uz
Feedback
Data Scientology

Data Scientology

Kanalga Telegram’da oā€˜tish

Hot data science related posts every hour. Chat: https://telegram.me/r_channels Contacts: @lgyanf

Ko'proq ko'rsatish
1 144
Obunachilar
Ma'lumot yo'q24 soatlar
Ma'lumot yo'q7 kunlar
-830 kunlar
Obunachilarni jalb qilish
Iyul '26
Iyul '26
+1
0 kanalda
Iyun '26
+6
0 kanalda
Get PRO
May '26
+4
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '26
+30
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '26
+40
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '26
+36
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '26
+13
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '25
+10
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '25
+7
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '25
+4
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Sentabr '25
+3
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '25
+8
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '25
+10
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '25
+10
0 kanalda
Get PRO
May '25
+9
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '25
+3
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '25
+7
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '25
+3
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '25
+4
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '24
+6
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '24
+2
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '24
+8
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Sentabr '24
+8
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '24
+11
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '24
+13
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '24
+11
0 kanalda
Get PRO
May '24
+10
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '24
+12
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '24
+20
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '24
+19
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '24
+19
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '23
+17
6 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '23
+23
3 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '23
+27
3 kanalda
Get PRO
Sentabr '23
+21
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '23
+9
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '23
+18
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '23
+20
0 kanalda
Get PRO
May '23
+26
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '23
+53
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '23
+15
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '23
+12
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '23
+18
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '22
+31
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '22
+14
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '22
+47
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Sentabr '22
+45
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '22
+18
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '22
+18
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '22
+18
0 kanalda
Get PRO
May '22
+27
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '22
+43
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '22
+47
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '22
+89
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '22
+57
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '21
+36
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '21
+27
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '21
+43
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Sentabr '21
+64
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '21
+55
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '21
+28
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '21
+26
0 kanalda
Get PRO
May '21
+29
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '21
+26
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '21
+49
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '21
+21
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '21
+45
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '20
+882
0 kanalda
Sana
Obunachilarni jalb qilish
Esdaliklar
Kanallar
10 Iyul0
09 Iyul+1
08 Iyul0
07 Iyul0
06 Iyul0
05 Iyul0
04 Iyul0
03 Iyul0
02 Iyul0
01 Iyul0
Kanal postlari
Hyperparameter tuning approach question R I am doing some work with cell type classification, where I have 4.3 million cells and 512 features (condensed embeddings from the encoder of a transformer). The broader goal is to implement a contextual bandit for augmenting the training set of the dataset, as it is currently imbalanced, and rare cell type classification is poor when I tried a baseline logistic regression classifier. Dataset: Feature matrix shape: (4290471, 512) Labels shape: (4290471,) Class distribution: T cell 1966941 DC 858451 NK cell 561904 Monocyte 411170 B cell 375882 Platelet 54576 Progenitor cell 24689 ILC 24254 Erythrocyte 12604 I didn't do any hyperparameter tuning for the LR classifier, but I want to try other ML models (LightGBM, XGBoost, SVM) However, I face a bottleneck with hyperparameter tuning. I want to do 80/10/10 train/validate/test split, but the training set is so large and takes a long time even on H100. What are some solutions to this? I tried optuna but still very long for each hyperparameter trial. I then tried optuna but instead of using the full 80% for training each time, only 15% of the 80% is used (subsampling from the training set). I'm not sure if this is robust or not. I also couldn't really find anything in the literature. Anyone been in a similar situation? https://redd.it/1usa46w @datascientology

2
TorchJD: Training with multiple losses in PyTorch P Hi everyone! I wanted to share some recent progress on TorchJD that might be useful to the machine learning community. When training models with multiple losses (multiple tasks, constraints, auxiliary losses, regularization terms, etc.), you typically have two options: Scalarization: Various ways to combine those losses into a single loss (e.g. average them or combine them with trainable weights); then you can do gradient descent on it. Jacobian descent: Compute the Jacobian of the vector of losses (i.e. one gradient per loss), and aggregate it into an update vector that will decrease each individual loss (rather than just the average loss). There are many ways to do this aggregation step. Scalarization methods are generally cheaper in memory, but in some cases there is so much disagreement between your objectives that it's better to use a Jacobian descent method. In any case, thanks to our amazing new contributors, we've now finally implemented most existing methods of the literature from both categories into our library TorchJD, so that you can try anything in just a few line changes! Recently, TorchJD has been accepted into the PyTorch ecosystem, and we're trying to make it become the go-to library for training with multiple losses. If you'd like to help build the future of the project, come join us on Discord (link can be found in the readme of the repo). New ideas, contributions, bug reports, experiments, and any form of feedback are all welcome. We have many ideas on how to make all this even more efficient, and we will need help for that. If you want to support us, a star on GitHub also helps a lot! https://redd.it/1upzxk2 @datascientology
36
3
I trained a local AI model that generated 22,000+ novel drug-like molecules — verified against 4.6M known compounds. Dataset available. Built an 80M parameter causal transformer on consumer hardware (RTX 5070), trained on MOSES + ZINC-250k. Generated and filtered for QED ≄ 0.5, SA ≤ 4.0, MW ≤ 500. Top compound hits QED 0.947. 100% novel against MOSES, ZINC, and ChEMBL. HuggingFace: https://huggingface.co/datasets/MKEChem/mke-novel-druglike-smiles Happy to answer questions about the generation method. https://redd.it/1uojccn @datascientology
60
4
Books/Resources to improve mathematical foundations for ML research D I am a mid to late stage PhD student in ML. I've known this before, but only recently I started feeling this urgently: my mathematical foundations are shaky, because I kept "learning-things-as-I-go" when working on various problems. I likely have only a year or two left until I graduate, and before I do so, I want to really dedicate some time and focus to brush up on the fundamentals. Primarily, I want to improve my knowledge in Linear Algebra, Probability Theory, and Functional Analysis. For Lin. alg., I am looking at "Linear Algebra done right", and I think this book is sufficient for the topic, unless anyone thinks otherwise. I am not sure where to start for probability, as well as functional analysis. Rudin's books give me headaches. I instead started reading "A primer on RKHS" (https://arxiv.org/abs/1408.0952) to "dip my toe" into functional analysis. Apart from the above, I might re-read PRML book (I've only read specific chapters before), and try to finish Pat Kidger's Just-Know-Stuff list (https://kidger.site/thoughts/just-know-stuff). Thoughts? Anyone have any book/resource recommendations? Someone told me to look into "the bright side of mathematics" on YouTube, anyone ever go through the videos there? I'm aware finding good, digestible resources is less than 10% of the challenge. The difficult part is sticking through and actually reading/working through these topics, while still juggling other academic responsibilities. https://redd.it/1ulmy9g @datascientology
78
5
WIP: Currently building an app to teach (French) sign language using computer vision https://redd.it/1uk1lk7 @datascientology
WIP: Currently building an app to teach (French) sign language using computer vision https://redd.it/1uk1lk7 @datascientology
91
6
A physical, working LeNet-1 (1989) built from transparent PCBs, glass and aluminium. https://redd.it/1uhr1g1 @datascientology
A physical, working LeNet-1 (1989) built from transparent PCBs, glass and aluminium. https://redd.it/1uhr1g1 @datascientology
101
7
+3
Matn yo'q...
131
8
ShadeNet 28M — Dual-mode PBR material estimation from any RGB image https://redd.it/1ufmhd4 @datascientology
102
9
DeepSWE: new benchmark looking at how well today's frontier models can actually write code R DeepSWE delivers four advances over existing public benchmarks: Contamination free: Tasks are written from scratch, not adapted from existing commits or PRs, so no model has seen the solution during pretraining. High diversity: Tasks span a broad pool of 91 repositories across 5 languages. Real-world complexity: Prompts are \~half the length of SWE-bench Pro's, yet solutions require 5.5x more code and \~2x more output tokens. Reliable verification: Verifiers are hand-written to test software behavior rather than implementation details. The result is a benchmark that reflects how today's frontier coding agents actually perform in software engineering work. https://preview.redd.it/lacvagyr159h1.png?width=1373&format=png&auto=webp&s=6514340a15d51d7f03da733f08fb3f6a302cac75 It's open-source: https://github.com/datacurve-ai/deep-swe https://redd.it/1ue0hlp @datascientology
109
10
I've also been looking for the plane! https://redd.it/1ucd6rd @datascientology
I've also been looking for the plane! https://redd.it/1ucd6rd @datascientology
102
11
C++ tracker for small aerial targets https://redd.it/1u9eder @datascientology
C++ tracker for small aerial targets https://redd.it/1u9eder @datascientology
128
12
Next-Latent Prediction Transformers R Microsoft Research Preprint Next-token prediction is myopic. What if transformers learn to predict their own next latent state? Microsoft Research presentĀ Next-Latent Prediction (NextLat): a self-supervised learning method that teaches transformers to form compact world models for reasoning and planning. It also unlocks up to 3.3x faster inference via self-speculative decoding! On top of next-token prediction, NextLat trains the transformer to predict its own next latent state given the current latent state and next token. NextLat has a few key benefits: 1. Representation Learning: NextLat encourages transformers to compress history into compact belief states. 2. Better Data Efficiency: predicting in latent space provides denser supervision than predicting one-hot tokens. 3. Faster Inference: via recursive multi-step lookahead. I'm super excited about this work. Please do check it out below: šŸ’¬ Blog:Ā https://jaydenteoh.github.io/blog/2026/nextlat šŸ’» Code:Ā https://github.com/JaydenTeoh šŸ“ Paper:Ā https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.05963 https://redd.it/1u84mio @datascientology
115
13
How does the ML community view evolutionary algorithm research? Career implications of an EA PhD? D How does the ML research community feel about evolutionary algorithms? Should I do a PhD in this area? Quick remark: I know some people in the ML community dunk on evolutionary algorithms because there’s often a better optimizer, but they do have their place, which is what researchers in my community aim to quantify. Background: I just finished my first year as a mathematics master’s student working on the theory of evolutionary algorithms (EAs)/randomized search heuristics. I’m fortunate to be on a research assistantship and have already coauthored several papers in strong conferences in our area. I’ve always been more interested in classical ML/deep learning theory but haven’t had anyone to work with. Researchers in my field, including my advisor, occasionally publish in mainstream ML venues such as AAAI and NeurIPS, but it’s primarily the EA venues. For a while now, I’ve been independently studying deep learning and statistical learning theory, and I have found intersections with my current research that I plan to pursue for my thesis. With my current CV, it’s looking like I could get into some of the best PhD programs in my area, but I’m wondering if I should try to go to a more ML-centric PhD, even if it means going to a less prestigious institution/group for the sake of my career. I’m not sure yet what I want to do after my PhD and a possible postdoc, but I want to keep myself competitive for top-tier opportunities. What implications might doing an EA PhD have for my career? With strong EA publications, could I get into a good ML PhD program if I pitch myself appropriately? Could staying somewhat outside mainstream ML actually be a good career move, given how competitive and crowded ML has become? https://redd.it/1u66q3l @datascientology
112
14
Which software or tools are used to make these kinds of diagrams or animations? https://redd.it/1u3bh7r @datascientology
Which software or tools are used to make these kinds of diagrams or animations? https://redd.it/1u3bh7r @datascientology
110
15
Introducing Papers Without Code P Hi, Niels here from the open-source team at Hugging Face. I've recently relaunched paperswithcode.co as a source for finding the state of the art (SOTA) across various AI domains, from 3D generation to AI agents. This is done by automatically parsing research papers published on arXiv/Hugging Face, enabling leaderboards to be created. See BrowseComp below as an example (a scatter plot and a table are available for each benchmark). \- Scatter plot (you can hover over the dots to see the models): https://preview.redd.it/9rz2r3ffcf6h1.png?width=2880&format=png&auto=webp&s=b3f8e7a870802f6ef8227ecc0619e9e1057554b0 \- Table: https://preview.redd.it/qoqriddw5f6h1.png?width=2862&format=png&auto=webp&s=a0034574f693847537037013672fb61daf27b16e As you can see, I've added support for viewing evals for closed-source models, too, given that many benchmarks are nowadays dominated by them, like GPT-5.5 and Mythos 5. You can always disable viewing closed-source evals with a toggle or in your PwC settings: https://preview.redd.it/p3k6jt6q6f6h1.png?width=1582&format=png&auto=webp&s=40149e51d6b326a77e53e33baf70d9850b3de365 When you turn them off, here's what the open model leaderboard looks like: https://preview.redd.it/tg42sin36f6h1.png?width=2838&format=png&auto=webp&s=1330a117ae9b4e0ce6d459493ae9e8f64107310a Closed-source papers are treated as regular "papers", although they can be any source, like a blog post (given that PwC supports submitting any source beyond arXiv). See the GPT-5.5 or Mythos 5 papers as examples, with their evals at the bottom. Notice the "closed" tag on their evals. Hence, you could jokingly call these "papers without code". Let me know what you think of this, and whether anything needs to be changed or added! Kind regards, Niels https://redd.it/1u1wq0a @datascientology
143
16
Greater than 80% of researchers at CVPR are chinese. This speak volumes on the chinese nexus in research, and something needs to be done about it. D There are coordinated efforts where people have favoured and jeopardised the double blind review process. No doubt out of these 80% there are great talent but we have to acknowledge that non chinese have been sobotaged and this was also reflected in the recent leaks of the reviewer data from the top ml conferences (won’t name them but they start with i). I have also personally faced such discrimination and had a discussion on the subreddit asking others if they have witnessed something similar. It was shocking to know that this is occurring on large scale. The question is how do we stop it, or highlight this? We have to preserve the sanctity of the research. https://redd.it/1u00gdg @datascientology
130
17
+1
Matn yo'q...
141
18
3D Reconstruction from Video - Class Final Project https://redd.it/1tx9oss @datascientology
148
19
Built an open-source hub of CV notebooks for almost every real-world use cases and Models https://redd.it/1tvgjg0 @datascient
Built an open-source hub of CV notebooks for almost every real-world use cases and Models https://redd.it/1tvgjg0 @datascientology
141
20
LibreYOLO v1.2.0 epic release: 16 model families now supported https://redd.it/1tt6pl8 @datascientology
LibreYOLO v1.2.0 epic release: 16 model families now supported https://redd.it/1tt6pl8 @datascientology
145