Вже доступно! Дослідження Telegram за 2025 — головні інсайти року 
Coin Post – Money, Investments, Bitcoin
Відкрити в Telegram
Simple, plain, and fast crypto digests. Since 2017 Russian version: @Coin_Post Editor: @Anastasiia_CoinPost Advertising: @CoinPost_Agency Chat: https://t.me/+x91r5TkB3rE3MGUy Creator: @K_Capitan
Показати більше📈 Аналітичний огляд Telegram-каналу Coin Post – Money, Investments, Bitcoin
Канал Coin Post – Money, Investments, Bitcoin (@coinpost) у мовному сегменті Англійська є активним учасником. На даний момент спільнота об'єднує 277 165 підписників, посідаючи 468 місце в категорії Криптовалюти та 311 місце у регіоні Міжнародний.
📊 Показники аудиторії та динаміка
З моменту свого створення невідомо, проект продемонстрував стрімке зростання, зібравши аудиторію у 277 165 підписників.
За останніми даними від 15 червня, 2026, канал демонструє стабільну активність. Хоча за останні 30 днів спостерігається зміна кількості учасників на -11 190, а за останні 24 години на -334, загальне охоплення залишається високим.
- Статус верифікації: Не верифікований
- Рівень залученості (ER): Середній показник залученості аудиторії становить 0.52%. Протягом перших 24 годин після публікації контент зазвичай збирає 0.27% реакцій від загальної кількості підписників.
- Охоплення публікацій: В середньому кожен допис отримує 1 451 переглядів. Протягом першої доби публікація в середньому набирає 758 переглядів.
- Реакції та взаємодія: Аудиторія активно підтримує контент: середня кількість реакцій на один пост – 20.
- Тематичні інтереси: Контент зосереджений навколо ключових тем, таких як u.s, liquidity, etfs, faq, venezuela.
📝 Опис та контентна політика
Автор описує ресурс як майданчик для висловлення суб'єктивної думки:
“Simple, plain, and fast crypto digests. Since 2017
Russian version: @Coin_Post
Editor: @Anastasiia_CoinPost
Advertising: @CoinPost_Agency
Chat: https://t.me/+x91r5TkB3rE3MGUy
Creator: @K_Capitan”
Завдяки високій частоті оновлень (останні дані отримано 16 червня, 2026), канал підтримує актуальність та високий рівень охоплення публікацій. Аналітика показує, що аудиторія активно взаємодіє з контентом, що робить його важливою точкою впливу в категорії Криптовалюти.
277 165
Підписники
-33424 години
-2 8607 днів
-11 19030 день
Триває завантаження даних...
Схожі канали
Хмара тегів
Вхідні та вихідні згадування
---
---
---
---
---
---
Залучення підписників
червень '26
червень '260
в 0 каналах
травень '260
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
квітень '260
в 3 каналах
Get PRO
березень '260
в 7 каналах
Get PRO
лютий '260
в 6 каналах
Get PRO
січень '260
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
грудень '250
в 3 каналах
Get PRO
листопад '250
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
жовтень '250
в 4 каналах
Get PRO
вересень '250
в 4 каналах
Get PRO
серпень '250
в 5 каналах
Get PRO
липень '250
в 5 каналах
Get PRO
червень '250
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
травень '250
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
квітень '250
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
березень '250
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
лютий '250
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
січень '25
+9
в 3 каналах
Get PRO
грудень '240
в 3 каналах
Get PRO
листопад '24
+30
в 4 каналах
Get PRO
жовтень '24
+528
в 6 каналах
Get PRO
вересень '24
+44
в 4 каналах
Get PRO
серпень '24
+281
в 8 каналах
Get PRO
липень '24
+501 045
в 9 каналах
Get PRO
червень '24
+383 291
в 10 каналах
Get PRO
травень '24
+1 445
в 20 каналах
Get PRO
квітень '24
+691
в 13 каналах
Get PRO
березень '24
+3 173
в 35 каналах
Get PRO
лютий '24
+4 212
в 53 каналах
Get PRO
січень '24
+4 390
в 28 каналах
Get PRO
грудень '23
+3 393
в 34 каналах
Get PRO
листопад '23
+5 209
в 33 каналах
Get PRO
жовтень '23
+5 041
в 31 каналах
Get PRO
вересень '23
+2 907
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
серпень '23
+4 800
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
липень '23
+4 748
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
червень '23
+2 736
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
травень '23
+5 944
в 0 каналах
| Дата | Залучення підписників | Згадування | Канали | |
| 16 червня | 0 | |||
| 15 червня | 0 | |||
| 14 червня | 0 | |||
| 13 червня | 0 | |||
| 12 червня | 0 | |||
| 11 червня | 0 | |||
| 10 червня | 0 | |||
| 09 червня | 0 | |||
| 08 червня | 0 | |||
| 07 червня | 0 | |||
| 06 червня | 0 | |||
| 05 червня | 0 | |||
| 04 червня | 0 | |||
| 03 червня | 0 | |||
| 02 червня | 0 | |||
| 01 червня | 0 |
Дописи каналу
James Wynn just opened a 10x short on SpaceX 🚀
🔠 Entry: $214.11
🔠 Liquidation: $224.31
🔗 Live position
Not exactly far away considering how hard this rocket has been flying lately.
🤓 Looking at the chart, I can actually see the logic behind the trade:
📉 The $220-225 area has already acted as a rejection zone twice, and that's exactly where Wynn's liquidation sits. If buyers can't push through that level, a cooldown toward $190-200 wouldn't be surprising after such a vertical move
📈 On the flip side, a clean break above $225 could trigger another squeeze and send the perp into full price discovery mode
The timing is interesting too. We have the Fed meeting ahead, plus the Iran-US memorandum expected on Friday. That's plenty of macro fuel for volatility.
Personally, I wouldn't be surprised by a pullback here.
🤩 But DYOR: shorting one of the strongest charts on the market with 10x leverage is still a bold move
| 2 |  The Fed's 2-day meeting starts today.
No rate cut is expected ✂️
The real story is Kevin Warsh's first meeting as Fed chair. Markets will be listening closely for any hints about future easing and liquidity.
One sentence can move everything.
Buckle up 🍿 | 298 |
| 3 |  Nvidia quietly put together a free course on building AI agents 🟢
If you've been meaning to understand how AI agents actually work (or build one yourself), this is one of the better resources I've found:
❤️ How modern AI agents are structured
❤️ Planning, reasoning, and interaction with LLMs
❤️ Connecting APIs, tools, and external services
❤️ Using memory and context effectively
❤️ Building your own AI agent from scratch
❤️ Working with documents and knowledge bases (RAG)
❤️ Hands-on labs, code examples, and practical exercises
One thing that confused me at first: you'll see a $1.68/hour price tag next to some labs. That's not for the course itself. The learning materials are free − the fee only applies if you use Nvidia's cloud GPUs for the practical exercises
I spent some time digging through it and even tested a few things myself. The content is surprisingly solid 👍
❤️ Save it for later and send it to that friend who keeps saying they're going to build an AI agent "soon"
#AI | 702 |
| 4 |  AI romance scams are entering their hardware era. It’s not just fake profiles and copy-pasted scripts anymore.
Some scam farms are now using AI to write the messages, robotic arms to type them on real phones, and another camera phone to "watch" the screen and guide the taps 🩶
To the app, that doesn’t look like automation. It looks like a human sitting there, texting normally. To the victim, it looks like attention, flirting, emojis… until the expensive gift requests start.
Wild part is, this is probably just the early version.
Next cycle, your scammer may have better ops than half the DeFi teams on your watchlist 🤯 | 714 |
| 5 |  🇺🇸 Trump got his birthday gift after all − the ninth war is apparently "finished."
The official Iran-US memorandum signing is set for Friday, June 19 in Switzerland. Iran got the main thing it wanted: the naval blockade is lifted right now, while the nuclear issue gets pushed into another 60 days of talks. So yeah, expect a few more Trump "victories" over Iran
📊 This week still looks spicy:
🟠 Tuesday: Bank of Japan rate decision. In 2024 and 2025, this ended with crypto dumps
🟠 Wednesday: Fed meeting. No cut expected, but the market will be listening closely to Walsh
🟠 Thursday: BlackRock launches a new BTC ETF for the bear market
🟠 As for BTC, my call for a move toward $68k has almost played out already − price has now pushed close to $67k. The next big liquidity block sits just above. If bulls fail to break through it, BOJ and Fed headlines could be the perfect excuse for a sharp move back down
@Coin_Post | 769 |
| 6 |  One thing I keep noticing is how closely BTC still follows the old 4-year cycle. Historically, the pattern looked like this:
📈 Tops formed around Sep-Nov of Year 3
📉 Bottoms formed around Sep-Oct of Year 4
This cycle's top is already in at roughly $124k.
If history rhymes even a little, we're now about 3 months away from the window where previous cycles tended to bottom.
I've traded through enough cycles to know that the market rarely feels bullish near a bottom. If this pattern keeps playing out, the best opportunities may appear when most people have already given up 👁🗨 | 978 |
| 7 |  Not buying
Not shilling
Just watching if TRUMP token remembers what day it is 🎂🇺🇸 | 966 |
| 8 | Looking at my Dogecoin position still hurts 🚬
The coin never got close to $0.50 this cycle. It's down ~90% from the 2021 peak. And yet I'm not selling.
In fact, I finally have a plan 😎
Not because I think DOGE is about to moon tomorrow. But because a few things aren't lining up with the "Dogecoin is dead" narrative.
The setup, the risks, the levels I'm watching, and why I think the next 3-6 months matter more than most people realize:
👇 New video is live on YT
📹 WATCH HERE | 1 038 |
| 9 | Wall Street is getting nervous 😨
Big banks are dropping some big forecasts this week – and the picture is mixed
🏛 Goldman Sachs
AI spending may be way bigger than the market expects. Goldman sees Big Tech AI capex reaching $1.1T in 2027, with a bull-case scenario at $1.4T. AI compute demand could grow 24x by 2030
🏛 World Bank
Global growth forecast for 2026 was cut to 2.5% because of war risks in the Middle East and higher energy prices. If Brent jumps to $115, growth could fall to 2.1%. In a worse supply shock, it may slow to 1.3%
🏛 Bank of America
BofA says 7 out of 10 bear-market signals for the S&P 500 are already flashing red. Their target is 7,100, roughly 4.5% below current levels. Main risk: rotation out of overheated AI stocks
🏛 Morgan Stanley
Asian LNG prices could jump to $25/MMBtu in Q3-Q4 2026. That’s more than 30% above the forward curve. The drivers: Asian heatwaves, Europe competing for supply, and winter storage demand
🏛 Citi
Citi cut its 3-month gold target from $4,300 to $4,000/oz. Reason: stronger dollar + less demand for safe-haven assets. But the 6-12 month target is still higher at $4,500
I remember this from past cycles: when 7 out of 10 red flags were flashing, the market was usually close to a top. So… is the real correction still ahead? 😨
@Coin_Post | 1 038 |
| 10 |  Altcoin research FAQ: How to tell if a token is actually cheap ❓
When the market is bleeding, I start looking for alts that could make sense for a long-term portfolio. But "down 80%" is not enough. Before buying, I want to know one thing: is this token actually cheap, or does it just look cheap? Here’s the checklist I use:
1️⃣ Is the protocol actually growing?
Don’t start with vibes. Check the basics: revenue, fees, users, volume, TVL, active addresses.
If the chart looks bullish but the protocol is losing users and volume, that’s not a hidden gem. That’s probably exit liquidity
2️⃣ Does the token capture value?
This is the part most people miss. A project can be great, but the token can still be useless. Ask:
➖ Does the token get revenue share?
➖ Are there buybacks or burns?
➖ Is staking actually meaningful?
➖ Does governance control real fees or emissions?
➖ Does demand for the product create demand for the token?
If the answer is "no," the business can grow while the token goes nowhere
3️⃣ Is the valuation reasonable?
Look beyond market cap. FDV matters because future unlocks can dilute you hard. Then compare the token with similar projects:
🟠 FDV / revenue
🟠 FDV / fees
🟠 FDV / TVL
A 10x multiple can be cheap in one sector and expensive in another. Context matters
4️⃣ What can go wrong?
Check unlocks, emissions, competition, weak tokenomics, smart contract risks and regulation. If supply is about to hit the market, "cheap" can get cheaper
5️⃣ What’s the actual setup?
You don’t need one perfect target price. Build 3 scenarios:
📈 Bull case
➖ Base case
📉 Bear case
Then ask: is the current price attractive compared to the realistic upside and downside?
🔧 Useful tools: DefiLlama, Token Terminal, Dune, Artemis, TokenUnlocks
Don’t buy an alt just because the narrative sounds hot. Personally, I only care when the numbers, value capture and valuation actually make sense.
Down bad ≠ undervalued
#FAQ | 1 058 |
| 11 |  🚀 SpaceX just hit the market! Shares are indicated to open 29% above the IPO price, and on paper Elon Musk just became the first trillionaire in history, with his net worth topping $1.1T after the listing
📊 Meanwhile, BTC is still chopping inside a triangle. And as always with triangles, the breakout can go either way
🟠 I’d love to see one more weekend push toward $68k to run the stops first – and only then let the trend send it lower again.. Let’s see if bulls can squeeze something out of this SpaceX hype 🧪
@Coin_Post | 1 066 |
| 12 | New perp DEX waitlist to farm 🪙
Ambient Finance is launching its own perp platform – Superluminal, built on Fogo.
Still early. Not much public info yet. But the team has been building for a while, and the waitlist is already open.
⌨️ To do:
🟢 Open the website
🟢 Drop your email for the waitlist
🟢 Follow Superluminal on X for updates
If they add points, testnet, referrals or trading rewards later, early users may have a head start.
I’ll probably submit a few entries and see where it goes. If solid funding shows up later, this could turn into a decent little farm 💵
#earn | 1 218 |
| 13 |  Q: Are you concerned about the latest inflation number?
Trump: No, I love it. The numbers were great. You know what I really love? I love the inflation.
I don't' think there is a bigger Bitcoin Maxi then Trump 😁
@Coin_Post | 1 118 |
| 14 |  FAQ: How to trade Polymarket with less risk 💡
The prediction markets topic got enough reactions from you guys, so here’s the promised breakdown.
On Polymarket, you can make money not only by picking the right outcome, but also by trading price gaps, spreads and liquidity. These approaches are often called delta-neutral: the trader tries to build a position where profits on one side offset losses on the other. Still, none of this is completely risk-free.
1️⃣ Buying YES + NO for less than $1
Every binary market has two opposite contracts: YES and NO. Example: "Will Argentina win the World Cup?"
Once the event settles, the winning contract pays $1, while the losing one pays $0. So 100 winning shares return $100. But YES and NO prices don’t always add up to exactly $1. This can happen because of bid-ask spreads, low liquidity and uneven order-book depth. That temporary mispricing is what traders try to catch.
Example:
📈 YES costs $0.40
📉 NO costs $0.55
You can buy both sides for $0.95. No matter what happens, one side will settle at $1, leaving a gross profit of $0.05 per pair. You’re not betting on the correct outcome – you’re trading a temporary pricing error.
Risk: the setup only becomes neutral after both orders fill. If your YES order fills but NO moves higher before you buy it, you’re left holding a regular directional position. Fees and slippage can also wipe out the spread.
2️⃣ Hedging through a crypto exchange
Suppose there’s a live market with the question, "Will BTC hit $100k before the end of the year?" and traders are already pricing both the YES and NO outcomes.
The NO token trades at $0.35, meaning the market currently prices the probability of "no" at roughly 35%. A trader compares that price with their own estimate: how far BTC still needs to move, how much time remains, and how volatile it usually is.
If the trader believes the real probability of NO is closer to 45%, the token looks undervalued at $0.35. They buy it expecting the market to reprice NO higher – for example, to $0.45. That would produce a potential profit of $0.10 per token, before expenses.
But if BTC suddenly pumps, the probability of reaching $100k rises and the NO token loses value. To partially protect against that move, the trader simultaneously opens a BTC long on a futures exchange.
The setup looks like this:
▶️ BTC rises – NO loses value, but the long offsets part of the loss
▶️ BTC falls – NO gains value, while the long moves into the red
▶️ If the trader correctly spotted an undervalued NO token, its repricing becomes the source of profit
So the profit doesn’t come simply from holding two opposite positions. It comes from estimating the probability more accurately than the market, while the futures hedge reduces the impact of BTC price moves on the trade.
Risk: this isn’t a perfectly neutral setup – it’s only a partial hedge. Funding costs and price differences between platforms can also eat into the profit.
3️⃣ Market making
Market maker doesn’t need to decide which outcome is correct. They place limit orders around the current price and try to earn the spread between buying and selling.
Example:
📈 Buy YES at $0.50
📈 Sell YES at $0.52
If both orders fill for the same size, the trader earns $0.02 per token. The more times this cycle repeats, the more spread revenue they collect. Some markets may also offer liquidity rewards.
Risk: the buy order may fill while the sell order doesn’t. Then the trader is left holding YES, and the result once again depends on the event.
That’s why market makers constantly monitor inventory, adjust quotes and limit position sizes.
Crypto degens have turned Polymarket from a betting platform into yet another trading venue. No altseason yet, so we trade whatever moves 😁
#FAQ | 1 264 |
| 15 |  Anthropic has opened access to Claude Fable 5 – its most powerful publicly available model yet 🤖
💰The price matches the horsepower – 2x the standard price of Opus 4.8:
🟠 $10 per 1M input tokens
🟠 $50 per 1M output tokens
For crypto, this is a double-edged sword:
Models this capable can make smart-contract audits and vulnerability research much faster. But attackers get access to the same upgrade – making exploits cheaper and easier to find. Anthropic clearly knows the risk. Fable 5 launched with strict safeguards, and flagged cybersecurity requests are automatically routed to the less powerful Opus 4.8.
Smarter audits. Smarter attackers.
Probably a good time to clean up your DeFi security: revoke old approvals, spread funds across separate addresses, and stop keeping everything in one hot wallet 🧠
#AI | 1 221 |
| 16 |  🩸 Around $400B was wiped from the US stock market after Trump warned Iran of another round of strikes
🇺🇸 Then came the macro print:
US CPI: 4.2% – the highest since April 2023
🟠 BTC caught an instant bid on the news. Now we watch whether buyers follow through – or the move gets faded and BTC is sent below the local low 👀
@Coin_Post | 1 178 |
| 17 |  Remember the BONK waitlist I shared earlier? It’s finally live 🙃
The project is called Bonkuji, and early users can now start farming points for a possible future drop.
⌨️ To do:
🟢 Go to Bonkuji
🟢 Log in with the same wallet or X account used for the waitlist
🟢 Complete the daily tasks
🟢 Repost the required activities on X
🟢 Skip the paid packs unless you actually want them
Low effort, BONK ecosystem, possible early-user rewards. Worth keeping on the radar 👀
#earn | 1 364 |
| 18 |  Bitcoin’s 1,000-day setup 💸
The idea is simple: buy BTC 500 days before the halving and sell 500 days after. It has worked three times:
🟠 2015-2017: +3,299%, then a 51% dump
🟠 2018-2021: +1,044%, then a 62% drawdown
🟠 2022-2025: +560%, then a ~43% drop
The next buy window opens in roughly 175 days:
▶️ Start buying: December 2026
▶️ Take profit: by the end of August 2029
Full disclosure: I’ve tried trading this setup before, but holding for that long is much harder than the chart makes it look. Still, the pattern is hard to ignore. Does the 1,000-day playbook work again?
💯 – Same cycle, same outcome
🤔 – This time is actually different | 1 336 |
| 19 | A pretty cool live US debt infographic 👀
Hover over any number to see what it tracks:
https://www.usdebtclock.org/
Send it to a friend who loves scary numbers 😁 | 1 407 |
| 20 |  Btw, speaking of football… ⚽️
It’s not only the SpaceX IPO where serious money is expected. Just look at how much cash will be moving through the 2026 World Cup.
The tournament in the US, Canada and Mexico will be the biggest ever: 48 teams, 104 games, 39 days. FIFA expects to make over $13B, up from $7.57B in the previous cycle:
▶️ $4.3B from broadcasting rights
▶️ $2.8B from sponsors
▶️ ~$3B from tickets and VIP packages
▶️ And brands like Visa, Coca-Cola, McDonald’s and Bank of America usually spend another 2-5x the cost of sponsorship rights on ads and promos
The event could add around $17.2B to US GDP and up to $40.9B globally 🤯
Now imagine the volume hitting prediction markets during the World Cup – especially Polymarket and Kalshi. Crypto traders there aren’t just betting on winners. They trade price gaps and delta-neutral setups.
Want a separate breakdown on how it works and what risks to watch? Drop a 🔥 | 1 350 |
