ar
Feedback
Crucial MCQ (Judiciary Quiz)

Crucial MCQ (Judiciary Quiz)

الذهاب إلى القناة على Telegram

Law Quiz Only verified law exam #info previous year questions #pyq other law exam related MCQ Imp #legal_news Contents - for fair use ( study purpose) (Groups is Only to help aspirants, no commercial intentions) #sharing_is_caring (share link

إظهار المزيد
7 128
المشتركون
لا توجد بيانات24 ساعات
+47 أيام
-1730 أيام
أرشيف المشاركات

Refractory materials are used for the construction of furnaces because they:
Anonymous voting

Deep focus earthquakes which occur at greater depth is called—
Anonymous voting

The Vice-President of India is subject to removal by
Anonymous voting

Who preside over a joint session of the two Houses of Parliament?
Anonymous voting

The term 'Ghalla-bakshi' refers to
Anonymous voting

'Cruelty' within the purview of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is a ground for
Anonymous voting

Sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife is not rape, if the wife is above
Anonymous voting

The legal effects of a void muslim marriage are
Anonymous voting

Which of the following is not essential for the offence of kidnapping
Anonymous voting

Which of the following is a legal effect of a valid marriage
Anonymous voting

sticker.webp0.10 KB

‘A’, a Hindu boy, aged 15 years, marries 'B', a Hindu girl, aged 12 years. The marriage was consummated when the girl had attained puberty (which she did at the age of 13). The girl at the age of 17
Anonymous voting

Select the correct option :
Anonymous voting

‘A’ enticed a minor girl 'M' without the consent of her lawful guardian 'G' and kept her with him for a month after which he deserted her. While 'M' was loitering on the street immediately thereafter, 'B' took her with him from whose custody 'M' was later recovered by the police.

Which of the following conditions may not be validly stipulated in a nikah-nama
Anonymous voting

The remedy of restitution of conjugal rights is aimed at
Anonymous voting

In kidnapping the consent of minor is
Anonymous voting

Former S Muralidhar, said that the last twelve years have witnessed "unexplained interference by the executive" in the select
Former S Muralidhar, said that the last twelve years have witnessed "unexplained interference by the executive" in the selection of judges. The appointment process has in the past twelve years witnessed unexplained interference by the executive. Compounding this is the vagueness as to the criteria, a lack of transparency and an overall inefficiency.