Stephon Rudd
Kanalga Telegram’da o‘tish
1 173
Obunachilar
Ma'lumot yo'q24 soatlar
-37 kunlar
-2230 kunlar
Ma'lumot yuklanmoqda...
O'xshash kanallar
Taglar buluti
Kirish va chiqish esdaliklari
---
---
---
---
---
---
Obunachilarni jalb qilish
Iyun '26
Iyun '26
+6
0 kanalda
May '26
+4
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '26
+5
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '26
+7
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '26
+2
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '26
+7
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '25
+3
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '25
+3
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '25
+7
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Sentabr '25
+4
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '25
+2
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '25
+3
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '25
+1
0 kanalda
Get PRO
May '25
+2
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '250
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '25
+1
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '250
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '25
+3
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '240
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '24
+5
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '24
+1
1 kanalda
Get PRO
Sentabr '24
+13
1 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '24
+8
1 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '24
+25
1 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '24
+14
1 kanalda
Get PRO
May '24
+7
1 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '24
+5
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '24
+8
1 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '24
+8
1 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '24
+8
1 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '23
+2
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '23
+7
1 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '23
+103
2 kanalda
Get PRO
Sentabr '23
+5
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '23
+15
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '23
+9
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '23
+12
0 kanalda
Get PRO
May '23
+10
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '23
+21
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '23
+19
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '23
+28
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '23
+44
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '22
+17
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '22
+197
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '22
+7
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Sentabr '22
+15
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '22
+16
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '22
+34
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '22
+18
0 kanalda
Get PRO
May '22
+30
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '22
+44
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '22
+104
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '22
+27
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '22
+98
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '21
+105
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '21
+182
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '21
+1 650
0 kanalda
| Sana | Obunachilarni jalb qilish | Esdaliklar | Kanallar | |
| 27 Iyun | 0 | |||
| 26 Iyun | 0 | |||
| 25 Iyun | 0 | |||
| 24 Iyun | 0 | |||
| 23 Iyun | 0 | |||
| 22 Iyun | 0 | |||
| 21 Iyun | 0 | |||
| 20 Iyun | +1 | |||
| 19 Iyun | 0 | |||
| 18 Iyun | 0 | |||
| 17 Iyun | 0 | |||
| 16 Iyun | +1 | |||
| 15 Iyun | +2 | |||
| 14 Iyun | 0 | |||
| 13 Iyun | 0 | |||
| 12 Iyun | 0 | |||
| 11 Iyun | 0 | |||
| 10 Iyun | 0 | |||
| 09 Iyun | 0 | |||
| 08 Iyun | 0 | |||
| 07 Iyun | 0 | |||
| 06 Iyun | +1 | |||
| 05 Iyun | 0 | |||
| 04 Iyun | +1 | |||
| 03 Iyun | 0 | |||
| 02 Iyun | 0 | |||
| 01 Iyun | 0 |
Kanal postlari
THE BEAST PT 11: I'm not alone in believing the little horn that uproots the 3 big horns in Daniel 7 prophecy was connected to the rise of the Papacy. It turns out that this was a very common belief amongst the protestant church in the 4th and 5th centuries, spanning all the way until the 18th century.
In other words, before the 1800's protestant Christian believed Revelation was already fulfilled for the most part, and that Daniel 7 and Revelation 17 as it pertained to the 10 horns and 10 mountains, referred to the Papacy in Western Rome.
Yes there were still emperors, but by the time of the 4th century, Rome was divided. The empire was fractured, and Emperors were phasing out. Now the Catholics were taking over, and they were dominating everything, trying to take new territory.
It wasn't until the Rothschilds arose to power that Revelation and Daniel prophecies got converted into futurist applications. That's a long sidebar that I'll have to leave alone for now.
I said there were 10 kingdoms, right? I named them, said they were against Christians. Well 3 of them were not. They were the Heruli, the Vandals and the Ostrogoths. These 3 kingdoms were Arian Christians that resisted the rise of the Catholics authority and power.
In 493 AD Emperor Zeno of Rome under the Papacy wiped them out. In 533 AD the Vandals were wiped out by Emperor Justinian. And in 538 the Ostrogoths when Emperor Justinian gave the power of the last western Rome tribe to the Bishop of Rome.
3 horns, uprooted by the one...the Papacy. In 538 AD began the power of the Papacy and it went on until 1798 AD when French General Louis Alexandre Berthier captured Pope Pius VI. The historcists believed back then that this fulfilled the prophecy spoken of by John in Revelation 13:3, where the beast suffered a mortal wound.
The reality is Revelation is not always in a straight line. That's why it's never been understood. John was caught up in several visions and several different times. It was not all in the same vision. We study it as if it's one linear visitation because we like stories.
But it was different prophecies, for different times, jumping from future to past without respect of your ability to follow along. The Papacy obviously came back. If the "mortal wound" to the head of the beast is the papacy falling in 1798 AD, then it's revival is definitely what we are seeing now.
Imagine that. The papacy fell in 1798 AD. And a few years later in the 1800's, this books of prophecy magically got reinterpreted to hide the fact that most of this had already happened. Why? Because if they did not do this, we would never know the demonic history of the Papacy.
But the exposure is coming now. I have more but I will let you all freak out over what I just said for a while before I continue.
| 2 | THE BEAST PT 10: "So he carried me away in the Spirit into the wilderness. And I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast which was full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns. The woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet, and adorned with gold and precious stones and pearls, having in her hand a golden cup full of abominations and the filthiness of her fornication." Revelation 17: 3-4
We know the beast is Rome. We know the heads are kings. But what are the horns and what is the harlot? Check this out. Look at what it says in verse 12:
"The ten horns which you saw are ten kings who have received no kingdom as yet, but they receive authority for one hour as kings with the beast.”
It took me a long time to figure this one out. I had to do some deep digging. The 10 horns were 10 kings that were way off into the future. This part was talking about something that would happen long after the Temple fell.
What's interesting is the beast is present in the prophecy in both the current (of that time) AND the way off future, even though the end of the age happened long before the 10 kings were to come.
Now I didn't know that the 10 kings were off into the distance until I did some research. But that means the harlot ALSO might have tentacles beyond the end of the age. Then I stumbled on the Barbarian Kingdoms period of Rome in the 4th and 5th centuries.
I was surprised to learn that it was fragmented into 10 kingdoms:
1. Alemanni
2. Franks
3. Burgundians
4. Vandals
5. Suevi
6. Visigoths
7. Ostrogoths
8. Lombards
9. Heruli
10. Anglo-Saxons
10 tribes of Western Rome that were brutal and vicious to Christians during the last years of the Roman empire before it fell. By this century there were no more Emperors, there was the Papacy. Yes...the Catholics.
I will take a break before I get into this but I believe Daniel John was prophesying the rise of heresy (the harlot) during the rise of Catholicism. Clutch your pearls, curse me out, but I will be back to go deeper to those who are not hissing at me... | 49 |
| 3 | THE BEAST PT 9: 5 dead kings, the 6th king is on the throne, the 7th king will be short, but the eighth goes to perdition...this is what John prophesied in Revelation 17:9-11. So there was a king who was on the throne at that time, he was referring to.
Seeing that Revelation was written in the mid to late 60 AD period, he was talking about the leaders of that time. So I started searching. How many kings came and went before the 60's AD period? You know what shocked me?
1. Julius Caesar
2. Augustus
3. Tiberius
4. Caligula
5. Claudius
All 5 of these emperors of Rome had come and died before the 60's AD period. Now, arguably, Julius was not an emperor. Rome was still a Republic controlled by the voice of the people, not a dictator.
However, since Julius became a dictator during that time, he is considered the pioneer of the Roman Empire when they left a republic governorship and moved into a dictatorship. However, from Julius to Claudius, all 5 dictators of Rome oppressed the Jews.
Which leaves the 6th Emperor of Rome...Nero. Ironically, his name in Gematria spells 666, which matches "the number of his name" prophecy. But there's more. He is known as the Roman ruler who oppressed Christians to insane levels, to the levels described in Revelation.
And John wrote that Revelation during Nero's reign. Interesting how secular history never tracks back to biblical history? This is by design. I digress. So the 6th one was, and then he was not, then there was a 7th king that would come later, who was the same as the eighth.
What was John talking about? Oh, he was talking about "Year of the Four Emperors" in 69 AD. That was the year when the Emperors all tried to regain control of Rome and stabilize the people, and kept getting killed for it.
The 7th years were Galba, then Otho, Vitellius, and then Vespasian. He was the Emperor in 70 AD when he ordered his son Titus to burn down Jerusalem and the temple. Now I want you to think about this.
3 emperors quickly came and died in rapid succession in 69 AD. These 3 were considered the 7th king in John's prophecy since they were different than the others and had a very short time in power. But Vespasian, the eighth, went to perdition as soon as he went into power.
You know what perdition means in the Greek? It's a word "apoleia" which literally means "destruction." I saw this and was like wow. The very year of the temple destruction, exactly 40 years (God's number dramatic changes to systems and orders) after Jesus ascended, and according to John in Revelation...Vespasian went to perdition.
Meaning, he destroyed the temple. And if we go back to the other prophecies by Jesus in Mathew 24 and 25, that was the sign that marked the end of the age.
The beast is Rome. The heads on the beast are the Kings that gradually ushered in the destruction of the sacrificial age, the 8th actually destroyed it, but now we need to know something. What are the 10 horns described in Revelation 17:12?
This is where it gets interesting. People will get pissed off at me from this point on...if they aren't already. I will take my time still, you will know that I'm done when I put FINAL in the title... | 45 |
| 4 | THE BEAST PT 8: The man of perdition. This is where bible prophecy goes off the rails. We are looking for one man who will appear and stand in the temple, David, and declare himself God. Not minding...that this, too, in the prophecy was symbolism, not literal.
Moving right along. The man of perdition is seen as the antichrist. But the truth is, there are many antichrists, but only one beast. Let's go to scripture again:
“Here is the mind which has wisdom: The seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman sits. There are also seven kings. Five have fallen, one is, and the other has not yet come. And when he comes, he must continue for a short time. The beast that was, and is not, is himself also the eighth, and is of the seven, and is going to perdition.” Revelation 17:9-11
Let's break this down because THIS is WAY MORE than meets the eye. First, John says a wise person will understand this, implying that foolish people will get it wrong.
He said, "The seven heads are mountains on which the woman sits," referencing the 7 heads of the beast. But look what happens next. John literally interprets his OWN words when he said: "There are also seven kings." Ah, so the 7 heads represent 7 kings.
Let's continue, "Five have fallen, one is, and the other has not yet come." Remember this, this is a big key. "And when he comes, he must continue a short time." Stop. So there are 7 kings, 5 have already died, and the 6th one is the "one," meaning he is the current king at that time.
You following me so far? Then he says "and when he comes, he must continue a short time. The beast that was, and is not, is himself also the eighth, and is of the seven, and is going to perdition. This is big people.
Check this out. I will tell you what it means, then I will support it with evidence. The Writer was saying 7 kings ride the beast, 5 are already dead, the 6 one is there now at that time, and the seven will come but not for a long time.
So the eighth is the one going to perdition. Let this sink in, I will blow your mind in the next post... | 47 |
| 5 | THE BEAST PT 7: The age has its foundation. The age in scripture referred to "the age of sacrifice," not the end of the world. So when the Temple was destroyed in 70 AD, it was the end of the age.
That's why the Writer of Hebrews (written around 70 AD) spoke of Jesus being with them once at the end of the age. So if this was the age, that means Revelation or the prophecy of it, had to have happened entirely or at least mostly before 70 AD.
Which means the "man of perdition" has already come and gone. Which redefines "the beast." This is the part that really interested me. What was the beast? Yes...I said "what," not "who," because the beast is not a person, it's a system.
But what system was it? Rome. And I have proof.
“Here is the mind which has wisdom: The seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman sits. There are also seven kings. Five have fallen, one is, and the other has not yet come. And when he comes, he must continue for a short time. The beast that was, and is not, is himself also the eighth, and is of the seven, and is going to perdition.” Revelation 17:9-11
This is a famous passage in the prophecy, close to the end of the age, where we start moving into the millennial reign of Christ. For years, people have taken this scripture literally and think there will be a creature that actually looks like that.
Then there are the people who believe it's symbolic but referencing nations of people in the system. You know what I think the beast is? Rome. Wait until you see how Rome fits perfectly with the symbolism of the beast... | 49 |
| 6 | THE BEAST PT 6: John prophesied the end of the ages in Revelation. Daniel in the 7th chapter. More on this later. Back to the ages. Jesus talked about the ages in Matthew 24 and 25.
In Mathew 24:3, the disciples asked Jesus when the destruction of the temple would occur. Jesus always spoke to them literally, telling those people what they personally would encounter. In verse 3, they asked Jesus, "Tell us, when will these things be, and what will be the sign of Your coming, and of the end of the age?"
Keep in mind, these are not metaphors or figures of speech. Also, keep in mind the culture. For 1000's of years, the temple was significant to the salvation of the people. Without the temple, there was nowhere for them to do animal sacrifices so that they could get atonement for that year.
So with Jesus telling them this temple will be destroyed, the cultural connection is immediate, and the fear sets in. The disciples are saying wait, how will you forgive our sins if we can't bring you a sacrifice? The temple being destroyed eliminates that ability.
Jesus tells them it will happen at the end of the age. The temple was still standing. Jesus told them they would know the end of the age when the temple is destroyed...that happened 40 years later. I digress...
Think about what I just said. Jesus goes on a 40-day wilderness fast. Moses went to the mountain for 40 days. Noah built an ark, and it rained for 40 days. God raised Jesus from the dead, and He stayed on earth for 40 days.
It was around 30 AD when Jesus said these words in Mathew 24. 40 years later, God's famous number, the temple was destroyed, marking the end of the age of animal sacrifice. This is why Jesus said, "It is finished," In John 19:30.
His death after a perfect life was the start...of the end times. It was the start of the end of the age...of animal sacrifices for atonement. Someone said, "But you said this was about the beast!" It is.
But if you don't even understand what age means in scripture, you will never understand what I have to say next. But now, if you heard me, what I will say next will hit like a Mack truck.... | 52 |
| 7 | THE BEAST PT 5: The end of the age wasn't just a play on words. It had an actual meaning. When it was used in scripture by Jesus and the prophets, it was a promise. Jesus told the 11 that He will be there until the end of the age...physically.
Even though He left shortly after saying that, He meant that physically. I can leave my kids at home and go to the store. But my kids are secured because they know that shortly, I will return, and with goodies.
Scripture tells us EXACTLY when the age was over. But first, I need to correct myself. There's actually another age. Adam was created, it was the age of perfection. No need for redemption. Then the age of the fall, we needed animal sacrifice for redemption.
Now we are in the age of grace, faith in Jesus for redemption. Hebrews 9:26 tells us that Jesus was the end of the ages (the perfection, and the fall).
“But as it is, he has appeared once for all at the end of the ages to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.” Hebrews 9:26. There's that word again, same meaning. The writer (because it's not clear of Paul wrote this or not) literally said that Jesus has ALREADY APPEARED at the end and DURING the end of the 2 ages (at that current time).
He did not say "He WILL appear." The writer said it already happened. And he said Jesus did it once for all at the end of the ages. What is he talking about? Acts 1. Acts 1 shows what words Jesus said to the 11 disciples in the 28th chapter of Mathew before His ascension.
But what else does it tell us? That Jesus was still on the earth for 40 days AFTER His resurrection, doing miracles. So The Writer was saying paraprasingly, you all SAW what Jesus did around you all after his resurrection before He went back to heaven.
The Writer called that 40-day period on earth as Jesus appearing during the end of the ages. What's interesting is whoever wrote the book of Hebrews wrote around 70 AD...the exact time that the Romans besieged Jerusalem and burned the temple to the ground... | 58 |
| 8 | THE BEAST PT 4: The end of age does not translate into "the end of time" or "the end of the world." The Greek word for "age" is "aion" which means "era" or "dispensation." Now I know I said dispensationalism is heresy and it still is.
The idea that God changes His mind about how He deals with our sin nature problem based on dispensation is heresy. But dispensations of how MAN is to attain right standing with God is biblical. There are only 2 dispensations in scripture.
Sacrificial works done by the priest every year to find right standing with God, and then believing in the Priest who sacrificed for us once. We are in the latter of the dispensation. So 2 dispensations; there is no third.
I will say that differently. Two ages, there is no third. Jesus was on the earth during the first age, the age of animal sacrifice for favor. He was talking to people IN that age and letting them know "I will not leave you physically or stop visiting you physically until this age is finally over.
This is what Jesus was saying them here and I say that with proof....from scripture... | 59 |
| 9 | THE BEAST PT 3: I'm going to say this first, and then we can argue about it later in the comments section. We need to address Mathew 24 and 28. We will start with "the end of the age" misinterpretation.
First of all the bible prophecy gatekeepers always change this word "age" into "world" and they do this so that they can throw around the words "end times." End times has been associated with a time in the future where the world has to end so that God can reign.
I'm not negating that God will reign over the earth, but I will argue that Jesus was not talking about this in Mathew 24 or 28. Let's go to scripture. Mathew 28:20.
God just raised Jesus from the dead (no, that's not a typo, see Romans 10:8-9 for further reference). He's standing before His 11 disciples. Scripture says some believed, some did not, that it was Jesus.
Jesus speaks a few words to them, and at the end He says something no one really addresses. He says "I am with you always, to the end of the age." The end of the age. Keep in mind, Jesus was LITERALLY STANDING in front of them when He said that. He said He would not PHYSICALLY LEAVE them until the END of the age.
The scholars have turned this statement into a figure of speech, much like they did Mathew 24. But He meant that literally. So this means Jesus had a different meaning of "age" than the modern church does.
And that's exactly what we are about to discuss next... | 64 |
| 10 | THE BEAST PT 2: The first thing I want to point out is that the beast isn't a person, it's a system. But it's more than that...we will park here and return to it later.
This conversation cannot continue without stating my obvious point. I use to be a futurist, meaning all of Revelation was for a future series of events. After so many red pills not very long ago (like 2 or 3 years) I became a partial preterist.
That means I thought some or most parts of Revelation has been fulfilled, others are to happen later. But now? I don't know what I am at the moment. I don't know because the more I read Revelation and Daniel, the more I realize that none of these things are literal.
I mean NONE. Even the description of heaven...not literal. That's a topic all to itself that only makes sense as you realize that God was using symbolism throughout the entire prophecy to illustrate His work in the earth.
So whether I am a partial preterist or something else, I will just have to go with the information presented to me, stay away from the gatekeepers of bible prophecy who are designed to keep you boxed in to their control and influence, and make my determinations based on the most logical conclusions.
My next post begins the drama. Buckle up. | 69 |
| 11 | THE BEAST PT 1: Before I begin this thread will start by saying that I will take my time with it. There is a lot of information to unpack, way more than this thread can hold, and I need to package this in a way that gives you the most key points of my argument, without conflating the topic with TMI.
When I make these posts I will ignore the pushback until I am finished the thread. No, I'm not running from "exposure" by ignoring the arguments, I am merely staying focused until I finished my conclusion.
But I want to talk about the beast in revelation and the implications of it. We will not only use scripture to discuss this but also secular history and information. Some Christians are going to clutch their pearls at that statement.
No, I'm not becoming Catholic and I do believe the bible is final and needs no outside validation to be accurate. But I will use secular information to support my arguments and conclusions based on scripture.
This one will not be all delivered in a few minutes. It may take all day but stay tuned...it's coming. | 79 |
| 12 | This is what it looks like when people lose the argument of facts. These are the kinds of people Candace Owens, Alex Jones and Tucker "CIA" Carlson attract. | 98 |
| 13 | I think we are seeing this now. Notice how Trump said this almost on the delta of this post? It's part of the plan... | 128 |
| 14 | I have been watching Fall of the Cabal series again, part 2 as well. Hours and hours of red pills. Soon I realized I had forgotten what this was all about. It was about the children this whole time.
And we are going to get back to discussing this moving forward. | 132 |
| 15 | It's interesting how that UFC fighter said Michelle Obama was a man with the world watching. Did you see how fast the proof videos started circling social media?
Its starting to look like someone who's part of the plan told him to say that to start the exposure while the world was watching. | 266 |
| 16 | I just wanted to share with you my Truth Social handle. I will not return to FB.
Just here and truth, and I'll use X sometimes as well. I will mirror my posts from Telegram to Truth.
https://truthsocial.com/@StephonRudd | 234 |
| 17 | Let me explain what we are seeing here. There are a ton of videos of black people raging and fighting all over the place. It seems like no events is safe anymore.
Lately it's been so bad that it's making us blacks with higher education and better etiquette look bad. I mean REALLY bad. I really can't get too upset at people who don't encounter us much to think we are all alike.
Let me say this guys and gals. If we are to fix this problem we need to first remove the race from the equation. We have to remember that what we are seeing is not the downfall of the black race, but a telltale sign of the fall of democracy.
Black people in recent history (the last 50 to 60 years) have voted Democrat. They are liberals. It's not different than all of these riots by Antifa that are mostly white, or the vagina hat wearing morons that stood out front of the White House fighting for rights to murder their babies.
We are systematically seeing the RESULTS of liberal ideology turning people's minds to mush. And the only solution is to beat these people, and shut down everything they have done and frankily...the party needs to be arrested.
All of them. | 205 |
| 18 | https://x.com/EricLDaugh/status/2066477260295520622?s=20 | 180 |
| 19 | I locked the group down that makes commenting possible. We will get this channel back under control, we have lots to talk about.
I just left vacation bible school day 2 with the family and I feel refreshed. | 191 |
| 20 | Black peeing on Metcaff's grave, fools in the streets doing crazy things...you don't find it strange that a camera always seems to find these people? And good quality records too.
Stay alert, people. We are witnessing another paid event similar to the George Floyd event. Except this time someone was really killed. George Floyd...that was an actor. The real one died in Corpis Christi, Texas 3 years before the one we saw died.
That's a subject for another day though. | 181 |
Endi mavjud! Telegram Tadqiqoti 2025 — yilning asosiy insaytlari 
