uz
Feedback
Continuous Learning_Startup & Investment

Continuous Learning_Startup & Investment

Kanalga Telegramโ€™da oโ€˜tish

We journey together through the captivating realms of entrepreneurship, investment, life, and technology. This is my chronicle of exploration, where I capture and share the lessons that shape our world. Join us and let's never stop learning!

Ko'proq ko'rsatish
2 296
Obunachilar
-124 soatlar
-137 kunlar
-4130 kunlar
Postlar arxiv
"Selling work opens up markets that weren't attractive for software businesses" "Itโ€™s not about selling "virtual employees". It's about unbundling the specific tasks or outcomes that employees have traditionally performed, and selling those." https://www.sarahtavel.com/p/a-few-sell-work-not-software-updated#%C2%A7its-not-about-selling-virtual-employees-its-about-unbundling-the-specific-tasks-or-outcomes-that-employees-have-traditionally-performed-and-selling-those

It feels good in the moment for hotheads to call for retaliation but we have to think through the second-order consequences. The U.S. only has about 4,000 Tomahawk missiles in its inventory. We can do about a week of Shock & Awe. Then what? Are we going to send in ground troops? Iranโ€™s territory is vast, its forces are decentralized, and enough of its infrastructure is underground by now. It will also be supplied by China and Russia. In retaliation, our highly exposed bases in Syria and Iraq (which Neocons refused to remove, leading to this tragedy) will likely come under heavy fire; in fact our troops there are sitting ducks. Our carrier groups could even be targets. America will take meaningful casualties. Meanwhile, the Strait of Hormuz could be closed, compounding the situation in the Red Sea, causing a global oil shock. Assuming Iran wants to continue the war, we will have no exit strategy. Regime change will fail. We will be stuck in a new forever war. In fact, thereโ€™s a decent chance that we will get run out of large parts of the Middle East. https://x.com/davidsacks/status/1751707656262455559?s=46&t=h5Byg6Wosg8MJb4pbPSDow

GUI ->? ์Œ์„ฑ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๋Œ€ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋“ฏํ•œ UI: ํ…์ŠคํŠธ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์ด ์•„๋‹Œ ์Œ์„ฑ๊ณผ ์‹œ๊ฐ์ด ํ•ฉ์ณ์ง„ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด UI. ์น ํŒ์„ ๋†“๊ณ  ํ˜น์€ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€, ๋น„๋””์˜ค๋ฅผ ๋ณด๋ฉฐ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ๊ณผ ๋Œ€ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋“ฏํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ธํ„ฐํŽ˜์ด์Šค. GUI์‹œ์ ˆ์ด ๋Œ€ํ˜•๋งˆํŠธ ๋งค๋Œ€์— ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜๋“ค์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•ด๊ฐ€๋ฉฐ ๊ตฌ๋งคํ–ˆ๋‹ค๋ฉด, AI๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ œํ’ˆ๋“ค์ด ๋งŽ์•„์ง€๋ฉด ๋ฐฑํ™”์ ์— ๊ฐ€์„œ ์ƒ๋‹ด๋ฐ›์œผ๋ฉด์„œ ์ œํ’ˆ์„ ๊ตฌ๋งคํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ๊ฒฝํ—˜์ด ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์„๊นŒ. ์ผ๋ฐฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์šฉ๋„์—์„œ ๋Œ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ(์‚ฌ๋žŒ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ๋А๋‚„๋งŒํผ์˜ ๋งฅ๋ฝ์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ณ  ์•ฝ๊ฐ„์˜ ์นœ์ ˆํ•จ์ด ๊ฐ€๋ฏธ๋œ) ์„œ๋น„์Šค๋“ค์ด ๋” ๋‚˜์˜ค์ง€ ์•Š์„๊นŒ.

Generative AI created a renewed interest in text-based interfaces. For the first time in history, computers can truly "understand" natural language and respond to open-ended questions and poorly structured commands. For many, this was a callback to the UNIX philosophy as best articulated by @tszzl in his famous "Text is the Universal Interface" blog post that came out just a few months before ChatGPT. While tools like DALLE and Midjourney are entirely driven by text, many apps like RunwayML augmented traditional UIs with prompt-based generative AI. But actually, looking a little closer, you can start to see that Midjourney is growing its own JIT UI for controls inside the chat window. Some more recent examples of JIT UIs: - @perplexity_ai copilot where the AI can generate forms on the fly to get more information from the user to tune the search. - ChatGPT Code Interpreter and products like @JuliusAI_ that can show charts or, in some cases, entire UI. In computing, nothing ever is a silver bullet. Every new system creates new problems to solve and this one is no different. As we're all finding out, Chatbots present novel UX challenges, which were best articulated by @Wattenberger in "Why Chatbots Are Not the Future". And JIT UI introduces a new set of challenges, such as how to think about state and persistence. It's unclear that JIT UIs holds the answer, but it's a thread worth exploring. It's also unclear if this is the kind of thing that startups can innovate on, as it's predicated on having a platform, and UI innovations get copied super quickly. However, clearly, it's time to try and reimagine UI and solve some issues with GUIs that have plagued computing for decades! https://x.com/amasad/status/1749993684580593991?s=46&t=h5Byg6Wosg8MJb4pbPSDow

1. ๋ฐฑ์ข…์› ์”จ๊ฐ€ ์ฐฝ์—…ํ•œ์ง€ ๋ฌด๋ ค 30๋…„ ๋งŒ์— ์ƒ์žฅ(IPO)์„ ์ค€๋น„ ์ค‘์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ํ•œ๋‹ค. 2. ์ข€ ๋” ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋งํ•˜๋ฉด, ๋ฐฑ์ข…์› ์”จ๊ฐ€ ์ฐฝ์—…ํ•œ ๋”๋ณธ์ฝ”๋ฆฌ์•„๊ฐ€ ๊ณผ๊ฑฐ์—๋„ ์ƒ์žฅ์„ ์‹œ๋„ํ•œ ๋ฐ” ์žˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ์ฝ”๋กœ๋‚˜ ํŒฌ๋ฐ๋ฏน ๋“ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ƒ์žฅ์ด ์Šคํƒ‘๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค๊ฐ€, ์ด๋ฒˆ์— ๋‹ค์‹œ ๋„์ „ํ•œ๋‹ค๊ณ . 3. ์‚ฌ์—…์„ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•œ ํ›„๋ถ€ํ„ฐ, ๋†๋‹ด์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ โ€˜๋‹จ๊ธฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋นจ๋ฆฌ ์„ฑ์žฅํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๋ณด๋‹ค๋Š”, 30๋…„์„ ๋ˆ์งˆ๊ธฐ๊ฒŒ ์‚ด์•„๋‚จ์•„์„œ, ๊ทธ๋•Œ์ฏค ์ƒ์žฅํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํšŒ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ๋งŒ๋“œ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋ฐ”๋žจ์ด๋ผ๋ฉด ๋ฐ”๋žจ"์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๋ง์„ ์ข…์ข… ํ–ˆ๋Š”๋ฐ.. 4. ๋ฐฑ์ข…์› ์”จ์กฐ์ฐจ๋„ ์ƒ์žฅ๊นŒ์ง€ ๊ฐ€๋Š” ๋ฐ 30๋…„์ด ๊ฑธ๋ ธ๋‹ค๋‹ˆ ๊ดœํžˆ ๋งˆ์Œ์ด ๊ฒธํ—ˆํ•ด์กŒ๋‹ค. ์Šคํƒ€ํŠธ์—… ์”ฌ์— ์žˆ๋‹ค ๋ณด๋ฉด, ๋งˆ์น˜ ๋น ๋ฅธ ๊ฒŒ ์ง„๋ฆฌ์ด์ž ์„ ์ธ ๊ฒƒ์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ ๋А๊ปด์ง€์ง€๋งŒ, ์•ˆ์ •์ ์ธ ๊ธฐ์—…์„ ๋งŒ๋“œ๋Š” ๋ฐ๋Š” ์ƒ๊ฐ๋ณด๋‹ค ํ›จ์”ฌ ๋” ์˜ค๋žœ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•œ์ง€๋„ ๋ชจ๋ฅธ๋‹ค.