Izzat Abdullaev | IELTS 8.5

#ReportByIA The bar chart compares the proportion of citizens aged 65 and over in Canada, Germany, and the UK in 1980 and 2000, along with projected figures for 2030. Overall, all three nations exhibit an upward trajectory in their elderly demographic over the 50-year period. Germany consistently records the largest share of senior citizens across the entire timeframe, while Canada displays the most pronounced overall growth. In 1980, Germany had the highest percentage of people aged 65 and above at 15%, followed by the UK at approximately 13% and Canada at 10%. Over the subsequent two decades, both Germany and Canada saw substantial rises, reaching 25% and 20% respectively by 2000. In contrast, the UK’s proportion remained completely static at around 13%, causing it to be overtaken by Canada. Looking ahead to 2030, the aging population in Germany is projected to peak at 30%, maintaining its top position. Canada is expected to continue its steep rise to 25%, matching Germany’s 2000 level. Although the figure for the UK is forecast to increase to roughly 18%, it will remain the lowest among the three countries. ⚡@IzzatAbdullaev⚡

#QiyqiripApp 😯 I used to listen to British Council podcast episodes nonstop back then, and honestly, that’s 100% why my Listening has been consistently high ever since. ▪️ This is an official app by British council by the way, and you can download it here: 📱 IOS (Iphone): Download here. 📱Android: Download here. Take your listening score to Band 9.0! @IzzatAbdullaev

♟ During my 3-5 minute breaks in the evening, I just love watching Magnus play a match quickly. It is both mentally stimualting and therapetic When I got kids ( which is happening anytime soon), I’m sending them to chess school from the moment they can walk. Even better, I’ll make their mother play at least 100 games during pregnancy. My kids are coming out at a grandmaster level, haha. @IzzatAbdullaev

Drop some banger songs to listen to when working/studying. I’ve been spamming EsdeeKid and King Von, but would be great to discover other cool songs as well. I'm not picky; just hit me with straight bangers.

#QiyqiriqMistake ❌ Convenince ❌ Convinence ✅ Convenience @IzzatAbdullaev

#Note to myself:

#QiyqiriqPurchase 📸 Bought a very cool camera today – Sony A7S III. Thinking of getting a Canon, but shooting qualoty is way better with Sony, it turns out. It’s always been my childhood dream to dabble in cinematography. Now that I can do it, I figured why not :) ✅@IzzatAbdullaev✅

It is indeed beautiful, both to spell and pronounce.

#EssayByMe ❤️ 10th August (TODAY) - Real exam question. ⚡️@IzzatAbdullaev⚡️

#EssayByMe ❤️ 2nd August - Real exam question. ⚡️@IzzatAbdullaev⚡️

#EssayByMe ❤️ 2nd August - Real exam question. ⚡️@IzzatAbdullaev⚡️

#EssayByMe ❤️ 9th August - Real exam question. @IzzatAbdullaev

#EssayByMe #FuckAI_IWroteThis

❤️ Task 2 (9th August - Real exam): The best way for countries to prepare for a future is investing more resources in its young people. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Whether a country's future is best secured by directing greater resources toward their young people is a topic of hot debate nowadays. In my view, it is the single most effective form of preparation available, since the benefits of such spending accumulate over an entire working life rather than depreciating like most other public expenditure. Granted, governments face many competing demands on limited resources, and some of these appear more urgent than investment in the young. An aging population, for one, requires immediate healthcare and pension provision, while the effects of climate change are already being felt rather than anticipated. Diverting funds toward decades-long education outcomes can therefore seem like a lower priority when set against problems that are pressing today, especially in countries where the pressure to show short-term results shapes political decision-making. Therefore, critics find this a reasonable position, particularly where public budgets are already stretched thin by current crises. However, this view overlooks how closely these immediate problems are tied to the capabilities of the next generation. Healthcare systems require a continual supply of trained staff, and the transition to cleaner energy depends on skilled engineers and technicians who do not yet exist without prior investment in education. Also, a road or a power plant begins losing value from the day it is completed, whereas a well-educated young person continues contributing productively for several decades, which makes youth investment the rare form of spending whose returns increase over time rather than decline. South Korea is a prime example: in the 1950s its income per capita was lower than that of many countries in sub-Saharan Africa, yet a sustained national commitment to universal education helped it become one of the world's most advanced economies within two generations, despite having almost no natural resources to draw on. Reducing investment in the young to meet present demands therefore risks leaving future crises harder, not easier, to solve. In conclusion, while the pressures of aging populations and climate change are legitimate, they do not change where the long-term solution lies. If a country neglects their young people in favor of short-term fixes, problems are merely postponed, since it is the next generation who will eventually staff the hospitals, engineer the clean energy transition, and pay for the commitments made today. 378 words ✅@IzzatAbdullaev✅

#EssayByMe #FuckAI_IWroteThis

Task 2 (9th August - Real exam): Nowadays, many people use the Internet to get medical advice instead of going to see a doctor. Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

Consulting online sources for health concerns rather than visiting a doctor has become routine for a large share of the population, driven largely by convenience and the sheer scale of information now available at no cost. In my view, this shift is broadly beneficial, though it carries risks that depend heavily on how the information is used. Indeed, the primary driver is accessibility. Medical appointments often require booking weeks in advance, travelling to a clinic, and paying consultation fees that many people, particularly in countries without universal healthcare, would rather avoid for what seems like a minor issue. A search engine or symptom-checker app, by contrast, delivers an answer within seconds and costs nothing. There is also a psychological dimension: some conditions, especially those related to mental health or sexual health, carry stigma, and people frequently feel more comfortable researching privately than discussing symptoms face to face with a stranger in a white coat. Current busy schedules compound both factors, since a quick search fits into a lunch break in a way that a hospital visit rarely does. On balance, I consider this trend a positive one, provided it is treated as a starting point rather than a substitute for professional care. Used well, the internet allows people to arrive at appointments already informed, ask sharper questions, and recognise when a symptom warrants urgent attention rather than dismissing it. Public health bodies and hospitals themselves increasingly publish reliable material precisely because they recognise this behaviour is here to stay, which has improved the overall quality of medical information online. However, the danger lies at the extremes: those who self-diagnose serious conditions and never seek confirmation, or those who panic over a rare complication listed on a forum and become anxious unnecessarily. Neither failure is caused by the internet itself, though, but by treating unverified information with the same authority as a qualified clinician's judgement, which is a matter of how people use the tool rather than a flaw in the tool. Ultimately, the internet is not replacing doctors so much as changing when and how people decide to see one, which is a shift that serves most people well, as long as they know where the tool's benefit ends. 305 words 💡@IzzatAbdullaev💡

Hollywood movie logic is hilarious. You know the villain has trained every single day for 25 years. He's survived wars, defeated countless elite fighters, and become one of the deadliest warriors alive. Then he gets beaten by the protagonist, who started training a month ago because his girlfriend got kidnapped. Apparently, decades of discipline, experience, and battlefield skill are no match for a three-minute motivational soundtrack, and "the power of love" (so f'n corny). At that point, I don't even feel bad for the hero. I feel bad for the villain guy. Imagine dedicating your entire life to mastering your craft, only to lose to someone whose greatest "power" is remembering his girlfriend's smile. And somehow... I'm supposed to clap for that? Ehh, a huge bummer. @IzzatAbdullaev

#QiyqiriqMistake ❌Prinson ❌Prisin ✅Prison @IzzatAbdullaev