Jikkyleaks archive
Відкрити в Telegram
2 835
Підписники
-324 години
-207 днів
-5830 день
Триває завантаження даних...
Схожі канали
Хмара тегів
Вхідні та вихідні згадування
---
---
---
---
---
---
Залучення підписників
липень '26
липень '260
в 0 каналах
червень '26
+2
в 8 каналах
Get PRO
травень '26
+3
в 7 каналах
Get PRO
квітень '26
+3
в 5 каналах
Get PRO
березень '26
+5
в 5 каналах
Get PRO
лютий '26
+11
в 7 каналах
Get PRO
січень '26
+4
в 5 каналах
Get PRO
грудень '25
+4
в 11 каналах
Get PRO
листопад '25
+4
в 4 каналах
Get PRO
жовтень '25
+7
в 7 каналах
Get PRO
вересень '25
+4
в 6 каналах
Get PRO
серпень '250
в 12 каналах
Get PRO
липень '25
+11
в 8 каналах
Get PRO
червень '25
+9
в 7 каналах
Get PRO
травень '25
+15
в 12 каналах
Get PRO
квітень '25
+5
в 7 каналах
Get PRO
березень '25
+15
в 13 каналах
Get PRO
лютий '25
+11
в 9 каналах
Get PRO
січень '25
+9
в 9 каналах
Get PRO
грудень '24
+11
в 10 каналах
Get PRO
листопад '24
+23
в 13 каналах
Get PRO
жовтень '24
+7
в 9 каналах
Get PRO
вересень '24
+10
в 11 каналах
Get PRO
серпень '24
+22
в 11 каналах
Get PRO
липень '24
+14
в 7 каналах
Get PRO
червень '24
+11
в 6 каналах
Get PRO
травень '24
+10
в 3 каналах
Get PRO
квітень '24
+16
в 6 каналах
Get PRO
березень '24
+21
в 7 каналах
Get PRO
лютий '24
+18
в 9 каналах
Get PRO
січень '24
+25
в 21 каналах
Get PRO
грудень '23
+24
в 12 каналах
Get PRO
листопад '23
+46
в 12 каналах
Get PRO
жовтень '23
+23
в 14 каналах
Get PRO
вересень '23
+32
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
серпень '23
+48
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
липень '23
+97
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
червень '23
+247
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
травень '23
+26
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
квітень '23
+27
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
березень '23
+257
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
лютий '23
+40
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
січень '23
+366
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
грудень '22
+245
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
листопад '22
+62
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
жовтень '22
+43
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
вересень '22
+25
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
серпень '22
+79
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
липень '22
+2 248
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
червень '22
+107
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
травень '22
+318
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
квітень '22
+781
в 0 каналах
| Дата | Залучення підписників | Згадування | Канали | |
| 01 липня | 0 |
Дописи каналу
| 2 | https://x.com/Jikkyleaks/status/2071213077630951729?s=20 | 162 |
| 3 | An article in response to an article. Seems fair.
The vaccine-SIDS link and how they were able to hide it.
https://x.com/Jikkyleaks/status/2071169422002184206 | 912 |
| 4 | https://x.com/Jikkyleaks/status/2071173219642671300?s=20 | 169 |
| 5 | https://vxtwitter.com/Jikkyleaks/status/2070710773643620391?s=20 | 191 |
| 6 | https://x.com/Jikkyleaks/status/2070710773643620391?s=20 | 1 |
| 7 | https://vxtwitter.com/Jikkyleaks/status/2069595553516912996?s=20 | 302 |
| 8 | https://vxtwitter.com/Jikkyleaks/status/2068249496849715642?s=20 | 443 |
| 9 | https://x.com/Jikkyleaks/status/2068249496849715642
The SIDS vaccine paper controversy debunked
I'm really glad that @jsm2334 made this post, because it highlights how the pharma industry mobilises academics to provide pseudo-scientific arguments to bury a problem. Jeff makes the claim that the retraction of the Miller paper was justified (it wasn't - it passed peer review and wasn't fraudulent, which is the correct threshold for publication), because he thinks that the correct method of looking at the increase in SIDS deaths after vaccination is something called a "self controlled case series (SCCS)". But he knows this is not true for two reasons You can't use death as a measure in the self-controlled case series, because once you're dead you can't continue to be your own control. It creates a survivor bias and is a known problem with SCCS. You can't use SCCS in the absence of a predictable incidence rate because you're comparing one time point to another. If the incidence is decreasing over time (as SIDS does) then comparing an earlier to later time point | 1 |
| 10 | https://x.com/Jikkyleaks/status/2067933031369937265?s=20
OK I'll prove it. Here is the data from NHS digital showing that contraceptive usage in under 16s in the UK actually DROPPED after the HPV vaccine rollout in 2007. The 80% fall in teenage pregnancies is because of a dramatic drop in sexual activity. That's why the cervical cancers disappeared in that age group - and only in that age group. Women who had the HPV vaccine in late teens did NOT see a drop in cervical cancer deaths. The argument that the massive drop in teenage pregnancies in the UK was due to increased contraception would have required a 400% increase in contraceptive usage. Instead, it dropped. It looks like it was the iphone, not the HPV vaccine, that fixed the teenage pregnancy problem and postponed the cervical cancer problem.
Source: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/nhs-contraceptive-services/nhs-contraceptive-services-england-2012-13-community-contraceptive-clinics | 2 446 |
| 11 | https://vxtwitter.com/Jikkyleaks/status/2067921043524899266?s=20 | 3 |
| 12 | https://x.com/Jikkyleaks/status/2067546005734887740?s=20 | 1 502 |
| 13 | https://vxtwitter.com/i/status/2067751678615720235 | 244 |
| 14 | https://x.com/i/status/2067699779430391974 | 246 |
| 15 | Lies of Omission
https://x.com/Jikkyleaks/status/2067547138519863807?s=20
[re] @BBCNews
Cervical cancer deaths fall to zero in young women given vaccine
@Jikkyleaks ➡️ This is a false statement by omission. It should say that cervical cancer deaths fell to zero in young women irrespective of vaccination status. That is multifactorial due to change in screening and under-age sexual activity in the UK. No RCT has shown a reduction in cancer.
Teenage pregnancies are a surrogate for underage sexual activity (which drives cervical cancer rates in the under 25s). In the UK they fell off a cliff in 2007 - the year the iphone came out and the HPV vaccine rollout started.
@Jikkyleaks THREAD https://twitter-thread.com/t/1994313536806252851
We're missing something really important in the "where did all the pregnancies go?" question. That is, what happened to teenage pregnancies - a constant for nearly 30 years - which suddenly fell off a cliff in 2007... The year the HPV vaccine rolled out. | 687 |
| 16 | https://vxtwitter.com/Jikkyleaks/status/2067413463501242606?s=20 | 264 |
| 17 | https://x.com/Jikkyleaks/status/2066938044926837041
2024-2025 COVID-19 Vaccine and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Among US Veterans
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2850241 | 405 |
| 18 | "Sorry @JeffereyJaxen it wasn't a vaccine of any type. You don't create a peptide inhibitor for a vaccine, which is what they did. The vaccine story was their back up plan for when their bioterrorism was eventually revealed to the world. When are the prosecutions?" - @Jikkyleaks
https://x.com/Jikkyleaks/status/2065987290942541938?s=20
[re] https://x.com/JeffereyJaxen/status/2065836229858296070?s=20
[ref] https://www.news-medical.net/news/20250314/Breakthrough-peptide-inhibitor-effective-against-multiple-SARS-CoV-2-variants.aspx
• https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7665879/
• https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1093646/full
• https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7319219/
grok https://x.com/i/grok/share/b5d8a454142643d4a4a0eb65a48a47b1
"Designing a peptide inhibitor for the virus (referencing early papers on spike-ACE2 blockers) is inconsistent with vaccine development, pointing to the furin cleavage site sequence as evidence of intentional engineering." | 2 463 |
| 19 | https://x.com/Jikkyleaks/status/2065591120378372507?s=20 | 376 |
| 20 | https://vxtwitter.com/Jikkyleaks/status/2065376388555952470?s=20 | 405 |
Вже доступно! Дослідження Telegram за 2025 — головні інсайти року 
