fa
Feedback
LeakyVax

LeakyVax

کانال بسته

Channel dedicated to leaky vaccines, viral evolution, and all things contagious. Contact: LeakyVax@proton.me @LeakyVaxBot Donate: cointr.ee/LeakyVax

نمایش بیشتر
586
مشترکین
اطلاعاتی وجود ندارد24 ساعت
-3 2477 روز
-7 51130 روز
آرشیو پست ها
🥦

You can imagine this is more likely a side effect of some blanket covid policy being removed or edited, or simply timing out.
You can imagine this is more likely a side effect of some blanket covid policy being removed or edited, or simply timing out. Some pajeet in a tech role, that has never heard of her and hasn't much stake in the vaccine narrative at all, merely clicking a button because he got an email, but these boomers have perpetual main character syndrome and love to believe they're living in a movie, writing this cute little script about her video, which will get few to no views upon rerelease, being part of some calculated corporate scheme about backpedalling. Shut the fuck up and please just step into reality this is so delusional and nauseating you stupid cunt.

Semi-relevant post for interest:

Boiling water is an effective method of sterilising, but involves handling potentially contaminated water and is fairly energy intensive. Other sterilising methods involve chemical sterilisers which have associated hazards and health effects when ingested. Another physical method of sterilisation like boiling is UV sterilisation. Perhaps there's a way to set up irradiating water with UVC light, products for this likely already exist I haven't looked into them. However UVC bulbs are not too expensive and use much less electricity than manual boiling. If basic utilities like the water supply continue to degrade with societal entropy, loss of actualised competence, etc. perhaps a set up like this should be investigated.

🫖 🇬🇧 🦠 People have been told to boil their drinking water after 22 cases of a waterborne disease were confirmed in South West England. 📎 Sky News

Repost from Disclose.tv
NEW - AstraZeneca Covid vaccine is being withdrawn worldwide after the pharma giant admitted that it can cause a "rare and dangerous" side effect. https://www.disclose.tv/id/0de31a6i47/ @disclosetv

🤪🧠✨

Bloodfest (From Mizumono_.mp38.34 MB

We are not disgust sensitive, moderns are disgust tolerant. The implicit framing here is that the disgust sensitivity in the examples given is pathologically elevated, when in actual fact we're in a hypernovel ecology of low disease low death etc. Modern populations have been permitted to relax into an excessive tolerance and numbness to that which is instinctually and teleologically disgusting because of the unprecedented lack of disease and death. Pathogen, sexual, and moral disgust are thought of as three domains within disgust psychology. The recent elevation in pathogen disgust from the pandemic has seemingly also elevated sexual and moral disgust. This is good for fans of the Nature Order. Nature, via disease, used to do the 'negative regulation' on undesirables that will have to fall into the hands of man if order is to be restored.

So true!

Repost from JON MILLER
crazy that he’d admit this

But Press Sec., how would you feel if you did eat meat this morning?

Repost from Paul Joseph Watson
After The Food and Drug Administration confirmed that traces of Bird Flu have been found in commercial milk, and that other animals such as cats have died from drinking it, a reporter asked the White House for an update on the risk to the meat supply, to which the Press Secretary remarkably responded “I don’t consume meat.” https://modernity.news/2024/05/02/i-dont-consume-meat-biden-press-sec-response-over-bird-flu-risk-to-meat-supply/

So essentially, developmentally healthy vs. craniofacially dystrophic faces. Mutated of body mutated of mind moment.

Repost from The End Times
photo content

cycles of positive and negative selection, breathing, in out in out, you grow a beard, it's scruffy, you trim it, passive additive, active subtractive, repeat

Asking ChatGPT about genetic variation and species distinctions in "birds".
+1
Asking ChatGPT about genetic variation and species distinctions in "birds".

New study making headlines shows women with an increased genetic risk of breast cancer are more likely to die from breast cancer if they get breast cancer after having given birth. While this is undoubtedly true because cell differentiation occurring later in life will occur after some inevitable exposure to environmental carcinogens, this finding is not contextualised, as breastfeeding has been repeatedly and robustly shown to have a protective effect against breast cancer. For example, breast cancer was for a time known as "nun's disease" as nun populations are unfortunately notorious for increased breast cancer risk compared to populations of breastfeeding mothers. Anyway, just a quick post to point out a recent finding framed in a way that seems manipulating, anti-natalist, zoggy.