The Irish Sentinel

Mass murder of Ireland's next generation, and total silence. Luke O'Neill, Claire Byrne, Ryan Tubridy, Tony Holohan, Leo Varadkar, Micheal Martin, Stephen Donnelly, Joe Duffy, Simon Harris, Newstalk presenters, Ciara Kelly (special mention), everyone who works for RTE, the nurses who injected people, the doctors who injected people, Mary Lou McDonald, 98% of the Dail and Senate, the administrators of Ireland's hospitals, every scumbag in Ireland that calls themselves a journalist, Newspaper editors, Off the Ball crew on Newstalk, the judiciary, the churches (all of them), the GAA, Ronan Glynn, Paul Reid, Pat Kenny, Imelda May, PJ Gallagher,  Peadar Tobin, Foil Arms and Hogg, Norah Casey, all your like, every parent that didn't speak up and jabbed their children, and a million other c*nts that just went along and said nothing.... Take a bow.

⛔️A MUST SEE DOCUMENTARY WORLD DEATH ORGANIZATION 🆔Follow: Telegram | Twitter

⛔️Documentary: An Open Secret 'The Secret Hollywood Doesn't Want You To Know' "AN OPEN SECRET looks at the lives of children betrayed and abandoned by a system that essentially funnels them towards sexual predators without any oversight or regard for their safety. It documents not only these young peoples' experiences, but also how some have emerged stronger for their speaking out. It beg the questions of why children working in entertainment aren't afforded the same protections they are afforded at school, and argues for more effective treatment and stronger penalties for child sex offenders. " 🆔Follow: Telegram | Twitter

Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, excommunicated from the Church by order of Pope Francis, issued a grave warning, alleging that the pope is an enthusiastic collaborator in the Great Reset. He claims that the pope's goal is to dismantle the Church and replace it with an organization inspired by Masonic principles. He further contends that there is a sinister conspiracy between the deep state and the deep church and reminds us that the Pope is a Jesuit.

🇺🇸🇨🇦🇬🇧🇮🇪🇦🇺🇳🇿🇿🇦 There are legal developments both in the United States and most recently in Canada regarding government claims that the COVID-19 vaccine is safe and effective. Canadian family and emergency physician Charles Hoffe is the subject of disciplinary proceedings at the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia (BC) for making public statements about SARS-COV-2, the safety and effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines and other alternative treatments including ivermectin. The College has alleged that the doctor's statements are misleading, inaccurate or inflammatory and constitute professional misconduct. The College asked the Disciplinary Board to put the following facts on the record, thereby preventing the doctor from presenting rebuttal evidence in his defense: 1. the Covid virus kills or causes other serious effects 2. The virus does not discriminate; 3. Vaccines work; 4. Vaccines are generally safe and have a low risk of adverse effects, especially in children; 5. infection and transmission of the COVID-19 virus is less likely to occur among fully vaccinated individuals than for those who are unvaccinated; 6. vaccines do not prevent infection, re-infection or transmission, but they do reduce the severity of symptoms and the risk of poor outcomes; Health Canada has approved covid vaccines, and regulatory approval is a strong indicator of safety and effectiveness; 7. Health Canada has not approved ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19. 8. Health Canada recommends that Canadians should not consume the veterinary version of ivermectin. In its decision of June 29, 2024, the Disciplinary Panel of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC declined to consider paragraphs 2-5, considered a revised version of paragraphs 1 and 6, and considered paragraphs 7-8 (the uncomplicated claims about ivermectin). The Disciplinary Panel of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC thus refused to give legal consideration to 6 of the 8 points raised by the College. The decision in Canada on judicial deference is consistent with the U.S. Supreme Court's June 28, 2024 decision in Loper Bright Enterprises et al. v. Raimondo Secretary of Commerce et. al. which overturned the landmark 1984 decision in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council. The Chevron decision had given rise to what is commonly known as the Chevron deference doctrine. Under this doctrine, federal agencies had the power to interpret a statute they administer when that statute is vaguely written, and courts were required to give deference to the agency's interpretation of a statute. In Loper, the US Supreme Court overruled Chevron's doctrine, calling it "fundamentally misguided". They argued that courts should rely on their own interpretation of ambiguous statutes rather than having to accept the agency's interpretation. Commentators have suggested that the doctrine of Chevron deference gave the powerful - the people who control agencies like the FDA, CDC, and FCC - a significant advantage in court and made them the ultimate decision-makers when it comes to interpreting ambiguous laws. Commentators have pointed out that many of these agencies have close ties, including financial ones, to the industries they are charged with regulating and therefore lack objectivity in relation to those industries. The ruling in Labor means that federal judges now have greater authority to interpret these laws. The decision of the Disciplinary Panel of the College of Physicians of Surgeons of BC is in line with the decision of the US Supreme Court and prevents regulatory bodies from saying "it is so because we say it is so". They must prove the facts they claim and those who disagree will be allowed to challenge those facts and present counter evidence. https://open.substack.com/pub/jessicar/p/we-won-the-judicial-notice-decision?r=1e6da8&utm_medium=ios

🤡Greta Thunberg arrested again. They stop to pose for photographs. 🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork 📎  Twitter  ▪️ Truth Social

Children of Gaza 💔🔞 ⏯ @RealWorldNewsChannel ✳️ @RealWorldNewsChat