Red Eagle Law, L.C.

Last minute question about our 75-country pause group lawsuit? Your best chance at having it addressed before onboarding closes is in the AMA group: https://t.me/+RneOQfgtb-5iMWQ7 -curtis🦅

FAQ: How many families have signed up to participate in REL’s 2nd group lawsuit to challenge the State Department’s 75-country pause on IV issuances? Answer: 102 families! Families are from Nepal, Thailand, Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Ghana, Brazil, Egypt, Bangladesh, Colombia, DR Congo, Russia, Morocco, Belarus, Iraq, Nicaragua, Guatemala, Albania, Ethiopia, Jamaica, Bhutan, and Cameroon! Onboarding ends tonight at midnight PST! ⌛️ https://redeaglelaw.com/75-country-pause-lawsuit -curtis🦅

"Hundreds of foreign nationals selected for the federal government’s Diversity Visa Program filed a class-action lawsuit Wednesday against the Trump administration, challenging a series of immigration suspensions they argue unlawfully threaten their chances of obtaining U.S. residency. The lawsuit, Medani v. Trump, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. It seeks to compel federal agencies to resume processing and final adjudications for 664 families — representing 1,489 plaintiffs — before a statutory deadline of midnight Sept. 30, 2026. Under federal law, any diversity visas not issued by the end of the fiscal year are permanently lost." https://nepyork.com/2026/06/24/lawsuit-challenges-trump-administration-over-diversity-visa-freeze/

Update for Diversity Visa program. The Trump-revised version form used to collect entries (DS-5501) for the program was approved by OMB on 04/15/2026, yet FY-2027 entry period still not announced. https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAViewICR?ref_nbr=202603-1405-003 • curtis🦅

If you are on X, help us raise awareness about Trump suspending DV program with a like or retweet: https://x.com/curtismorrison/status/2069946332899606605?s=46 - curtis

📢Excited to announce: Medani v Trump has been filed in NDCA. This lawsuit is a putative class action filed on behalf of 664 Diversity Visa selectee families (1,489 Plaintiffs) against the Trump administration. We're challenging the suspension of the DV program. Let's go! 🗽

FAQ: . Some of my friends with pending I-765 cases have reached out to their congressional representatives for assistance or status inquiries. Would doing the same have any negative impact on our case in any way? If not, would you generally recommend that we reach out to our congressman’s office as well? Answer: I do recommend congressional inquiries. Here is why: 1) They are free. Cost you nothing. 2) If you are in litigation, or will be someday, the responses you received pursuant to your congressoinal inquiries can sometimes be helpful evidence. 3) It is important for members of congress to know what is not working in our government. 4) Sometimes, the congressional inquiry can lead to a path to persuading the congressional person to ask USCIS or State Department difficult questions. There is no scenario, that I have seen, where a congressional inquiry would have an adverse effect on a benefit application. -curtis🦅

Onboarding for Class Action Group Lawsuit for Immigrant Visa Applicants Blocked by the 75-Country Suspension ends on Friday!⌛️ This is our second group lawsuit challenging the 75-Country Pause. The first group lawsuit, Storie v Trump,1:26-cv-00567, is pending in the US District Court for the District of Columbia. The main difference between that lawsuit and this lawsuit is this lawsuit will be a putative class action. https://redeaglelaw.com/75-country-pause-lawsuit

The REL legal team had the privilege of attending last week’s Annual AILA Conference, which allowed us to talk with colleagues about the 75-country pause group lawsuit we are now onboarding. Here, I was even able to connect with immigrant visa applicants impacted in Thailand! https://x.com/m66479elizabeth/status/2068669938445750483?s=46 -curtis 🙏

RE; Dorcas. Sorry I did not share government's motion for stay pending appeal before ( was on phone).

As expected, the government has filed an emergency motion to stay the Dorcas order. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72369535/dorcas-international-institute-of-rhode-island-v-united-states-citizenship/ -curtis

‼️ We are now launching onboarding for our Class Action Group Lawsuit for IV Applicants Blocked by the 75-Country Pause ‼️ This class action group lawsuit is an opportunity for Immigrant Visa (IV) applicants to challenge the legality of the State Department’s January 14, 2026, decision to pause all visa issuances to IV applicants who are nationals of the following countries:  Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Antigua and Barbuda, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belize, Bhutan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Burma, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Colombia, Cote d’Ivoire, Cuba, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Dominica, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Fiji, The Gambia, Georgia, Ghana, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Haiti, Iran, Iraq, Jamaica, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Laos, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Nepal, Nicaragua, Nigeria, North Macedonia, Pakistan, Republic of the Congo, Russia, Rwanda, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Thailand, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, and Yemen. ❌ Deadline to participate:  June 26, 2026  ➡️To participate in this lawsuit, a participant must: 1) be the primary applicant of an Immigrant Visa application in the Employment or Family-Based categories, and not a DV-2026 selectee.   2) have already submitted a DS-260 and have an Immigrant Visa Case Number, and  3) not be a participant in another lawsuit challenging the 75-country pause. (This means no Storie v Trump plaintiffs can participate.)  Please review our page for disclosures and FAQ’s to confirm that you qualify to participate and that you understand what the case is about and how the attorney’s fees works.  Onboarding here: https://redeaglelaw.com/75-country-pause-lawsuit Still have questions regarding eligibility and onboarding? Ask our team here: https://t.me/+RneOQfgtb-5iMWQ7

“In response to questions to the DHS about the ruling, James Percival, DHS’s general counsel, said in an emailed statement that “the Left” has been using arguments about racial “animus” to go after “virtually every Trump-era Department of Homeland Security policy”. He called it “sabotage dressed in legal clothing”. It’s not clear what will happen in the many relevant lawsuits following the national ruling. Curtis Morrison, an attorney representing Ali and dozens of other physicians from countries affected by the travel ban and subsequent USCIS pause, said in his experience he has only seen the agency processing applications of plaintiffs in the lawsuits. He is concerned USCIS is “slow-walking the implementation of the order”. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/17/trump-immigration-crackdown-doctors

FAQ: For the upcoming 75-country pause group lawsuit, will just removing the 75-country pause help with my appliication's delay with SAO/security vetting? Answer: If the consular officer is still waiting for a security advisory opinion (SAO) for an application, just removing the 75-country pause barrier may not solve all the  problems. But it could, because it is more difficult for the State Department to ignore an application/pending SAO when the application is subject to litigation. -curtis🦅

Attorney representing USCIS Director Joseph Edlow: "We are not representing the government in Dorcas and cannot speak to what actions may or may not be taken in that case."

This is how I responded. -c🦅