Bonfire of Dreams

The hidden, entropic cost of "progress". Have you ever wondered why some architectural marvels and inventions from centuries or even millenia ago cannot be fully replicated with modern technology? Or why is building or making them considered too "inefficient" today, and was not hundreds and thousands of years ago when resources were much more difficult to procure, learned architects harder to find and logistics, tools etc. allegedly far less advanced? Why is the expressive potential of languages seemingly becoming less add less utilized? It would suffice to open a book in English written in the 19th century and the one written today to notice the difference. Yet, we have more functionally literate people than ever. And much greater academic output, but with hardly any significant breakthroughs. Why are so many people more busy than the medieval serfs but with having less to show for it? Why is the quality of almost everything deteriorating to the point where some things that were considered cheap centuries ago are now considered luxury? Where are the great statesmen, poets, inventors, military leaders and other capable people of the past? Why are we ruled by incompetent clowns and the lowest common denominator? Why is the AI that some are superfluously calling "super intelligent" supposedly making most of its users more 'stupid'? Why are people more atomized and their relationships more superficial than ever despite being more "interconnected" than ever? There are many other examples, however these should be enough to establish a pattern. What actually happens is that the system is not introducing any negative entropy (falsely implied by the notion of progress), but redistributing the existing negentropy to sustain itself. Some of the mechanisms involved are the following: 1. Reduction of the informational density or depth of the average dynamic node and forced homogenization of the outliers (social, economic and other types of conditioning or elimination when it comes to people) 2. The thinning of the volume of the connections between the nodes (their relationships), whether it be between the people (dynamic nodes) or between the people and objects as static nodes. For example, repairing your leather shoes was quite common a century ago, products lasted for much longer etc. 3. The expansion of the system boundaries and the increase of the number of connections (e. g. various blocs, multiculturalism, economic expansion, logarithmic scaling etc.). 4. The concentration of the internal control of the system at the decreasing number of increasingly saturated nodes while others are desaturated, converging towards one. In other words, their "god" did not create the universe, but is its logical conclusion (if left to its internal mechanisms alone) However, this process is not enough to sustain it forever, as we can see with the second law of thermodynamics... The Ouroboros eventually completely devours itself. Real Gods are still out there however, and for some, within. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_0gama-E8dg

Materialism doesn't justify its existence and nihilism is a psyop meant to deprive you of your goals while they pursue theirs. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6eLj_IcdhhM There are other empirical examples that point towards an immaterial aspect of existence, such as the application of the Fourier transforms and the extremely low probability for the spontaneous assembly of complex life within the time frame of the energetic "life-cycle" of the universe, however listing and explaining all of them would be excessive for the purpose of this article. In a purely deterministic, causal, material existence, not only is any notion of the observer completely redundant (unnecessary, excessive and systematically unjustified) but there is no room for consciousness or reflection either because that requires an offset from the causal mechanism itself. A shift in perspective, no matter how small. Which is only possible in a probabilistic (stochastic) environment, and any such environment/system (especially in its blank/unactualized state) requires external influences (multiple) to collapse the chain of states in any particular direction and for there to be enough such directions to reflect from each other, even if the offset between their outward configurations and/or time instances is minimal. For now we should note that this offset can be angular (derived) and intermittently phase synchronized (independent) because there is a qualitative difference between the types of observers. The actual system only appears to be deterministic because of the gradual entrainment and phase-synchronization (coagula). The threads of fate are not fully predetermined, they require the Norns to weave them. In a purely material existence, every function, even the most complex ones, could be executed without anyone or anything being aware of it or subjectively reflecting on it. You could have entire cities of p-zombies and there would be no loss of function whatsoever. On the contrary, it would be even more efficient! And would there actually be any passage of time if all the variables are known? Or would it all resolve instantaneously, just as some subatomic particles can know the state of another regardless of their distance? By observing the natural world, we can notice that almost all of its systems, especially the biological ones, are highly optimized to function within their neighboring physical environments. And the natural world rewards energy efficiency, which doesn't permit much of a margin for great evolutionary leaps, whims or mutation risks. Consciousness, as some of us may experience it, self-awarenes and what's generally considered to be sapience are completely alien to a deterministic, materialistic system. What purpose does a music taste, philosophy, game, art, or a plethora of other mental and unnecessary physical activities serve there? The last straw of the materialist is nihilism, and not even the kind where the objective meanings are relative or inherently missing, but complete absurdism. However, given the two competing views that are internally consistent, the one that can justify itself will always have a greater degree of truthfulness and dominance, even if there are no absolute objective truths. People who have the capacity for greater aspirations, quality and degree of freedom (not to be confused with vain pseudo-individualism and degeneracy) are often discouraged from pursuing their goals by being presented with a society that's absurd by design and being told that such a state is perfectly natural. Which is a psyop created by those who could never reach the same heights, to maintain their parasitic system. Lower life forms such as the ants and the pigs do not feel a need to justify or explain their existence, romanticize/glorify it or to "cope" with it, that seems to be exclusive to the higher life. Including the various whims and romances of the higher Ego, that can even be very destructive and contrary to the purely biological criteria. But without which, the higher life as we know it wouldn't be possible.

Who are the Gods, and how they shape the world? There were many interpretations of polytheistic beliefs across the higher cultures, some considering their ancestral Gods to have been the mere anthropological representations and explanations of the otherwise impersonal and mechanistic natural forces, some as mere aspects or daemons of a single root principle/deity, some as them being archetypal, literal, allegorical etc. While most of those contain some elements of the truth (even if misinterpreted though various cultural lenses, false assumptions and due to the lack of sufficient surviving sources), and while they may be applicable to one portion of the population or another (depending on their essential nature), most of them are missing or underemphasizing the most important aspect. Personality as the function of the higher Ego. True Gods were either the personal negentropy materialized (and/or otherwise made actual/manifest in this existence) or at least some of our ancestors recognizing and projecting their own divine potential upon the various forces and phenomena. In other words, the Gods were either the actual otherworldly (but real) entities acting directly or through the nature, or someone seeing their own reflection in the Well of Mimer. They were not the world itself, nor were they partaking of its archetypal source (logos), they were the external entities (Wills) capable of shaping it and thus making it actual. Not all entities wielding great powers are/were the Gods however, some are only the inferior mimics and secondary, derived approximations with no ontological essence of their own. Unfortunately, these impostors were often revered as well, although more commonly among the inferior peoples. Real Gods are the ghosts in the machine making the otherwise meaningless and apparently (but not truly) causal phenomena divine, personal and indeterminate. Great ancestors, kings, wizards, inventors and heroes carrying the golden thread (Spirits) that fought entropy against all odds were often accepted in their company, while for some others it was unattainable. Thor was not a personalization of lightning, he was the person wielding it according to his Will and a role model for his people. An inspiration that was invoked or appeased during the ceremonies and prayers. How old was the original Thor? Or was it Indra? Those myths might have been the surviving verbal history of a much older time, interpreted through the lens of people who have long lost the abilities of their divine ancestors, but whose memory persisted as folklore. Agni was not the principle of fire/heat, or even the flow of energy among the diffused phenomena, he was the one controlling that flow. And not the only one who could do that. The first great ancestors wielding the power of fire (after the cataclysm) became like Agni. It was more than mere mastery of the elements however. So was Mars invoked or evoked as the God of war so that his loyal armies get infused with his characteristics and receive his blessings, which go beyond the merely archetypal. For some of those people, it was more profound than merely appeasing him and giving him offerings. Although it's indisputable that some did just that, as was the case with the other PIE-descended cultures when it comes to their variants of such deities. To treat either approach as exclusive, would be to miss the greater picture. Hyperborean perspective does not concern itself as much with the ethno-cultural peculiarities of various PIE populations and their popular customs (where the few surviving accounts were often made by their opponents or enemies), as much as it is concerned with the remaining traces of that forbidden, ancient worldview that our divine ancestors have held in common, so that we may follow their examples and restore or manifest our personal Godhood. The philosophy of Essential Pluralism fully underpins the more classical view of polytheism as well, and serves as its bulwark against the Monist/Pantheist and Brahminic/Abrahamic subversions.

I am working on a writing now.. To loosely speak to it, as I find my words. There is a great deal of victim hood and submission, even beyond the Abrahamic, into further still the whole awakened notion and projects that fall outside of its wake. "you are going to ascend"... "you are going to heaven .. or hell" "you will, you will" All while sort of presenting a reality with practical challenges to enjoy the actual realm we live in. It is a deferment.. and while I feel we do evolve and step into our personalities through experience.. I cautiously view even these pathways - that are presented - as the truth. I retain my position. I do think we are here to experience life and remember ourselves/find our personality. And within that all, we are in a scripted reality of sorts. We had to agree to a arena, or control system.. if we wanted that experience. It reinforces to me that Earth may be the most challenging reality there is... and we happen to be here - now. There is the 3, 6 9, 12. Also the 4, 8, 12. More to come.

Arghh. If we can be fed on. We can also feed. Where is the line drawn. *fed/feed is omni-variable A positon implies another, and a other. I begin to understand the concept of.. An Oath of Moment

Within anothers position; Still finding words. Is it not just submission, in a manner, to determine that the path is complex? What would the laughing god say? To a point I made before, does not a complex solution to captivity(participation) in the one/this/reality/time.. gatekeep souls from simple wisdoms. To again speak to your paranoia.. no one is coming to save us, and no one is coming to take you. All this up to now, and most of what comes next. It is not only allowed, it is encouraged. With consent, do these conversations occur within the sight of the local observer. Who again invited us all in for this grand adventure. What is your positon on this.. are the answers complex.. or easily observable. To imagine.. Are we here to move within the birth of personalty or just some script running around. Please consider my questions. Always//Allways

The first "open nest" baby chick born. I did not brooder cage off the eggs and at times other hens laid into the clutch. Im replenishing my polish and silkie bloodlines as they had the worst luck this year. Should be a beautiful white polish chicken one day. Looking forward to what this ones siblings look like!

The bridge, heck lets call it the rainbow road, to pull from the reality. If two are agreeable then anything can be tackled. If two sides agree to a mercy, and not bloodletting, anything can be negotiated. Too often I feel there is a need to rise in contest, when perhaps the offer (to debate) is for practice. We could play fight as kiddos. As learned personalities, I have met a few who are at peace -- most still seek defense/war. The reality may run on battery, legion, of souls fueling the experience we have now. But.. if we are so powerful -- as it is said.. how did we get suckered into here? Instead. I say we agreed. We agreed to this. We consented. At some point. You selected this life, I feel. As did I. And that includes all that has been, and will be. Rested in the now / the moment. Those who match in time, frequency, and destination.. Owe it to themselves to see the adventure out.

https://youtu.be/Pmd3UiNfNkA?

https://youtu.be/DWBYg-ZET-o?

Learn to pilot. You've got your inputs.. Start moving.. To expand; As the reality around you continues to expand. More and more nonsense. Problems for all, it would seem. As I have said, find your footing. The landscape is what it is, the "until it isn't" does not seem to have any easy measure. Secure your borders, and prepare for all timelines. Do not forget to still have fun. As we witness the end of these times let us still remember to smile. Comforts we have now, will not compare to the comfort of brotherhood, truth, community, sacrifice.. I will not stop saying this. Find your footing, for soon you will need to move.

Yet the one by some means perpetuates the reality. We did have some atlas reference earlier. The one by observation is maintaining the reality and we are participant in the dream/reality/etc. The parasite relationship goes both ways. If it feeds on us to sustain the reality, spirits then also feed on the one for experience. Which by extension to me could mean the outside reality self consentually agreed to the experience that was to be provided by the mechanisms of the one. If i can observe consent and research what I am getting into as a mortal than my greater self, who by just that is greater -- would have a notion of exactly what I got myself into by coming here in the first place. This consideration removes fear and places curiosity and adventure - even if into horror - at the control of the spirited rather than the notion that we are in submission/ battle within the construct of the one. Do you not think there is value in conversation with a being only capable of deception (by your framing). I am not yet decided on the nature of it all, and thus have no feelings of terror or bliss to assign to the one, or the considered outside zero space. It may have purpose outside my comprehension from my mortal position.

I will have to review again then. I have read over the content but as it is your content I am only going to absorb so much across one plane of understanding. A dialogue is a preferred mechanism for building understanding and that is what I wish to construct. There is a bridge between our two understandings, articulations, etc. I feel exchange also assists with widening the language so that additional souls/spirits can participate. If you'd prefer a taller, over wider, conversation style i can adapt (and re read the material in more detail)

Exerts; Alright here we go. In your perspective what do you call or name the "outside" self that is not within the void/construct of the one. Do you have a terminology or description of the spirited souls whom are not presently within this reality. I consider both spirits engaged in the one reality and observing the one reality, but not tangibly participant. I call these beings or perspectives, watchers, observers, etc. Personalities. As a side step the personality is you, myself, and others who are in an active (spirit driven) participation in the creation, flawed as it is, of the one. It is the repeat manifest of a particular character of being, where be it within this life, a reincarnation life.. or outside of this place is consistent. It is not a script, it is true personality. It is choice, in a manner, manifest by a being of infinity ( from zero, I feel).. You could perish a thousand times or be redrawn in another layer of the construct. You, as a spirited one, would always become you. And if removed from here, and in the zero/undefined.. would continue to be you. As you are not dependant on the material. You are you, not of the one - but perhaps.. the one only who has your vibration or frequency. That specific unit. Across all time, space, of the always, and the allways. My vibration/coms/language is its own. I welcome your words. And it is this, the one seeks to copy. And its legions. If i could ask this one a question, it would be what has it forgotten. And in its forgetfulness... how does it feel about how it has lashed out in its frustrations.. and then by extension the spirits that have fallen to and bonded, knit themselves into the construct of the one. I ask the same of you. What would you ask the One, if called to bare witness to its doings and manipulations.

The world insists on placing positions and angles. The witness, or observer, has no such position of angle. They just see.

I have not had much to write lately.. It is not to say I am not thinking.. but where to begin. I feel now there is little care to grasp at the edges.. the carving must begin. So I prepare myself for the words to come. For they must be said, and they must also dance around the bonfire. Fluid flames.. nature's wrath. Time marches on through our story and soon too shall souls march towards their goals.. to fulfill their stories.. destiny in a way. The greater world will continue to attempt to water down. It is unfortunate for that project that eventually souls that can drink will arrive. The reality/realm will only accept false inputs for so long. It is not the End Times.. But certainly. Times are a changing.

A few good souls do great work here.

Racoons keep coming after the flocks feed. Head rooster Salty himself here, doing some sparring and preparing for the fight ahead.

Considerations being given to the mechanism of sacrifice, as a construct of trust - and control.