$===>$$$$$$$

Original plan has never changed. Postponed, but regrouped for a better execution now timed with the world stage being ready. https://bitcoinist.com/cryptog-group-ctgx-the-second-coming-of-bitcoin-creator-satoshi-nakamoto/

Here’s another one to think about. We all know Elon and CryptoG have partnered up. Reading CryptoGs goals and thinking about what Elon is trying to do with the “Everything” X app… 40,000 ft. What’s happening here?

$1T market cap (backed by reserved gold) divided by 30k token supply… = projected token price of ? Faces will melt. 😎

CTG with a 30k supply evolved through a process to become NOUR with a 30k supply. And here we are in the 4th quarter of 2023. 👀

Hope everyone got their orders in at 88xlm/NOUR before they sold out. Congrats if you did. 😎 It does look like there are 4 accounts controlling the price a bit with a script. None of these 4 are holding any significant amount. Expect it to systematically come down some till they find the sweet spot that investors are still coming in, then only up from there! HOLD THE LINE. DO NOT OFFER YOUR NOUR FOR LESS THAN YOU PAID!

Has everyone seen the additional wrapped assets offered by fchain.io? More 1:1 bridges to bring liquidity into Stellar from other blockchains.

notes WGUARDIAN cashbacks from the GF through Whip is being payed out today. Lets take a dive on this controversial topic and see whats happening. These assets are being distributed through an account ending in OSZG you can look at it here. https://stellar.expert/explorer/public/account/GBDGC5T5CN4HRPU57Q5KJKZLUVMRQTS4Q4ENAVNE3SW43VTANNO4OSZG This OSZG account was created by ZPND. this one.. https://stellar.expert/explorer/public/account/GD6OZZ3VEOQFDGQUJ2DEJUZGSGZTF7ROCVNYSGSAKULTIAIPAYHIZPND That account seems soo familiar .. must be because it is the parent account that all eASSETS lead back to from Elon Stellar. 🤔 interesting data point.. but then.. ZPND seems to get funded through an account ending in SCC7. 👀 Where have we seen SCC7 before? Oh yeah, thats CryptoG's Master account being tracked by Aurax.. But.. But.. how is CryptoG and Elon Stellar involved with a project from MAS.. How come so many things are all starting to connect? .. 😎

Stellar Network has a native token that powers any and all transactions that take place on the network, the Stellar Ledger is not agnostic. It can only be powered by the Lumens (XLM). Lumens (XLM) also happens to be a digital asset available for purchase on it's native network, the Stellar Network. This means that if a bank performs a interbank transfers but decides to clear and settle with another token, in this case, XRP as an example, they still utilize the lumens in their 'back office systems' because they need to plug into an IBM MQ client; the IBM MQ client implements the ISO20022 messaging system for all B2B and B2C transactions/payments/transfers for the entire banking system because 97% of all banks utilize IBM core banking systems; IBM's infrastructure leverages Stellar Network P2P architecture in creating a distributed database system in which the network of servers, nodes, and middleware can all become a decentralized, closed loop system. This then results in the Lumens being invoked at some point down the line with every transaction that is made on IBM's blockchain for leveraging the Stellar Consensus Protocol indirectly. This is why the transaction fees on Stellar are the cheapest of any other solution because it doesn't require as many layers to funnel through in order to settle, clear, and finalize a transaction. In addition to providing the ISO20022 entry points for the financial system, IBM also has it's own payment solution that settles based on smart contracts done on Hyperledger Fabric, which utilizes stellar to 'provide the network and digital asset management to facilitate the settlement of transactions'.. This is where the key differentiator takes place. Ripple offers a payment solution that banks need to CHOOSE to utilize XRP for their transactions in order for XRP to be used, in which case they still have to use IBM on the backend for ISO20022 message routing. Meanwhile, banks also have the option to utilize IBM's payment solution which utilizes stellar (which is cheaper and faster) since they already have to utilize IBM MQ regardless. So whether they choose to utilize any payment solution or IBM's payment solution, lumens is still involved in some way, shape, or form whether they indirectly or directly utilize the Stellar network. In other words, the saying "XRP is for institutions and XLM is for retail" is completely wrong. XLM is actually for both.

Do you see? 👁️ Any & all Ripple payments/credit transfers/interbank transfers/etc need to align with ISO20022 messaging schema >> Financial institutions connecting to the system must install an IBM MQ client >> IBM has a blockchain payments solution, which integrates into the IBM Blockchain Platform through the open source Stellar network. With Stellar, payments are settled based on instructions provided through smart contracts on Hyperledger Fabric; once payments are completed, they become immutable and final once recorded >> Stellar, now part of the Hyperledger project, provides the network and digital asset management to facilitate the settlement of transactions cleared on Hyperledger Fabric.

Now considering the above 👆🏼read this..”… resulted in the Ripple blockchain. While still in existence, we believe Ripple cannot realize the vision of a truly open payment network for both governance and technical reasons.”

This is new EU requirement set today is EXACTLY why I’ve been saying the statement above for months. XRP needs Stellar while Stellar doesn’t necessarily need XRP 😉

“Your financial institution will need to buy or build a payment application that interfaces with an IBM MQ client” 🙃