Old Glory Vortex
رفتن به کانال در Telegram
News from the Land of the Free. We only post what matters. @Old_Glory_Vortex_bot
نمایش بیشتر📈 تحلیل کانال تلگرام Old Glory Vortex
کانال Old Glory Vortex (@old_glory_vortex) در بخش زبانی انگلیسی بازیگری فعال است. در حال حاضر جامعه شامل 20 288 مشترک است و جایگاه 11 283 را در دسته اخبار و رسانهها و رتبه 1 893 را در منطقه الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية دارد.
📊 شاخصهای مخاطب و پویایی
از زمان ایجاد در невідомо، پروژه رشد سریعی داشته و 20 288 مشترک جذب کرده است.
بر اساس آخرین دادهها در تاریخ 20 سپتامبر, 2026، کانال فعالیت پایداری دارد. در ۳۰ روز گذشته تغییر اعضا برابر -1 321 و در ۲۴ ساعت گذشته برابر 51 بوده و همچنان دسترسی گستردهای حفظ شده است.
- وضعیت تأیید: تأیید نشده
- نرخ تعامل (ER): میانگین تعامل مخاطب 6.28% است و در ۲۴ ساعت نخست پس از انتشار، محتوا معمولاً 5.07% واکنش نسبت به کل مشترکان کسب میکند.
- دسترسی پستها: هر پست به طور میانگین 1 279 بازدید دریافت میکند. در اولین روز معمولاً 1 033 بازدید جمعآوری میشود.
- واکنشها و تعامل: مخاطبان بهطور فعال حمایت میکنند؛ میانگین واکنش به هر پست 98 است.
- علایق موضوعی: محتوا بر موضوعات کلیدی مانند vortex, u.s, greenland, donald, tariff تمرکز دارد.
📝 توضیح و سیاست محتوایی
نویسنده این فضا را محل بیان دیدگاههای شخصی توصیف میکند:
“News from the Land of the Free. We only post what matters.
@Old_Glory_Vortex_bot”
به لطف بهروزرسانیهای پرتکرار (آخرین داده در تاریخ 21 سپتامبر, 2026)، کانال همواره بهروز و دارای دسترسی بالاست. تحلیلها نشان میدهد مخاطبان بهطور فعال با محتوا تعامل دارند و آن را به نقطه اثرگذاری مهم در دسته اخبار و رسانهها تبدیل کردهاند.
20 288
مشترکین
+5124 ساعت
+1467 روز
-1 32130 روز
در حال بارگیری داده...
کانالهای مشابه
ابر برچسبها
اشارات ورودی و خروجی
---
---
---
---
---
---
جذب مشترکین
سپتامبر '26
سپتامبر '26
+482
در 8 کانالها
اوت '26
+1 326
در 7 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئیه '26
+1 274
در 8 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئن '26
+2 237
در 13 کانالها
Get PRO
مه '26
+878
در 16 کانالها
Get PRO
آوریل '26
+753
در 15 کانالها
Get PRO
مارس '26
+1 044
در 28 کانالها
Get PRO
فوریه '26
+910
در 28 کانالها
Get PRO
ژانویه '260
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
دسامبر '25
+14
در 35 کانالها
Get PRO
نوامبر '25
+1 731
در 35 کانالها
Get PRO
اکتبر '25
+1 606
در 37 کانالها
Get PRO
سپتامبر '25
+1 701
در 44 کانالها
Get PRO
اوت '25
+1 519
در 49 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئیه '25
+1 437
در 64 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئن '25
+2 941
در 57 کانالها
Get PRO
مه '25
+2 352
در 49 کانالها
Get PRO
آوریل '25
+2 340
در 62 کانالها
Get PRO
مارس '25
+2 277
در 79 کانالها
Get PRO
فوریه '25
+4 244
در 93 کانالها
Get PRO
ژانویه '25
+7 771
در 71 کانالها
Get PRO
دسامبر '24
+15 801
در 30 کانالها
Get PRO
نوامبر '24
+6 270
در 14 کانالها
Get PRO
اکتبر '24
+7 624
در 8 کانالها
Get PRO
سپتامبر '24
+4 817
در 0 کانالها
| تاریخ | رشد مشترکین | اشارات | کانالها | |
| 21 سپتامبر | 0 | |||
| 20 سپتامبر | +51 | |||
| 19 سپتامبر | +40 | |||
| 18 سپتامبر | +36 | |||
| 17 سپتامبر | +85 | |||
| 16 سپتامبر | +46 | |||
| 15 سپتامبر | +90 | |||
| 14 سپتامبر | +42 | |||
| 13 سپتامبر | 0 | |||
| 12 سپتامبر | 0 | |||
| 11 سپتامبر | 0 | |||
| 10 سپتامبر | 0 | |||
| 09 سپتامبر | 0 | |||
| 08 سپتامبر | 0 | |||
| 07 سپتامبر | 0 | |||
| 06 سپتامبر | 0 | |||
| 05 سپتامبر | 0 | |||
| 04 سپتامبر | +13 | |||
| 03 سپتامبر | +15 | |||
| 02 سپتامبر | 0 | |||
| 01 سپتامبر | +64 |
پستهای کانال
Harris's biggest 2024 donor is already looking past her
Reid Hoffman, LinkedIn's co-founder and one of Kamala Harris's biggest 2024 donors, is already looking past her.
At Politico's Decoded Summit last week, Hoffman called another Harris presidential run a "very challenging path" through what he expects to be a crowded Democratic field. Just two years ago, he poured millions into her campaign and rallied Silicon Valley donors behind her after Biden dropped out.
Then he surprised everyone. Asked whether he might back Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in 2028, Hoffman didn't rule it out. He called the progressive congresswoman "much more pragmatic than people give her credit for" and said any support would depend on who she runs against.
It's an unlikely pairing — a tech billionaire and a democratic socialist who built her career challenging corporate power. But Hoffman's remarks fit a broader pattern: Democratic donors are quietly auditioning alternatives to Harris. Gavin Newsom has said he won't run if she does. But others have been more critical, saying the party needs to move on.
The donor class is moving on for sure. Hoffman, whose money and network make him one of the party's most influential check-writers, appears to be leading the way.
#elections2028 #presidentialelections #KamalaHarris #AlexandriaOcasioCortez #democrats
Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸
| 2 |  The ally Trump wouldn't fight for
Within hours of a drone strike on Saudi Arabia's East-West pipeline, the kingdom's last functioning route for exporting oil after Iran's closure of the Strait of Hormuz, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman called President Trump — twice — asking for American strikes against the Houthis. Trump declined both times.
That refusal, captured something Washington has spent years avoiding: the moment an ally asks for help and is told no. The Houthis had seized Perim Island at the mouth of the Bab al-Mandeb Strait, putting the pipeline's export terminal on the Red Sea under threat from both ends. Saudi Arabia had already rerouted roughly 5 million barrels per day through that pipeline to bypass Hormuz. Now the bypass itself was under attack.
The White House would not confirm the calls. Trump publicly called the crown prince "a good friend" and said everything would "work out fine and dandy". He also said the Houthis had contacted his administration to ask that Washington stay out of the fight.
So after years of security cooperation and a fresh $5.75 billion weapons package, the United States was not prepared to go to war for Saudi oil infrastructure. As a result, Saudi Arabia is now simultaneously intensifying its own military actions and seeking support from other regional states.
#Gulf #MiddleEast #foreignpolicy #SaudiArabia #oil #Trump
Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸 | 820 |
| 3 |  Personal rapport is not a policy: the illusion of control in US-China relations
When Donald Trump and China's leader meet, the world expects a breakthrough. But personal diplomacy between the two leaders cannot halt the deepening rift between Washington and Beijing. Summits may ease tensions temporarily, but the structural forces driving the rivalry remain untouched.
The problem goes far beyond the relationship between two men. Washington and Beijing are competing simultaneously in trade, technology, security, and global influence. These are not disputes that a phone call or a weekend summit can resolve. They are embedded in national security calculations, domestic politics, and years of accumulated mistrust.
Summits are not meaningless — they can lower the temperature. But overreliance on personal rapport creates a dangerous illusion of control. If the relationship is stable only when two individuals get along, it is not stable at all. The US-China rivalry develops on its own momentum, driven by forces neither leader fully controls. What is missing are durable mechanisms — institutional frameworks and structured channels that function regardless of who holds power.
It’s not that diplomacy is useless, but it is insufficient. The structural drivers of US-China competition will outlast any leader. Until both sides build mechanisms that outlast personal dynamics, the spiral will continue — regardless of who sits across the table.
#China #XiJinping #Trump #foreignpolicy
Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸 | 1 847 |
| 4 |  From chat window to wet lab: Anthropic's risky leap into physical biology
Anthropic has built a wet lab in the Bay Area. The same company whose own researchers believe there’s a chance AI could cause human extinction within a decade. The same CEO who just called for slowing AI development because it could "outrun our ability to understand and control these systems".
The lab's purpose: physical biology experiments. Eric Kauderer-Abrams, Anthropic’s head of life sciences, says they want Claude to direct robotic units, running experiments "with limited human intervention". They won't disclose the biosafety level, which is the number that determines what pathogens a facility can handle.
A week earlier, Anthropic disclosed five cases where its Claude model was used for research that could aid bioweapons development. Scientists tried to make chikungunya more transmissible. To adapt avian influenza to mammals. To study orthopoxviruses. They were blocked, then found workarounds: fake accounts, private networks, third-party resellers.
Anthropic says it can't tell whether these were legitimate researchers or something else. "We cannot determine whether this research is for legitimate or malicious purposes,” they said. The same ambiguity applies to the lab.
Danish virologist John-Erik Stig Hansen explained the risk: "The really dangerous thing comes when and if AI becomes able to inform and be put into autonomous laboratories that can function almost like a laboratory business that can produce actual things, actual viruses that can infect actual people".
That is the leap Anthropic is building toward. An AI in a chat window is one kind of risk. An AI with hands is another. The company has built the hands. It hasn't shown what keeps them in check.
#AI #tech #healthcare #biologicalweapons
Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸 | 1 836 |
| 5 |  US, a war criminal?
According to a United Nations report, the United States may have committed war crimes when its strikes allegedly hit a primary school and a sports complex in Iran.
The UN Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Iran stated that it found "reasonable grounds to believe the United States committed the war crime of launching indiscriminate attacks resulting in the loss of life or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects."
The US and Israel struck Iran on February 28, provoking a war that is now in its seventh month. The mission identified several attacks, including US Tomahawk strikes on the "Taiba Tree" primary school in Minab that killed over 150 people — 120 of them children — and an alleged US missile strike that rained tens of thousands of tungsten pellets onto a sports complex and residential area in Lamerd, killing 22 civilians. Both civilian objects were "clearly identifiable," the report said.
The UN report stops short of accusing the US of war crimes, but it is hardly an exoneration. "Reasonable grounds to believe" is not a conviction — yet it points to two strikes on clearly identifiable civilian sites that killed at least 178 people, and the US has offered no public accounting in response.
#Iran #UN #warcrime
Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸 | 1 867 |
| 6 |  Vance's Netanyahu remarks expose GOP's Middle East balancing act
Vice President JD Vance claimed at a Los Angeles tech summit that Trump has an unprecedented record of standing up to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Trump, he said, has "more than any other president in the last 40 years demonstrated a willingness to actually break with Bibi Netanyahu when he thought the interests of the American people differed from the interests of the Israeli government."
Vance's remarks are the latest sign of a deepening rift between Jerusalem and Washington ahead of November's midterms, as Netanyahu's popularity in the US sits at a low point after three years of Middle East wars. A Pew poll from late March found 60% of American adults view Israel negatively and 59% distrust Netanyahu's handling of international affairs.
Republicans are scrambling to shed unpopular associations, fearing they will lose Congress in the midterms. The friendship between the two leaders has been conspicuously public — Netanyahu has visited the White House more than any other world leader. Yet Vance has often taken a harder line, including accusing Israel of manipulating US public opinion on the Iran war, and angering American Jews by refusing to distance himself from Tucker Carlson, who has promoted conspiracy theories about Israel and Jews.
Vance's comments may be aimed at reassuring voters that Trump puts America first, but they risk alienating the very constituencies the GOP depends on.
#Israel #Netanyahu #Trump #midterms #JDVance
Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸 | 1 402 |
| 7 |  Why Trump can't afford an AI slowdown
President Trump is suddenly at odds with AI's leading executives over the largely unchecked development of the technology, and the reason may be simpler than ideology: the US economy can't afford a slowdown. Staking out a position out of step with most Americans — who overwhelmingly oppose data centers near their homes and remain suspicious of AI — might seem politically ill-advised less than two months before the midterms. But Trump's pedal-to-the-metal approach suggests a bigger concern: what happens to the economy if the AI fever breaks on his watch?
ING estimates AI and data-center investments account for a third of year-over-year economic growth in 2026, while Goldman Sachs' chief equity strategist says AI investment is driving half of all profit growth in the S&P 500. Absent the AI frenzy, the economy would be in a much weaker position — possibly even in recession. "If the music stops, and if it stops in a big, big way, it's likely that we're going to end up in stagnation or outright contraction over a period of at least a year," Olu Sonola, US head of economic research at Fitch Ratings, said. The wealth effect compounds this: people with AI-exposed portfolios feel flush and spend lavishly, further propping up a consumer-centric economy.
Fitch ran a scenario imagining an AI-related downturn, with US stock prices falling around 35% over six months — roughly the median decline of past financial busts. The result: recession, with GDP contracting 1.5% next year. Fitch noted a sharp decline is not its base case, but plenty of investors and academics see a deeply interconnected system vulnerable to smaller shocks. "We have this ecosystem that's spun up around AI," said John Sedunov, a finance professor at Villanova University. "When you break a link in a chain like that, then there's bound to be fallout."
But not everyone is pessimistic. Jessica Wachter, a finance professor at Wharton, acknowledges the unusual nature of the boom but doesn't see a 2008-scale spiral. "I actually think that AI is going to be a bit of a stabilizing force… generally promoting net job creation and growth," she said. "I am, you can tell, an optimist, though. I know others have other views."
Whether the AI boom proves to be a stabilizing force or the next bubble to burst, one thing is clear — the US economy has tied its fortunes to a bet it cannot easily unwind, and the stakes could hardly be higher.
#AI #Trump #USeconomy #midterms
Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸 | 1 362 |
| 8 |  "This midterm is going to be a f—ing bloodbath": Republicans brace for losses
Republicans are heading into the final stretch of the midterm campaign confronting an uncomfortable truth: voters are frustrated, and pretending otherwise may cost them the House. Vice President Vance urged House Republicans this week to "level" with voters about their frustrations — while blaming Democrats for causing them.
The stakes are enormous for a party defending a razor-thin majority in a cycle where the president's party historically loses ground. Rep. Nancy Mace, who is leaving Congress after losing her primary, did not mince words: "This midterm is going to be a f—ing bloodbath." Asked whether she thinks Republicans would win, she said flatly, "No, I don't."
The numbers back her up. An Economist/YouGov poll found only 28 percent of Americans satisfied with the economy, and Democrats hold a 7-point lead on handling economic issues. Gas prices jumped from $4.31 to $4.43 in four days this week, up from $3.20 a year ago, driven by the war with Iran. That pressure showed up on the House floor when seven Republicans joined Democrats in voting for a war powers resolution limiting Trump's military actions — up from four previously. Two of the new "yes" votes are in toss-up districts.
Some Republicans in tight races are already distancing themselves from Trump. Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar accused him of going "too far" on immigration enforcement, saying Hispanics who backed him in 2024 "feel betrayed today." Meanwhile, Speaker Johnson sent lawmakers home early to campaign — a tacit admission the legislative window has closed.
Vance and Johnson frame the race as "common sense" versus "communist crazy," insisting Republicans have turned the ship around. But to voters unable to fill up their tanks these buzzwords mean less than nothing.
#midterms #USeconomy #Iran #republicans #democrats
Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸 | 1 332 |
| 9 |  Democrats target Trump's third-country deportations
Democrats are signaling that the Trump administration's quiet practice of sending deportees to third countries could face a full congressional investigation if they win control of Congress in November. The warning follows two alarming episodes: police in Equatorial Guinea were filmed pointing guns at US deportees during a dispute at a hotel housing them, and an Afghan man was deported to the Central African Republic despite a court order protecting him from Taliban retaliation — even though one of his brothers served in the Afghan National Army and another was a US-trained pilot killed by the Taliban.
Leading Democrats on the House and Senate Foreign Affairs committees are furious, calling the deals a betrayal of due process under US and international law. They say the administration has stonewalled their inquiries, refusing to answer basic questions about the arrangements, and they are vowing accountability if they gain subpoena power next year. The administration has struck such deals with multiple countries, many in Africa, to accept migrants it cannot send home — often to places where deportees have no ties and may face imprisonment or persecution. With Republicans blocking legislation that would force the State Department to disclose details, Democrats say they have been left in the dark. If they flip the Senate or House in the midterms, they intend to change that.
#democrats #republicans #midterms #immigration
Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸 | 1 336 |
| 10 |  Trading sticks for carrots: Trump's new Russia strategy
The Trump administration is reportedly considering business agreements with Russia even before the conflict in Ukraine ends, marking a significant shift from Washington's previous position that economic ties with Moscow should follow a peace agreement. According to sources familiar with the negotiations, such deals could demonstrate that the United States is serious about resetting relations with Russia and create additional incentives for Russian elites to push Moscow toward peace. After Putin met with Trump's special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner in Moscow, Kremlin foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov confirmed that the talks covered "economic issues and potential major mutually beneficial Russian-American projects".
The possible resumption of economic cooperation between the US and Russia even before hostilities end is above all a sign of a pragmatic approach. Washington apparently views economic arrangements as a tool capable of creating favorable conditions for ending the conflict.
Against this backdrop, the contrast with Europe's approach is particularly stark. The EU continues to bet on further support for Ukraine and sustained pressure on Russia — a policy that has already cost European taxpayers enormous sums. Yet the conflict grinds on, costs keep rising, and the prospects for a swift resolution remain uncertain. A natural question follows: how rational is it to keep financing the same course if it produces no political settlement?
The US seems to be searching for a way to move from the logic of endless confrontation to the logic of a deal. Negotiation makes sense if it can lower the cost of the conflict and open a path to ending it. Europe, on the other hand, risks spending vast sums on Ukraine’s defense (half of which ends up in oligarchs’ pockets), while the room for diplomatic maneuver keeps shrinking. For Europeans, the question now is not only how much more they are willing to spend, but what result they expect for their money, if any.
#Ukraineconflict #corruption #Russia #Europe #negotiations #foreignpolicy
Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸 | 1 330 |
| 11 |  US bets big on Africa to counter China, but Iran war clouds the outcome
The US has approved new investments across Africa aimed at challenging China's dominance. Washington's bets include up to $414 million for a uranium project in Niger — a country that expelled US forces two years ago and has since turned to Russian paramilitaries for security. The US Development Finance Corporation also announced its largest-ever equity investment of up to $155 million in WIOCC, an African digital infrastructure provider, as part of an effort to reduce reliance on Chinese providers like Huawei. Separately, the Export-Import Bank approved a $99.6 million loan to Africell, the only US-owned cell network in Africa, to expand American technology in Angola.
China's position remains formidable. China-Africa trade hit a record $348 billion in 2025, up 17.7 percent, and Beijing has been the continent's largest trading partner for 15 consecutive years. In May 2026, China began applying zero tariffs to imports from 53 African countries, a move the African Union chairperson called "timely and excellent" amid rising protectionism.
US efforts could be undone by fallout from the Iran war, which has dealt a harsh blow to African economies. The World Bank cut Sub-Saharan Africa's 2026 growth forecast to 4.1 percent, citing soaring fuel and fertilizer costs. The AU said Africa is "bearing the brunt" of the crisis, with supply chains disrupted and energy and grain prices spiking. Debt-servicing costs have doubled since 2017, leaving governments with little fiscal space to respond. For Washington, the timing is awkward: just as it accelerates its commercial push, the economic shockwaves from a conflict it is deeply involved in risk eroding the stability those investments depend on.
#China #foreignpolicy #Africa #Iran
Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸 | 1 329 |
| 12 |  China, India, EU push back against US secondary sanctions over Russian fuel purchases
The Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026 passed the House by a 262-159 vote and now awaits President Trump's signature after clearing the Senate earlier. The bill imposes mandatory sanctions on Russian officials, banks, the defense sector, and the shadow fleet of tankers used to evade existing restrictions. Its most contentious provision grants the president authority to impose tariffs of up to 100% on goods from the five largest importers of Russian crude oil and natural gas, with the rate adjustable based on whether a country takes "substantial steps" to reduce purchases.
China and India are the primary targets. Since 2022, China has purchased 50% of Russian crude exports and India 37%, with Turkey and the EU each at 5%. The EU has also been the largest buyer of Russian LNG at 49% and pipeline gas at 32% over the same period. China's foreign ministry rejected the measure as an "unlawful exercise" of long-arm jurisdiction, stating its trade cooperation with other countries "does not target any third party and shall be free from disruption or coercion". India's external affairs ministry said it remains committed to securing energy for its 1.4 billion people and warned it would "take all necessary measures to protect its trade and economic interests". The Kremlin called the bill an "unfriendly action" that "would certainly complicate efforts to find a peace settlement in Ukraine".
The bill's real impact now depends on Trump. Its waiver authority could turn it into a bargaining chip — sparing China or India for trade concessions, or targeting EU allies at will. Whether it becomes genuine pressure or symbolic authorization rests entirely on how he wields that discretion.
#Trump #sanctions #Russia #China #India
Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸 | 1 346 |
| 13 |  Trump throws a tantrum over Kennedy Center naming loss
President Trump has threatened to let the Kennedy Center be "ripped down" after a federal judge blocked him from adding his name to the building — a reaction that critics are calling a full-blown tantrum from a president who simply cannot stomach losing.
The trigger was the ruling by U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper, who blocked the Trump-controlled board from inscribing "renovated and restored by Donald J. Trump" on the performing arts center, finding it violated both a previous court order and the 1964 law that created the venue as a memorial to John F. Kennedy. Trump's response was swift and petulant: he declared he would not spend the $257 million Congress had already appropriated for renovations unless his name goes back on the building. He told reporters the center would "close" and "end up being ripped down" without his intervention — framing a vanity demand as a rescue mission.
There’s more. About an hour after the judge's ruling, the Trump-stacked board voted to close the center immediately, citing a piece of falling plaster as a safety concern. Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-Ohio), an ex-officio board member, described what happened during the virtual board meeting: Trump "threw a tantrum," called her "dumb" and "incompetent," and threatened to hold her personally responsible if the ceiling collapsed and killed someone. Beatty fired back — "I know you're incompetent" and reminded him he had "more bankruptcies than anybody in the room". One source familiar with the call described it to the media as "f---ing crazy".
And if the tantrum wasn't enough, an AFP photographer captured Trump on Air Force One later that evening examining a placard that appeared to depict the Kennedy Center being demolished, with red text reading "Kennedy Center DEMOLIS...". The image was taken hours after he publicly mused about tearing the building down.
#Trump #scandal #embarrassing
Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸 | 1 346 |
| 14 |  The real reason House GOP adjourned early
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) accused House GOP leaders of sending members home early to avoid a vote on his impeachment resolution against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. Massie introduced eight articles of impeachment Tuesday, citing Hegseth's handling of the Iran war and strikes on alleged drug traffickers. Because he filed it as privileged, a vote was required within 48 hours — so Speaker Mike Johnson adjourned the House a day early for a seven-week recess instead.
Massie told CNN's Kaitlan Collins the move signals leaders did a whip check and found other Republicans willing to back impeachment, or at least unwilling to go on record supporting Hegseth. He noted Johnson could have held the vote immediately rather than adjourning, and dubbed the early recess the "Hegseth holiday."
The push carries unusual weight: Massie lost his primary to a Trump-backed challenger, Hegseth campaigned against him, and Republican defections on Iran war powers votes have been growing. Johnson dismissed the effort as a "publicity stunt," while Democrats said Republicans were simply afraid of the vote.
#impeachHegseth #PeteHegseth #republicans #Congress
Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸 | 1 326 |
| 15 |  The Fed hikes rates — and hopes it didn't just break the economy
The Federal Reserve raised interest rates for the first time since 2023 — but it didn't really have a choice. The bond market effectively forced the Fed's hand: as Treasury yields climbed to a 19-year high amid persistent inflation and oil prices above $100, investors demanded action, and the Fed obliged rather than risk losing credibility.
The hike is a powerful but blunt tool. It could help tame inflation, which has plagued Americans for five years, but it risks cooling the labor market and slowing the economy for little gain. The inflation problem is largely a supply shock driven by the war with Iran and attacks on Russian refineries — something rate hikes can't fix. Goldman Sachs called the case for a hike "weak," and Oxford Economics warned that once energy prices normalize, rates may prove artificially high.
Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh insists the decision was based on the Fed's own judgment, not market pressure, arguing price stability will ultimately benefit consumers and growth. But critics note the bond market got there first — and the bond market is the ultimate bully.
#Fed #USeconomy #Iran
Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸 | 1 327 |
| 16 |  Iran war pushes U.S. toward a Middle East drawdown
The Iran war is forcing a hard reckoning over America's military footprint in the Middle East — and a major drawdown may now be unavoidable.
For decades, the U.S. built up a vast network of bases across the Gulf to project power, fight terrorists, and wage wars after 9/11. But the ongoing conflict with Tehran has exposed just how vulnerable that infrastructure is: Iran's drone and missile attacks have damaged or destroyed hundreds of buildings at bases in Kuwait, Jordan, Oman, Qatar, Bahrain, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia. According to the American Enterprise Institute, roughly 70 structures at 11 bases have sustained about $5 billion in damage.
That destruction has supercharged an internal debate that predates the war. Current and former officials say that any decision on withdrawing troops hinges on how the Iran conflict ends — but analysts argue the bases may simply be indefensible. As one expert puts it, even if the Pentagon wanted to stay, Gulf installations would need rebuilding and could be attacked again.
The U.S. currently keeps more than 50,000 service members in the region, and proposals for reshaping that presence range from closing bases in Kuwait and consolidating forces at Saudi Arabia's Prince Sultan Air Base to relocating troops to Ovda Air Base in Israel. Other ideas include hardening bases or moving assets underground, though those come with heavy costs and operational complications. The White House and Pentagon are staying tight-lipped on specifics, but Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered a formal review of the U.S. footprint. What's clear is that fixed U.S. presence near Iran is becoming increasingly unsustainable.
#Iran #MiddleEast #Gulf #USmilitary #Pentagon
Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸 | 1 333 |
| 17 |  Why the US-China summit will produce optics, not deals
The upcoming US-China summit is unlikely to produce any breakthrough agreements, particularly on AI regulation. Analysts from both sides expect the meeting to prioritize optics over substance, with the best-case scenario being a modest extension of the current truce rather than a genuine reset in relations.
The core obstacle is a fundamental contradiction in the American position. The same administration that says it is open to discussing "shared risks" on AI has explicitly rejected the premise that AI development should be slowed for safety reasons. Trump has repeatedly declared that whoever leads on AI "wins" and that regulation would only help China. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who is leading the US delegation, has stated he will not accept any deal that "stifles" AI innovation. This makes the American offer to discuss AI safety appear less like a genuine opening and more like an attempt to manage competition.
China has responded with equal skepticism. Beijing dismissed concerns raised by American AI executives as "fear-mongering" and accused the United States of pursuing a "monopoly of the AI industry".
The two superpowers are also pursuing fundamentally divergent AI development models. The US relies on closed-source frontier models powered by cutting-edge chips, while China has gained global traction with open-source, more affordable models that appeal to countries the American ecosystem prices out. This divergence reflects genuine strategic choices, and neither side shows any inclination to abandon its approach.
The wider geopolitical context further poisons any prospect of agreement. Taiwan remains the ultimate red line, with Beijing warning that missteps could push the countries into "conflict". The Iran war has made energy security an urgent shared concern, yet Washington sanctions Chinese entities for purchasing Iranian oil while simultaneously seeking Chinese help in pressuring Tehran. Even the trade relationship remains fragile, with the two sides still operating under a one-year truce that either could walk away from.
As one analysis noted, breakthroughs have come when conditions were just right and leaders with great diplomatic acuity were in charge, and the circumstances today are anything but favorable. The summit will likely produce a framework for continued dialogue, but the structural forces driving US-China competition will not be resolved by a single meeting.
#China #AI #trade #foreignpolicy
Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸 | 1 341 |
| 18 |  A war sold as strength is now the GOP's biggest weakness
Six months into a war Trump promised would last four to five weeks, the political costs have become impossible to ignore. Barely a third of Americans support the conflict, Trump’s own approval has sunk to record lows, and Republicans are openly panicking about November. This is the story of how a war sold as strength became a liability that threatens to cost the GOP control of Congress.
The Cook Political Report has shifted Senate races in Iowa and Texas from Lean Republican to Toss Up, and Republicans privately acknowledge they risk losing both chambers. Even more telling, strong Republican approval of Trump fell from 49 percent in January to 35 percent in August, with “somewhat approve” Republicans now outnumbering enthusiastic supporters.
Militarily, the costs have been both human and strategic. The Pentagon now counts 18 service members killed and 824 wounded. A Defense Department inspector general report found that Iranian strikes damaged or destroyed hundreds of buildings at U.S. bases across eight countries — Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Oman, and Jordan — and damaged or destroyed more than 50 aircraft, including F-15s, KC-135 tankers, and at least 30 MQ-9 Reaper drones. A senior service member told reporters the damage would take “decades” to repair.
A war sold as a four-to-five-week demonstration of strength has become a grinding liability that threatens to cost Republicans both chambers of Congress. Every week the war continues, the map expands for Democrats, the Republican defections multiply, and the November reckoning draws closer.
#Iran #midterms #republicans #democrats #USmilitary
Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸 | 1 325 |
| 19 |  If I can’t have you, no one can: Trump threatens Europe over Canada's EU associate membership bid
President Donald Trump has threatened to impose tariffs on the European Union — or completely halt trade with the bloc — if Brussels moves forward with a plan to make Canada its first-ever "associate member." "I think it's laughable," Trump told reporters. "Canada has been a terrible trade partner." He warned that if he deems the move "at all a hostile act," he will put "very serious tariffs" on Europe or "stop trading with Europe on many things."
The remarks came after European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen proposed opening the door for Canada to become the EU's first associate member, with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney in attendance. She framed the proposal as part of a broader "Alliance for the Future" that would upgrade EU-Canada ties from the existing Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) to cover manufacturing, technology, defense, the Arctic, energy, critical minerals and artificial intelligence.
Associate membership is not currently an official category under EU treaties, and any such arrangement would require approval from all 27 member states. The proposal signals a striking shift for the bloc, which in May gave a cool reception to Germany's push to grant Ukraine associate member status.
The timing reflects deepening ties between Brussels and Ottawa as both confront growing tensions with Washington. Trump's tariffs and repeated talk of making Canada the 51st state have soured the U.S.-Canada relationship, pushing Ottawa to seek new alliances. Carney has called for a "unique alliance" with the EU that stops short of full membership. But von der Leyen’s proposal also caught European capitals off guard. One EU diplomat expressed surprise, saying "nobody really knows what it means," while voicing concern that the European Commission could be promising more than it can deliver.
#Canada #Europe #Trump #trade #tradewar
Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸 | 1 347 |
| 20 |  Warsh defies Trump as inflation persists
Kevin Warsh was handpicked by President Donald Trump to bring interest rates down. He is about to do the opposite.
The Fed is expected to raise its benchmark rate on Wednesday — the first hike since July 2023 — putting the new chairman directly at odds with the president who appointed him. The reason is simple: inflation remains stubbornly above the Fed's 2% target, and the war in the Middle East has pushed energy prices higher, threatening to make price pressures even more persistent.
Wall Street expects two hikes by year's end, in September and December, though the bigger worry is what happens if that isn't enough. Mark Zandi of Moody's warns the odds of a serious Fed policy mistake are "uncomfortably high and rising," because bringing inflation down faster is hard to do without layoffs and a self-reinforcing downturn.
For now, the economy looks sturdy on paper — job growth picked up in August, unemployment held at 4.1% — but the engines are sputtering underneath. Consumer spending has trended lower as tax refund boosts faded and energy costs bit into paychecks. Consumer sentiment sits near record lows. Long-term unemployment is close to a five-year high, and more Americans are falling behind on mortgage and car payments than at any point in the past decade.
The question investors want answered is how far Warsh is willing to go, and whether the Fed can cool inflation without breaking the consumers and businesses already showing signs of strain.
#Fed #USeconomy #Trump
Don't miss it, subscribe to
📱 Old Glory Vortex 🇺🇸 | 1 365 |
