RC God

We don’t write JEE or NEET for our students. We don’t have to. Our results speak for us. Year after year, students who walk through our doors walk away with the ranks they once only dreamed of. From ordinary classrooms to extraordinary AIRs, the transformation speaks for itself. Behind every rank is a system built on discipline, proven strategies, expert guidance, & relentless preparation. Thousands of students trust us with their dreams. The results? Toppers who make headlines, ranks that open the doors to India’s most prestigious institutions, & futures transformed forever. You can call it hard work. You can call it dedication. We call it the difference our preparation makes. After all, when the same institute keeps producing top rankers, the results are telling you something. The only question is: will you be our next success story? Which one of the following most accurately identifies the flaw in the director’s reasoning? A. It assumes that because the institute’s students achieve high ranks, the institute’s teaching methods must be more effective than those of competing institutes, even though no comparison of the methods has been provided. B. It treats the high ranks achieved by the institute’s students as evidence that its preparation produces those results, without adequately considering whether other factors could explain the students’ success. C. It presumes that the institute’s preparation is necessary for achieving a high rank merely because students who receive that preparation sometimes achieve high ranks. D. It equivocates between students’ potential to achieve high ranks & their actual achievement of those ranks, treating the former as though it were sufficient to establish the latter. E. It assumes that because the institute’s preparation contributes to students’ performance, the institute’s role in producing high ranks is substantial enough to justify the prominence it gives those results in its advertising.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the flaw in the celebrity's reasoning? A. It assumes that a policy that benefits the government must have been adopted primarily to benefit the government. B. It presumes that the government would locate examination centres near candidates' homes if doing so served its electoral interests, although the argument provides no evidence about how electoral incentives would affect that decision. C. It infers a difference in the government's underlying priorities from a difference in outcomes without adequately establishing that the outcomes are attributable to those priorities rather than to other relevant factors. D. It assumes that the public's inconvenience is sufficient to establish that the government has failed to fulfil its responsibilities, regardless of the practical constraints involved. E. It treats the government's interest in securing votes as incompatible with its interest in conducting examinations efficiently.