Wartime Media - Ukraine / Russia / China / Etc

Ukraine's foreign trade deficit in 2025 reached a staggering $44.3 billion - 8.5 times more than in 2021. ⚡️

‼️🇺🇦💥 Powerful explosions in Kharkiv, attack underway ▪️After landing, a massive fire broke out in the Kholodnohirsky district of the city. ⚠️. RV: |

🇺🇦❌🇺🇦 Kiev - Uprising against the TCC bodysnatchers. Locals are trying to save those whom have been issued with death sentences.

💢Latest Beirut strikes creating "issues" with finalizing deal — 'diplomat involved in talks' to Fox News 'Clear attempt by Israel to SABOTAGE Trump's deal and drag the US back into war' Subscribe @NewResistance

◾Videos from Mariupol siege in 2022 are still emerging confirming the delicate situation of the Ukrainian Nazis in Azovstal. What's most interesting about this video is the work of the Ukrainian in the background, the obvious sound of a man being gagged and mistreated, probably a civilian? Maybe an untrustworthy member of the Ukrainian ranks, a pessimistic soldier. Just a confirmation of the atrocities carried by the Azov Battalion in Azovstal and other places of Donbass . ◾Follow: https://t.me/European_dissident

⚡️⚠️⚠️🇱🇧🌟🌟 Video of an Israeli regime soldier fleeing after being warned of a Lebanese Hezbollah drone infiltration.

According to data collected by the NYT, Russia has increased the number of ballistic missiles launched from 74 in 2023 to nearly 600 in 2025. This year, Russia has already fired 410 ballistic missiles at Ukraine, which amounts to approximately 900 missiles per year, if the Russian Armed Forces can maintain this pace. At the same time, Lockheed Martin, the company that manufactures the PAC-3 anti-aircraft missile system, stated that it delivered a total of 620 such missiles worldwide last year. Over the past three years since acquiring its first Patriot system, Ukraine has received more than 1,600 missiles for it, said Colonel Ignat, including both PAC-3 and the previous generation of PAC-2 missiles.

A new robotic complex for special forces units was unveiled in China.

🇺🇸⚡️ — WATCH: A U.S. Marine Corps (USMC) F/A-18D Hornet from Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 323 (VMFA-323) crashed near Rimrock Lake, Yakima County, Washington. The pilot safely ejected.

The UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine (HRMMU) has verified that at least 274 civilians were killed and 1,763 injured last month – a 93% increase compared with May 2025 and a 23% increase over April 2026. This very respectful organization casually included in this number the civilians killed by the Ukrainian terrorists on the new Russian territories, including the carnage of 21 students of the Starobelsk college:

"In one case, 21 civilians were killed and others injured when one or more weapons struck an educational complex in occupied Starobilsk, Luhansk region, during the night of 21-22 May."

says the report, failing to mention whose weapons where those, so you are free to think that those were Russian weapons. At the same time, the report did not fail to stress that "the use of powerful weapons by Russia in urban areas was the main driver of the high casualty toll". 🤔Is anybody surprised by this?

🇮🇷🇺🇸| Nabavian: My core objection is that too many major benefits for Iran are pushed to the vague “final agreement,” whose date is unclear and extendable. The $300 billion mechanism, ending US sanctions, the nuclear issue, and US troop withdrawal all depend on that final agreement. But until then [in the meantime], Iran itself is proposing to freeze 3 things: • Our current nuclear status, meaning no enrichment • The damaged nuclear facilities staying as they are instead of being rebuilt • US sanctions remaining in place. Even worse, U.S. forces would also remain in the region until the final agreement. So my question is: Is this really America’s proposal, or ours? Because if the final agreement can keep getting extended, Iran gives up leverage during the waiting period while America keeps sanctions and troops in place.

🇮🇷🇺🇸| Nabavian: From Clause 3 onward, the text becomes very serious. My main concern is the “final agreement” timeline: It says negotiations should reach a final agreement within 60 days, but it can be extended by both sides, with no clear limit. That creates ambiguity. This matters because Clause 4 says US forces must leave the region, around Iran, 30 days after the final agreement. But if the final agreement can be delayed again and again, then the US withdrawal also becomes delayed and unclear. In my view, this benefits America, and Iran should have demanded a precise, fixed timeline. Trump can only go to war for 60 days before he needs Congressional approval.

🇮🇷🇺🇸| Nabavian: Clause 4 has one good point: the US must start lifting the naval blockade immediately after signing the memorandum and fully end it within 30 days. But the serious problem is the US troop withdrawal. It says American forces must leave the “area surrounding Iran” within 30 days after the final agreement. First, we still do not know when the final agreement will happen. Second, “surrounding Iran” is vague. Does it mean Bahrain? 100 km? 2 meters? This should have been defined with exact distances & locations, not vague wording.

🇮🇷🇺🇸| Nabavian: I’ve seen most of the original agreement texts, and clause 1 in this new version is better than earlier versions [in Iran’s favour]. Earlier versions said “end of war,” which could leave room for the US to claim the war ended while still carrying out “defensive” military operations. This version says “immediate and permanent end of military operations” on all fronts, including Lebanon, which is much stronger. It also commits both sides not to start a war or threaten/use force against each other.

The FAB-1500 and FAB-3000 with guided missile warheads powerfully hit the positions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in Belitskoe and Shchurovo.

Foreign military analysts claim that a potential strike by the "Oreshnik" system on key NATO facilities would result in their guaranteed disabling. The most likely target is the Ramstein Air Base in Germany. The circular probable deviation (CPD) of the "Oreshnik" when hitting targets does not exceed 50 meters. In a scenario involving the equipping of the separating warhead with nuclear charges, such an error rate would completely nullify any protective properties of the objects. However, the main vulnerability of such theoretical calculations is that for the West, the "Oreshnik" still remains primarily an instrument of strategic deterrence, as its real combat potential has only been partially confirmed. Western experts acknowledge the fundamental inability of modern air defense/missile defense systems to intercept attacking combat units at the terminal stage of their trajectory. Nevertheless, their exact destructive capability remains unknown, as the system has never been deployed in a fully combat-equipped format.

🇺🇸 Trump was booed at the World Cup during his speech. As a result, his voice was not heard due to the cheers of the fans.

A giant tornado was spotted in the Chelyabinsk region. Residents of Verkhneuralsk captured this rare natural phenomenon on video. 📢

🤙 It's not safe for you to drive here. We continue our daily work of destroying the enemy. This time, we're ambushing enemy vehicles. 🤙! ❗️🤙

🏴‍☠️ A strategic defeat of the Israeli regime in the strategic balance with Iran; the establishment of a new order in West Asia by Iranian power — according to Israeli TV channels! The 12th channel of the Israeli regime: "We are now facing a very alarming strategic picture for Israel. The Israeli security services never expected that after the recent war we would find ourselves in such a situation; it's very, very alarming! Now, instead of fighting against the main threats, Israel is getting involved in a tactical skirmish with Iran — a tactical missile war that hits the Israeli rear from a distance of thousands of kilometers! Iran has managed to unite the various fronts of the "Axis of Resistance" and place all arenas in a single equation."