0/0
前往频道在 Telegram
0/0 = undefined A labyrinth of ideas, A diary of curiosities Bot: @contactzero_bot
显示更多📈 Telegram 频道 0/0 的分析概览
频道 0/0 (@error0error) 阿拉伯语 语言赛道中的 是活跃参与者。目前社区聚集了 10 465 名订阅者,在 宗教与灵性 类别中位列第 8 935,并在 沙特阿拉伯 地区排名第 7 391 位。
📊 受众指标与增长动态
自 невідомо 创建以来,项目保持高速增长,吸引了 10 465 名订阅者。
根据 13 六月, 2026 的最新数据,频道保持稳定运转。过去 30 天订阅人数变化为 343,过去 24 小时变化为 5,整体触达仍然可观。
- 认证状态: 未认证
- 互动率 (ER): 平均受众互动率为 15.92%。内容发布后 24 小时内通常能获得 7.20% 的反应,占订阅者总量。
- 帖子覆盖: 每篇帖子平均可获得 1 666 次浏览,首日通常累积 753 次浏览。
- 互动与反馈: 受众积极参与,单帖平均反应数为 0。
- 主题关注点: 内容集中在 مُشَاعَرَة, رَجُل, ظِلّ, نِسَاءَة, اِبن 等核心主题上。
📝 描述与内容策略
作者将该频道定位为表达主观观点的平台:
“0/0 = undefined
A labyrinth of ideas,
A diary of curiosities
Bot: @contactzero_bot”
凭借高频更新(最新数据采集于 14 六月, 2026),频道始终保持新鲜度与高覆盖。分析显示受众积极互动,使其成为 宗教与灵性 类别中的关键影响点。
10 465
订阅者
+524 小时
+717 天
+34330 天
帖子存档
10 474
To be clear, I used the term intellectuals to refer specifically to the (intelligentsia), while Zak uses the term in a more philosophical sense, I believe.
10 474
BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street: These three firms, the Big Three as they are known in financial circles, effectively own American capitalism. No, I am not exaggerating.
Most people have not heard of them but they have heard of the companies the Big Three own, which include America’s major airlines (American, Delta, United Continental), much of Wall Street (JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Citigroup) and car makers such as Ford and General Motors. Together, the Big Three are the largest single shareholder in almost 90% of firms listed in the New York Stock Exchange, including Apple, Microsoft, ExxonMobil, General Electric and Coca-Cola.
As for the dollar value of the Big Three’s shares, it has too many zeros to mean much. At the time of writing, BlackRock manages nearly $10 trillion in investments, Vanguard $8 trillion and State Street $4 trillion. To make sense of these numbers: they are almost exactly the same as the US national income; or the sum of the national incomes of China and Japan; or the sum of the total income of the eurozone, the UK, Australia, Canada and Switzerland.
— Technofeudalism, by Yanis Varoufakis
10 474
Bot:
﴿وَقَالَ أَي محمّد الرّازيّ: يَنبَغِي لِلطبِيب أَن يُوهم المَرِيض أَبدًا الصِّحَّة وَيرجّيه بهَا وَإِن كَانَ غَير وَاثق بِذلك فمزَاج الجِسم تَابع لِأخلَاق النَّفس﴾
- ابن جلجل، طبقَات الأطبّاء (420)
10 474
What begins with us training Alexa to do things on our behalf soon spins out of our control into something that we can neither fathom nor regulate. For once we have trained its algorithm, and fed it data on our habits and desires, Alexa starts training us. How does it do this? It begins with soft nudges to provide it with more information about our whims, which it then tailors into access to videos, texts and music that we appreciate. Once it has won us over in this manner, we become more suggestible to its guidance. In other words, Alexa trains us to train it better. The next step is spookier: having impressed us with its capacity to appeal to our tastes, it proceeds to curate them. This it does by exposing us to images, texts and video experiences that it selects in order subtly to condition our whims. Before long, it is training us to train it to train us to train it to train us … ad infinitum.
10 474
what exactly is a device like Alexa? What does it actually do? If you ask Alexa, it will tell you it is a home-based virtual assistant technology, ready to accept your commands – to switch on the lights, order more milk, take down a note, call a friend, search the internet, tell jokes – to be, in short, your dedicated, eager mechanical servant.
All true. Except that Alexa will never, ever tell you what it truly is: a tiny cog in a vast cloud-based network of power within which you are a mere node, a speck of digital dust, at best a plaything of forces beyond your comprehension or control.
现已上线!2025 年 Telegram 研究 — 年度关键洞察 
