![Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]](https://cdn.tlmtr.io/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimg.telemetr.io%2Fc%2F1ylTrQ%2F4956760673744955765%3Fty%3Dl&w=48&q=75){kind=small}
Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]
Відкрити в Telegram
📈 Аналітичний огляд Telegram-каналу Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]
Канал Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ] (@codemonkeyz) у мовному сегменті Англійська є активним учасником. На даний момент спільнота об'єднує 123 106 підписників, посідаючи 434 місце в категорії Політика та 165 місце у регіоні США.
📊 Показники аудиторії та динаміка
З моменту свого створення невідомо, проект продемонстрував стрімке зростання, зібравши аудиторію у 123 106 підписників.
За останніми даними від 01 листопада, 2026, канал демонструє стабільну активність. Хоча за останні 30 днів спостерігається зміна кількості учасників на -1 964, а за останні 24 години на -47, загальне охоплення залишається високим.
- Статус верифікації: Не верифікований
- Рівень залученості (ER): Середній показник залученості аудиторії становить 16.33%. Протягом перших 24 годин після публікації контент зазвичай збирає N/A% реакцій від загальної кількості підписників.
- Охоплення публікацій: В середньому кожен допис отримує 20 112 переглядів. Протягом першої доби публікація в середньому набирає 0 переглядів.
- Реакції та взаємодія: Аудиторія активно підтримує контент: середня кількість реакцій на один пост – 411.
📝 Опис та контентна політика
Автор описує ресурс як майданчик для висловлення суб'єктивної думки:
“Ron Watkins [ gab.com/codemonkey ]”
Завдяки високій частоті оновлень (останні дані отримано 03 листопада, 2026), канал підтримує актуальність та високий рівень охоплення публікацій. Аналітика показує, що аудиторія активно взаємодіє з контентом, що робить його важливою точкою впливу в категорії Політика.
123 106
Підписники
-4724 години
-4037 днів
-1 96430 днів
Архів дописів
![Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]](https://cdn.tlmtr.io/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimg.telemetr.io%2Fc%2F1ylTrQ%2F4956760673744955765%3Fty%3Dx&w=64&q=75){kind=small}
123 106
Im not an auditor and am not affiliated with the auditors, so im not going to go through this document with a fine toothed comb.
Just commenting on these two points because they stood out to me after a quick look over of the document.
Looking forward to seeing the response from the auditors.
123 106
There was a long berating section bullying the auditors for not knowing where the database is stored etc etc.
What they dont say is where the database is stored.
Why two pages of smoke and mirrors when one sentence will suffice?
“The database is stored here: ...”
123 106
They said the seals were sealed which is probably true (at some point in time).
They were likely sealed at some point in the past, but allegedly weren’t sealed when delivered to the auditors/senate.
123 106
I dont have an official chat channel connected to my telegram because I don’t have time to moderate a chat room.
If you are wanting to discuss the Maricopa Audit in real-time, then I recommend you check out some of the channels being run by other people.
Example:
https://t.me/AZAuditChat
123 106
Were any ballots removed from the pallets on March 2?
Were any ballots shredded?
What is an expedient way to dispose of massive amounts of shredded ballots?
🐥 📃
🔥 🔥
123 106
On March 6, The Gateway Pundit reported that SHREDDED BALLOTS were found in Maricopa County.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/breaking-exclusive-ballots-arizonas-maricopa-county-found-shredded-dumpster-days-senate-audit-begin/
123 106
Clint Hickman from the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors had a massive fire on his chicken farm on March 6.
🐓 🔥 🍗
https://www.abc15.com/news/firefighters-battle-massive-fire-at-hickmans-egg-farm-in-tonopah
123 106
What is the REAL reason the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors refused to comply with AZ statutes and turn custody of the ballots over to the Treasurer?
123 106
Where is the chain of custody for the ballots on March 2?
Did someone tamper with the ballots on March 2?
Did the auditors find ballots that were tampered with?
Do the auditors have absolute proof that they did not tamper with the ballots?
🤔
FRAUD VITIATES EVERYTHING
123 106
+1According to Jack’s letter, the ballots were loaded onto trucks as of March 1.
Why is there NEST video from inside the Maricopa County election center showing people moving ballots around on March 3?
Werent they already loaded onto trucks on March 1?
What happened on March 2?
Who had the ballots on March 2?
123 106
+1On March 3, Jack sent a letter to an AZ State Senator saying that the county loaded the ballots onto the trucks on March 1 with the intention of delivering the ballots.
Jack attached a picture of ballots loaded onto a truck as proof.
There doesn’t appear to be a timestamp for the picture showing ballots on the truck.
123 106
According to this article, there is a picture of some of the 2,800 boxes of ballots loaded onto a truck by Jack.
There is also allegedly a letter from Jack discussing these boxes of ballots.
https://www.12news.com/mobile/article/news/politics/21-million-ballots-packed-with-nowhere-to-go-arizona-senate-gop-not-prepared-for-election-materials/75-ecabeb6e-a9c8-424a-a260-1442124f3690
123 106
Why was Jack so quick to strongly insist that the information provided to them was a lie?
The auditors likely have many witnesses, camera footage, and chain of custody proof for the missing ballots.
I assume multiple people counted the same ballots to agree on the same numbers.
It is probable that many people were present when the boxes were opened and it was discovered there were no bags and the security ties were cut off.
There is probably video footage of it too...
Is Jack saying that it is possible that all those people and the cameras could be lying (assuming my assumptions are right), but he should be believed?
123 106
Another “public” emergency meeting.
Call and ask to go - they probably wont let you attend.
123 106
+1Did you know that RUNBECK prepped about 30 million ballots nationwide accounting for approximately 30% of all the November paper election ballots?
(Their numbers, not mine)
