Не попадись на ботовода! Telemetrio знаходить і позначає такі канали мітками 👉 Хочеш бачити мітку, оформляй підписку

Data Scientology

Відкрити в Telegram

Hot data science related posts every hour. Chat: https://telegram.me/r_channels Contacts: @lgyanf

США13 456 Технології та додатки40 098

Buy Ad

1 143

Підписники

-124 години

-27 днів

-430 днів

115

Перегляди допису

~ 3324 години

~ 4248 годин

10.06%

Коефіцієнт залучення

Немає даних

Дописів на день

Ads index

beta

Завантажуємо дані

Схожі канали

Machine Learning Research

555

∅

Більше каналів

Вхідні та вихідні згадування

---

Залучення підписників

жовтень '26жовт '26

жовтень '26

в 3 каналах

вересень '26

+11

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

серпень '26

+11

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

липень '26

+13

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

червень '26

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

травень '26

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

квітень '26

+30

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

березень '26

+40

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

лютий '26

+36

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

січень '26

+13

в 1 каналах

Get PRO

грудень '25

+10

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

листопад '25

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

жовтень '25

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

вересень '25

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

серпень '25

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

липень '25

+10

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

червень '25

+10

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

травень '25

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

квітень '25

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

березень '25

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

лютий '25

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

січень '25

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

грудень '24

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

листопад '24

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

жовтень '24

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

вересень '24

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

серпень '24

+11

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

липень '24

+13

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

червень '24

+11

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

травень '24

+10

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

квітень '24

+12

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

березень '24

+20

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

лютий '24

+19

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

січень '24

+19

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

грудень '23

+17

в 6 каналах

Get PRO

листопад '23

+23

в 3 каналах

Get PRO

жовтень '23

+27

в 3 каналах

Get PRO

вересень '23

+21

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

серпень '23

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

липень '23

+18

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

червень '23

+20

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

травень '23

+26

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

квітень '23

+53

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

березень '23

+15

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

лютий '23

+12

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

січень '23

+18

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

грудень '22

+31

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

листопад '22

+14

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

жовтень '22

+47

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

вересень '22

+45

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

серпень '22

+18

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

липень '22

+18

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

червень '22

+18

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

травень '22

+27

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

квітень '22

+43

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

березень '22

+47

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

лютий '22

+89

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

січень '22

+57

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

грудень '21

+36

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

листопад '21

+27

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

жовтень '21

+43

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

вересень '21

+64

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

серпень '21

+55

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

липень '21

+28

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

червень '21

+26

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

травень '21

+29

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

квітень '21

+26

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

березень '21

+49

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

лютий '21

+21

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

січень '21

+45

в 0 каналах

Get PRO

грудень '20

+882

в 0 каналах

Дата	Залучення підписників	Згадування	Канали
20 жовтня	0
19 жовтня	0
18 жовтня	0
17 жовтня	0
16 жовтня	0
15 жовтня	+1
14 жовтня	0
13 жовтня	+1
12 жовтня	+2
11 жовтня	0
10 жовтня	0
09 жовтня	0
08 жовтня	0
07 жовтня	0
06 жовтня	0
05 жовтня	0
04 жовтня	0
03 жовтня	+3
02 жовтня	+1
01 жовтня	0

Дописи каналу

Conference papers are cooked! D Got three papers to review for ICLR and five for AAMAS, and believe me the quality of these papers is insanely bad. I would even refrain from accepting them to a workshop, let alone be main venues. A sincere request; Please don't submit the paper unless it is ready and if you are a first timer, please please get a feedback from a mentor out. Otherwise you are just wasting the time of so many reviewers out there https://redd.it/1x9fyhd @datascientology

2	Detecting sewer pipe defects in CCTV inspection video: anyone working on something similar? https://redd.it/1x6tzsq @datascientology	57
3	PhD students, how ya feeling? D All seems a bit pointless now. Either pump out AI papers and neglect your own development, or take it slow and fall behind in the publishing race. I already have two papers made largely without LLMs (still seeking publication), but it's hard to resist just vibing the third from start to finish with Claude. https://redd.it/1x5fv1a @datascientology	78
4	Is this Gaussian Splatting, GenAI or some other technique? https://redd.it/1x3tvpw @datascientology	72
5	Nvidia’s erroneous paper accepted as ICML’s spotlight D Here is the story: Nvidia has published this work (with source code available) called dreamDojo which is a world model for robotics based of their prior work Cosmos 2.5 which is cited about 100 times and got ICML’s spotlight. Authors are very well known and respected in the field with too many peer reviewed papers already published. The work doesn’t have much novelty (which I don’t care) but it is yet another foundation model. The gist is that they collected about 44k hours of human data (data are NOT open sourced, which I don’t care) and used that for pre-training of DreamDojo initialized from Cosmos 2.5 . Table 4 of the paper though shows a very marginal improvement over cosmos 2.5. Believe or not, just about 0.5 db PSNR improvement. Its fishy, is not it? You use 44000 hours of human data and few hundred hours of other kind of data and robot data and 256 H100 gpu and you got just a very marginal improvement. Anyway I went to give it a try, started post training on their GR1 released data, and could produce their results. Meanwhile a colleague with the help of Claude found a bug in their post training code, which essentially make all the post training code wrong. Then we checked their github issues, and noticed that two other bugs are reported which effect the whole pre-training! Especially this bug . So essentially based on the code their released everything in pre training phase, post training phase and evaluation is buggy and is wrong. The code doesn’t seem AI written cause its (very) bad written. And now after seeing all those bugs the results in paper makes sense. My question is: WTF! How it did not ring a bell for the authors. Did not they ask we spend a hell lot of resources and huge amount of data and essentially got nothing? Did not it ring a bell for reviewers? Openreview https://redd.it/1x0i6b5 @datascientology	109
6	Saw this on Rednote, WTF D https://preview.redd.it/t7wxguxqvzth1.png?width=1314&format=png&auto=webp&s=0ba382fb88894c6e687d5bb9a4b14a85334eae67 Guess we have a dataset for sycophancy and AI content detection https://redd.it/1wzpzh3 @datascientology	112
7	Distilling Stockfish on a Billion Positions, Full 3.9B Dataset Available [P] https://blog.lukesalamone.com/posts/distilling-stockfish https://redd.it/1wxz5qq @datascientology	105
8	arXiv now limits submitters to up to two submissions per calendar month [N] https://blog.arxiv.org/2026/10/01/updated-rate-limit-policy/ https://redd.it/1wvg7yc @datascientology	121
9	LessThink-Qwen3-4B: the same model, with far less thinking P I post-trained Qwen3-4B to spend 44% fewer tokens on reasoning, keeping its knowledge and answer style. The whole pipeline ran on one GPU. folks, you can check it out on : https://5ivatej.com/lessthink/ https://redd.it/1wtygav @datascientology	125
10	Free, open-source AI engineering course where you build each algorithm by hand: 523 lessons, now as EPUB/PDF books P AI Engineering from Scratch is an MIT-licensed curriculum: 523 lessons across 20 phases, from linear algebra and backprop to transformers, LLMs, agents, and production serving. The code is stdlib-first, so you see every step instead of calling a library. This month's edition: \- six EPUB and PDF volumes built from the lessons, attached to the release \- the site interface and lessons in eight languages (Chinese, Hindi, Spanish, Arabic, French, Portuguese, Turkish, Vietnamese) \- CI now runs each lesson's own tests, and a sweep fixed datasets, models, and links that had stopped working Site: https://aiengineeringfromscratch.com Books and release notes: https://github.com/rohitg00/ai-engineering-from-scratch/releases/tag/v2026.10 If you use a coding agent, npx skills add rohitg00/ai-engineering-from-scratch and then /start-learning gives you a placement quiz and a study plan. https://redd.it/1ws6e9p @datascientology	142
11	I made a computer vision tool for rock climbing analysis in 3D using iPhone LiDAR! https://redd.it/1wphdyq @datascientology	157
12	Penalty kick analysis running fully in the browser at ~30 fps with WebGPU https://redd.it/1wnafi6 @datascientology	185
13	+4 Немає тексту...	361
14	[Upcoming AMA] Waymo AI Team AMA – Drop Your Questions Early! [D] https://redd.it/1wfesc0 @datascientology	347
15	I made a computer vision tool for running analysis! https://redd.it/1wcx27z @datascientology	367
16	OpenAl Says It Has Cracked One of Math's “Millennium Problems” (Navier-Stokes) N As reported by the New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/08/science/openai-proof-millennium-problem.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share OpenAI’s announcement: https://openai.com/index/navier-stokes-solution/ https://redd.it/1wavdi7 @datascientology	285
17	Camera recommendation for real-time object tracking on a conveyor belt (Budget: ~$150 - $280) https://redd.it/1w9nud3 @datascientology	303
18	World Labs' new Atlas model: Space-time simulation, "bullet time" from 3 cell phones, and scalable Real-to-Sim https://redd.it/1w4m5yr @datascientology	386
19	Where to submit stat/prob ML D I'm a researcher in statistical and probabilistic ML, I have a steady record of top ML publications and really used to enjoy going to conferences. Over the last few years LLM based works have completely taken over the top conferences. At this year's ICLR, walking among the rows of posters you were lucky to find one paper per row of 10 that wasn't about how their favourite LLM could or couldn't solve their niche benchmark. The workshops tell the same story, most are some kind of agentic flavour. Looking at this year's NeurIPS workshops it's the same thing, basically all are about agents. I'm wondering where do the stat/prob ML communities go from here? I look up to people like Arnaud Doucet, Aapo Hyvärinen, Christian Naesseth, Stefano Ermon, they seem to still publish at the top 3? On my end, I m thinking AISTATS/UAI might be the way to go. All in all, the top 3 might never really have been intended as the home for prob/statML works, it just happened to be the 'prestigious' venue. https://redd.it/1w0kipf @datascientology	463
20	Qwen 3.6 VLM playing “Where’s Waldo?” https://redd.it/1vylz7a @datascientology	355

Переглянути всі дописи