0/0

Kanalga Telegram’da o‘tish

0/0 = undefined A labyrinth of ideas, A diary of curiosities Bot: @contactzero_bot

Ko'proq ko'rsatish

Saudiya Arabistoni7 391 Din & Maʼnaviyat8 935...

📈 Telegram kanali 0/0 analitikasi

0/0 (@error0error) Arab til segmentidagi kanali faol ishtirokchi. Hozirda hamjamiyat 10 465 obunachidan iborat bo'lib, Din & Maʼnaviyat toifasida 8 935-o'rinni va Saudiya Arabistoni mintaqasida 7 391-o'rinni egallagan.

📊 Auditoriya ko‘rsatkichlari va dinamika

невідомо sanasidan buyon loyiha tez o‘sib, 10 465 obunachiga ega bo‘ldi.

13 Iyun, 2026 dagi oxirgi ma’lumotlarga ko‘ra kanal barqaror faollikka ega. Oxirgi 30 kunda obunachilar soni 343 ga, so‘nggi 24 soatda esa 5 ga o‘zgardi va umumiy qamrov yuqori darajada qolmoqda.

Tasdiqlash holati: Tasdiqlanmagan
Jalb etish (ER): Auditoriya o‘rtacha 15.92% darajada jalb etiladi. Nashrdan keyingi dastlabki 24 soatda kontent odatda umumiy obunachilar sonining 7.20% ini tashkil etuvchi reaksiyalarni to‘playdi.
Post qamrovi: Har bir post o‘rtacha 1 666 marta ko‘riladi; birinchi sutkada odatda 753 ta ko‘rish yig‘iladi.
Reaksiyalar va o‘zaro ta’sir: Auditoriya faol: har bir postga o‘rtacha 0 ta reaksiya keladi.
Tematik yo‘nalishlar: Kontent مُشَاعَرَة, رَجُل, ظِلّ, نِسَاءَة, اِبن kabi asosiy mavzularga jamlangan.

📝 Tavsif va kontent siyosati

Muallif resursni shaxsiy fikrni ifoda etish maydoni sifatida ta’riflaydi:
“0/0 = undefined A labyrinth of ideas, A diary of curiosities Bot: @contactzero_bot”

Yuqori yangilanish chastotasi (oxirgi ma’lumot 14 Iyun, 2026 da olingan) sababli kanal doimo dolzarb va katta qamrovli bo‘lib qoladi. Analitika auditoriya kontent bilan faol hamkorlik qilishini, uni Din & Maʼnaviyat toifasidagi muhim ta’sir nuqtasiga aylantirishini ko‘rsatadi.

10 465

Obunachilar

+524 soatlar

+717 kunlar

+34330 kunlar

1 666

Post ko'rishlar

~ 75324 soatlar

~ 88948 soatlar

15.92%

Muloqot nisbati

~ 4

Kuniga postlar

Ads index

beta

Postlar arxiv

10 474

You don't always get the chance to see the model behind a painting

10 474

By Dante Gabriel Rossetti

10 474

Repost from The Shire

Fig. 160. "The appearance of blood Vessels in the ears of a white rabbit." Experimental Pharmacology. 1917

10 474

To be clear, I used the term intellectuals to refer specifically to the (intelligentsia), while Zak uses the term in a more philosophical sense, I believe.

10 474

It runs counter to what I wrote a few months earlier, but it's a very compelling argument

10 474

https://t.me/conatis/19817

10 474

— أبو فراس الحمداني

10 474

Repost from خطّ يخطُّ

10 474

I present to you the top 0.01% of the top 0.01% :

10 474

BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street: These three firms, the Big Three as they are known in financial circles, effectively own American capitalism. No, I am not exaggerating. Most people have not heard of them but they have heard of the companies the Big Three own, which include America’s major airlines (American, Delta, United Continental), much of Wall Street (JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Citigroup) and car makers such as Ford and General Motors. Together, the Big Three are the largest single shareholder in almost 90% of firms listed in the New York Stock Exchange, including Apple, Microsoft, ExxonMobil, General Electric and Coca-Cola. As for the dollar value of the Big Three’s shares, it has too many zeros to mean much. At the time of writing, BlackRock manages nearly $10 trillion in investments, Vanguard $8 trillion and State Street $4 trillion. To make sense of these numbers: they are almost exactly the same as the US national income; or the sum of the national incomes of China and Japan; or the sum of the total income of the eurozone, the UK, Australia, Canada and Switzerland. — Technofeudalism, by Yanis Varoufakis

10 474

مو لهالدرجة بس يلا البلاسيبو هم يشتغل مرات

10 474

Bot: ﴿وَقَالَ أَي محمّد الرّازيّ: يَنبَغِي لِلطبِيب أَن يُوهم المَرِيض أَبدًا الصِّحَّة وَيرجّيه بهَا وَإِن كَانَ غَير وَاثق بِذلك فمزَاج الجِسم تَابع لِأخلَاق النَّفس﴾ - ابن جلجل، طبقَات الأطبّاء (420)

10 474

— Technofeudalism, by Yanis Varoufakis

10 474

What begins with us training Alexa to do things on our behalf soon spins out of our control into something that we can neither fathom nor regulate. For once we have trained its algorithm, and fed it data on our habits and desires, Alexa starts training us. How does it do this? It begins with soft nudges to provide it with more information about our whims, which it then tailors into access to videos, texts and music that we appreciate. Once it has won us over in this manner, we become more suggestible to its guidance. In other words, Alexa trains us to train it better. The next step is spookier: having impressed us with its capacity to appeal to our tastes, it proceeds to curate them. This it does by exposing us to images, texts and video experiences that it selects in order subtly to condition our whims. Before long, it is training us to train it to train us to train it to train us … ad infinitum.

10 474

what exactly is a device like Alexa? What does it actually do? If you ask Alexa, it will tell you it is a home-based virtual assistant technology, ready to accept your commands – to switch on the lights, order more milk, take down a note, call a friend, search the internet, tell jokes – to be, in short, your dedicated, eager mechanical servant. All true. Except that Alexa will never, ever tell you what it truly is: a tiny cog in a vast cloud-based network of power within which you are a mere node, a speck of digital dust, at best a plaything of forces beyond your comprehension or control.

10 474

Repost from Dabi🏴‍☠️

ي بعض الحالات، يتحول التشخيص الذاتي إلى هوية نفسية، فيبدأ الفرد يعرّف نفسه بالمرض الذي ظنّ أنه يعاني منه: “أنا مكتئب”، “أنا مصاب باضطراب الشخصية الحدّية”، بدل أن يرى نفسه كشخص يمرّ بتجربة عابرة قابلة للعلاج. هذا يعمّق الشعور بالعجز ويجعل الشفاء أكثر صعوبة.

10 474

Repost from Dabi🏴‍☠️

قراءة الأعراض النفسية ومحاولة مطابقتها مع الذات تؤدي أحيانًا إلى ما يسمى بـ القلق الصحي النفسي؛ أي أن الشخص يبدأ بتخيل الأعراض أو تضخيمها حتى يقتنع أنه مريض فعلًا، فيعيش في دائرة من الخوف والتوتر الدائمين دون سبب حقيقي.