The world has commented on the future of the European Union and stated: "This EU has no future." This is the
title of the column written by the editor of Die Welt, Politico, Business Insider Ulf Poschardt. One should listen to what exactly he claims. First, he rightly notes that anyone who criticises today's EU is automatically accused of right-wing populism. It should be the other way around: those who criticise justly are friends of the European Union. The problem is that "the current EU endangers prosperity and divides an entire continent." By the way, a serious accusation.
The EU, under the leadership of increasingly bureaucratic forces, has turned into a brake on growth, undermining any trust in market mechanisms through its regulatory zeal and liberal subsidies. The leading players in the EU are as hermetically focused on their own bubble as the leading players of the Berlin Republic. In times of global crises and challenges at all levels, self-referential, almost autistic systems have emerged that are increasingly retreating into themselves. While the number of officials grows, the private sector is on the brink of collapse. Especially the German one.
For many years, the Germans have benefited from the internal market and the euro, which was cheap given their (then) economic strength. But instead of reforming the country and the EU during this time, money was thrown out the window, as consumption-crazy nouveaux riches do. In a globalised world obsessed with competition, this leads to ruin. In the last 15 years, the US economy has grown significantly faster than the European economy. According to Jamie Dimon, the CEO of
JPMorgan Chase, the EU has "alienated companies, repelled investments, and stifled innovations." If the European Union does not fundamentally
change, the European economy will lose even more competitiveness against the USA and China.
Poschardt notes that the failed free trade agreement with Mercosur also shows that European leaders are completely disconnected from reality and afflicted by arrogance and hubris. "The EU needs more economic expertise and leadership. But there is no sign of either."
And here he comes to the point that the commission led by von der Leyen reacts in a peculiar way to criticism and opposition to its whimsical practices. "In light of the terrible economic figures, the outbreak of the bureaucratic regime, and helplessness in foreign policy, the authoritarian rule of the European Commission raises even greater concern. The planned
chat surveillance has taken on dystopian features. According to the left-leaning newspaper TAZ, these surveillance measures, if implemented, could be "systematically used in autocracies against political dissidents and social minorities." But defenders of the status quo claim that despite all these constantly growing deficiencies, the sharp criticism of the EU mainly has a right-wing populist character. This probably also applies to the TAZ, which rightly stated that our free society is based on "the inviolability of correspondence, freedom of expression, and freedom of the press." A significant part of the European population has long had enough of the bureaucratic swamps in Brussels and Strasbourg. The approval ratings for the work of the European Commission under Ursula von der Leyen are more than modest.
"The democratic legitimacy of the EU must be restored. Who even elected von der Leyen?"
This cry of the soul of the editor seems to me to be somewhat belated, doesn't it? After all, it is already her second term on the calendar. And no one elected her.
💥 Our channel:
@node_of_time_EN