Bare Act
Ir al canal en Telegram
⚖ For the Students of Law. Author: Sagar Badade (सागर बडदे) Website: legalcell.org
Mostrar más📈 Análisis del canal de Telegram Bare Act
El canal Bare Act (@thebareact) en el segmento lingüístico de Inglés es un actor destacado. Actualmente la comunidad reúne a 11 282 suscriptores, ocupando la posición 762 en la categoría Ley y el puesto 34 150 en la región India.
📊 Métricas de audiencia y dinámica
Desde su creación el невідомо, el proyecto ha mostrado un crecimiento acelerado, reuniendo a 11 282 suscriptores.
Según los últimos datos del 24 septiembre, 2026, el canal mantiene una actividad estable. En los últimos 30 días la variación de miembros fue de 231, y en las últimas 24 horas de 5, conservando un alto alcance.
- Estado de verificación: No verificado
- Tasa de interacción (ER): El promedio de interacción de la audiencia es 13.16%. Durante las primeras 24 horas tras publicar, el contenido suele obtener 2.66% de reacciones respecto al total de suscriptores.
- Alcance de las publicaciones: Cada publicación recibe en promedio 1 484 visualizaciones. En el primer día suele acumular 300 visualizaciones.
- Reacciones e interacción: La audiencia responde de forma activa: el promedio de reacciones por publicación es 0.
- Intereses temáticos: El contenido se centra en temas clave como apr-2026, judge, may-2026, marathi, उत्तरपत्रिका.
📝 Descripción y política de contenido
El autor describe el recurso como un espacio para expresar opiniones subjetivas:
“⚖ For the Students of Law.
Author: Sagar Badade (सागर बडदे)
Website: legalcell.org”
Gracias a la alta frecuencia de actualizaciones (últimos datos recibidos el 25 septiembre, 2026), el canal mantiene la vigencia y un amplio alcance. La analítica demuestra que la audiencia interactúa activamente con el contenido, lo que lo convierte en un punto de referencia dentro de la categoría Ley.
11 282
Suscriptores
+524 horas
+357 días
+23130 días
Carga de datos en curso...
Canales Similares
Nube de Etiquetas
Menciones Entrantes y Salientes
---
---
---
---
---
---
Atraer Suscriptores
septiembre '26sep '26
septiembre '26
+208
en 0 canales
agosto '26
+233
en 0 canales
Get PRO
julio '26
+194
en 0 canales
Get PRO
junio '26
+157
en 0 canales
Get PRO
mayo '26
+142
en 0 canales
Get PRO
abril '26
+58
en 0 canales
Get PRO
marzo '26
+18
en 0 canales
Get PRO
febrero '26
+46
en 0 canales
Get PRO
enero '26
+65
en 0 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '25
+43
en 0 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '25
+131
en 0 canales
Get PRO
octubre '25
+135
en 0 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '25
+85
en 0 canales
Get PRO
agosto '25
+98
en 0 canales
Get PRO
julio '25
+130
en 0 canales
Get PRO
junio '25
+37
en 0 canales
Get PRO
mayo '25
+48
en 0 canales
Get PRO
abril '25
+58
en 0 canales
Get PRO
marzo '25
+208
en 0 canales
Get PRO
febrero '25
+93
en 2 canales
Get PRO
enero '25
+132
en 1 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '24
+329
en 1 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '24
+799
en 3 canales
Get PRO
octubre '24
+644
en 1 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '24
+558
en 1 canales
Get PRO
agosto '24
+500
en 3 canales
Get PRO
julio '24
+920
en 2 canales
Get PRO
junio '24
+852
en 1 canales
Get PRO
mayo '24
+953
en 1 canales
Get PRO
abril '24
+851
en 1 canales
Get PRO
marzo '24
+894
en 0 canales
Get PRO
febrero '24
+692
en 1 canales
Get PRO
enero '24
+522
en 2 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '23
+456
en 1 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '23
+75
en 1 canales
Get PRO
octubre '23
+40
en 2 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '23
+59
en 0 canales
Get PRO
agosto '23
+61
en 0 canales
Get PRO
julio '23
+153
en 0 canales
Get PRO
junio '23
+70
en 0 canales
Get PRO
mayo '23
+62
en 0 canales
Get PRO
abril '23
+49
en 0 canales
Get PRO
marzo '23
+112
en 0 canales
Get PRO
febrero '23
+207
en 0 canales
Get PRO
enero '23
+158
en 0 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '22
+207
en 0 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '22
+132
en 0 canales
Get PRO
octubre '22
+143
en 0 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '22
+406
en 0 canales
Get PRO
agosto '22
+934
en 0 canales
| Fecha | Crecimiento de Suscriptores | Menciones | Canales | |
| 25 septiembre | +5 | |||
| 24 septiembre | +5 | |||
| 23 septiembre | +11 | |||
| 22 septiembre | +9 | |||
| 21 septiembre | +8 | |||
| 20 septiembre | +2 | |||
| 19 septiembre | +6 | |||
| 18 septiembre | +2 | |||
| 17 septiembre | +11 | |||
| 16 septiembre | +2 | |||
| 15 septiembre | +7 | |||
| 14 septiembre | +9 | |||
| 13 septiembre | +13 | |||
| 12 septiembre | +3 | |||
| 11 septiembre | +19 | |||
| 10 septiembre | +9 | |||
| 09 septiembre | +13 | |||
| 08 septiembre | +9 | |||
| 07 septiembre | +9 | |||
| 06 septiembre | +8 | |||
| 05 septiembre | +4 | |||
| 04 septiembre | +2 | |||
| 03 septiembre | +13 | |||
| 02 septiembre | +17 | |||
| 01 septiembre | +12 |
Publicaciones del Canal
Section 15 of the Patents Act, 1970 states that : ''Where the Controller is satisfied that the application or any specification or any other document filed in pursuance thereof does not comply with the requirements of this Act or of any rules made thereunder, the Controller may refuse the application or may require the application, specification or the other documents, as the case may be, to be amended to his satisfaction before he proceeds with the application and refuse the application on failure to do so. ''
| 2 | Answer | 845 |
| 3 | If the Controller is satisfied that the application, specification or other document filed does not comply with the requirements of the Patents Act, 1970, they may
A. Refuse the application
B. Require the application, specification or the other documents, as the case may be, to be amended to their satisfaction before proceeding with the application
C. Refuse the application on failure to amend the application, specification or other documents
D. All of the above | 822 |
| 4 |  गणपती बाप्पा मोरया! 🙏🏻
I am happy to launch the new version of our platform:
🌐 Website: https://LegalCell.org
Key Highlights:
📖 Guide: Chapter-wise Notes, Q&A, MCQs & Case-Law across 40+ Acts
⚖️ Case Law Digest: Monthly Issues from SC & HC Reportable Judgments across 300+ Acts
🎯 Monthly MCQ: Practice Questions across 90+ Acts
🏆 Exam Study-Guide: Judiciary & AIBE Preparation Guides.
🎁 Get Your 1-Day Free Trial Here:
👉 https://forms.gle/vJSZcJrGdAXjthT76
🔓 Explore Paid Plans: https://www.legalcell.org/p/join.html
— Sagar Badade (सागर बडदे) | 1 291 |
| 5 | The plaintiff shall make the person with whom the adultery is alleged to have been committed a co-defendant, unless the Court shall otherwise order. | 1 271 |
| 6 | Answer | 1 279 |
| 7 | Who is required to be made a co-defendant in a suit for divorce on the ground of adultery under the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936?
A) The person with whom the adultery is alleged to have been committed
B) The person who witnessed or facilitated the adultery
C) The person who informed or complained about the adultery
D) No one is required to be made a co-defendant | 1 238 |
| 8 | Section 44 says that when the consideration for which a person signed a bill consisted of money, and was originally absent in part or has subsequently failed in part, the sum which a holder standing in immediate relation with such signer is entitled to receive from him is proportionally reduced. | 1 930 |
| 9 | Answer | 1 837 |
| 10 | According to Section 44 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, what recourse does a holder have if the consideration for a bill of exchange consisted of money and has partially failed?
A. The holder can recover the full amount of the bill.
B. The holder can recover only the amount for which there was valid consideration.
C. The holder can recover the full amount, but is liable to reimburse the excess to the signer.
D. The holder has no recourse. | 1 699 |
| 11 | "Tenant" means any person by whom or on whose account rent is payable for any premises. | 2 351 |
| 12 | Answer | 2 253 |
| 13 | Person in occupation of premises is tenant if
(1) he is only permitted to use that property
(2) he is put in exclusive possession of it and pays rent
(3) such person had lived for few days with the deceased original tenant as his friend
(4) all are correct | 1 909 |
| 14 | Section 29(1) of the Limitation Act, 1963 explicitly states that nothing in the Limitation Act, 1963 shall affect section 25 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. | 2 477 |
| 15 | Answer | 2 470 |
| 16 | Under Section 29 of the Limitation Act, 1963, what is the impact on Section 25 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872?
A. It reinforces the applicability of Section 25.
B. It weakens the applicability of Section 25.
C. It does not affect Section 25.
D. It repeals Section 25. | 2 190 |
| 17 | Act of a child under seven years of age is not an offence. | 2 452 |
| 18 | Answer | 2 413 |
| 19 | Under Section 82 of the Indian Penal Code, nothing is an offence which is done by a child under the age of.
a) 14 years
b) 7 years
c) 18 years
d) 21 years | 2 136 |
| 20 | “Who is the BCI to come between the students and me? The Bar Council of India has no business to order such inquiries against students” CJI Kant (Mihira Sood v. BCI, 14-Aug-2026, diary No. 49499/2026)
As the eve of India's Independence Day arrives, we prepare to celebrate our national freedom. Yet, as we stand on the threshold of August 15, we must pause and ask: are we truly free?
True freedom is not merely about hoisting a flag, but the liberty of thought, speech, and expression without fear.
A recent and unprecedented conflict unfolded at NALSAR University of Law in Hyderabad. Students there peacefully protested against the participation of Chief Justice of India, Suryakant, as the chief guest for their convocation.
The final-year students expressed deep concern that the Supreme Court had refused the urgent listing of a petition regarding violent police action against students.
To them, receiving degrees from a dignitary whose public conduct appeared to overlook state violence felt like a betrayal of the constitutional values taught at NALSAR.
In response, BCI Chairman Manan Kumar Mishra issued a startling circular on August 13.
This circular threatened to completely block the professional enrollment of the entire graduating batch of 2026 as advocates.
The BCI also directed the university's Vice Chancellor to submit a report within three days to identify the lead student protesters.
This was a direct assault on the students' fundamental right to livelihood and their freedom to practice a profession.
Now look at this, the Preamble and Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution guarantee every citizen the right to freedom of speech, expression, and peaceful protest.
An important thing to note here is the historic tolerance of the judiciary itself. In October 2025, a shoe was thrown at the then Chief Justice B. R. Gavai in open court.
Yet, Chief Justice Gavai magnanimously dismissed the shocking incident as a "forgotten chapter," choosing not to file any criminal complaint.
Contrast this with BCI's aggressive overreach, which the Supreme Court itself had to halt on August 14.
A Supreme Court bench, including Chief Justice Suryakant, Justice Jayamala Bagchi, and Justice V. Mohana, questioned BCI's jurisdiction.
The Chief Justice himself observed that even if the students were wrong, they had the right to protest, declaring it a matter between him and the students.
The court ordered that no action be taken against any student or teacher, forcing BCI to withdraw its controversial threat.
The result of this is a powerful reminder that our democracy remains alive not because of silent compliance, but because of the courage of our youth. When students studying the Constitution stand up to protect its spirit, they prove they are not a "burden" but the true custodians of our future.
As we celebrate our independence, let us remember that the true strength of our Constitution lies not merely in its written words, but in the courageous hearts of those who dare to defend it.
-- Sagar Badade (सागर बडदे) | 2 032 |
