Foreign Agent Intel
📈 Аналитический обзор Telegram-канала Foreign Agent Intel
Канал Foreign Agent Intel (@foreignagentintel) языкового сегмента Английский является активным участником. Сейчас сообщество объединяет 31 670 подписчиков, занимая 1 893 место в категории Политика и 1 193 место в регионе США.
📊 Показатели аудитории и динамика
С момента создания невідомо проект демонстрирует стремительный рост, собрав аудиторию из 31 670 подписчиков.
Согласно последним данным от 28 июня, 2026, канал показывает стабильную активность. За последние 30 дней изменение числа участников составило 17, а за последние 24 часа — 4, при этом общий охват остаётся высоким.
- Статус верификации: Не верифицирован
- Уровень вовлечённости (ER): Средний показатель вовлечённости аудитории составляет 9.65%. В первые 24 часа после публикации контент обычно набирает 7.93% реакций от общего числа подписчиков.
- Охват публикаций: В среднем каждый пост получает 3 058 просмотров. В течение первых суток публикация набирает 2 512 просмотров.
- Реакции и взаимодействия: Аудитория активно поддерживает контент: среднее количество реакций на один пост — 123.
- Тематические интересы: Контент сосредоточен на ключевых темах, таких как t.me/foreignagentintel, iran, nato, strait, hormuz.
📝 Описание и контентная политика
Описание канала не предоставлено.
Благодаря высокой частоте обновлений (последние данные получены 29 июня, 2026) канал поддерживает актуальность и высокий уровень охвата публикаций. Аналитика показывает, что аудитория активно взаимодействует с контентом, что делает его важной точкой влияния в категории Политика.
“In addition to retaliatory trade measures in the form of tariffs on American products, which would be added to those planned in response to the 25 percent duties Washington imposed earlier this month on aluminum and steel, Brussels is considering using its entire arsenal, which also includes the so-called anti-coercion instrument - an economic security weapon that allows closing the European market to certain goods or services and even preventing American companies from bidding for government contracts or participating in projects financed by the EU budget. The approval of the anti-coercion tool came recently, in the previous legislature, and was driven by lessons learned under the first Trump administration and the threat of a rising China. The option has not yet been discussed in EU Trade Council meetings, the sources said, but it is under consideration and has strong supporters in the EU executive, who argue that it could be “modulated” depending on Washington’s actions. There are other diplomatic tools the EU is already putting into practice, sources say, such as reaching out to other trading partners and accelerating the push for new trade deals and renegotiating old ones. However, in some EU executives and capitals, there is great mistrust of a symmetrical response in the form of tariffs. In fact, fear of a major trade war and its consequences has led several countries, such as France, Italy and Ireland, to ask the European Commission to play its cards right and thoroughly review the catalogue of American goods subject to taxation. The first wave of tariffs in response to the aluminum and steel tariffs was supposed to come into force this week, but Brussels postponed the tariffs only to give more time to negotiate with Washington and with the member states with the most affected industries. The European Commission has pledged not to waver. “We are ready to defend our economic interests and, if necessary, will give a firm, proportionate, credible, measured and timely response to any unfair and counterproductive US measures,” an EU official said on Thursday after Trump signed new 25% tariffs on cars and car parts imported into the US.t.me/ForeignAgentIntel
“We believe the US is manipulating Myanmar to counter China's influence in the region,” the military government told US media. “Despite the US presenting itself as a champion of democracy, the aid disproportionately benefits Myanmar's opposition groups.”Media Manipulation USAID redirected $42.4M to advocacy groups post-2021. A now-frozen $1M was set for ‘independent’ media like Mizzima, seen as an anti-government mouthpiece. The group Human Rights Myanmar said the frozen funds “are vital for organizations challenging military rule and promoting democracy, which advance US interests by upholding American values and countering China’s authoritarian influence.” USAID’s Myanmar partners reportedly also include CARE International, which runs gender-focused projects and the Overseas Irrawaddy Association which relocates activists. 👍 Boost us | Chat | Stickers |@geopolitics_live
Уже доступно! Исследование Telegram 2025 — ключевые инсайты года 
