Election Data Analyzer

County 10 of 12.....U/(D+R)=1.00 for the year.

County 9 of 12.....U/(D+R)=1.09 for the year

County 8 of 12.....U/(D+R)=1.06 for the year.

County 7 of 12.....U/(D+R)=1.28 for the year...this is the highest so far but look at the explosion after the election. It is driving up the number.

County 6 of 12.....U/(D+R) = 0.995 for the year.

County 5 of 12....U/(D+R) = 0.938 for the year. This would clearly be 1.0 if I truncated this at 11/4/20.

For those of you who want to try this at home, you will need the EDA file and the stand alone dashboard file. I will repost the later on USEIP soon. The former is already posted on USEIP.

And here is a side by side showing the the cummulative with the U/D+R ratios. Again, those of you who have that stand alone dashboard excel file that I was supporting back in summer of 2021 can do all of this yourself, don't take my word for it.

To be continued but it occurs to me that truncating the data betwee 1/1/20-11/4/20 (instead of 12/31/20) and running the same analysis would clearly dial all counties to 1.0 ratios which is "bizarro land". To be clear, I don't know how this type of manipulation (if it is that) could be used in nefarious ways. I am simply presenting the data here. Counties 5-12 are coming...

County 4 of 12.....U/(D+R) = 1.035 for the year.

County 3 of 12....U/(D+R) = 1.074 for the year

County 2 of 12....U/(D+R) = 0.987 for the year.

This table is also in the companion dashboard file right next to the chart above. Please try this at home. What does this mean? Lets look at the number of work days per year and conservatively say that is 260 (52x5, I will ignore holidays). There were 97 days where the ratio of U/D, U/R or U/(D+R) was an integer (30+48+19). That means 37% (97/260) of the time, voters as an aggregate registered in this county in perfect ratios of integers. For example, looking at line 1, there were 15 days in the year, when the ratio of U/D+R was = 1. There were 2 days where the U/D+R was = 3. That is how you use this table. Is this natural human behavior? I am going to resurrect this analysis from the dustbin of EDA archives and go through 12 counties and summarize it all together. Let's see what comes of it.

Folks, eons ago when I started EDA (July 2021 lol), I issued a companion dashboard excel file. Later, I incorporated many of the dashboard elements into the main EDA file, but not all. Given the work of Draza Simith and Jeff O'Donnell as I have posted above from the CD Podcast where they look at ratios of Trump/Biden ballot tabulator counts it has caused me to realize there is something hiding in plain sight, which is above. This graph was part of EDA originally, many of you have this file (that I stopped supporting) and can do this at home. I would ask you to do so. Don't take my word for it. Look at how the ratio is dialed in the closer we get to the election. Is this human bahavior? Look at how the ratios become more dispersed after the election. Is that more representative of human behavior? But wait, there is more....

Need some motivation to fix 2020? Kamala becomes a SCJ. Hillary appointed VP. Biden resigns. Ready to fix it now?

"And the 47th" ### https://t.me/georgenews | @GEORGENEWS

The 45th and 47th POTUS....said by the man himself.

This is the ratio of [Unaffiliated/(Dem+Rep)] daily registrations for an entire year 2020 in one county. The total ratio for the year is 0.989. Weird huh? Almost like someone was trying to control it. Is this happening in your state?

This is the ratio of [Unaffiliated/(Dem+Rep)] daily registrations for an entire year 2020 in one county. The total ratio for the year is 0.989. Weird huh? Almost like someone was trying to control it. Is this happening in your state?