelerated transition.
Official narrative: family considerations.
Open question: purely personal decision, or personal reasons coinciding with political pressure?
---
Jeff Sessions
Trump publicly criticized him for months over Russia-related recusal decisions.
Reports repeatedly suggested Trump wanted him out.
Sessions submitted a resignation letter after the 2018 midterms.
Official narrative: resignation.
Widely understood: Trump wanted a new Attorney General.
---
Category A: Trump clearly wanted them out
Jeff Sessions
Kirstjen Nielsen
John Kelly
H.R. McMaster
Category B: Officially personal, but political tensions were obvious
Tulsi Gabbard
Dan Bongino
Jim Mattis
Category C: Direct firing, no "personal reasons" cover story
Pam Bondi
Rex Tillerson
Mike Waltz
---
HHS is denying the robust rumors that RFKjr is on his way out - given the pattern above, I am not ready to concede the strong possibility the July will see transition to a new Secretary. But as I originally posted, this must be considered a rumor at this time.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 2 848 |
| 3 | BREAKING- Very active rumor mill currently with specifics from senior USG (government) employees that RFKjr will be leaving as Secretary HHS in July, after the 4th. Meeting was apparently held last Monday. Oz to head transition team.
---
Reportedly widely and openly discussed during last Wednesday's Congressional baseball game.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 2 654 |
| 4 | DNI Gabbard Reveals Evidence of U.S. Taxpayer-Funded Global Biolab Program
Press Release copied from the DNI Website
https://www.malone.news/p/dni-gabbard-reveals-evidence-of-us
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 3 052 |
| 5 | DNI GABBARD REVEALS EVIDENCE OF U.S. TAXPAYER-FUNDED GLOBAL BIOLAB PROGRAM
Subscribe and share ➡️➡️ @TrumpSource | 2 409 |
| 6 | 👆👆👆
In March 0222, I wrote about the Ukraine biolabs- I was labelled as spreading misinformation by various news sources.
Today, Tulsi Gabbard released the hard evidence that I had uncovered in 2022 - there were many, many biolabs in Ukraine.
I also heard first hand accounts that we personally took these labs out, once the war started - as we didn't want Russia to get hold of them.
Russia had every right to not want Ukraine to have US biolabs on their border.
The start of this war was built on lies and more more lies.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 2 840 |
| 7 | Friday Funnies: Tickman cometh
The realities of herd-poisoning
https://www.malone.news/p/friday-funnies-tickman-cometh
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 3 177 |
| 8 | Stand with Mike Lee - demand your senators stand up and debate to save the SAVE America Act!
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 3 258 |
| 9 | 👆👆👆
True story...
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 3 226 |
| 10 | Don't make it hard - just take care of yourself and your family. Eat healthy food, cut out the junk, don't over indulge (limited intake), exercise, don't drink too much, get outside, and enjoy life. #MAHA
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 4 302 |
| 11 | 👆👆👆
Thune needs to be gone from his position as senate leader - like yesterday.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 4 043 |
| 12 | Every season brings a new health scare. This spring it is ticks.
The headlines say America is facing a record tick season. The "evidence" is the CDC's Tick Bite Tracker.
Look at what that tracker actually measures and the whole story falls apart. 🧵
---
Instead the public is asked to infer a biological conclusion from a behavioral metric.
That is a weak foundation for such confident headlines.
Lyme is real. Alpha-gal is real. But healthcare utilization is not the same as biological risk.
---
Instead the public is asked to infer a biological conclusion from a behavioral metric.
That is a weak foundation for such confident headlines.
Lyme is real. Alpha-gal is real. But healthcare utilization is not the same as biological risk.
10/ So the question nobody in public health wants to ask:
Are we measuring ticks? Or are we measuring fear of ticks?
Full essay here 👇
https://www.malone.news/p/are-we-measuring-ticks-or-measuring
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 4 030 |
| 13 | Homesteading: The Filly, the Freeze, and the Sourdough Experiment.
"Summer is almost upon us, although here it still feels more like spring. Some big jobs have been accomplished, while others continue to languish. Such is life on a farm.
The biggest news is that yesterday we welcomed a healthy filly out of our homebred mare, Tantra. She is a lovely buckskin, or perhaps a bay. At this point, only color testing will settle the question. If she moves as well as she looks, I suspect she will be a keeper."
- by JGM.
Read more at:
https://www.malone.news/p/homesteading-the-filly-the-freeze
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 4 373 |
| 14 | Having been together for 50 years, with my amazing wife of 47 years... here is my advice to younger folk.
Find someone special, who is your best friend and jump in. Commit to being devoted.
If you chose wisely, you won't regret it - ever.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 3 885 |
| 15 | 👆👆👆
Is this the path forward for AI?
Are data centers already outdated?
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 3 641 |
| 16 | Okay this is genuinely insane.
SpaceX just unveiled a satellite whose only job is to run AI. Not internet. Not GPS. Just compute, floating in orbit.
It's called AI1, and the reason behind it breaks your brain.
AI data centers on Earth are hitting a wall, not a chip wall, a physics wall.
They need staggering amounts of power and water just to stay cool, and we're running out of grid and land to build them.
So Musk's answer is: stop building them on Earth.
In orbit, the sun never sets. Free power, 24/7. No water for cooling, you just radiate heat into the vacuum of space. The two things choking AI on the ground barely exist up there.
And here's the wild part: Musk says it's easier to build than a Starlink satellite. Strip out the complex antennas and it's "a lot of solar cells, a radiator, and some laser links."
One AI1 carries the compute of an Nvidia GB300 rack, the same hardware data centers fight over down here.
AI1 is just the first one. The plan is a constellation of up to a million of them.
And the timing isn't an accident, SpaceX goes public this week at a ~$1.75 trillion target. This isn't a rocket company anymore. It's positioning itself as the power grid for AI, in space.
The race for AI compute just left the planet. Literally.
❤️ @chatgpt5 | 🤖ChatGptBot | 🤖 Our Bots | 3 472 |
| 17 | 👆👆👆
They had to have been writing grants and papers on these strains- which means others in the government . Those with oversight responsibilities- must have known these samples were brought in illegally and turned a blind eye.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 3 329 |
| 18 | NIH researchers charged with allegedly smuggling viral pathogens into the United States previously flew or planned to fly viral samples to the country, according to newly released emails.
Claude Kwe, who worked under Vincent Munster at the NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, brought DNA from 35 samples that tested positive for monkeypox in 2024. Kwe wrote that they were eager to perform full genome sequencing on these samples, which contained or were derived from a select agent.
Munster separately discussed shipping samples of a monkeypox strain called the Congo Basin clade in 2022. In other emails, researchers discussed coronavirus samples, including having the Omicron variant brought to the United States without NIH shipping involvement. An outside researcher also proposed that Munster hand carry samples from Africa.
Sen. Rand Paul released the emails and stated that NIH scientists charged with attempting to smuggle monkeypox had a years-long history of skirting rules for moving dangerous pathogens. Federal prosecutors accused Kwe and Munster of smuggling monkeypox from the Republic of Congo and lying to investigators.
Emails from 2012 showed the NIH mislabeling a shipment of MERS coronavirus as diagnostic rather than infectious.
Join ➣ 👉@COVID19VACCINEVICTIMSANDFAMILIES | 3 514 |
| 19 | Three federal actions this year, all sold the same way: reining in the administrative state. The EPA disclaiming power it used since 2009. The Court killing a federal vaccine mandate. A White House order shrinking the childhood vaccine schedule. They are not the same move. 🧵
---
They run on three different doctrines, with different targets and different directions. The most cited is the major questions doctrine: an agency cannot decide a matter of vast economic or political significance unless Congress clearly authorized it.
---
The Court's own phrase: Congress does not hide elephants in mouseholes. Sweeping power has to be granted in plain words. The catch is that the Court has never defined "major." That undefined word is where the power, and the trouble, lives.
---
As a sword: the EPA rescinded the 2009 endangerment finding and repealed federal vehicle emissions standards by claiming it never had the authority. In 2007 the same Court told the same agency it did. Same subject, opposite result.
---
As a shield: the Court blocked OSHA's vaccinate-or-test rule covering 80 million workers. The same week it upheld the CMS mandate for federally funded health facilities. Mandates fall where the statutory hook is general. They survive where it is specific.
---
Then the vaccine schedule order, where the doctrine does not fit. It polices agencies that seize power, not agencies that give it up. An agency cannot be told it lacks authority to shrink what it had authority to build. Recommending and de-recommending are the same power.
---
What actually checked that order was not the major questions doctrine. It was the Administrative Procedure Act and the Federal Advisory Committee Act. In March a federal judge halted the change on those grounds. The order itself hedges: "to the extent permitted by law."
---
The structure underneath all three: these doctrines pull power from the agencies and the executive and send it to two places, the courts and Congress. The courts will use theirs. Congress is the question.
---
Congress has passed all twelve annual spending bills on time four times since the late 1970s, last in 1996. It runs on continuing resolutions, more than 200 of them, roughly half the days of a normal year. FY2026 opened with the longest shutdown in US history.
---
So the doctrine demands clear statements from the one body that cannot pass a budget. Take contested power from the agencies and it does not land in a revived Congress. It pools in the courts and in whatever executive holds the pen.
---
A movement built on judicial restraint, on textualism and original meaning, has made the judiciary the final word on the scope of the regulatory state. In a Congress that will not legislate, the doctrine produces more judicial activism, not less.
---
The rule-of-law test is not which side wins this year. It is whether outcomes rest on durable, general, knowable law or on shifting discretion. Discretion moved from the agency to the judge is still discretion.
---
The full essay, with the cases and the legislative record laid out in detail:
https://www.malone.news/p/three-doctrines-one-objective
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 4 377 |
| 20 | beginning of the post👆
But where investigators actually typed the organism, they found it. Park and Krumwiede in New York, Fraser in Edinburgh, three British Royal Commissions. The bovine type was roughly a quarter of childhood TB and about half of tuberculous neck glands. Real and confirmed in children, even as the national totals were not.
---
Modern data argues for the same restraint. Zoonotic TB is generally about 1 to 2 percent of human TB, near 140,000 cases a year, likely undercounted in some regions. Real. Not nothing. Not the blanket case against fresh milk that regulators imply.
---
So the honest statement is narrow. M. bovis was a real risk where infected cattle met untreated milk, worst for children. The remedy was not to heat all milk and ban the alternative. It was to clean up the herds. The US tested and removed infected cattle and eliminated it. Countries that only pasteurized kept it for decades.
---
The lesson is not that raw milk causes tuberculosis. The lesson is that diseased herds are dangerous. Test the animals. Remove infected cattle. Document herd health. Raw milk from a tested, healthy herd is a different product from milk of unknown status. The deciding factor is animal health, not temperature.
---
The real lesson of the swill milk scandal is not that milk is dangerous. It is that any system becomes dangerous when corruption, convenience, and profit replace accountability.
The cow was never the central problem. The conditions were. The fraud was. The corruption was.
Full essay, every source documented:
https://www.malone.news/p/raw-milk-the-wrong-lesson
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD | 4 747 |
Вже доступно! Дослідження Telegram за 2025 — головні інсайти року 
