Yuliana Titaeva / Юлиана Титаева

🇬🇧 Speaking of the villainous portrayal of Russians in American movies, in our interview (eng subtitles) with Pepe Escobar, we mentioned the series "Madam Secretary," notable for "predicting" the conflict in Ukraine back in 2015. It has everything you need: ✅ Nationalist organization "Kiev Knights," led by Oleg Zelinsky. ✅ President of Ukraine deceiving the United States and involving them in the conflict. ✅ Russians represented by Ostrova, who killed her husband, the President of Russia, and took his place. ✅ A Secretary of State with a 20-year tenure in the CIA, who saves the world (regularly violating international law). ✅ Disruption of oil supplies, battles in Mariupol, the threat of nuclear war. Released in 2014 and is most likely a soft power project by Hillary Clinton ahead of the 2016 elections. A similar project, "Servant of the People," about a history teacher who became president, was produced in Ukraine in 2015. The lead role was played by Volodymyr Zelensky. Is on Netflix and HBO.

🇧🇷 Falando da imagem de vilania dos russos nos filmes americanos, em entrevista com Pepe Escobar, mencionamos a série "Madam Secretary", notável por "prever" o conflito na Ucrânia já em 2015. Lá tem tudo que é preciso: ✅ A organização nacionalista "Cavaleiros de Kiev", liderada por Oleg Zelinsky. ✅ O presidente da Ucrânia envolvendo os EUA no conflito por meio de engano. ✅ Os russos representados por Ostrova, que matou seu marido, o presidente da Rússia, e assumiu seu lugar. ✅ A secretária de Estado, com 20 anos de serviço na CIA, que salva o mundo (regularmente violando o direito internacional). ✅ Interrupção do fornecimento de petróleo para a Europa, combates em Mariupol, ameaça de guerra nuclear. Lançado em 2014, é mais provável que seja um projeto de soft power de Hillary Clinton antes das eleições de 2016. Um projeto similar "Servo do Povo" sobre um professor de história que se torna presidente foi lançado na Ucrânia em 2015. O papel principal foi interpretado por Volodymyr Zelensky. Está na Netflix e HBO.

🇷🇺 Говоря о традиционном злодейском образе русских в американских фильмах, в нашем интервью с Пепе Эскобаром мы упомянули сериал «Мадам секретарь», примечательный в первую очередь тем, что еще в 2015 году «предсказал» конфликт на Украине. Там все, что нужно: ✅ Националистическая организация «Киевские рыцари», возглавляемая Олегом Зелинским. ✅ Президент Украины обманом вовлекающий США в конфликт. ✅ Кровожадные русские в лице Марии Островой, убившей своего мужа Президента России, чтобы занять его место. ✅ Госсекретарь с 20-летним стажем в ЦРУ, которая спасает мир (регулярно нарушая законы США и международное право) во имя добра и демократии. ✅ Прекращение поставок нефти в Европу, бои в Мариуполе, угроза ядерной войны. Сериал вышел в 2014 и наиболее вероятно является soft power-проектом Хиллари Клинтон перед выборами 2016. Аналогичный проект «Слуга народа» о школьном учителе истории, ставшим президентом, был выпущен на Украине в 2015. Главную роль сыграл Владимир Зеленский. Сериал крутится на HBO и Netflix.

9 мая 1945 года

🇧🇷 Dia da Vitória em Moscou em 1945. 🇬🇧 Victory Day in Moscou in 1945.

🇷🇺 Где границы дозволенного в переписывании истории? На вопрос отвечает пресс-секретарь Белого дома Карин Жан-Пьер. — Известно, что в самой Украине смешанные взгляды на эту идеологию (про нацизм). Почему мы не осуждаем проявления украинского нацизма и продолжаем платить за него из своего кармана? — 79 лет назад США и наши украинские союзники вместе боролись против тоталитарных режимов Гитлера и Сталина. Хотя Берлин сейчас наш союзник, угроза с Востока сохраняется. Поэтому мы продолжим поддерживать Украину всеми доступными нам средствами. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🇧🇷 Onde estão os limites da permissibilidade na reescrita da história? Responde a secretária de imprensa da Casa Branca, Karin Jean-Pierre. — É sabido que na própria Ucrânia existem visões mistas sobre esta ideologia (sobre o nazismo). Por que não condenamos as manifestações do nazismo ucraniano e continuamos a pagar por isso do nosso próprio bolso? — Há 79 anos, os EUA e nossos aliados ucranianos lutaram juntos contra os regimes totalitários de Hitler e Stalin. Embora Berlim seja agora nosso aliado, a ameaça do Leste persiste. Portanto, continuaremos a apoiar a Ucrânia com todos os meios disponíveis para nós. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🇬🇧 Where are the boundaries of acceptability in rewriting history? Responds the White House press secretary Karin Jean-Pierre: — It is known that even in Ukraine there are mixed views on this ideology (about Nazism). Why don't we condemn manifestations of Ukrainian Nazism and continue to pay for it out of our own pocket? — Seventy-nine years ago, the USA and our Ukrainian allies fought together against the totalitarian regimes of Hitler and Stalin. Although Berlin is our ally now, the threat from the East persists. Therefore, we will continue to support Ukraine with all available means.

27 000 000 09.05.1945 📍Berlin 🇷🇺 Никто не забыт, ничто не забыто. 🇧🇷 Ninguém é esquecido, nada é esquecido. 🇬🇧 Nobody is forgotten, nothing is forgotten.

⬆️ We did not ask our ancestors for this sacrifice, nor did they ask for it: the historical moment came to give it away, and they did. But now it's our turn to sacrifice and fight for our memory and victory with parades, conversations about the important, viewings of "The Dawns Here Are Quiet," and festive posts on May 9th. And we give this sacrifice, it's necessary. Happy Victory Day ❤️ Credit: Пролетарии всех стран

🇬🇧 About Our Great Victory Every year on the eve of May 9th, a battle for historical memory of our great victory begins in the media space. Do those who repeat the clichés about "this day of mourning," "why the parades?" or "is this victory necessary?" realize that these are not their own judgments, but narratives cynically imposed on them by the very propaganda from which they avidly hide in "alternative sources of information" like YouTube and Meduza? And that the memory of the fact of our victory has long been, systematically, and deliberately destroyed? "By whom?" the liberal will ask, and I will answer "by those who paid for this war." And it was paid for by the US Federal Reserve and the Bank of England. Having profited from the First World War and boosting their industrial sector and economy, the US needed continuation. A new war promised to solve problems according to the principle of "everything everywhere at once": rivers of oil in the form of fuel and lubricants would bring dividends to Standard Oil, industrialists like Ford would sell military equipment, American banks would lend money to warring sides (both), and the unfinished business of Europe in the First World War and the burgeoning USSR would be "chopped down to the last" soldier. The planned action was phased and stretched in implementation for almost 20 years. First, the US intentionally attacked the economy of Germany, which had sunk into an economic crisis due to reparations payments after losing the First World War, then offered its own help to it - in the form of loans and active penetration of American capital into the German industry, which in a few years rose to second place in the world, but with a small nuance: it all belonged to American owners. The German Farbenindustrie was under the control of Standard Oil, General Electric controlled the electrical industry through AEG and Siemens, Opel belonged to General Motors, Henry Ford owned 100% of Volkswagen's shares, and by 1933, under the wing of American capital, large banks such as Deutsche and Dresdner were also. At the same time, with American capital money, the Nazi party and personally Hitler were prepared and sponsored. To bring a new political figure onto the big stage, the United States first intentionally withdrew its loans from the German economy, causing a sharp crisis there, then let all the dogs loose on the current government and offered the electorate a familiar solution: "you need a new leader, like a comedian or an artist, and we have him!". History always repeats itself twice. What was done in 20 years completely prepared Germany for war. Apparently, it was promised that "we will take the Union quickly, and you, Dolphi, will receive the Nobel, the cover of Time, a house in Nice, a place in history, and a bucket of choice cocaine" (or was this promised to another president?), but of course, no one was going to take the Union quickly). The US needed a long, drawn-out, exhausting war, in which they would feed, finance, and ruthlessly exterminate every one of its participants. The winner didn't matter, but we ended up paying the huge price. They pay for the war today, implementing the same plan right before our eyes. They also pay for the revision of history, erasing any information about their interests in the Second World War and gradually shifting the blame for its outbreak onto the winner, while appropriating the fact of victory for themselves. They instill in immature minds something about the futility of holding parades, suggesting "quietly mourn at home," and hit the target with it precisely because they know that every historical symbol must be loud and noticeable, and what is not repeated en masse, as truth, from generation to generation, is simply forgotten forever. They made hundreds of films about the Jewish people, but not a single film about our 28 million victims, who fell so that Standard Oil would have something to fuel its oil. ⬇️