Beat the Bailiffs Extra

LANDLORDS TO PAY TENANTS BILLS Ofgem Consultation Give your views

LANDLORDS FINES SIX TIMES HIGHER THAN REQUIRED MEASURE Currently, buy-to-let investors must ensure their properties have an energy performance certificate (EPC) rating of C or higher by 2030 or risk a maximum penalty of £5,000; However, under plans being considered by the Government in the Energy Independence Bill, failing to meet these targets will carry a fine of up to £30,000 – six times higher than the original proposal. GOVERNMENTS GONE GESTAPO OTHER RUDICULOUS PROPOSALS IN THE ENERGY INDEPENDENCE BILL: - Mass Surveillance by FBI The FBI will have more access to data than UK GDPR allows the UK government. - Customer Battery Storage to be centralised with NO PAYMENT PROMISED - Discriminatory Pricing TWO TIER BILLING taking from the working to pay those that don’t - Mandating Price increases Firms will not be required to carry out public consultations

THE ENERGY INDEPENDENCE BILL & NESO BRINGING MASS SURVEILLANCE BY USA TO ENGLISH INHABITANTS Where UK GDPR protects them

NESO HANDED US FIRM PALANTIR A CONTACT on 8 September 2026 The Energy Independence Bill (As introduced) Gives Suppliers Powers to access Banks IN BREACH OF UK GDPR USA legislation allows the FBI to all corporate data, including Palantir.. CHANNEL CHATS CHANGE SHIT - MP’s VOTE FOR YOU Whether you vote or not, whether you like your MP or not, they will be voting on your behalf. You have to pay to comment in my channel BECAUSE I DON’T VOTE ON YOUR BEHALF sending your MP an email is FREE!

BMA: “US FIRM PALANTIR CAN NOT BE TRUSTED” Wants Personal GP Records Already Partnered with NESO UK Energy Grid British Medical Association (BMA), have opposed the integration of GP data into Palantir’s FDP, arguing there is a lack of trust in the company, which also works for the Israeli military and US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)

ROGUE NATION USA IS NUMBER 1 TRADING PARTNER OF UK The Energy Independence Handing this Genocide supporting country more power over UK households HAVE YOU RAISED A CONCERN TO YOUR MP?

Russell Brand Sentenced for 10 yrs 6 Months

ENERGY COMPANY GUILTY OF 10 COUNTS OF MANSLAUGHTER Found Guilty in a Jury Trial, Sentencing in 2027 Island Energy workers were excavating gas pipes on the road below the buildings that serviced the area of La Collette, including the flats, on Friday 9 December - the day before the explosion. During works, a pipe was incorrectly cut, which stopped the gas supply to other properties in La Collette. The court heard gas was reintroduced into the system, but without a pressure test being carried out to check for any leaks. Residents reported smelling glass at 8:30 pm At 03:53 GMT on 10 December 2022, an explosion occurred in flat 28 that caused Block H to collapse. It was ignited by an unknown spark or flame, the court heard. A second explosion happened shortly after 04:00 in Block F. READ - Island Gas found Guilty for the 2nd Time

DISCRETIONARY PAYMENTS Council Tax - Can’t Afford To pay ::::…. [YOUR ADDRESS & POSTCODE] [COUNCIL NAME ADDRESS & POSTCODE find it on: https://www.gov.uk/find-local-counci] DATE: [THE DATE] Dear [SECTION 151 OFFICERS NAME], Account name: [YOUR NAME] Account number: [COUNCIL TAX REFERENCE NUMBER] Debt Collector reference: [REFERENCE IF YOU HAVE ONE] I am sorry that I was unable to keep up payments towards my Council Tax Arrears from (date) My reasons for applying for a discretionary reduction are as follows: [List any special factors relating to hardship or vulnerability e.g., medical conditions, disability, number of children and details of any vulnerable adults also living in the property] I am asking you to review my Council Tax bill and see whether I owe this. And whether I could have received further help or reductions from the Council towards this bill. My application under Section 13a LGFA 1992 is separate to any entitlement I may have under the local council tax reduction scheme. If I am liable and the above account is correct - I am willing to pay my council tax bill , but I cannot afford to pay this debt through an enforcement debt collection agency along with their punitive fees and charges. I have attempted to deal with the the enforcement company sub-contracted by the Council but they are making unreasonable demands. I am also physically scared of their threatening behaviour. Especially with [STATE NUMBER OF CHILDREN IN THE HOUSE] young children in the house. If I paid them what they are asking - this will put me into further hardship and will have a knock-on effect on my ability to pay my current council tax , priority bills and debts. I include the following evidence I wish you to consider: [Include details of your income, expenditure and debts] [Include copies of benefit letters, hospital letters, medical reports, information on saving and means, copies of letters in support of your case from other people] I am making a formal request that the amounts owing are reduced or written off , which I understand the Council can consider under Section13A of the Local Government Finance Act 1992; I also understand that the council can consider my current circumstances and my reasons - and see that this method of collecting this debt via an enforcement agency may not be suitable as stated under Department for Communities and Local Government’s Guidance to local councils on good practice in the collection of Council Tax arrears. “4.5 Local Authorities should remain prepared to deal directly with individuals at any point. It is perfectly within their gift to call action back from the bailiffs at any time and where there is a case to do so they should consider such action.” I have no assets to sell to help clear my debt and I have exhausted loans from family and friends. If possible please could you request that [DEBT COLLECTION COMPANY NAME] send the matter back to yourselves; I am therefore asking you to consider my request as I cannot afford to pay this through the enforcement company . I am in no way refusing to pay but with my current financial situation, I have struggled to find money to pay this debt; Please note: in the event you do not accept my application, I am entitled to appeal to the Valuation Tribunal England under section 16 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992. Please provide a copy of your “Published” Debt Recovery Policy. or state reasons for not providing such document. I hope we can come to an arrangement for the arrears to be resolved as soon as possible. Naturally, I hope that you will award a discretionary reduction in my case but if you are unable to agree to this, please explain your reasons. Thank you for your attention. I look forward to hearing from you within eight weeks of the date of this letter. Yours faithfully, [YOUR NAME]

HOW ALLOWING 34,000 ROGUE TRADERS & ANPR RESULTED IN 1 IN 15 VEHICLES CARRYING GHOST PLATES IN ENGLAND Says Ghost Plate Inquiry Traders fail to make simple checks, such as If the buyer OWNS the Car!! 👀 10 recommendations from the report: 1. Standardise design of registration plates, with security features to bring the UK up to international standards. Ban the use of 3D and 4D plates. 2. Significantly restrict the number of licensed sellers via annual fees, regular audits and removal of non-compliant sellers. 3. Introduce background screening of suppliers including criminal record checks. 4. Educate drivers about the risks of illegal plates and the rogue traders who sell them. 5. Mandate compliance checks as part of the MOT. 6. Increase the fine and give offenders points for use of an illegal plate and seize vehicles of repeat offenders. 7. Ensure police forces have the equipment and training to tackle non-compliance. 8. Clamp down on illegal sales and strengthen DVLA powers for prosecution of rogue suppliers. 9. Establish a national taskforce on number plate compliance and develop a national approach to tackling broader non-compliance. 10. Strengthen and enforce rules around ‘registered keeper’ information to be able to identify vehicle ownership. This inquiry report by the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Transport Safety examines the rapid rise and severe societal impacts of illegal registration plates—such as “ghost” and cloned plates—used to evade Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) systems. It highlights that the UK’s regulatory framework is severely outdated and unfit for purpose, driven by lax supplier registration rules, tens of thousands of largely unmonitored manufacturers, and low penalties that fail to deter rogue motorists. Consequently, these vulnerabilities facilitate widespread vehicle tax and toll evasion, burden law-abiding drivers with false fines, compromise road safety, and pose significant threats to local public finances and national security.

PRIVATISATION PROMISED CHEAPER PRICES IN 1990 What we have is 36 years of records breaking prices, an infrastructure open to cyber attacks; expensive to balance and may switch off for 5 days. UK GOVERNMENT AWARDS THIS CHRONOLOGY OF BAD BEHAVIOUR: December 1990 – The Great Sell-Off: The 12 regional electricity distribution and supply companies in England and Wales are privatised. Promising competition and lower costs, the government strips public ownership, setting off a cascade of marketization 1992 – The “Dash for Gas”: Restrictions on using gas for electricity generation are lifted. Private companies rush to build Combined Cycle Gas Turbine (CCGT) plants, shifting the national dependency away from coal and deeply tying domestic electricity prices to volatile global gas markets 1995 – Nuclear Privatization: Even the nation’s nuclear assets—previously state-run—are bundled into private hands under British Energy, transferring crucial national security infrastructure to corporate balance sheets.  2001 – NETA and Market Manipulation: The introduction of the New Electricity Trading Arrangements (NETA) creates a complex wholesale market that critics argue allows dominant generators to game pricing, leading to widening gaps between generation costs and consumer bills.  2012 – Early Cybersecurity Warnings: Industry analysts and security experts warn that privatised utility companies are critically lagging behind in cyber defences, leaving essential infrastructure exposed to state-sponsored attacks akin to foreign cyber sabotage. 2018–2022 – The Price Surge and Supplier Collapses: Years of corporate extraction culminate in disaster. Wholesale gas spikes, dozens of smaller independent energy suppliers go bust because of poor financial hedging, and customer bills more than double, culminating in an unprecedented cost-of-living crisis.  2024–2026 – The Cyber Insecurity Disclosures: Frequent alerts over cyber vulnerabilities in critical national infrastructure make front-page news. Incidents, including smaller power plant disruptions, underscore that private operators have chronically under-invested in resilient, deep-level cybersecurity in favour of short-term shareholder dividends.

AI HALLUCINATION 😂

BRITISH GAS TO RESUME FITTING PREPAYMENT METERS - Using New Powers under the Energy independence bill.. Snooping bank accounts and HMRC… TARGET: #Freetard CAN AFFORD TO PAY BUT DON’T

ENERGY INDEPENDENCE BILL IN BREACH OF UK GDPR - The Bill is only on its 2nd Reading WRITE TO YOUR MP Ask them how they are voting on the bill

😂😂😂 https://t.me/TisTreason/6117

NO WET INK SIGNATURE Judicial Guidance V MOJ FOI RESPONSE SIGN to Prevent Spurious Challenges Extract for Liability order SUPPLEMENTARY GROUNDS FOR INTERNAL REVIEW To: Disclosure Team / Internal Reviewer Ministry of Justice, 102 Petty France, London, SW1H 9AJ (data.access@justice.gov.uk) From: Jatinder Kaur Anand Reference: MoJ ref: 260727024 / 260822024 Ground 5: Clarification of “Wet Ink” Signatures vs. Statutory Validity in Certified Extracts A supplementary point requiring formal administrative and legal clarification arises from the explicit instructions contained within the departmental Word document template designated for certified extracts (exampleofliabilityordercertifiedextractencrypt.docx), which directs staff regarding the Designated Officer signature: “must be signed by an HEO or SEO authorised by an SEO. Can be signed either wet ink (which will eliminate some spurious challenges) or digitally” This instruction creates profound procedural confusion for litigants in person and demands formal review on two distinct legal grounds: 1. Dismissal of Legitimate Scrutiny as “Spurious”: It is legally untenable for departmental administrative guidance to dismiss formal challenges to the authenticity of unverified court extracts as “spurious” while simultaneously relying on ad-hoc Word document templates rather than native, automated court-generated database records. Litigants in person are entitled to test the legal provenance and authentication of instruments used to enforce public debt without administrative prejudice. 2. Statutory Basis for “Wet Ink” Authentication: The reviewer must clarify what specific primary legislation, statutory instrument, or rule under the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 or Magistrates’ Courts Rules 1981 empowers HMCTS to mandate or recommend a “wet ink” signature specifically to ward off legal challenges, and how an administrative preference overrides the requirement for an independently generated, tamper-proof judicial record under Rule 68; This instruction directly conflicts with primary statutory guidance established by the Guide to the Magistrates’ Courts (Amendment) Rules 2019 (S.I. 2019/1367). Specifically, rule 9 of the 2019 amendment rules removed rule 109 of the Magistrates’ Courts Rules, removing requirements for signatures on prescribed court forms and confirming that there is no statutory requirement for wet ink signatures. I request that the independent internal reviewer formally address these supplementary points alongside the core grounds regarding Rule 68 compliance, Section 12 contradictions, and the unlawful deflection of court judgment inquiries. Yours sincerely, Jatinder Kaur Anand MOJ DOCS MENU