Stephen Wells

Using these "offensive behaviour" laws that were meant for drunks swearing in public, against political speech and criticism of government is a bit of a one-trick method, that has diminishing returns. When this policing becomes a widespread tactic, and they do it for years on end to anyone who criticises the Jewish lobbies or the government, it just enrages people as they recognise it for what it is. The obvious political silencing of dissenters. https://t.me/hersantite/465

Evil Zionists. Evil Jews. Evil Africans. Evil Indians, Asians, Arabs and Muslims. Evil Hindus, Budhists and Seikhs. Evil Christians, evil whites. In Australia its now only legal to say the last two.

"Australians have no culture" Oh yeah! Then explain this!

Hey, they denied me animal fats in their entirety. An entire essential food group withheld and replaced with poison.

Offensive behaviour laws solely exist to persecute those who criticise Commonwealth elites and policies. https://t.me/NoticerNews/3827

A Fascist will meet aggression against him with aggression of his own

Joel Webbon was probably the straw that broke the camel's back for me when it comes to feeling sullied by the name Christian by the overwhelming majority of those who identify with it. In his conversation with Thomas Rouseau he agreed that a Nation is an ethnic group with shared ancestry. He called for the deportation of 100 million non white immigrants from the USA. It looked like finally like there was a Christian pastor that would acknowledge the truth on race and nations. But like every Christian minister Ive come across there was a caveat at the end that negated all he said before it: A black man whom Webbon personally likes, is, according to Webbon, an American and should keep his citizen rights. Why? Because his family has been in the USA for 200 plus years and he has similar values to Webbon. Its just an irredemable programming of Christian leaders. An inbuilt cognitive dissonance that is almost genetic at this point. The Isrealites lived in Eygpt for 400 years. Joseph, right at the beginning of that time became prime minister and the most powerful man under Pharoh. Moses at the end of that time was raised by the Queen. All of the Isrealites just before Moses became their leaders worshipped Eygptian Gods. Were they Eygptians after 400 years? Or did they remain Isrealites? A New Testament example. The Apostle Paul has Roman citizenship. Was he a Roman? Did his legal status change which Nation he was from? Or did he remain a Jew? A Benjamite? Joel Webbon is one of the most Nationalist Christian leaders on the planet. Yet even he is tainted by the most basic of blind spots. I dont need to quote some obscure verse in the Bible to refute him. The fact I can just show two of the most pivotal charcters in the Bible and say "what Nation do they belong to?", shows that they dont deserve to be listened to and have permanently tarnished the name, Christian.

What I have believed for over a decade, long before I became a believer; Whatever Christianity becomes or is forced to become in order to survive, would simply scare the shit out of the supermajority of people who call themselves Christian today. We must now simply put the effort in to bring that about. I would like to remind all of you that RAHOWA has always had three elements. Each as important as the other. We must now pay attention to the religious aspect. Our race has always believed in the heavenly father in one guise or another through every age. It's there buried in the roots of our language, in the very formative acts of our speciation as Aryans. If we are to move forward again to bring about the Coming Man, then so too must our faith be able to survive the great winnowing. What particular form it must take is now necessarily ours to know -- but it is ours to find out.

The truth of God is evident in every tree, every flower, in the heavens and every breath of our lives. And morality, truth, good and holyness is inate in the subconsious knowkedge of every white man. Simply seek the truth in every area of live. Speek the truth whenever it is risky to do so and live according to what you believe to be true to the best of your ability. If enough white men do that, then I have faith that we will discover a shared religion again

What the British public thought of immigration in the 1970s

Christianity over the last 80 years has been a monumental failure. It has specifically failed on the subjects of nations and race. Today 99% of people who call themselves Christian have views on race that are explicitly contradicted in the Bible yet 100% of ordained priests and pastors that I have seen or heard make some error of interpretation or cherry picking and blind spots when it comes to what God explicitly commands in regards to race and nations. I could use the communist cope of "no one has tried real Christianity yet" or I could face up to reality and say Christianity is a toxic brand that goes against natural law on race. As an organised religion it is done. So where from here? I believe Jesus Christ is part of the Trinity. I believe He is the way, the truth and the life. That He is an eternal blood sacrifice for my sins and the sins of anyone who chooses to believe that he was crucified and raised from the dead after 3 days in hell. That my soul is imortal and that it will be judged upon my death. All of the last paragraph is irrelevant when it comes what needs to be done in this life. It is pointless to preach the truth of the Gospel to people if you are going to tell them lies about all the things that impact their lives in this life. Why would anyone believe in Christ if the person telling them about Him is lying (conciously or through ignorance) on race and nations? When the person can literally see the devastation that world view has caused right in front of their eyes? No body in western society is ignorant of the gospel of Christ. Everyone has heard the good news. There is no need to evangelise it. What is needed is for people to see other people living by what they believe in and experiencing outcomes from it that they find desireable. For the past 80 years 99% of Christian example has led to race suicide. As long as that is what it predominantly means to be Christian, white nationalists should reject any calls for their countries to become Christian countries again. Those within the movement who believe what they read for themselves in the Bible on race and nations rather than what Church leaders preach, should simply keep their faith personal and let their deeds in life promote their religious views. We can no longer preach the truth of Christ because our words will simply be tainted by all the lies Christians have told on so many other subjects during our lifetime. I have focused on race and nations, but there are other aspects of life where preachers have been just as wrong. All we can be is an example of Christ in our daily lives. Whatever name people like me will be called in the future, I dont know or care. 2,000 years ago Jews was the name of people who believed in the coming of Christ. Then he came and the vast majority of people who were called Jews rejected Jesus and behaved attrociously. The once respected title of Jew, became a toxic brand and those few Jews who actually followed scripture and accepted Jesus were given a new name, originally as an insult: Christian. Perhaps it is time for a new name for those few of us who follow what the Bible says and dont want to be tarnished by the blasphemy of those who are called Christians.

The only way to mitigate this negative cultural shift is to allow peaceful political organising and representation. Otherwise the frustration and resent only continues to rise even further under repression. This is a well known and studied historical phenomenon. Mass adoption of JQ awareness is occurring, and people are obviously not content with kosher-right political party placations like Reform and Restore, that will see hundreds of thousand of legal immigrants per year. People see through the ploy and are growing increasingly frustrated by it. And banning (or smashing with the police) any outfit that isn’t system approved across the West, is obviously not working or helping. It’s incredible really, all the calls to “turn down the temperature” and the system always does the exact opposite of what would be required to do exactly that - then acts surprised.

What I want most out of the lawyers and barristers arguing constituationality of the hate group laws, is for them to argue the direct opposite of Mike Burgess in regards to his advice on what is likely to increase the risk of violence from white members of the public. He argues that our "extreme rhetoric" might trigger non members of our org to take it upon themselves to get violent. Our lawyers should argue back that taking away our abilty to peacefully engage in the political process virtually guarantees members of the public taking it upon themselves to get violent. Burgess has about as many logical brain cells as a trannie who believes men can be women. He argues that if we engage in democracy our ideas will gain support. So why would we engage in violence if we are winning without it? The cognitive dissonance of the guy is off the charts. Probably because his entire intelligence training on white nationalism, consists of nothing more than having watched Romper Stomper when he was a cadet.

LIBERAL PARTY HACK INVERTS THE TRUTH White people all throughout the West recognise that our governments are replacing us via mass immigration and enforcing multiculturalism to suppress resistance. So White people band together, and use common arguments against the common foe. Then our rulers, who are beholden to foreign stakeholders and use foreigners to replace us, accuse us of “importing foreign concepts.”

After watching the Thomas Rouseau/ Joel Webbon conversation, I become more acutely aware that there is not a single Christian Nationalist Priest or Pastor whose political views doesnt have gaping holes in their consistency of theology when it comes to the subject of Nations. Joel Webbon is close but wins no cigar. I found myself waiting for him to shut up so I could hear Thomas speak. Despite the fact that this was a great conversation over all, which will hopefully pull more Christians towards the truth on race and Nations, Christian Nationalist leaders are still way behind the 8 ball. I would love to argue with someone like Webbon one day on a podcast. Rouseau was very disciplined in not being drawn into one and in keeping his talking points on priniples and politics and the end goal of achieving a white America, but I am a believer in Christ not a leader of a large secular organisation. I have no pragmatic reasons to be diplomatic and am also in a position to push back from scripture, not just from natural law.

The room in which these Aboriginal speeches are being given is the Chamber of the Legislative Council, which has a Freemason symbol – a square and compasses with the letter G inside – overlooking all the good little system pets. The G either means God, or geometry, or gnosis, or genesis – depending on which lie a Freemason wants to tell you in order to muddy the waters. The so-called First Peoples’ Assembly of Victoria comprises 33 members. 33 is the highest degree, which is the word they use for rank, in Scottish Rite Freemasonry. To suggest a secret society conspires is a conspiracy theory. Obviously, they’re just an ageing country club like any other – that just so happens to get their symbology built into the architecture housing the government and written into the legislation that creates a new branch of government.

Thomas Rouseau and Pastor Joel Webbon find common ground. https://youtu.be/J30zudllYtA?si=EH1XlsJl0sFAeqQ1

These people are in such a libtardian bubble they don’t even realise the cyclical nature of history and power transfer. They think their reign of power and tyranny will be eternal. After communism always comes a nationalist immune response. Modern third-world-race-communism will invoke the same immune response, as the populace realise this is existential. Even 18mths from now we could be looking at a One Nation kosher-right government. 4 years from there, when people are disappointed at the inevitable inaction by One Nation, you could be looking at a true nationalist government. All of their actions are going to come to light in time, no stone will be left unturned and no crime against our people left uninvestigated and unpunished.

Amen!

Some good life advice: One thing you learn in life is that, in the vast majority of cases, the people no one liked growing up did deserve it. You'll always hear conventional wisdom that the people no one liked growing up have hearts of gold and are Christ-like. In reality, no one liked them because they were weird assholes that were a drain to be around. The only reason people think the opposite is because of Hollywood, and the people writing the Hollywood scripts are those same unlikable, bitter people. It's not that hard to get along with the average person and be likable. If you're in a situation where everyone avoids you, you consistently have issues with everyone around you, etc., then the problem is you, not them. 193 countries tier stuff on a personal level. https://t.me/totallyawesomefriends