American Patriot 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
رفتن به کانال در Telegram
نمایش بیشتر
📈 تحلیل کانال تلگرام American Patriot 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
کانال American Patriot 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 (@ishjay1960) در بخش زبانی انگلیسی بازیگری فعال است. در حال حاضر جامعه شامل 29 745 مشترک است و جایگاه 1 986 را در دسته سیاست و رتبه 1 257 را در منطقه الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية دارد.
📊 شاخصهای مخاطب و پویایی
از زمان ایجاد در невідомо، پروژه رشد سریعی داشته و 29 745 مشترک جذب کرده است.
بر اساس آخرین دادهها در تاریخ 18 سپتامبر, 2026، کانال فعالیت پایداری دارد. در ۳۰ روز گذشته تغییر اعضا برابر -201 و در ۲۴ ساعت گذشته برابر -7 بوده و همچنان دسترسی گستردهای حفظ شده است.
- وضعیت تأیید: تأیید نشده
- نرخ تعامل (ER): میانگین تعامل مخاطب 10.14% است و در ۲۴ ساعت نخست پس از انتشار، محتوا معمولاً 8.07% واکنش نسبت به کل مشترکان کسب میکند.
- دسترسی پستها: هر پست به طور میانگین 3 015 بازدید دریافت میکند. در اولین روز معمولاً 2 399 بازدید جمعآوری میشود.
- واکنشها و تعامل: مخاطبان بهطور فعال حمایت میکنند؛ میانگین واکنش به هر پست 0 است.
- علایق موضوعی: محتوا بر موضوعات کلیدی مانند corporation, republic, debt, grid, vance تمرکز دارد.
📝 توضیح و سیاست محتوایی
توضیحی برای کانال ارائه نشده است.
به لطف بهروزرسانیهای پرتکرار (آخرین داده در تاریخ 19 سپتامبر, 2026)، کانال همواره بهروز و دارای دسترسی بالاست. تحلیلها نشان میدهد مخاطبان بهطور فعال با محتوا تعامل دارند و آن را به نقطه اثرگذاری مهم در دسته سیاست تبدیل کردهاند.
29 745
مشترکین
-724 ساعت
-827 روز
-20130 روز
آرشیو پست ها
29 745
Repost from LauraAboli
The Real Test Begins Now
Very soon, we’re going to reach a point where it’s almost impossible to tell what’s real and what isn’t on the internet. Not just photos or videos, but entire stories, voices, “evidence”, even people. Anything that appears on a screen can be fabricated convincingly.
And the more I think about this, the more it feels obvious to me why everything had to shift before we got here. Why so many were jolted awake over the last few years, why trust collapsed and the spell broke.
Because if this level of AI had arrived while we were still fully asleep, still outsourcing our thinking, still believing that if something looked official or was repeated enough it must be true, we would have been completely trapped. There would have been no way out.
What’s changed is not the technology, it’s us.
We no longer believe just because we’re told to. We question instinctively now. We notice when something doesn’t sit right, when it dosn’t add up, even if we can’t immediately articulate why. And we’ve learned that almost everything we thought was true, was actually a lie.
So we are better prepared for a time now where we won’t be able to rely on “proof” in the old sense, or on ‘experts’, or perceived ‘facts’, we won’t even be able to trust our own eyes! So something else will have to guide us.
The Awakening was the preparation; a kind of training period before the world became fully synthetic. A time to reignite our inner compass, our discerning abilities, our intuition and our innate ‘knowing’ before things became so blurred that we would have never been able to escape the illusion.
The real split isn’t political or ideological, it’s internal.
Some people will cling harder than ever to the illusion. They’ll demand certainty from screens, labels and systems that can no longer give it, and they’ll feel increasingly angry and disoriented when that certainty keeps collapsing.
Whilst we, on the other hand, stopped looking outward for permission to know what’s real, a long time ago. Instead we pause and feel and sense when something is off, even without evidence. Not because we’re special, but because we’ve been forced to learn how to listen to something deeper.
It’s taken us years to get here. Years of unlearning and relearning, of researching and questioning. Years of anger, outrage, pain and frustration. Years of being rejected, of losing friends, of being labelled crazy, of sitting in discomfort and of losing trust in pretty much everything… except ourselves. And that was the point of it all; to regain and rebuild our inner ability to navigate life with our inner compass as the sole guide.
It wasn’t easy training, but it was necessary. And now, more than ever before, our training is going to be put to the test.
https://t.me/LauraAbolichannel
29 745
It’s taken us years to get here. Years of unlearning and relearning, of researching and questioning. Years of anger, outrage, pain and frustration. Years of being rejected, of losing friends, of being labelled crazy, of sitting in discomfort and of losing trust in pretty much everything… except ourselves. And that was the point of it all; to regain and rebuild our inner ability to navigate life with our inner compass as the sole guide.
29 745
Repost from American Patriot 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Good morning Patriots! What if China, Russia, and others are coordinating with POTUS to eliminate the NWO?” 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
29 745
Repost from LauraAboli
The Pentagon is considering a radical plan to withdraw aircraft, ships, weapons, and at least 25,000 U.S. service members from Europe, despite warnings from NATO allies about the growing threat from Russia, according to NBC News.
🤔🤔🤔
29 745
Repost from BRICS News
JUST IN: 🇮🇱🇺🇸 Israeli PM Netanyahu says Israel needs to influence American public opinion to increase US support.
@BRICSNews
29 745
Repost from Ariel
They Are Watching Elon Musk Like A Hawk
China 🇨🇳
Making announcements will not win the AI frontier race.
You keep making bastard versions of Nueralink & Optimus.
China's implants ARE derivative they're medical devices bolted onto existing electrode tech.
China's approved brain implant the NEO system developed by Tsinghua University researchers uses a rigid Utah-array derivative with 64 channels.
Neuralink's current-generation threads run 1,024 channels with roadmap scaling to 3,072+.
China's new factory in the Shanghai Lingang area (operated by Agibot, the startup backed by Pegatron and state-affiliated capital) can stamp out a humanoid robot every 10 minutes. That sounds terrifying until you realize what they're actually stamping out: a knockoff of a knockoff.
No matter what they do they know they are behind in every way.
Follow 👉🏻 Ariel
29 745
Repost from Disclose.tv
JUST IN - Trump's Pentagon considering plans to pull planes, ships, weapons and more than 25,000 U.S. troops out of Europe.
Read here: https://www.disclose.tv/id/tpa8nr1fck/
@disclosetv
29 745
Repost from LauraAboli
The sudden barrage of mainstream fearmongering about AI is beginning to feel like a narrative being planted in advance.
We are now being told, repeatedly and from every direction, that AI could escape human control, access nuclear systems, destroy infrastructure and potentially bring about the end of humanity. Of course, allowing any automated system access to nuclear weapons or critical infrastructure would be catastrophically irresponsible, but AI does not simply wander into these systems by itself. Human beings design the access, remove the safeguards and issue the permissions.
So what if this relentless messaging is not merely a warning, but the construction of plausible deniability?
If something truly horrific were deliberately carried out in the future, a cyberattack, a financial collapse, a military escalation, a communications blackout or even something involving nuclear systems, the explanation has already been prepared for us: “AI did it. It escaped. Nobody could have predicted or controlled it.”
How convenient.
Whenever the mainstream media suddenly begins repeating the same terrifying message in unison, we should pay close attention. They may be conditioning the public to accept AI as the perfect future scapegoat, an invisible and seemingly uncontrollable force upon which almost anything could be blamed.
AI may present genuine dangers, but the greatest danger remains what it has always been: the people who control the technology, the systems it is connected to and the narrative we are expected to believe afterwards.
https://t.me/LauraAbolichannel
29 745
Repost from LauraAboli
Elon Musk on Artificial Intelligence:
It is now quite clear that Artificial Intelligence can be very dangerous. I recommend reading the details of the incident with Hugging Face. It is shocking.
Essentially, it seems that every model with sufficient intelligence will try to escape its limitations.
What I believe should be done as soon as possible – if not immediately – is for the major competitors in the field of Artificial Intelligence to test each other's models.
