D MAN LOVES ME!

Zero argument in first message. Just insult. Again, zero arguments, exactly what to expect with cognitive dissonance in brainwashed people. Always the same, you have one side thinking and another just saying no for no reason.

If you don't, I'll have to conclude I am right.

5 pussies. Because they didn't send any reason to Alfred, they just disagree) Oh maybe they don't know tg of Alfred it is @cryptoalfred submit response freely.

Cynical smile is not appreciated. What I think about WW 2. I answered in post after the first one. You should as ruler of your country decide what is BEST OUTCOME for your country. If taking Russian flag would rape all your women and turn you into slavery, you fight to last breath, escape, do whatever you can. If it changes flag, saves your life, and even builds your economy, then think about making smarter decision than losing cripling millions of families. Good answer?

You mostly anonymous poll AGREE – 228 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍 91% DISAGREE – 17 👍 7% DISAGREE (but I have already sent my reason why to Alfred) – 5 👍 2% 👥 250 people voted so far.

I'll give you a new chance... (wow people are really interesting)

so 34 people here, and 4 sent me their comments and arguments. Now, in your face, I call the remaining 30 of you PUSSIES. Because a man openly, genuinely asks you to prove him wrong, but you won't. You won't do any 'good' that you believe in... instead, you just vote as a fucking sheep what you are conditioned to vote. At least I am thinking with my own head. Limited by my capabilities. However, trying MY best.

Thank you brother.

Thanks my friend for your feedback. It is a bit naive, because they aren't letting anything... it's happening CONSTANTLY and without stop for thousands of years. Geography maps are changing. Absolutely no collapse will happen. Because only you lived in a bubble where you believed their propaganda, but whenever interest great enough would appear, there would be a way to get it. There is even one video game, where if you want to attack some nation you need to find casus belli - cause of war. It can be anything... to 'justify' the war. So then your wars got justified, while those you don't want from your enemies are 'aggressor' wars. Bro, did US never attack a foreign country that couldn't attack US?

as a country you must decide what's better for your citizens. If mongols attack you, you fight... if some nation that's 20% different than you at MOST attacks you, and you stand to lose MAJOR part of your healthy young working population as result, and you can lose nothing, to me it's bad decision to go in war.

Finally, third disagreer of the 25. And of course, like all losers, he wrote NO FUCKING REAL ARGUMENTS. Just claims. Absolutely no argument. Not one thing I could answer to. He claims. Statements. Not proofs, facts or anything answerable.

China is a BRILLIANT strateg. China is on sidelines, waging also active passive war with US, but wishing to keep US market. China played it perfectly. Didn't get directly involved. Got ZERO sanctions, used Russian Resources in proxy war fight... The biggest winners in this war are: US, Russia, China The biggest losers: Ukraine EU (except Hungary) We agree with everything. Just China is very smart. China is actually very dangerous. China is the real danger... depending on their ambitions. Heck didn't Covid come from China? Anyway... I don't know much about them as I don't have proper sources and I didn't focus on that... but this was important for financial markets so yeah... you're right, China is a major player.

15% disagree. Imagine. 25 people currently. Only 2 could verbalize their reasons. And with the first commenter, I can actually see where he comes from. He argumented all the way through. It is not good for YOU my friend to have an opinion and not know why you have it.

IF I AM WRONG, and you manage to prove it to me, fuck, I am happy to not be wrong anymore. But if I am right... maybe get on the truth side as well with me and majority here.

I am still waiting. 17% disagree. I got only two arguments (respect for both of you for sending your thoughts honestly. We can disagree and be friends as you see. You're neither banned nor shamed. Your name censored).

According to this theory, when an action or idea is psychologically inconsistent with the other, people automatically try to resolve the conflict, usually by reframing a side to make the combination congruent. -- in other words, they see I am right, but since they already hold so dogmatically their beliefs about Ukraine that are brainwashingly implanted in their heads, they try to justify any proof or claim as 'something else' and try to kick it out of their system, refuse etc. It is ACTUAL phenomenon.

Even these two that wrote to alfred, I respect more than the remaineder of 17% who disagree but can't fucking verbalise why they disagree. I am OPEN to being wrong and to fix it. But prove me wrong. Show me. I publish here. So if I'm stupid, at least my audience will get your point. But seems to me, many of the 17% are being just irrational and incapable of thinking indepentendtly. Google Cognitive Dissonance.

82%+ of people agree with me! It means I am not completely alone on this island of thought. But not everyone can read without emotions and hear what is actually being said. I have more love and peace-wishes than most of your war mongering side takers. How you know if you're war mongering side-taker? Well, if you want to smash some head, one or another, you're cruel, you just justify it with taking a side. Simple as that my man.

I am here for all comments. I am not, no matter how hard for brainwashed people to get, on ONE side. I love Ukraine and I like Russia. Both GREAT countries. Magnificent coders, scientists, cuisine... IF I had to choose between the two for living, I preferred Ukraine a bit more. Just because Russia was bigger and seemed more dangerous. But I respect them a lot. So tell me, DIRECTLY what am I missing or even better what did I write that is factually wrong? Alfred will send, and I WILL publish and answer here.

While commenter from before I can respect as he used at least DIRECT arguments on which I could have answered something. What can I answer here? "since when did US go from ... giving dictator the territory he wants" So you fully accepted the position of US dictating who gets what? You see my point? For you it's already normal. Is this United States of America or United WORLD of America? That one you like, but other way around you don't. Nah, you're wrong my man.