uk
Feedback
Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]

Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]

Відкрити в Telegram

Ron Watkins [ gab.com/codemonkey ]

Показати більше

📈 Аналітичний огляд Telegram-каналу Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]

Канал Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ] (@codemonkeyz) у мовному сегменті Англійська є активним учасником. На даний момент спільнота об'єднує 132 787 підписників, посідаючи 391 місце в категорії Політика та 159 місце у регіоні США.

📊 Показники аудиторії та динаміка

З моменту свого створення невідомо, проект продемонстрував стрімке зростання, зібравши аудиторію у 132 787 підписників.

За останніми даними від 25 червня, 2026, канал демонструє стабільну активність. Хоча за останні 30 днів спостерігається зміна кількості учасників на -2 605, а за останні 24 години на -15, загальне охоплення залишається високим.

  • Статус верифікації: Не верифікований
  • Рівень залученості (ER): Середній показник залученості аудиторії становить 18.34%. Протягом перших 24 годин після публікації контент зазвичай збирає N/A% реакцій від загальної кількості підписників.
  • Охоплення публікацій: В середньому кожен допис отримує 0 переглядів. Протягом першої доби публікація в середньому набирає 0 переглядів.
  • Реакції та взаємодія: Аудиторія активно підтримує контент: середня кількість реакцій на один пост – 0.

📝 Опис та контентна політика

Автор описує ресурс як майданчик для висловлення суб'єктивної думки:
Ron Watkins [ gab.com/codemonkey ]

Завдяки високій частоті оновлень (останні дані отримано 26 червня, 2026), канал підтримує актуальність та високий рівень охоплення публікацій. Аналітика показує, що аудиторія активно взаємодіє з контентом, що робить його важливою точкою впливу в категорії Політика.

132 787
Підписники
-1524 години
-5837 днів
-2 60530 день
Архів дописів
Interesting document describing RUNBECK’s plan to bring mail-in voting to the masses. Document includes plans to change laws/rules and information about setting up SORTING EQUIPMENT FOR jurisdictions expecting more than 75,000 RETURNED BALLOTS. https://runbeck.net/wp-content/uploads/Election-Center-VBM-Timeline.pdf

Runbeck’s ftp server is on clearnet and returned as a google search result. Dont go to that link. It is easy to hack an ftp setup like that, and you don’t want to be targeted just because you clicked on a google search result.

photo content

Was RUNBECK hacked or simply selling Viagra and Cialis?
Anonymous voting

Was RUNBACK hacked, or are they simply selling Viagra and Cialis?
Anonymous voting

Was Runback hacked or are they simply selling Viagra and Cialis from Canada?
Anonymous voting

I can think of two possibilities why RUNBECK appears to be selling Viagra and Cialis. 1. They were hacked. 2. They are simply
I can think of two possibilities why RUNBECK appears to be selling Viagra and Cialis. 1. They were hacked. 2. They are simply selling Viagra and Cialis. Regarding point 1, RUNBECK boasts on their website of offering the highest level of cyber security guidance, security, training, and support. If they are professionals at cyber security, their website simply being hacked is hard to believe. Regarding point 2, the subdomain http://old.runbeck. net (url broken on purpose to prevent clicking) seems to be selling Viagra and Cialis to the “old” demographic which appears to have been identified as being potential customers of Viagra and Cialis.

Why does Google show the RUNBECK website selling viagra and cialis? Do you trust an election vendor that appears to be sellin
Why does Google show the RUNBECK website selling viagra and cialis? Do you trust an election vendor that appears to be selling VIAGRA?

If you are planning to attend the Maricopa County Supervisors Press Conference on Monday, please ask them to answer these questions.

What we don’t know: 1. Who received the mail-in ballots marked RETURN TO SENDER? 2. Were the mail-in ballots marked RETURN TO SENDER sorted away from the mail-in ballots which were filled out normally? 3. Were the mail-in ballots marked RETURN TO SENDER eventually filled out by the sender then dropped into the anonymous ballot drop boxes with no chain of custody?

What we now know: Runbeck printed mail-in ballots. Runbeck gave mail-in ballots to USPS to deliver. Runbeck received mail-in
What we now know: Runbeck printed mail-in ballots. Runbeck gave mail-in ballots to USPS to deliver. Runbeck received mail-in ballots. Runbeck sorted received ballots - 40k per hour. Runbeck has been partnered with Dominion. Runbeck has been partnered with Maricopa County. Runbeck was allegedly caught sending pallets of fake ballots to Fulton County, Georgia. Runbeck was allegedly caught printing ballots with a ~30% error rate for Tarrant County, Texas.

We must stand up against their lies.

They are refusing to meet with the Senate for the hearing on Tuesday and they are doing a press conference on Monday. They don’t have logic, proof, the law, or God on their side, so now they will focus all their efforts on trying to discredit the audit and auditors. They are panicked because they know what the auditors likely already have. Like a cornered dog, they lash out. If the election was held honestly, why are they fighting so hard to stop the audit?

Are you a voter? You need to start calling around and asking questions. Here are some starter questions that you should know the answers to: Who processes my voter registration? Who stores my vote and who has access to my voting history on the database? Who prints the ballots? Who mails them? Who receives them? Who are they tied to? Who funds who?

Who printed the mail in ballots? Who sent out the mail-in ballots? What happened to the mail-in ballots that were RETURNED TO SENDER??? Were returned ballots ultimately used? If so, who used them?

In the surprise of the century, RUNBECK has partnered with Dominion Voting Systems.
In the surprise of the century, RUNBECK has partnered with Dominion Voting Systems.

RUNBECK made the ballots for Tarrant county that allegedly had a 30% error rate causing the barcodes to be unscannable. Unsca
RUNBECK made the ballots for Tarrant county that allegedly had a 30% error rate causing the barcodes to be unscannable. Unscannable barcodes on ballots may cause the ballot to go to digital adjudication where it can be “fixed” by a person. https://www.star-telegram.com/news/politics-government/election/article246746216.html