0/0
رفتن به کانال در Telegram
0/0 = undefined A labyrinth of ideas, A diary of curiosities Bot: @contactzero_bot
نمایش بیشتر📈 تحلیل کانال تلگرام 0/0
کانال 0/0 (@error0error) در بخش زبانی عربی بازیگری فعال است. در حال حاضر جامعه شامل 11 329 مشترک است و جایگاه 8 038 را در دسته دین و مذهبی و رتبه 6 849 را در منطقه المملكة العربية السعودية دارد.
📊 شاخص‌های مخاطب و پویایی
از زمان ایجاد در невідомо، پروژه رشد سریعی داشته و 11 329 مشترک جذب کرده است.
بر اساس آخرین داده‌ها در تاریخ 14 نوامبر, 2026، کانال فعالیت پایداری دارد. در ۳۰ روز گذشته تغییر اعضا برابر 163 و در ۲۴ ساعت گذشته برابر 11 بوده و همچنان دسترسی گسترده‌ای حفظ شده است.
- وضعیت تأیید: تأیید نشده
- نرخ تعامل (ER): میانگین تعامل مخاطب 11.94% است و در ۲۴ ساعت نخست پس از انتشار، محتوا معمولاً 5.52% واکنش نسبت به کل مشترکان کسب می‌کند.
- دسترسی پست‌ها: هر پست به طور میانگین 1 351 بازدید دریافت می‌کند. در اولین روز معمولاً 625 بازدید جمع‌آوری می‌شود.
- واکنش‌ها و تعامل: مخاطبان به‌طور فعال حمایت می‌کنند؛ میانگین واکنش به هر پست 0 است.
- علایق موضوعی: محتوا بر موضوعات کلیدی مانند مُشَاعَرَة, رَجُل, ظِلّ, نِسَاءَة, اِبن تمرکز دارد.
📝 توضیح و سیاست محتوایی
نویسنده این فضا را محل بیان دیدگاه‌های شخصی توصیف می‌کند:
“0/0 = undefined
A labyrinth of ideas,
A diary of curiosities
Bot: @contactzero_bot”
به لطف به‌روزرسانی‌های پرتکرار (آخرین داده در تاریخ 15 نوامبر, 2026)، کانال همواره به‌روز و دارای دسترسی بالاست. تحلیل‌ها نشان می‌دهد مخاطبان به‌طور فعال با محتوا تعامل دارند و آن را به نقطه اثرگذاری مهم در دسته دین و مذهبی تبدیل کرده‌اند.
11 329
مشترکین
+1124 ساعت
+217 روز
+16330 روز
آرشیو پست ها
11 329
Repost from 0/0
On strangers, and love-of-the-first-sight
This is why things like 'love of the first sight' exist. Because strangers thrill us with an air of mystery. By definition, we don't know anything about them, and this is exactly why we fall in love with them. They represent hope and mystery. they can be potentially anyone we can imagine; a new dear friend, a lover, or just some beautiful mind we'll share a conversation with. They are pure potential, regardless of who they really are.
11 329
I also owe an intellectual debt to my brother V. S. Ravi, whose vast knowledge of English and Telugu literature (especially Shakespeare and Thyagaraja) is unsurpassed. When I had just entered medical school (premed), he would often read me passages from Shakespeare and Omar Khayyam’s Rubaiyat, which had a deep impact on my mental development.
11 329
I found mysteries and possibilities everywhere. When I was eighteen, I read a footnote in some obscure medical tome that when a person with a sarcoma, a malignant cancer that affects soft tissues, develops high fever from an infection, the cancer sometimes goes into complete remission. Cancer shrinking as a result of fever? Why? What could explain it, and might it just possibly lead to a practical cancer therapy? I was enthralled by the possibility of such odd, unexpected connections, and I learned an important lesson: Never take the obvious for granted.
11 329
Although my current interest is neurology, my love affair with science dates back to my boyhood in Chennai, India. I was perpetually fascinated by natural phenomena, and my first passion was chemistry. I was enchanted by the idea that the whole universe is based on simple interactions between elements in a finite list. Later I found myself drawn to biology, with all its frustrating yet fascinating complexities. When I was twelve, I remember reading about axolotls, which are basically a species of salamander that has evolved to remain permanently in the aquatic larval stage. They manage to keep their gills (rather than trading them in for lungs, like salamanders or frogs) by shutting down metamorphosis and becoming sexually mature in the water. I was completely flabbergasted when I read that by simply giving these creatures the “metamorphosis hormone” (thyroid extract) you could make the axolotl revert back into the extinct, land-dwelling, gill-less adult ancestor that it had evolved from. You could go back in time, resurrecting a prehistoric animal that no longer exists anywhere on Earth.
11 329
A similar argument has been proposed for the relatively high incidence of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in humans. The reason these disorders have not been weeded out [by evolution] may be because having some of the
genes that lead to the full-blown disorder are advantageous—perhaps boosting creativity, intelligence, or subtle social-emotional faculties. Thus humanity as a whole benefits from keeping these genes in its gene pool, but the unfortunate side effect is a sizable minority who get bad combinations of them.
— The Tell-Tale Brain
11 329
Repost from 0/0
أنا الَّذي لم يجدْ إلَّا الـ أنا وطنًا
رأى الهوى مذهبَ الأحرارِ فاعتنَقَهْ
مُسافرٌ تهتدي كُلُّ النُجوم بهِ
وحائِرٌ ضيَّعت أحلامُهُ طُرُقَهْ
وحاذِقٌ ليس إلَّا الحُبَّ يجهلهُ
ولا يذوقُ نعيمَ الحُبِّ من حذِقَهْ
وليس يُدركُ سرَّ الماءِ شاربُهُ الظمآن
بل من رأى في لونِهِ غرَقَهْ
وقفتُ أندُبُ أطلالَ الذين مضَوا
وها خُطاهم بطينِ الروحِ مُلتصِقة
11 329
Repost from 0/0
يبدو كمن يحتَسي في صمتِهِ قلقَهْ
هل يشتكي جُرحَهُ أم يشتكي أرقَهْ
يبدو سقيمًا ولا يبدو بهِ أثرٌ
لسُقمِهِ غير أنَّ الحُبَّ قد سحقَهْ
صلبًا كمن ليس يخشَى أيَّ فاجعةٍ
كأنَّ كل الذي يخشاهُ قد لحِقَهْ
وبائسًا ووحيدًا مثلَ مئذَنَـةٍ
في دارِ كُفرٍ، تُثيرُ الحُزنَ والشفقة
طافُوا بهِ كُلَّ أبوابِ الكهانةِ
ما من كاهنٍ قال كذبًا فيهِ أو صدَقَهْ
يُقالُ أن كبيرَ الكُهنِ قالَ لهُ:
لا تفتحِ القلبَ لو أنَّ الهوى طرَقَهْ
والحُزنُ ليس قميصًا سوف يخلعهُ
لكنما هو وحيٌ صامِتٌ نطَقَهْ
11 329
The difference between the two pictures is that in ancient mythology we played a pivotal role in the world. We were at the center and God himself was reaching his hand to us; He made the universe for us. He made us in his own image. And you can rant all day about how unscientific & narcissistic this view is, but it gave us a purpose and an active role in the world (which we are now deprived of). Practically, we were the entitled bitch of the universe.
But today we feel more lost than ever because in our modern mythology, we don't even have a place for us in the world. We are not the heroes of our myths (we don't even count in the grand cosmic story). We created this beautiful narrative about the universe and the stars... But we have no place in it. That is fucking us, psychologically, culturally, and philosophically.
11 329
The difference between the two pictures is that in ancient mythology we played a pivotal role in the world. We were at the center and God himself was reaching his hand to us; He made the universe for us. He made us in his own image. And you can rant all day about how unscientific & narcissistic this view is, but it gave us a purpose and an active role in the world (which we are now deprived of). Practically, we were the entitled bitch of the universe.
But today we feel more lost than ever because in our modern mythology, we don't even have a place for us in the world. We are not the heroes of our myths (we don't even count in the grand cosmic story). We created this beautiful narrative about the universe and the stars... But we have no place in it. That is fucking us, psychologically, culturally, and philosophically.
