Stephen Wells

A newly elected One Nation MP broke down in tears as he confirmed he is homosexual, thanked his Indonesian Muslim boyfriend and declared "I love migrants" during his maiden speech to South Australian parliament. https://www.noticer.news/one-nation-mp-jason-virgo-speech/ Follow: @NoticerNews

One Nation is in danger of being swamped by Asians. They dont assimilate etc etc. Seriously, is this the Party people are relying on to save Australia? A brown homo who is being banged by another brown who is pretending to be a Muslim. Shouldnt he be throwing himself off a building or something? What about all the so called Christians in One Nation? Did they skip Leviticus in their Bible studies? Expect a transgender pedophile from Somalia or Sudan to be your next candidate for one Nation

RACISM BEATS MURDER “What racism purports to be is a sin against the holy concept of multiculturalism.” https://xyz.net.au/2026/05/racism-beats-murder/

Its funny One Nation are seeking to centralise more control over their branches. Obviously the average branchgoing patriot is way more racist and nationalistic than the party wants to hold people at and contain them at. Their average supporter would be championing mass deportations and/or be NS or most the way there, but their party line is 130k immigrants. Pauline has also been completely silent on the WAP High Court case. She should publicise it more, its in her interests for it to be successful. Otherwise, where does she think Sewell's 5000 members + 3000 wider supporters are going to go? In the absence of anything else, they'll just flood One Nation and turn her branch meetings into Klan rallies. Then I wonder if the Labor government will just ban One Nation if all the nazis go there and are preaching Hitler at the branch meetings

Pesonally I was planning to join the Labor Party.

Chud the builder Can he (legally) shoot him? Chud the builder Yes he can! Proscution's case shown to be State venegeance against a white man's past legal but "offensive" behaviour, not because of any evidence of attempted murder. https://youtu.be/Ju0aEvk0SYY?si=Xo04mFXmTNWcu5HZ

IS THE ABC TRYING TO MAKE PAULINE MORE POPULAR? Based. “Pauline Hanson and her party have again been caught in tense moments with media, with the One Nation leader captured on camera using the words “nasty bitch” and a staffer telling a journalist to “shut up”.” https://xyz.net.au/2026/05/is-the-abc-trying-to-make-pauline-more-popular/

1) Anything can be argued in regards to politics, but without the abilty to read Pauline Hansen's thoughts there is no way to prove any opinion about her motives. The same is true of all politicians. We can suspect all kinds of things about them, but conclusions are rarely reached using a scientific method or standards required in our legal system. Likewise, it would be easy to attribute a nefarious motive to the person who formulated this question that he or she was trying to manipulate the opinions of the students to feel hostile against Pauline Hansen, but this too would be just speculation. 2) She owned and operated a fish and chip shop and she talks like a monty-python actor in drag. 3) Because there is a genuine rebellion and public backlash against political correctness, so any politician that represents these voters will be rewarded by them. Ralph Babet has often spoken out about political correctness. Less educated voters often resonate more with such arguments because they have been subjected to less indoctrination by the education system and generally have more instinctive common sense as a result. 4) Highly improbable. Research has consistently shown that a) people with higher IQ scores get higher paying jobs than people with very low scores and b) that different ethnic groups have genetic differences in average IQ. Australian Aboriginals, for example, have very low IQs on average and have repeatedly had worse outcomes in jobs and living standards despite decades of financial support and assistence from the government. 5) See answer to question one. It should also be pointed out that she was objectively correct. Though what she said about Asians is true for all ethnic groups. All ethnic groups naturally congregate with their own. This has been demonstrated repeatedly all over the world throughout history. 6) Recent polls have shown that as many as 2/3rds of the electorate think immigration levels are too high and up to half think there should be a complete pause. One Nation's recent electoral success in a bi election shows that enough people ageee with her to be able to put her candidates into the House of Representatives. 7) Yes racism is on the rise in Australia, which is a natural consequence of the pushing of multiculturalism. Historically putting different ethnic, cultural and religious groups into the same geographical area has always resulted in conflict, for example the 1990's conflict in former Yugoslavia. Fat white incels generally become far Left activists not racists. The former NSN activist group promoted fitness, strength and large traditional families. Whereas far Left groups oppose "fat shaming" and objective beauty standards. Economic prosperity supresses racism to some degree as it allows individuals to live in areas where people are like them. Poverty means lack of choice which results in having to live alongside people who are different to oneself if such people are present in one's country. Proximity times diversity equals racism.

This was some actual homework assigned at a highschool in Perth. I decided to complete it (see below). What grade would you give me?

In response to claims by some mainstream media outlets that the White Australia Party has been "ruled invalid", or "knocked back" by the AEC, this is simply false. The Facts. >The White Australia Party application was successfully filed with the AEC on the 25th of April 2026. >The Party received written confirmation from the AEC on the 28th of April 2026. >The AEC was made aware of the pending High Court challenge to the 'Hate Group Laws' by the White Australia Party. >The AEC was given a redacted list of 1780 members and informed that the members names would be unredacted once the High Court challenge succeeded. >The AEC responded that the audit to register the party would be paused pending the release of names. >The AEC is currently pausing all registrations until the Farrer by-election is completed on the 10th of July 2026. >The White Australia Party did not correspond with any anonymous sources or unofficial spokespersons in the AEC. The Lies. >The media spoke to anonymous sources in the AEC saying the application has been ruled invalid. Journalists decided today was the day to make up these lies because they are doing damage control to attempt to counter the success we had today getting our Constitutional Writ confirmed for the High Court in September. Furthermore there is a 10 day delay in the injunction so the Commonwealth can attempt to defend itself.

The White Australia Party's constitutional challenge to the government's "hate groups" legislation has been accepted by the High Court and a hearing scheduled for September, setting the stage for one of the most consequential rulings in decades. https://www.noticer.news/high-court-accepts-white-australia-party-ban-case/ Follow: @NoticerNews

The news is essentially no news, as the emergency injunction has been deemed not serious enough to make a decision on immediately. So we remain in limbo. Checking how many people are in the gym with us or coming over for a game of monoploly, lest we might be arrested and jailed for continuing to do the things have done since we were children (meet up with people who look like us and socialise whilst doing legal, normal and social things). Because we did the unthinkable of doing these things with people who looked like us and had similar political opinions.

Australia is about to face down its destiny. Is this nation, as its first 15 Prime Ministers made clear, a citadel for the White Man in the Southern Seas? Or is it a halfway home for the world, bent crooked by financial slavery to serve foreign interests? Is democracy the right for any voice to be heard, even those many disagree with? Or is it simply a farce to hide a homicidal agenda against the birthright citizenry of this nation? What is happening right now is monumental and will play a large role in determining the world our children grow up in. Let us hope there is an appeal to reason, while there is still the capacity for reasoning left.

The High Court today wont decide on the Government ruling on the White Australia Party, EAM, NSN and the people who were members of them. It will simply rule on whether the people who were in them can walk around freely until that decision is made. But if the injunction against the government is struck down today, then the intent of the Judges will be pretty clear. Prayer couldnt hurt.

The ban of the White Australia Party and a very disappointing Nick Fuentes reaction

Dan Bilzarian and Jake Shields have recently discovered what a two faced homosexual Fuentes is as well.

Happening tomorrow: White Australia Party VS The Commonwealth of Australia. Lawyers acting on behalf of the recently outlawed White Australia Party will be seeking immediate injunctive relief, which if granted will prevent the government from putting White Australia advocates in jail, at least until High Court judges review the constitutional validity of new “hate-crime” legislation used to ban the party. This process will decide whether ‘Democracy’ and free political communication have any standing in Australia’s future.

Considering the High Court just upheld the right of pervert men to be women, I cant say I have much faith in the judicial system.

The White Australia Party was not the NSN. But it was designated as being the NSN because former members of the NSN had joined it, even though more than 3/4 of it's members had never been members of the NSN. It appears therefore that any group former NSN members join in the future will automatically be a "pheonixing" of the NSN, or simply be "The NSN by a different name" and automatically illegal. Because of this I recommend all former NSN members to join the Labor Party.

For the first time in over 70 years, the Australian government has overtly banned a political party by name while it was actively seeking registration with the Australian Electoral Commission. In a sane world, the White Australia Party’s High Court case should be straightforward. The legislation used to proscribe them contains serious constitutional flaws. The banning of political groups was found unconstitutional in the Communist Party Case (1951). The High Court ruled that Parliament could not simply dissolve a political organisation. When the Menzies Government then tried to amend the Constitution via referendum to allow such bans, the Australian public rejected it. With the case now in progress, and an injunctive relief hearing set for Thursday, the whole nation and the whole political spectrum will be watching. As Thomas Sewell has aptly stated: "The High Court will now have to finally decide whether Australia is founded on Anglo-Saxon principles or on Talmudic ones." https://x.com/LonePatriot14/status/2056525649196810647