Roots Of Knowledge ROK 😊

كيف تستفيد من كتاب الهداية ؟ كتبه لياقت زمان غفر له ولوالديه من أشهر الكتب عند الحنفية هو للأمام المرغيناني المسمى بالهداية . يعتبر هذا التصنيف شرحا لمجموعة من كتابين مختصر القدوري والجامع الصغير رغم الفرق بين كلا المتنين حيث كان أولهما لا يستغني عنه مكتبة من مكتبات الفقيه الحنفي ألا وهو المتن المتين الذي احتوى معظم المسائل بابا بابا وقد نال القبول عبر التاريخ عند كل من أراد الغوص في المذهب الحنفي فإن مسائلها تتضمن الفكرة الحنفية إذا صح التعبير فلما صار صيته في الآفاق شمر العلماء لشرحه وإبراز ما فيه من الأصول والأدلة ومن جملة من تصدى له هو الإمام المرغيناني ولكن رأى أن يضيف إليه ما فاته من مسائل الجامع الصغير لكاتب المذهب صاحب أبي حنيفة محمد بن الحسن الشيباني فإن كتابه هذا كان عمدة القضاة والفقهاء في طريقة التفقه قبل مختصر القدوري ورغم قلة ما فيه من مسائل كل باب كانوا يتلقون التفقه كابر عن كابر لقرب العهد من أئمة المذهب فكان الكتاب يتمثل إشارات إلى تلك المعلومات المتوارثة . ولكن لما طال الزمان وقبض الفقهاء وكاد أن يدفن ما في صدورهم معهم احتاجوا إلى من يشرح لهم الزوايا والخبايا فنهض أمثال صاحب القدوري وشمر عن ساعد الجد وأتى بما يغنى ويشفى الغليل وإن كان لا يبلغ شأو الأمام محمد. فالهداية كأسمه تهدى قارئه إلى استدلالات الحنفية وتمرنه ليتلقى منها طريقة التفقه ومعرفة تطبيق الأصول والتأويل عند الحنفية . فالذي يقرأ الهداية ينبغي أن يكون على علم من أسلوبها في سرد المسائل وإلا فلعله يقرأ كل ما بين دفتيه ولا يحصل منه إلا نسخة أخرى في ذاكرته. وللأسف هذا شأن تدريس الكتاب في كثير من المدارس يحلّ الاستاذ المتن أو يترجمه ويكتبه الطالب بيده في دفتره وهكذا الحال في كل مسئلة من غير أن يسقى قلبه الفقه مباشرة فيصدق عليه القول الناس كالإبل المائة لا تكاد تجد فيها راحلة . فكيف إذاً يستفيد الطالب من كتاب الهداية ؟ اعلم أصلحك الله إن المذهب الحنفي ليس منحصرا في هذا الكتاب فحسب ولا الفقه بأسره يؤخذ من مورد واحد بل يعتبر هذا الكتاب مدخل عظيم ليتعلم استدلال الفقهاء وتطبيق قواعدهم وضوابطهم . فإذا عرفت هذا فأول ما تقدم عليه في كل مسئلة أن تعرف الآيات التي كانت مطمح نظر الفقهاء حول المسئلة فيميز بين الأمر والنهي خاصها وعامها حقيقتها ومجازها وهل خفي منها شيء أم كان محكم المراد وغير ذلك وهذه الأصول التى تدرس تعصم مراعاتها الفهم عن الخطأ في نصوص الشريعة والأصول تقضي ولا يقضى عليها. فإذا أحطت أيها الطالب بما قلنا فاسمع إلى عرض كل إمام مستدله ثم ما رجحه صاحب الهداية ما له وما عليه يرسخ عندك طريقة النقاش ولا تنسينّ أن جلّ ما كتبه المرغيناني من استدلال فإنما هو من صنيع المتأخرين من الفقهاء وقلّ ما كتبه الأولون فلهذا تجدهم يختلفون في بيان دليل دخول المرفقين والكعبين في الوضوء وكثيرا ما يغتر الدارس حيث يعتقد أن كل ما أتى به صاحب الكتاب عين ما قال به الإمام أبو حنيفة كلمة كلمة كأنّ النعل طابق النعل وبعد كل هذا أيها الطالب العزيز لم يبق لك إلا معرفة ما قال المتأخرون في تلك المسائل والتخريجات على ما قال الأئمة لما لم ينصوا عليه وفائدة هذا أن التخريجات توضح لك أسلوب التطبيق في النوازل والمستجدات لتغير الزمان والمجتمعات وتطور علوم الطبيعة والطب. وهذا يحتاج إلى مقالة أخرى ليس هذا محلها وفي الختام كتاب الهداية عُويلِم مليء بعلم الفقه ولا يمكن أن يستوعب ما فيه بقراءته مرة ولا مرتين ولكن بمزاولته و التدبر في الاستدلال والفروق بين المسائل.

Apologies I won't be able to have livestream today I'll try to do it tomorrow evening inshallah

The student may comprehend the challenges that the Hanafis of later times faced, as well as how this hierarchy of viewpoints led to the application and journey of each case in point and masalah, producing branching off new situations. Theoretical differences among the author's contemporaries gave the Hanafi school a degree of flexibility in allowing jurists to voice preferences for previously held opinions. If a student is unfamiliar with the author's preferred positions of authority and points of view, they cannot be considered to have thoroughly studied Hidayah. In conclusion, I believe it's imperative that students comprehend the author's writing style and his contributions to the discipline of fiqh, particularly when evaluating it to other works that are very similar. Once a learner has a firm grasp of these ideas, they will find it easier for one to navigate the material. All things considered, studying the book Hidayah offers Hanafi fiqh students a priceless chance to be marvelled at the degree of scholarly integrity and meticulous observance of tradition.

How can one benefit from studying the book Hidayah in Hanafi Fiqh? One of the most well-known books in the collection of Hanafi fiqh texts is Hidayah. The primary text, on which the author of Hidayah prepared his commentary, includes portions from Imam Muhammad's al-Jami al-Sagheer and the Qudoori manual, written in the fifth century A.H. While Qudoori and al-Jami al-Sagheer are fundamental in outlining the key stances of the school for each chapter, they are limited in offering rationale and justification for the opinions expressed. In his work, the author of Hidayah aims to logically defend each case discussed and shed light on the reasoning behind each matter. Furthermore, in order to contrast other views held by jurists he makes cross-references between the opinions of scholars from within the hanafi school and those ouside, primarily those of Imam Shafi. This enables the reader to see how each jurist arrived at their decision and how other scholars discussed their arguments. Although the author does not present counterarguments from each jurist, it is nevertheless a valuable exercise that helps the reader understand how jurists interacted with one another. In what way, then, should a student approach this book to get the most out of it? First and foremost, it should be mentioned that the book is a Hanafi Fiqh treatise. This basically means that when all words are removed, the underlying thoughts and ideas that unite to form the given scenario or theme remain and can be thoroughly explored. Thus, the main goal is to locate pertinent evidence that is subject to jurisdiction—that is, Quranic passages that address the problem. If they have a firm understanding of the verse's language in all of its varied facets, this enables the student to easily determine what may and may not be included, such as labelling it fard or haram, or the degree to which a broad word can be constrained. After comprehending this, the student concentrates on the passages that can be further explained by reports and the views of the Sahabah. After finishing, the learner will be able to identify the sources that were utilised to build this case and masala. However, since this is fiqh, a profound level of knowledge and a thorough examination of the reasoning behind each decision are necessary. Investigating the ‘hows’ and ‘whys’ of this decision and determining its consistency with prior similar rulings will be necessary. Conversely, viewing individual masala as isolated and separate from the broader context fails to provide a coherent explanation. If there is such a strong emphasis on rationality, one could wonder why it was necessary to cite passages and narrations. The answer to this is that the former can be thought of as the essential framework and foundations without which stability cannot be maintained throughout time. The reasoning behind it plays a similar role to the invisible rules that enable the structure to form and function, which may be formalised by dissecting the entire thing. The rationale can only be effective when it can be consistently demonstrated throughout a chapter or even multiple chapters and pass the debate test. Naturally, the frequency at which a certain usool is used in a particular context will differ from another based on a variety of factors, including the type of textual evidence that supports the debate and the nature of the subject under discussion. Once all of this is understood, the student can explore how subsequent Hanafis, specifically the Mashaikh [Hanafis of the third and fourth centuries], addressed additional issues that prior experts had overlooked. As the heirs of the founding Imams' writings, the Mashaikh, may differ from one another on certain matters, yet their judgements should nonetheless be carefully taken into account. By now the student should be able to discern between the founders' inferred overlaying positions on matters on which they stayed silent, and the Mashaikh's contributions to the clear-cut opinions of the early founders. The student may comprehend the challenges t

Not Every Reader Is The Same Reading a book and deriving value from it can vary greatly from person to person, in my experience. First-time readers seldom comprehend all the author has written, particularly if the work is divided into several volumes. Even when someone is reading a book and taking thorough notes, they are essentially copying and pasting what the author says and may even believe that they have learnt something new. Of course, all that a reader learns from a book is worthwhile and deepens their understanding of the subject at hand. The material then starts to sink in and become a part of the long-term understanding after reading the book several times, especially if the reader also reads other sources and has discussions with people. When someone with years of experience teaching and researching a certain subject picks up one of these books for the first time, it won't be a particularly exceptional reading. Instead, because of all their knowledge, people are able to recognise the author's level of skill in the field and comprehend not just what he has written, but also where he is coming from. This kind of reader will have questions and objections, which turns reading into a critical analysis of the text rather than a simple process of absorbing information. I can speak from my experience when I suggest that taking notes while reading books on complex subjects is crucial. Writing down any questions you have while reading is also highly beneficial, even if the book doesn't provide the answers. This can spark your interest in the topic and perhaps even turn it into a passion that you pursue later in life. Lastly, dedicated readers usually read a book more than once. You will gain a deeper understanding of the subject matter and the author's perspective with each reading of the book. It's not necessary to agree with the author on what they write all the time.

فكرة الفقه عند الحنفية فكرة الفقه عند الحنفية هي فهم الفقيه مراد الشارع فيما يتعلق بالأعمال والأقوال . وقد جمعه الفقهاء في مصنفاتهم فسموها ب"مسائل" وذلك أن الفقه أو فهم الشريعة من أول يوم كان بشكل سؤال وجواب كان الناس يسئلون عما جهلوا وأجيبوا فدونت تلك الأسئلة والأجوبة ثم بعد مرور القرون أخذوا يضيفون إليها مسائل ابتنت على تلك المسائل التي ناقشها قدماء المذهب فتتراكم المسائل ويزداد عدد الصفحات حتى يصبح عندهم موسوعات ضخمة وكل ذلك يدل على أن همّ الفقهاء لم يكن مجرد جمع المسائل فحسب بل كانوا يتوسلون بها إلى وضع خريطة في الذهن لترتبط كل مسئلة بعضها ببعض كأنهم ينظرون إلى صورة مكتملة بها تسر الناظرين فالفقه مثل احجية الصورة المقطوعة فكما أن الأحجية تحتاج إلى وضع كل قطعة في الموضع الذي يناسبها تماما وإذا وضعت في غير ذلك الموضع الملائم لشكله فسدت الصورة ولم يتبين للناظر الصورة صحيحة فكذلك الفقه إذا لم يعرف الطالب موقع كل مسئلة أصبح يشوش عليه الفقه ولا يظهر له تناسقه وإنما يرى تعارضا بين الأقوال لا حل له إلا التسليم والسكوت فالتناسق وربط كل مسئلة بأخرى لا يمكن إلا إذا كان لها هيكل كبير يجمع كل جزء بأصول دقيقة مستمدة من القران والسنة وخيار هذه الأمة من الصحابة والتابعين فإنهم مهدوا الأصول وأنزلوا كل مسئلة منزلتها في أبواب الفقه كالوضوء والصلاة و النكاح والبيع والسير وغيرها. فالمسائل تدل على الأصول والقواعد والمعاني التي كانت مركزة في صدور الفقهاء فإن قال قائل: كيف يكون حفظ تلك الأصول والقواعد لمن جاء بعدهم فإننا نرى أن مرور الزمان وتغير المجتمعات قلما يسلم لها الأصول من تحريف والخطأ في فهمها وسوء التطبيق ؟ قلنا :أن تقديم الأصول في صورة "سؤال وجواب" قد كفانا هذا. فإذا قرأ الطالب هذه المسائل فهِم أولًا ما تحير فيه السائل ثم عرف جواب الفقهاء وكلما قرأ الأمثلة المتشابهة بتلك اتضح له فروق ما بينها مثل ما ذكروا في مسئلة المياه التي يصح بها الوضوء فقالوا نص الشارع على كون الماء المنزل من السماء طهورا ولكن لا يفهم من هذا حكم الماء المختلط بغيره مثل الصابون و الشاي والزعفران وهل يبقى ماء إذا تغير لونه وطعمه ورائحته هكذا يتذاكر المتفقه الصور المختلفة حتى يصل بها إلى الأصول والمعاني التي تقضي على تلك الصور ولكن مهما غفل الطالب عن معاني كل باب ولم يتجاوزها ظن الفقه مجرد فهم المسائل وحفظها كأنها غير مدرك بالعقل عشوائي يتناقض في ذهنه بعضها مع بعض فأنّى يرغب في هذا طالب الفقه ؟ فلا يلام إذا أصبحت المذاهب الأخرى لديه أكثر ميلا وتعقلا أما إذا سار في المذهب الحنفي سيرا كما ذكرنا اطمئن إليه قلبه وصار عقله يتوقد كلما يعرض له سؤال وشعر بأن الشريعة تناسب كل مجتمع ويمكن تطببقها في كل زمان مهما تطور العالم . ومن أفضل الكتب لمن أراد أن يتعلم فكرة الفقه عند الحنفية هو كتاب القدوري فإن مسائلها تتمثل أصح ما تنوقل عن الأئمة فتتضمن تلك الأصول الدائرة في أذهانهم وإذا أتقنها سهل عليه فهم ما كتبه كل ما أتى بعده من الفقهاء وعرف موقع كل ما قالوا ولم يختلج في صدره شيء من تعارض الأقوال

This is the new alternative to curious cat for those who feel comfortable asking questions anonymously https://tellonym.me/Liaquat

The Purpose Of Fiqh Study The study of Fiqh in the Hanafi school is to grasp the lawgiver's meaning in topics concerning actions and expressions.The lines of text in books dedicated to explaining fiqh are known as masail, which loosely translates as questions or scenarios. As the years passed, jurists began to introduce new problems and scenarios into this ever-expanding encyclopaedia of laws and rulings. This demonstrates that there is a strong emphasis on not only collecting masail and cases that have been transmitted, but also striving to map out all of the missing pieces of the puzzle. Just like a jigsaw puzzle, each piece has a spot where it fits exactly, and attempting to position it anywhere else will result in pieces appearing out of place. By laying out a methodology based on the language of the Arabs around the time of the Quran's revelation, the widespread practice of the early generation, namely the companions and tabieen, and the observable consistency in the rulings and laws, the hanafis were able to produce a robust approach in giving a sensible structure to all matters from wudu, salah, hajj, nikah, trade, and international law. All of this was preserved in a creative way by offering scenarios and questions that allowed teachers and students to learn through practical examples. The teacher introduces the subject in the form of questions or case studies at hand and carefully guides the students by emphasising what the Hanafis look for and contrasting analogous examples. To illustrate, the hanafis say that the lawgiver only permits ritual purification with water from the sky above. This would imply that the water must be free of any additives that modify it into something other than water. By examining various variables such as earth-based substances, beverages, and squeezed juices, they can compile an extensive array of scenarios that can be linked back to the overarching theme and concepts of using water. Engaging with these questions and scenarios helps learners acquire a grasp of the underlying concepts that underpin this and comparable cases. Once this is achieved, they can effortlessly adapt it to other topics, like examining a tree's branches and determining the type and structure of the trunk from which they grow. On the contrary, if students view the questions and situations as the end goal of the fiqh books, they are likely to struggle to see the binding themes and overarching principles behind them, resulting in a lack of harmony in the overall pattern of fiqh. Not to mention the apparent contradictions in the viewpoints of different jurists. The book Qudoori is an ideal text for students to learn about this concept of fiqh. There are just enough scenarios and questions in each chapter to enable students to gradually refine their understanding and fully explore all the concepts. After one has a firm understanding of this text, it is easy to place it within the lineage of later Hanafi writings.

Unfortunately I won't be able to make it for livestream today 😞 Inshallah see you guys tomorrow evening

⏳🏷️Early bird discount flies away tomorrow! 🔴✨A 𝟮𝟬% 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁 with the promo code 🏷️"𝗧𝗔𝗙𝗦𝗘𝗘𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗥𝗟𝗬𝗕𝗜𝗥𝗗", valid until 𝗢𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝟵𝘁𝗵! As-Suffa Presents 𝐓𝐚𝐟𝐬𝐞𝐞𝐫: 𝐋𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝐅𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐒𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐡𝐬 ✨📖𝐴 𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑛𝑒-𝑑𝑎𝑦 𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑦𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑡 𝑓𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑆𝑢𝑟𝑎ℎ𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑄𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑛, 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑆𝑢𝑛𝑛𝑎ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑝ℎ𝑒𝑡 𝑀𝑢ℎ𝑎𝑚𝑚𝑎𝑑 ﷺ, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑇𝑎𝑓𝑠𝑖𝑟 𝑏𝑦 𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑤𝑛𝑒𝑑 𝐼𝑠𝑙𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑐 𝑠𝑐ℎ𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑠! 🗓️Saturday | 9th November, 2024 🕙10:00 AM - 15:00 PM 📌As-Suffa Institute, 156 High Street, Aston, Birmingham, B6 4UX 🖊️𝗧𝗔𝗨𝗚𝗛𝗧 𝗕𝗬 𝗠𝘂𝗳𝘁𝗶 𝗟𝗶𝗮𝗾𝘂𝗮𝘁 𝗭𝗮𝗺𝗮𝗻 AVAILABLE ONLINE | OPEN TO BROTHERS AND SISTERS Donot miss this enlightening study! 🔗𝐑𝐞𝐠𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐧𝐨𝐰-as-suffa.org/education/tafseer-last-five-surahs/

Inshallah I'll be riding for charity this Sunday. It would mean a lot to me if you can support me by donating and sharing my link jzk 😊😊 https://fundraise.as-suffa.org/liaquat-for-palestine

The Need for Students To Have a Framework For Hadith Without a doubt, Hadith is one of the most important sciences in Islamic education institutes. Students throughout history have dedicated themselves to not only preserving the Prophet's words, peace be upon him, but also ensuring the chains of narration are reliable. The demand for text preservation today is not as great as it was centuries ago. However, in today's world, where people exploit hadith to support their own views, it is critical to preserve the meanings of hadith from subjective readings that can deviate from the intended meanings of the Hadith. The hadith's wording can be difficult for beginners, and if the chapters aren't studied on a regular basis, the narrations can appear fragmented and unclear. Here are some of the reasons why students may struggle to understand narrations. 1. Being unfamiliar with the habits and practices of the Arabs in the seventh century. 2. Words and phrases that don't appear as common in later Arabic 3. The lack of context 4. Understanding what was told to whom 5. Trying to reconcile the narrations and passages of the Quran 6. Understanding the chronological arrangement of statements 7. Distinguishing between worldly advice and legal verdicts. 8. Distinguishing between metaphorical and literal claims. 9. Trying to apply hadith to the current world. 10. Making sense of hadith regarding the realm of the unseen. Students can easily be confused or misled if they are not properly guided through these issues. This is why it is critical for anyone attempting to explain hadith to provide a commentary that serves as a framework for students to understand. Hujjat al-Allah al-Baligha by Shah Wali Allah Dehlawi is one of the works I've found to be really useful in this regard. Otherwise, much of the commentary provided by academics in Islamic seminaries is either highly focused on what fiqh scholars have said, simple translations, or teacher's own thoughts on the hadith, with no obvious methodology being applied. The latter can be quite troublesome because it offers the teacher virtually complete freedom to discuss the Hadith and the risk of misunderstanding, misapplying, or worse, exploiting it to push their own interpretations, influencing the minds of their students.

Mashallah wonderful gift 🎁 ❤️ Amana fragrances

Systematic Learning Is The Best Way To Develop My suggestion to students is to avoid perusing commentaries on books before studying the main text. The text of any book was written so that the author's concepts might be studied and understood. Jumping ahead and studying the commentary before its time can leave gaps in the student's memory that are difficult to forget or rectify later. However, the material must be taught by a teacher who understands how to convey it without overwhelming the pupils with too much information, which would impede their academic development. Imagine giving an infant adult food before its time, you can imagine the long-term consequences. The same is true of someone who attempts to study sophisticated tafseers but has not studied the Quran exclusively from the ayahs themselves. The elegance of the Quran's phrases and words is lost on the student. After the student has studied the text in a measured manner, there should be nothing wrong with covering a commentary or two. Students are occasionally to fault for creating a developing hype and culture among others in which it is implied that if you haven't studied this Sharh or that one, you're somehow deficient. I remember a guy who was intrigued by Mukhtasar al-Maani. He had no prior knowledge of balagah, let alone matn talkhees or miftah al-uloom. So one day he asked me to teach him the book, and I asked him, "Do you know what balagha is about?" He answered something about the beauty of the Arabic language. I told him that he was wasting his time if he hadn't covered the fundamentals of the subject. It is all too common these days to find students who have not been trained in primary textbooks in the fundamentals of most sciences but desire to pursue highly advanced topics. If a student learns to crawl through the foundational texts, they will be able to run through the more difficult ones.

If everyone only spoke according to what they knew You can only draw a conclusion from research once you have thoroughly examined all of the available sources and references on your own. Your ultimate goal as an Islamic science student is to be able to do this kind of research. You can only accomplish this by putting in a lot of effort in your studies, particularly in Arabic. To a learner, discovering new information and opposing viewpoints ought to be as natural as opening a new chapter in a book. The majority of graduates rely on the research of some of their seniors instead of investing in developing their own research abilities. When giving a viewpoint that is not their own and is credited to someone else, it is crucial to make the distinction to the folks around you in this case. This encourages candour in the study and makes the audience aware of the boundaries of each person's qualifications. When someone advocates for a certain viewpoint so strongly that others begin to mistrust and despise all other viewpoints, it is because they believe this to be the sole viewpoint. It is imperative to find the most effective means of addressing viewpoints that publicly cause issues in society and are manifestly opposed to the majority of scholars without inciting social unrest. The Prophet, peace be upon him, said to Our Mother Aisha (r.a.), "I would have rebuilt the Kaba to the condition it was in during Ibrahim's (a.s.) time if it weren't for the fact that your people [of Makkah] have only lately embraced Islam." It is important to consider the negative influence of our words and deeds, particularly on social media. Just as reducing the potential effects of one's acts and words on society was a crucial teaching of our Prophet, peace be upon him, finding plausible reasons for your Muslims and not leaping to conclusions is a crucial social Sunnah. Understanding one's own limitations not only demonstrates humility but also enables one to connect with the various viewpoints of accomplished academics. Not every disagreement needs to be shared on social media, particularly when it comes to issues that call for a core understanding of the subject. Similarly, not every opposing viewpoint has to be openly disregarded and labelled as deviant or problematic. Calling out and branding people all the time makes the common Muslim think that it's normal to be wary of scholars and to contest with anything they have to say. There will always be certain scholars who have made really harsh statements against other people, but it must be remembered that these were published in publications that were mostly unavailable to the general audience. Generally speaking, you should apply the same standards of criticism to scholars you disagree with as you would to your own. If not, your criticism is unjust and raises the question of why you wouldn't tolerate the same attitude in yourself. The Quran, which says, "Be absolute witnesses upholding justice even if it is against yourselves," is the greatest source of guidance for us.

Spend More Time Outside Of Class Studying True students will always look for ways to improve their comprehension of a subject and widen their reading on it. It is extremely unlikely that you would obtain an in-depth comprehension of a subject by relying solely on what you have learnt in class. The teacher is like a guide who shows you how to explore the landscape of knowledge or navigate an ocean; he cannot teach you everything there is to know and does not have the ability to do so. I have never met an expert in any field who did not spend more time outside of class researching his area of expertise. If you want to excel in school, I recommend that you study on the side or after you finish your studies. Most students struggle to read advanced Arabic books on their own, which is likely one of the reasons they were unable to fully benefit from the classes during their study years. Another explanation is that they refused to admit that they had flaws in their studies and disregarded them until the years passed and they realised it was too late to go back a few years and improve themselves. A effective place to start is to reread and self-study the books you've already studied. This time, you will absorb more from the text in a shorter period of time.