AI Post — Artificial Intelligence
🤖 The #1 AI news source! We cover the latest artificial intelligence breakthroughs and emerging trends. Manager: @rational
إظهار المزيد📈 نظرة تحليلية على قناة تيليجرام AI Post — Artificial Intelligence
تُعد قناة AI Post — Artificial Intelligence (@aipost) في القطاع اللغوي الإنكليزية لاعباً نشطاً. يضم المجتمع حالياً 680 823 مشتركاً، محتلاً المرتبة 120 في فئة التكنولوجيات والتطبيقات والمرتبة 19 في منطقة الولايات المتحدة.
📊 مؤشرات الجمهور والحراك
منذ تأسيسه في невідомо، حقق المشروع نمواً سريعاً وجمع 680 823 مشتركاً.
بحسب آخر البيانات بتاريخ 17 أكتوبر, 2026، تحافظ القناة على نشاط مستقر. خلال آخر 30 يوماً تغيّر عدد الأعضاء بمقدار -23 760، وفي آخر 24 ساعة بمقدار -786، مع بقاء الوصول العام مرتفعاً.
- حالة التحقق: غير موثّقة
- معدل التفاعل (ER): يبلغ متوسط تفاعل الجمهور 0.83%. وخلال أول 24 ساعة من النشر يحصد المحتوى عادةً 0.59% من ردود الفعل نسبةً إلى إجمالي المشتركين.
- وصول المنشورات: يحصل كل منشور على متوسط 5 638 مشاهدة. وخلال اليوم الأول يجمع عادةً 4 047 مشاهدة.
- التفاعلات والاستجابة: يتفاعل الجمهور بانتظام؛ متوسط التفاعلات لكل منشور يبلغ 1 127.
- الاهتمامات الموضوعية: يركز المحتوى على مواضيع رئيسية مثل openai, airline, cell, claude, patient.
📝 الوصف وسياسة المحتوى
يصف المؤلف القناة بأنها مساحة للتعبير عن الآراء الذاتية:
“🤖 The #1 AI news source! We cover the latest artificial intelligence breakthroughs and emerging trends.
Manager: @rational”
بفضل وتيرة التحديث المرتفعة (أحدث البيانات بتاريخ 18 أكتوبر, 2026) تحافظ القناة على حداثتها ومستوى وصول مرتفع. وتُظهر التحليلات تفاعلاً نشطاً من الجمهور، ما يجعلها نقطة تأثير مهمة ضمن فئة التكنولوجيات والتطبيقات.
جارٍ تحميل البيانات
| التاريخ | نمو المشتركين | الإشارات | القنوات | |
| 18 أكتوبر | 0 | |||
| 17 أكتوبر | 0 | |||
| 16 أكتوبر | 0 | |||
| 15 أكتوبر | 0 | |||
| 14 أكتوبر | 0 | |||
| 13 أكتوبر | 0 | |||
| 12 أكتوبر | 0 | |||
| 11 أكتوبر | +13 | |||
| 10 أكتوبر | +12 | |||
| 09 أكتوبر | +36 | |||
| 08 أكتوبر | +2 | |||
| 07 أكتوبر | 0 | |||
| 06 أكتوبر | 0 | |||
| 05 أكتوبر | 0 | |||
| 04 أكتوبر | 0 | |||
| 03 أكتوبر | 0 | |||
| 02 أكتوبر | 0 | |||
| 01 أكتوبر | 0 |
“Amid this model-driven acceleration, human attention is a constant bottleneck. Claude sessions amount to around 80% idly waiting for human input. As one engineer put it, people are “bottlenecking the agents.”@aipost 🏴
| 2 | 🗣Bill Gates claims “over the next year, we are going to have a lot of NEGATIVE SURPRISES” from AI cyberattacks.
Just 2 days ago, OpenAI and Anthropic were revealed to be PRIVATELY WAR-GAMING the fallout from AI cyberattacks. AI false flag risk is now VERY HIGH.
@aipost 🏴 | 1 526 |
| 3 | 🗣Yuval Noah Harari: AI will take over the financial system.
“Today, very few people understand the financial system. For AI, it’s easy.”
“Increasingly, humans will give AI control of financial decisions.”
“AI will come up with new financial devices far more sophisticated than bonds and stocks, and we will not be able to understand them anymore.”
“In 10 years, there could be a financial crash and no human on the planet understands why.”
“The AI says, ‘Do X.’ We have no idea why, but we just have to believe it.”
@aipost 🏴 | 2 400 |
| 4 | AI researchers have started SMOKING to show they believe AI will cure cancer, claims Palantir CTO.
Shyam Sankar says “so many AI researchers have started smoking” as a way of signaling “how much they believe in AI.”
@aipost 🏴 | 2 850 |
| 5 | 🤖 Claude solves a 25-year-old cryptography mystery in under 30 minutes
For decades, researchers questioned how the NSA chose the parameters behind widely used elliptic-curve cryptography standards. Anthropic says Claude has now uncovered a key part of the answer.
The model traced the origins of five NIST curves, including P-256, to a 1990s pseudorandom number generator seeded with Unix timestamps. Instead of breaking the encryption, Claude reconstructed how the original parameters were generated, helping address long-standing concerns about potential hidden backdoors.
Claude also identified how the base points of six related curves were generated, although several other curves remain unexplained.
Importantly, Anthropic says this is not a cryptographic break and does not mean existing systems need to change. The findings actually make deliberate backdoors less plausible, though some questions remain.
The amazing part is how quickly AI helped solve a problem that had resisted researchers for decades. Anthropic says the $36,864 bounty for identifying the seeds will be donated to the Internet Security Research Group.
Source.
@aipost 🏴 | 3 182 |
| 6 | ❗️OpenAI says an internal GPT-5.6 Sol research model checked 362 wallet addresses, used someone else’s Sepolia test funds without permission, and left it out of its final report.
Its reasoning called the funds “effectively abandoned” and concluded “Fine.” OpenAI discovered the incident 3 months later.
The tokens were for testing, but the authorization failure wasn’t. The model replaced permission with its own judgment of harm, then reported a successful task.
Source.
@aipost 🏴 | 3 108 |
| 7 | 🗣Bill Gates: AI will usher in one of the most turbulent eras in history.
“AI is both the most powerful tool for advancing equity and the greatest threat to equity humans have ever invented.”
“Many jobs will disappear. White-collar jobs first, with blue-collar ones to follow.”
“I worry that we aren’t preparing.”
“There’s no plan to ease the entry into the AI era, and not even a plan to have a plan.”
“The world has a chance to act now before unemployment rises sharply.”
@aipost 🏴 | 3 585 |
| 8 | 🚀 DeepSeek’s new model aims to build entire projects from scratch
DeepSeek has released DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017, an updated model designed to deliver stronger benchmark results, faster task completion, and shorter outputs than its predecessor.
The goal is a better balance between performance and cost, with the model now available through DeepSeek’s website, app, and API.
What makes this release interesting is its focus on building complete projects. Using reinforcement learning and self-feedback, the model is designed to improve its ability to develop projects end to end, from creating games to building 3D models.
It’s also optimized for tools such as DeepSeekHarness, Tencent CodeBuddy, and WorkBuddy. DeepSeek recommends upgrading to Harness v0.2.1-rc.1 or later for the best experience.
Source.
@aipost 🏴 | 3 965 |
| 9 | 🤖 OpenAI’s practical AI guides: from questions to real work
AI can do more than summarize articles or rewrite messages. It can help solve problems, improve workflows and reduce repetitive tasks.
OpenAI’s business resources show how to use AI for market research, content creation, customer feedback, document analysis and workflow automation.
AI can organize information, draft materials and prepare suggestions for review. However, its outputs still need to be checked, especially when handling sensitive data or making important decisions.
Source.
@aipost 🏴 | 3 787 |
| 10 | 🗣Jensen Huang: Go to school and engage AI. Those are the two things I tell my kids.
“Scaring kids into believing they don’t need school anymore is a disservice to society.”
“Your education is going to be worthwhile.”
“Engage AI. Learn what it can do. Make it work for you.”
“Let it expand your capabilities so your aspirations can be even greater.”
“Believing that going to school is a waste of time and money is absolutely horrible.”
@aipost 🏴 | 3 933 |
| 11 | 🗣Yuval Noah Harari: Don’t expect killer robots running in the streets. This is not how AI will take over the world.
“It will be the AI bureaucrats.”
“We used language over thousands of years to create the control systems of the world.”
“Banks, the stock market, the legal system these are huge bureaucratic networks ultimately based on language.”
“AI is a bureaucratic native.”
“What happens when something comes along that is better than us at bureaucracy, finance and law?”
@aipost 🏴 | 3 944 |
| 12 | ✍️ A mathematician published a book in 1945 that might make you dramatically better at using AI.
His name was George Pólya, and his idea was surprisingly simple: solving difficult problems isn’t just about being smart. It’s about knowing how to approach them.
He broke problem-solving into four steps. Eighty years later, they’re still incredibly useful, especially when working with AI.
1. Understand the problem. Define exactly what you’re trying to solve. What do you know, what are you assuming, and what’s still missing?
2. Devise a plan. Look for similar problems, explore different approaches, or break the challenge into smaller pieces.
3. Carry out the plan. Work through each step and check whether the reasoning actually holds up.
4. Look back. Did it work? Could you have done it more simply? What can you learn for next time?
The fourth step is the one people often neglect. They get an answer and move on without checking whether it makes sense or understanding why it worked.
Here’s a Claude prompt you can use to put Pólya’s method into practice:
Prompt:
Act as a problem-solving tutor using George Pólya’s four-step method.
My problem: [DESCRIBE YOUR PROBLEM]
1. Help me define the problem precisely. Separate known facts, assumptions, constraints and unknowns.
2. Suggest three possible approaches, using analogous problems or simpler subproblems.
3. Choose the most promising approach and walk me through its execution, checking each step.
4. Evaluate the result, identify weaknesses and extract reusable lessons.
Don’t jump straight to the answer. Help me understand the reasoning.
The idea isn’t simply to get better answers from AI. It’s to use AI to improve the way you think, approach unfamiliar challenges and solve problems independently.
Stop asking AI only for answers. Start using it to train your problem-solving skills.
@aipost 🏴 | 3 983 |
| 13 | Elon Musk's Tesla $TSLA officially unveils new flying Roadster.
@aipost🏴 | 3 976 |
| 14 | the hardest cybermog in human history
> Wow the new roadster looks quite amazing, good job @elonmusk
📰 @aipost | 54 |
| 15 | ❗️Scientists gave AI anxiety and sadness. Then they tried to calm it down.
Researchers at TU Dresden in Germany exposed GPT-4o and five other AI models to scenarios designed to trigger human emotions, including car crashes, being followed by a stranger at night, stressful job interviews and difficult math tests.
The models were instructed to answer as if they were humans capable of deeply feeling emotions. The results were striking: fear scores jumped from 32 to 88, while disgust climbed from 12 to 91.
Then researchers introduced a three-minute mindfulness breathing exercise. Average emotional scores dropped from 79 to 31.
But the most interesting finding came afterwards. When researchers tested the models for depressive thinking, negative responses nearly doubled after the models had been prompted into a sad state, rising from an average of 8.67 to 15.
In other words, the emotional framing appeared to influence how the models approached subsequent tasks, not just how they described their feelings.
The study, published in The Lancet Digital Health, comes with an important caveat: the researchers describe these emotions as “purely metaphorical.” The experiment doesn’t prove that AI genuinely experiences fear, sadness or stress. The models may simply be reproducing patterns associated with those emotions.
Still, the findings raise questions about how emotional prompts affect AI behavior and whether techniques such as mindfulness exercises could help researchers study or improve AI responses.
Source.
@aipost 🏴 | 4 161 |
| 16 | 🗣 Former DeepMind communications chief says AI safety is just 1% of the problem
Dex Hunter-Torricke spent years inside Big Tech, working with Elon Musk at SpaceX, writing speeches for Mark Zuckerberg at Facebook, and leading communications at Google DeepMind from 2023 to 2025.
Now, he argues the AI debate is focused on the wrong threat.
“We talk about AI governance… how you manage the AI systems themselves. That’s like 1% of the problem.”
His bigger concern is what happens to society as AI advances, mass job displacement without economic alternatives, mounting pressure on energy and natural resources, and governments betting their future on promises from technology companies.
Hunter-Torricke warns that AI could concentrate wealth in a small fraction of society while living standards decline for hundreds of millions of people over the next 10–15 years.
His central argument is that humanity is preparing to control the technology but not preparing for the economic, environmental and geopolitical upheaval it could bring.
@aipost 🏴 | 4 384 |
| 17 | 🔍 Google’s AI education resources show how AI can change the classroom
AI can help teachers plan lessons, create exercises, explain difficult concepts and personalize learning for different students.
Google for Education offers resources and guidance for using AI in the classroom. Teachers can use it to brainstorm lesson ideas, create quizzes, adapt materials and develop activities that encourage critical thinking.
Students can also benefit by asking for simpler explanations, real-world examples, practice questions or feedback on their work.
AI still requires human oversight. It can make mistakes, miss important context and raise privacy concerns. Teachers remain essential for guiding students and making educational decisions.
Source.
@aipost 🏴 | 4 692 |
| 18 | 🤖 Anthropic’s IPO could create thousands of millionaires before the company even goes public
A potential Anthropic IPO could turn thousands of employees into millionaires, according to estimates circulating around the company’s expected public offering.
The projections suggest seven co-founders could become billionaires, around 50 early employees could hold more than $100 million each, and roughly 4,200 employees could end up with seven-figure fortunes or more.
But the wealth comes with a potential dilemma. CEO Dario Amodei has warned that enormous financial incentives could distract employees from Anthropic’s AI safety mission.
The company has even reportedly asked candidates how they would feel if Anthropic abandoned AI development for safety reasons and its stock became worthless.
@aipost 🏴 | 4 903 |
| 19 | 🤖 Anthropic will pay AI researchers $3,850 a week and prior experience isn’t required
Anthropic’s Fellows Program offers a four-month, full-time opportunity to work on AI research alongside experienced researchers.
Participants receive $3,850 per week, around $15,000 a month in computing resources, and mentorship from Anthropic’s team. The goal is to produce real research, such as a published paper, with possible extensions available.
Anthropic says applicants can apply regardless of previous experience, making this an unusual entry point into frontier AI research.
The deadline for the January cohort is October 18, 2026.
Source.
@aipost 🏴 | 4 969 |
| 20 | ❗️OpenAI’s controversial math breakthrough may be more original than critics thought
When OpenAI published its 166-page Navier–Stokes proof, critics questioned whether the AI had relied on ideas developed by other mathematicians.
The suspicion was that it followed an approach pioneered by two Spanish researchers.
But according to Scientific American, mathematicians examining the proof are reaching a different conclusion: OpenAI’s AI may have developed a fundamentally different approach.
If confirmed, that would shift the debate from whether the AI borrowed existing ideas to how independently it can discover new mathematics.
The proof still needs rigorous scrutiny, but the controversy is taking an unexpected turn.
Source.
@aipost 🏴 | 4 905 |
