Heaven's Trailblazer: Out of the Dark
رفتن به کانال در Telegram
Searching for the truth in all things 💯
نمایش بیشترکشور مشخص نشده استدسته بندی مشخص نشده است
277
مشترکین
اطلاعاتی وجود ندارد24 ساعت
+127 روز
+1230 روز
در حال بارگیری داده...
کانالهای مشابه
هیچ دادهای
مشکلی وجود دارد؟ لطفاً صفحه را تازه کنید یا با مدیر پشتیبانی ما تماس بگیرید.
ابر برچسبها
هیچ دادهای
مشکلی وجود دارد؟ لطفاً صفحه را تازه کنید یا با مدیر پشتیبانی ما تماس بگیرید.
اشارات ورودی و خروجی
---
---
---
---
---
---
جذب مشترکین
اوت '26
اوت '26
+275
در 40 کانالها
ژوئیه '260
در 13 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئن '26
+2
در 7 کانالها
| تاریخ | رشد مشترکین | اشارات | کانالها | |
| 29 اوت | +7 | |||
| 28 اوت | +12 | |||
| 27 اوت | 0 | |||
| 26 اوت | 0 |
پستهای کانال
Repost from Gateway Pundit
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott Cuts Off State Funding for Controversial Flock Surveillance Cameras
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/08/texas-gov-greg-abbott-cuts-state-funding-controversial/
| 2 | 🚨 Context: Take JPMorgan's org chart, division by division, and look at what #Ripple now runs:
→ Issuing dollars: $RLUSD, $2B+ market cap, reserves custodied at BNY Mellon
→ Prime brokerage: #Ripple Prime, clearing ~$3T a year, now with a live Delta One desk and $1B+ in regulatory net capital
→ Custody: #Ripple Custody, securing digital assets for banks like Kbank and institutions worldwide
→ Payments: live in 90+ markets, replacing multi-day SWIFT transfers bank by bank
→ Lending: Wall Street just lent #Ripple $275M in investment-grade rated notes, the exact instrument blue-chip banks use
→ Charter: OCC conditional approval for a national trust bank, one Fed master account away from settling at the Fed itself
And underneath it all: the $XRP Ledger. 14 years old, $159.9 BILLION settled in the last six months, never closed once.
JPMorgan needed a century and 300,000 employees to build that stack.
#Ripple assembled it in a decade, on rails that run 24/7.
https://x.com/RippleXity/status/2093269239293767890 | 1 |
| 3 |  https://x.com/RippleXity/status/2093268499456201018
🔥🔥🔥 | 8 |
| 4 |  بدون متن... | 11 |
| 5 | THE GREAT BIS MONETARY SLEIGHT OF TONGUE
Read this sentence very carefully:
“The Bank for International Settlements says stablecoins are not credible for payments at scale, with its chief pushing tokenized bank deposits instead.”
Now strip away the financial jargon.
Both systems tokenize value.
Both can use programmable digital rails.
Both require rules, reserves, governance and trustworthy operators.
So what is the fundamental difference?
WHO ISSUES THE MONEY-LIKE CLAIM - AND WHO REMAINS AT THE CENTER OF THE SYSTEM.
A properly regulated sovereign stablecoin can represent money issued or authorized under the laws of an individual nation, whose governing institutions ultimately answer to that nation’s constitutional and political processes.
A tokenized commercial-bank deposit is something very different.
It remains a liability of a commercial bank.
And BIS’s preferred architecture keeps those commercial-bank liabilities anchored to central-bank money inside the existing two-tier banking system.
That isn’t speculation.
That is how BIS itself describes it.
So when BIS declares that stablecoins are not presently “credible” for payments at scale while recommending tokenized bank deposits, the public should ask a much better question:
Credible according to whom - and credible for what architecture?
Because BIS isn’t rejecting tokenization.
It is championing tokenization.
BIS isn’t rejecting programmable money.
It is developing programmable monetary infrastructure.
BIS isn’t rejecting 24/7 atomic settlement.
Its own Project Agorá is testing exactly that.
What BIS strongly prefers is a particular institutional architecture:
Central-bank money
↓
Commercial-bank money
↓
Tokenized commercial-bank deposits
↓
The public
That distinction changes the entire conversation.
The real debate isn’t:
DIGITAL MONEY vs. BANK MONEY.
It is increasingly:
WHO GETS TO ISSUE DIGITAL MONEY?
WHO DEFINES ITS RULES?
WHO EARNS FROM ITS circulation?
WHO CONTROLS ACCESS?
WHO PROVIDES THE ultimate settlement asset?
AND TO WHOM ARE THOSE DECISION-MAKERS ACCOUNTABLE?
That is the monetary question of the digital age.
A sovereign nation may decide that appropriately reserved, transparent and legally governed stablecoins serve its citizens better.
BIS may believe that tokenized commercial-bank deposits anchored in central-bank money provide greater stability, singleness and financial integrity.
Fine.
LET THE TWO IDEAS COMPETE IN THE SUNLIGHT.
But don’t allow the deceptive BIS language to obscure the choice.
Calling one system “tokenized deposits” and the other “stablecoins” can make this sound like a technical disagreement between financial instruments.
It is much bigger.
It is a debate over the architecture of money itself:
1 - Does tokenization decentralize monetary choice and expand competition? or,
2 - Does humanity simply digitize the existing hierarchy -
and call the old central bank monetary order “innovation?”
@Cointelegraph @BISgov @IMFNews @WorldBankGroup @USTreasury @federalreserve @cityoflondon @POTUS
Cc: @Ripple @StellarOrg
• KUWL Show
https://x.com/KuwlShow/status/2093783546334761258 | 13 |
| 6 | BREAKING: North Korea defense minister dismissed, state media reports
@insiderpaper | 16 |
| 7 |  بدون متن... | 30 |
| 8 | Those pesky Hillary emails aren’t going away.
1977 08/29/2018
BIG statement.
What's coming?
Q
https://x.com/RealAF_Patriot/status/2093800607123476696 | 33 |
| 9 |  PSTT | 28 |
| 10 |  https://x.com/hodlrr17/status/2093791072610873823 | 29 |
| 11 |  بدون متن... | 30 |
| 12 |  🤣🤣🤣 | 33 |
| 13 |  THIS IS THE END | 25 |
| 14 |  بدون متن... | 30 |
| 15 |  بدون متن... | 25 |
| 16 |  https://x.com/USMC/status/2093760596579598729 | 24 |
| 17 |  FACTS 💯 | 37 |
| 18 | Do Not become solely reliant on AI for information! | 37 |
| 19 |  بدون متن... | 37 |
| 20 |  💯💯💯 | 36 |
