Stephon Rudd

There are 3 terms in forensics that people need to understand: 1. Identification 2. Elimination 3. Inconclusive These are three important words because if you don’t understand them you’ll run around repeating misinformation. Identification is when the forensic scientist positively found the evidence to match whatever they are matching it with. Elimination is when they found that it did NOT match whatever they are matching it with. Inconclusive is when they do not have enough survived evidence to determine one way or another. They concluded the bullet fragments as inconclusive. They did NOT say it was “eliminated” which would mean the bullet frag didn’t match. It was inconclusive which is NORMAL when a bullet hits a solid object and breaks up into small pieces. If this bullet had gone into Charlie cleanly without ricochet, there would be PLENTY of evidence to determine the forensics. But the fact that the podcasters are running around saying “see the bullet didn’t match” tells me they don’t read enough. They need to put the camera down and pick up a book, learn some things, before the speak…because they sound really ignorant and getting applause from fans who know even less them them. Shameful. So does the bullet match? No one knows. HOWEVER, that piece of evidence means very little. Dad said he did it. Mom said he did it. Ex boyfriend said he did it. They have Tyler’s phone HE said he did it. I mean dang what do you people need? A visitation form the Messiah showing you a replay of what happened when no one was looking? He did it. Stop this foolishness.