Current Affairs by Prithu
Открыть в Telegram
This channel explains daily editorial covering indian express, Hindustan Times, Livemint and Hindu. You can reach to me for any query at @Prithu_jaiman Or reach out at https://www.instagram.com/prithujaiman?igsh=MWt4bThwdHBrMnlyaQ==
Больше📈 Аналитический обзор Telegram-канала Current Affairs by Prithu
Канал Current Affairs by Prithu (@saurabhpolity) языкового сегмента Английский является активным участником. Сейчас сообщество объединяет 23 971 подписчиков, занимая 2 478 место в категории Политика и 17 681 место в регионе Индия.
📊 Показатели аудитории и динамика
С момента создания невідомо проект демонстрирует стремительный рост, собрав аудиторию из 23 971 подписчиков.
Согласно последним данным от 30 июля, 2026, канал показывает стабильную активность. За последние 30 дней изменение числа участников составило -600, а за последние 24 часа — -11, при этом общий охват остаётся высоким.
- Статус верификации: Не верифицирован
- Уровень вовлечённости (ER): Средний показатель вовлечённости аудитории составляет 8.15%. В первые 24 часа после публикации контент обычно набирает 3.36% реакций от общего числа подписчиков.
- Охват публикаций: В среднем каждый пост получает 1 954 просмотров. В течение первых суток публикация набирает 806 просмотров.
- Реакции и взаимодействия: Аудитория активно поддерживает контент: среднее количество реакций на один пост — 5.
- Тематические интересы: Контент сосредоточен на ключевых темах, таких как statement, judge, act, context, sabha.
📝 Описание и контентная политика
Автор описывает ресурс как площадку для выражения субъективного мнения:
“This channel explains daily editorial covering indian express, Hindustan Times, Livemint and Hindu. You can reach to me for any query at @Prithu_jaiman
Or reach out at https://www.instagram.com/prithujaiman?igsh=MWt4bThwdHBrMnlyaQ==”
Благодаря высокой частоте обновлений (последние данные получены 31 июля, 2026) канал поддерживает актуальность и высокий уровень охвата публикаций. Аналитика показывает, что аудитория активно взаимодействует с контентом, что делает его важной точкой влияния в категории Политика.
23 971
Подписчики
-1124 часа
-897 дней
-60030 день
Загрузка данных...
Похожие каналы
Облако тегов
Входящие и исходящие упоминания
---
---
---
---
---
---
Привлечение подписчиков
июль '26
июль '26
+1
в 0 каналах
июнь '26
+29
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
май '26
+64
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
апрель '26
+610
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
март '26
+391
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
февраль '26
+239
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
январь '26
+461
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
декабрь '25
+110
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
ноябрь '25
+335
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
октябрь '25
+244
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
сентябрь '25
+1 377
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
август '25
+279
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июль '25
+85
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июнь '25
+93
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
май '25
+60
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
апрель '25
+82
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
март '25
+90
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
февраль '25
+61
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
январь '25
+46
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
декабрь '24
+21
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
ноябрь '24
+28
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
октябрь '24
+75
в 3 каналах
Get PRO
сентябрь '24
+114
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
август '24
+83
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
июль '24
+608
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
июнь '24
+181
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
май '24
+527
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
апрель '24
+451
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
март '24
+384
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
февраль '24
+236
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
январь '24
+100
в 2 каналах
Get PRO
декабрь '23
+91
в 1 каналах
Get PRO
ноябрь '23
+32
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
октябрь '23
+48
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
сентябрь '23
+78
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
август '23
+133
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июль '23
+44
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июнь '23
+61
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
май '23
+26
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
апрель '23
+29
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
март '23
+25
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
февраль '23
+80
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
январь '23
+95
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
декабрь '22
+46
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
ноябрь '22
+85
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
октябрь '22
+163
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
сентябрь '22
+1 748
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
август '22
+173
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июль '22
+377
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июнь '22
+4 738
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
май '22
+156
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
апрель '22
+1 879
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
март '22
+113
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
февраль '22
+359
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
январь '22
+657
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
декабрь '21
+3 549
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
ноябрь '21
+689
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
октябрь '21
+6 344
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
сентябрь '21
+1 598
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
август '21
+178
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июль '21
+159
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июнь '21
+292
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
май '21
+583
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
апрель '21
+115
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
март '21
+97
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
февраль '21
+132
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
январь '21
+4 880
в 0 каналах
| Дата | Привлечение подписчиков | Упоминания | Каналы | |
| 31 июля | +1 | |||
| 30 июля | 0 | |||
| 29 июля | 0 | |||
| 28 июля | 0 | |||
| 27 июля | 0 | |||
| 26 июля | 0 | |||
| 25 июля | 0 | |||
| 24 июля | 0 | |||
| 23 июля | 0 | |||
| 22 июля | 0 | |||
| 21 июля | 0 | |||
| 20 июля | 0 | |||
| 19 июля | 0 | |||
| 18 июля | 0 | |||
| 17 июля | 0 | |||
| 16 июля | 0 | |||
| 15 июля | 0 | |||
| 14 июля | 0 | |||
| 13 июля | 0 | |||
| 12 июля | 0 | |||
| 11 июля | 0 | |||
| 10 июля | 0 | |||
| 09 июля | 0 | |||
| 08 июля | 0 | |||
| 07 июля | 0 | |||
| 06 июля | 0 | |||
| 05 июля | 0 | |||
| 04 июля | 0 | |||
| 03 июля | 0 | |||
| 02 июля | 0 | |||
| 01 июля | 0 |
Посты канала
Explanation:
Statement 1 is CORRECT: The BNSS, 2023 introduced "trial in absentia" to prevent absconding offenders and transnational fugitives from indefinitely stalling criminal proceedings. Courts are empowered to record evidence and pronounce judgments even in the absence of the accused once they are declared a proclaimed offender.
Statement 2 is INCORRECT: To protect due process, the law requires statutory safeguards before starting a trial in absentia—including declaring the accused a proclaimed offender, issuing public notices, sending arrest warrants, and observing a mandatory waiting period (90 days after framing charges).
Statement 3 is INCORRECT: The law does not deny legal remedies. It mandates state-funded legal defense for an unrepresented accused during the trial and permits the convicted individual to file an appeal in a higher court, provided they surrender or present themselves before the appellate court.
| 2 | Implementation of BNSS: First "Trial in Absentia" of Absconding Offender
News
In a major milestone for criminal procedure, a Delhi court initiated India's first "trial in absentia" against a proclaimed absconding offender under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.
About
The proceedings were invoked under Section 356 of the BNSS against absconding gangster Kapil Sangwan (believed to be operating from London).
Section 356 empowers courts to proceed with trial, record prosecution evidence, and pronounce judgments against declared absconders who evade arrest or extradition.
Eliminates the procedural requirement where trials were indefinitely stalled pending the physical presence or arrest of the accused.
Why is it Important?
Addresses a long-standing structural flaw in India's legal process where high-profile fugitives and organized crime syndicates evade justice by fleeing foreign jurisdictions. It accelerates trial completion and strengthens deterrence against organized crime.
UPSC Edge
Prelims Focus: Key provisions of BNSS, 2023 (Section 356 - Trial in Absentia); Legal requirements for declaring a 'Proclaimed Offender'.
GS-II (Polity & Governance): Criminal justice system reforms, judicial pendency, procedural streamlining, and legal measures against transnational fugitives.
#GS2 #PolityAndGovernance #BNSS #Criminal_Justice_Reforms | 633 |
| 3 | Answer Here | 535 |
| 4 | With reference to the provision of "Trial in Absentia" under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, consider the following statements:
1. It empowers criminal courts to proceed with trials, record evidence, and pronounce judgments against proclaimed offenders who have absconded to evade justice.
2. The procedure can be initiated immediately upon filing a chargesheet, without requiring any public notice or statutory waiting period.
3. A person convicted under a trial in absentia is permanently barred from filing an appeal in a higher court.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 1 and 2 only
(c) 2 and 3 only
(d) 1, 2 and 3 | 521 |
| 5 |  Нет текста... | 471 |
| 6 | Supreme Court Strikes Down Retrospective Environmental Clearances via Executive Orders
News
The Supreme Court ruled that retrospective Environmental Clearances (EC) cannot be granted to industrial or infrastructure projects through mere administrative Office Memoranda (OM).
About
The apex court struck down the Environment Ministry's 2021 Office Memorandum that created an administrative mechanism for ex-post facto environmental approvals.
The Court held that while statutory provisions under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 allow ex-post facto clearances in exceptional public interest scenarios, executive circulars cannot establish a routine regularization path for projects that commenced illegally without prior clearance.
Reaffirmed the Precautionary Principle and Sustainable Development Doctrine as non-negotiable components of environmental jurisprudence.
Why is it Important?
Prevents commercial project developers from creating a fait accompli—constructing projects without prior environmental impact assessments and later seeking routine executive regularization. It reinforces judicial oversight over executive environmental governance.
UPSC Edge
Prelims Focus: Statutory powers under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; Precautionary Principle; Difference between statutory rules and executive Office Memoranda (OMs).
GS-III (Environment) & GS-II (Judiciary): Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) norms, judicial review of executive policies, and sustainable development framework.
#GS3 #Environment #EIA #SupremeCourt | 552 |
| 7 |  As India scales its Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) and aims for AI sovereignty, digital compute capacity becomes a core national asset. However, powering these data centres creates a direct nexus between technology policy, power sector planning, and climate commitments. | 969 |
| 8 |  While a surging billionaire count reflects macroeconomic dynamism, capital market maturity, and expanding entrepreneurial ecosystems, it also highlights the policy challenge of wealth concentration. It underscores the need for progressive taxation, social security expansion, and targeted inclusive growth models. | 956 |
| 9 |  Farmer groups in Rajasthan have formally filed objections against the proposed Geographical Indication (GI) tag for Unjha Jeera (cumin) and Saunf (fennel), arguing that Unjha in Gujarat is merely a trading/marketing hub rather than the actual agrarian production center. | 1 270 |
| 10 | High-Powered Nandan Nilekani Task Force on Exam Reforms & Public Examinations Bill
News
Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced the formation of a high-powered task force led by Nandan Nilekani to overhaul national testing systems, while the government tabled the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026 in the Lok Sabha.
About
Nilekani Task Force Architecture: A multidisciplinary expert panel led by Nandan Nilekani, featuring V. Kamakoti (Director, IIT Madras), S. Somanath (Former ISRO Chairman), Tapan Deka (Former IB Director), Anita Karwal (Former Education Secretary), and Amrit Lal Meena (Logistics Expert).
Mandate: To recommend immediate technical and structural measures to secure upcoming competitive exams, deploy tech-driven anti-leak protocols, and overhaul testing infrastructure.
Legislative Push: The Government listed the Public Examinations Amendment Bill, 2026 in the Lok Sabha to establish fast-track courts, mandate 5-month trial timelines, and enforce strict penalties against organized paper-leak syndicates.
Why is it Important?
Institutional paper leaks impair meritocracy, cause severe youth distress, and stall recruitment cycles. Coupling high-tech Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) solutions (via Nilekani's task force) with statutory fast-track judicial enforcement aims to rebuild systemic trust in national examination bodies.
UPSC Edge
Prelims Focus: Nandan Nilekani Task Force composition; Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026; Fast-Track Special Courts (FTSCs) execution framework.
GS-II (Polity & Governance): Civil service recruitment integrity, administrative reforms in public testing agencies, digital public infrastructure in governance, and judicial speed.
#GS2 #PolityAndGovernance #PublicExaminations #ExamReforms
Note- Nandan Nilekani Committee was also constituted for Aadhar and UIDAI also. | 1 184 |
| 11 | Must read for Mains 2026 for GS-3 and GS-4 | 809 |
| 12 | US Trade Policy: Retaining 10% Tariff Under Forced Labor Scrutiny
News
Following the expiration of temporary tariffs imposed under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, the United States retained a 10% tariff levy on merchandise imports from India under Section 301, citing supply chain forced-labor compliance concerns.
About
Section 301 Mechanism: Allows the United States Trade Representative (USTR) to investigate and impose trade sanctions against countries whose trade practices or labor standards are deemed unreasonable or discriminatory to US commerce.
Targeted Export Lines: Primarily impacts labor-intensive export sectors such as textiles, apparel, marine products, and processed agriculture.
Comparative Positioning: Countries meeting specific bilateral compliance protocols (e.g., Japan, South Korea) secured lower effective rates compared to non-compliant export nations.
Why is it Important?
This tariff action illustrates how non-tariff barriers (NTBs) and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria are increasingly used to regulate international trade access. Indian export competitiveness requires strengthening supply chain documentation, formalizing labor standards, and pursuing proactive trade diplomacy.
UPSC Edge
Prelims Focus: Section 301 vs Section 122 of the US Trade Act of 1974; WTO principles on Most Favoured Nation (MFN) and Non-Tariff Barriers.
GS-III (Economy): Foreign trade policy, global supply chain compliance, export promotion strategies, and India-US economic relations.
#GS3 #Economy #ExternalTrade #NonTariffBarriers | 837 |
| 13 | Copyright Law vs. Artificial Intelligence (ANI v. OpenAI)
News
The Delhi High Court commenced hearings on a landmark lawsuit filed by news agency ANI against OpenAI, evaluating whether AI models can use copyrighted journalistic content for training without explicit licensing or authorization.
About
Core Legal Question: The High Court is evaluating the dynamic relationship between statutory copyright protections (Copyright Act, 1957) and rapid technological innovation driven by Large Language Models (LLMs).
Fair Use Standard: OpenAI contends that training AI on publicly available information and using Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) techniques does not constitute copyright infringement under Section 51 of the Copyright Act.
First for Indian Judiciary: This marks the first time an Indian Constitutional Court is addressing the boundaries of "fair use" in the context of generative AI training data.
Why is it Important?
The ruling will establish a critical legal precedent for India's digital economy. It balances protecting the intellectual property and financial viability of original content creators against encouraging innovation in artificial intelligence research and deployment.
UPSC Edge
Prelims Focus: Copyright Act, 1957 provisions; Exceptions under Section 52 (Fair Dealing/Fair Use); Basics of RAG and LLM architecture.
GS-III (Science & Technology & Economy): Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) in the digital age, governance of Artificial Intelligence, and protection of news media ecosystems.
#GS3 #ScienceAndTechnology #IntellectualPropertyRights #ArtificialIntelligence | 879 |
| 14 | Electoral Roll Revision (SIR) in Inaccessible Border Corridors
News
As part of the Special Summary Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, Election Commission personnel and Block Level Officers (BLOs) in Punjab are navigating flooded riverine border stretches via boats to ensure full voter registration coverage ahead of statutory deadlines.
About
Special Summary Revision (SIR): A periodic statutory drive conducted under the Representation of the People Act, 1950, to update voter lists by registering new voters, correcting details, and deleting duplicate entries.
Grassroots Execution: Utilizes Block Level Officers (BLOs) to conduct door-to-door verification, focusing on geographically isolated, riverine (Diara), and international border enclaves.
Constitutional Mandate: Implements the Election Commission of India's (ECI) mandate under Article 324 to maintain clean, inclusive, and accurate electoral rolls.
Why is it Important?
Exemplifies field-level administrative dedication to upholding universal adult suffrage (Article 326). Ensuring that citizens in remote, flood-prone, or border areas are not disenfranchised strengthens democratic legitimacy and inclusive governance.
UPSC Edge
Prelims Focus: Representation of the People Act, 1950 (Sections 14-25); Role and statutory duties of BLOs; Constitutional provisions under Article 324 and Article 326.
GS-II (Polity & Governance): Electoral reforms, inclusive democratic participation, administrative execution in challenging geographies, and the role of the Election Commission of India.
#GS2 #PolityAndGovernance #Elections #ElectoralReforms | 1 425 |
| 15 | Supreme Court Bars Unauthorized Recording of Virtual Proceedings
News
The Supreme Court issued strict directions prohibiting the unauthorized recording, editing, and social media sharing of audio-visual footage from live-streamed court proceedings without explicit judicial permission.
About
Judicial PIL: The order responded to a Public Interest Litigation highlighting the growing misuse of live-streamed proceedings, where video snippets were edited out of context for clickbait and sensationalism on digital platforms.
Regulatory Compliance: Reaffirms that while live-streaming promotes judicial transparency, court proceedings remain legally protected content under the administrative rules of the judiciary.
Contempt Powers: Unauthorized recording or alteration of court footage will attract proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Why is it Important?
Maintains a balance between the "Open Court" principle and safeguarding the dignity, privacy, and decorum of judicial proceedings. Sensationalized online clips can pressure judges, intimidate litigating parties, and distort public perception of complex legal arguments.
UPSC Edge
Prelims Focus: Model Rules for Live-Streaming and Recording of Court Proceedings; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; Constitutional status of the Supreme Court as a Court of Record (Article 129).
GS-II (Polity & Governance): Judicial transparency, open court doctrine, digital governance safeguards, and judicial independence.
#GS2 #PolityAndGovernance #Judiciary #DigitalGovernance | 1 330 |
| 16 |  Question has already being asked in Mains 2024. Further this issue becomes more important this year.
Please note that a GS-4 case study from this topic is expected one | 1 419 |
| 17 | Public Examinations Reform: Fast-Track Courts & Anti-Leak Legislation
News
Following nationwide student protests regarding paper leaks in public recruitment examinations, the Union Government announced plans to establish dedicated Fast-Track Special Courts (FTSCs) alongside a tough new statutory framework to penalize organized cheating syndicates.
About
Statutory Baseline: Builds upon the enforcement mechanisms of the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024, designating strict penal provisions for organized paper leak networks.
Judicial Mechanism: Establishes specialized Fast-Track Courts to expedite trial proceedings, addressing past operational bottlenecks where probe agencies filed weak closure reports or trials faced years of procedural delay.
Investigative Oversight: Sets mandatory timelines for charge-sheet filings, digital evidence preservation, and financial audits of private testing agencies and administrative collusion.
Why is it Important? Systemic paper leaks compromise meritocracy, delay public recruitment cycles, and create acute distress among millions of youth. Creating dedicated judicial pipelines prevents procedural delays, deters organized crime syndicates, and restores institutional trust in national public recruitment systems.
UPSC Edge
Prelims Focus: Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024 provisions; Non-bailable and cognizable nature of organized paper leak offenses; Jurisdictional powers to setup Fast-Track Special Courts.
GS-II (Polity & Governance): Judicial reforms, fast-track justice delivery systems, public administration accountability, rule of law, and civil service recruitment integrity.
#GS2 #Polity #JudicialReforms #PublicExaminations #Governance | 1 560 |
| 18 |  Reason to ask above question. | 1 640 |
| 19 | Deployment of Plainclothes Police in Protest Dispersal
The involvement of police officers in plain clothes during public protests involves a delicate balance between state operational necessity and constitutional safeguards governing accountability.
1. Arguments Supporting Legality and Justification (State & Operational View)
Operational and Tactical Necessity: Police manuals permit plainclothes officers to blend into crowds for real-time intelligence gathering, covert surveillance, and identifying agent provocateurs, armed agitators, or infiltrators who might derail a peaceful demonstration.
Immediate Prevention of Violence: In volatile situations where an assembly turns violent or threatens public safety, immediate physical intervention by on-duty plainclothes personnel can be justified under general police powers to prevent crime and protect life and property.
Absence of an Explicit Statutory Ban: While standard regulations prescribe uniforms for routine law enforcement, statutory law (such as the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita / CrPC) grants police broad discretion to maintain public order, without explicitly prohibiting plainclothes personnel from assisting uniformed teams in crowd control.
2. Arguments Demonstrating Illegality (Constitutional & Rights View)
Violation of D.K. Basu Guidelines: The landmark Supreme Court ruling in D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal (1997) explicitly mandated that all police personnel handling citizens, arrests, or detentions must wear clear, visible identification and name tags displaying their designations.
Erosion of Accountability and Due Process: When non-uniformed officers exercise physical force or lathi-charge demonstrators, individual identity is obscured. This deprives citizens of procedural due process under Article 21, as unidentified officers cannot easily be held accountable for custodial violence or excessive force.
Chilling Effect on Fundamental Rights: The presence of unidentifiable individuals using force creates panic and confusion, directly infringing upon the right to assemble peacefully guaranteed under Article 19(1)(b).
Statutory Authority Standard: Section 189 of the BNSS (formerly Section 129 CrPC) requires an explicit command of lawful state authority to disperse an assembly. An official uniform provides the necessary visual proof of that authority to prevent acts from being perceived as unlawful private aggression.
While deployable for covert intelligence gathering and identifying provocateurs, using plainclothes officers to execute direct physical force or lathi-charges against peaceful protesters is procedurally unsupportable under the D.K. Basu framework and fundamental constitutional guarantees. | 1 |
| 20 | Answer here | 1 671 |
