Anteater’s Amazon
Ir al canal en Telegram
Mostrar más
📈 Análisis del canal de Telegram Anteater’s Amazon
El canal Anteater’s Amazon (@anteateramazon) en el segmento lingüístico de Inglés es un actor destacado. Actualmente la comunidad reúne a 11 513 suscriptores, ocupando la posición 8 479 en la categoría Criptomonedas y el puesto 279 en la región Singapur.
📊 Métricas de audiencia y dinámica
Desde su creación el невідомо, el proyecto ha mostrado un crecimiento acelerado, reuniendo a 11 513 suscriptores.
Según los últimos datos del 19 octubre, 2026, el canal mantiene una actividad estable. En los últimos 30 días la variación de miembros fue de -151, y en las últimas 24 horas de -7, conservando un alto alcance.
- Estado de verificación: No verificado
- Tasa de interacción (ER): El promedio de interacción de la audiencia es 28.15%. Durante las primeras 24 horas tras publicar, el contenido suele obtener 11.02% de reacciones respecto al total de suscriptores.
- Alcance de las publicaciones: Cada publicación recibe en promedio 3 240 visualizaciones. En el primer día suele acumular 1 268 visualizaciones.
- Reacciones e interacción: La audiencia responde de forma activa: el promedio de reacciones por publicación es 6.
- Intereses temáticos: El contenido se centra en temas clave como mstr, defi, eth, concern, leg.
📝 Descripción y política de contenido
No se ha proporcionado la descripción del canal.
Gracias a la alta frecuencia de actualizaciones (últimos datos recibidos el 20 octubre, 2026), el canal mantiene la vigencia y un amplio alcance. La analítica demuestra que la audiencia interactúa activamente con el contenido, lo que lo convierte en un punto de referencia dentro de la categoría Criptomonedas.
11 513
Suscriptores
-724 horas
-1227 días
-15130 días
Archivo de publicaciones
11 513
oh and - do not underestimate how much time and effort it will take to develop formal relationships w/ tardfi instis.
11 513
oh and tangent to this - if you haven't already, do look up tax implications on trading crypto tardfi instruments over direct crypto in your jurisdictions.
highly jurisdiction specific but for example in singapore under structures like a 13O it is significantly better to trade them in tardfi instruments instead where possible.
11 513
with all the hacks going on - crowdsourcing here for an informed view on what the ideal setup is for crypto rn.
e.g. - which apple devices would you buy, how would you set it up, what muiltisig and so on.
11 513
separately, curious if anyone has stopped using PRs and instead just push to main + rely on CI. ampcode has been a proponent for this and they’ve been constantly ahead of the curve.
curious how that worked out for yall.
my bottleneck is increasingly CI w my latest workflow changes
11 513
i think subscription subsidies will only continue to erode from here so if you have stuff you’ve been wanting to build best to get on them asap
11 513
i’m incinerating tokens though - def not efficient usage cos the coordinator threads are constantly reading other threads’ transcripts (due to running out of context, compaction not reliable etc)
11 513
ironically the direction that seems to work best for me for now is using /goal to manage other threads’ /goals lol.
also built a centralised service that serves as the store of truth / single coordination point for all thread lifecycles. seems to work quite well for long duration tasks now
11 513
some decent recommendations in the comments - cheers! always happy to discuss ai & ai tooling!
11 513
also not to start a religion war - but i found my experience working w clankers (i dont read any code) to improve quite a bit using golang.
i dont need to use rust for the stuff im building and its been a bliss over using tons of typescript+python.
11 513
the problem with /goal is that you have to define an outcome initially - but it’s not natural ux imo. most of my prompts are a long yap that might not necessarily contain clearly defined outcomes.
v curious if anyone has solved this well yet
11 513
for those of you who multi account - curious what your setup is.
i run 5 codex and 2 claude max subs rn, using omp.
biggest issue i face is babysitting threads for trivial approvals. curious how you deal w this.
i was thinking of implementing a background llm observer that reads all my transcripts (triggered by hooks) and makes notes / auto-replies for trivial stuff.
/goal mode has been ok-ish but i feel like it’s a ux that shouldn’t even exist. agent should know to keep going basically
11 513
final non-mkt related yap
it surprises me just how resistant people still are to adopting LLMs.
i’d encourage you to do so if you haven’t already.
i’ve found myself preferring to talk to LLMs over most people nowadays.
