Bare Act
前往频道在 Telegram
📈 Telegram 频道 Bare Act 的分析概览
频道 Bare Act (@thebareact) 英语 语言赛道中的 是活跃参与者。目前社区聚集了 11 278 名订阅者，在 法律 类别中位列第 762，并在 印度 地区排名第 34 150 位。
📊 受众指标与增长动态
自 невідомо 创建以来，项目保持高速增长，吸引了 11 278 名订阅者。
根据 24 九月, 2026 的最新数据，频道保持稳定运转。过去 30 天订阅人数变化为 231，过去 24 小时变化为 5，整体触达仍然可观。
- 认证状态： 未认证
- 互动率 (ER)： 平均受众互动率为 13.16%。内容发布后 24 小时内通常能获得 2.66% 的反应，占订阅者总量。
- 帖子覆盖： 每篇帖子平均可获得 1 484 次浏览，首日通常累积 300 次浏览。
- 互动与反馈： 受众积极参与，单帖平均反应数为 0。
- 主题关注点： 内容集中在 apr-2026, judge, may-2026, marathi, उत्तरपत्रिका 等核心主题上。
📝 描述与内容策略
作者将该频道定位为表达主观观点的平台：
“⚖ For the Students of Law.
Author: Sagar Badade (सागर बडदे)
Website: legalcell.org”
凭借高频更新（最新数据采集于 25 九月, 2026），频道始终保持新鲜度与高覆盖。分析显示受众积极互动，使其成为 法律 类别中的关键影响点。
11 278
订阅者
+524 小时
+357 天
+23130 天
数据加载中...
相似频道
标签云
进出提及
---
---
---
---
---
---
吸引订阅者
九月 '269月 '26
九月 '26
+204
在0个频道中
八月 '26
+233
在0个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '26
+194
在0个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '26
+157
在0个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '26
+142
在0个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '26
+58
在0个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '26
+18
在0个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '26
+46
在0个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '26
+65
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '25
+43
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '25
+131
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '25
+135
在0个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '25
+85
在0个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '25
+98
在0个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '25
+130
在0个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '25
+37
在0个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '25
+48
在0个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '25
+58
在0个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '25
+208
在0个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '25
+93
在2个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '25
+132
在1个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '24
+329
在1个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '24
+799
在3个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '24
+644
在1个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '24
+558
在1个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '24
+500
在3个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '24
+920
在2个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '24
+852
在1个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '24
+953
在1个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '24
+851
在1个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '24
+894
在0个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '24
+692
在1个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '24
+522
在2个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '23
+456
在1个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '23
+75
在1个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '23
+40
在2个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '23
+59
在0个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '23
+61
在0个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '23
+153
在0个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '23
+70
在0个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '23
+62
在0个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '23
+49
在0个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '23
+112
在0个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '23
+207
在0个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '23
+158
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '22
+207
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '22
+132
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '22
+143
在0个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '22
+406
在0个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '22
+934
在0个频道中
| 日期 | 订阅者增长 | 提及 | 频道 | |
| 25 九月 | +1 | |||
| 24 九月 | +5 | |||
| 23 九月 | +11 | |||
| 22 九月 | +9 | |||
| 21 九月 | +8 | |||
| 20 九月 | +2 | |||
| 19 九月 | +6 | |||
| 18 九月 | +2 | |||
| 17 九月 | +11 | |||
| 16 九月 | +2 | |||
| 15 九月 | +7 | |||
| 14 九月 | +9 | |||
| 13 九月 | +13 | |||
| 12 九月 | +3 | |||
| 11 九月 | +19 | |||
| 10 九月 | +9 | |||
| 09 九月 | +13 | |||
| 08 九月 | +9 | |||
| 07 九月 | +9 | |||
| 06 九月 | +8 | |||
| 05 九月 | +4 | |||
| 04 九月 | +2 | |||
| 03 九月 | +13 | |||
| 02 九月 | +17 | |||
| 01 九月 | +12 |
频道帖子
Section 15 of the Patents Act, 1970 states that : ''Where the Controller is satisfied that the application or any specification or any other document filed in pursuance thereof does not comply with the requirements of this Act or of any rules made thereunder, the Controller may refuse the application or may require the application, specification or the other documents, as the case may be, to be amended to his satisfaction before he proceeds with the application and refuse the application on failure to do so. ''
| 2 | Answer | 813 |
| 3 | If the Controller is satisfied that the application, specification or other document filed does not comply with the requirements of the Patents Act, 1970, they may
A. Refuse the application
B. Require the application, specification or the other documents, as the case may be, to be amended to their satisfaction before proceeding with the application
C. Refuse the application on failure to amend the application, specification or other documents
D. All of the above | 791 |
| 4 |  गणपती बाप्पा मोरया! 🙏🏻
I am happy to launch the new version of our platform:
🌐 Website: https://LegalCell.org
Key Highlights:
📖 Guide: Chapter-wise Notes, Q&A, MCQs & Case-Law across 40+ Acts
⚖️ Case Law Digest: Monthly Issues from SC & HC Reportable Judgments across 300+ Acts
🎯 Monthly MCQ: Practice Questions across 90+ Acts
🏆 Exam Study-Guide: Judiciary & AIBE Preparation Guides.
🎁 Get Your 1-Day Free Trial Here:
👉 https://forms.gle/vJSZcJrGdAXjthT76
🔓 Explore Paid Plans: https://www.legalcell.org/p/join.html
— Sagar Badade (सागर बडदे) | 1 253 |
| 5 | The plaintiff shall make the person with whom the adultery is alleged to have been committed a co-defendant, unless the Court shall otherwise order. | 1 248 |
| 6 | Answer | 1 257 |
| 7 | Who is required to be made a co-defendant in a suit for divorce on the ground of adultery under the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936?
A) The person with whom the adultery is alleged to have been committed
B) The person who witnessed or facilitated the adultery
C) The person who informed or complained about the adultery
D) No one is required to be made a co-defendant | 1 218 |
| 8 | Section 44 says that when the consideration for which a person signed a bill consisted of money, and was originally absent in part or has subsequently failed in part, the sum which a holder standing in immediate relation with such signer is entitled to receive from him is proportionally reduced. | 1 912 |
| 9 | Answer | 1 819 |
| 10 | According to Section 44 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, what recourse does a holder have if the consideration for a bill of exchange consisted of money and has partially failed?
A. The holder can recover the full amount of the bill.
B. The holder can recover only the amount for which there was valid consideration.
C. The holder can recover the full amount, but is liable to reimburse the excess to the signer.
D. The holder has no recourse. | 1 681 |
| 11 | "Tenant" means any person by whom or on whose account rent is payable for any premises. | 2 334 |
| 12 | Answer | 2 236 |
| 13 | Person in occupation of premises is tenant if
(1) he is only permitted to use that property
(2) he is put in exclusive possession of it and pays rent
(3) such person had lived for few days with the deceased original tenant as his friend
(4) all are correct | 1 896 |
| 14 | Section 29(1) of the Limitation Act, 1963 explicitly states that nothing in the Limitation Act, 1963 shall affect section 25 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. | 2 477 |
| 15 | Answer | 2 470 |
| 16 | Under Section 29 of the Limitation Act, 1963, what is the impact on Section 25 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872?
A. It reinforces the applicability of Section 25.
B. It weakens the applicability of Section 25.
C. It does not affect Section 25.
D. It repeals Section 25. | 2 190 |
| 17 | Act of a child under seven years of age is not an offence. | 2 452 |
| 18 | Answer | 2 413 |
| 19 | Under Section 82 of the Indian Penal Code, nothing is an offence which is done by a child under the age of.
a) 14 years
b) 7 years
c) 18 years
d) 21 years | 2 136 |
| 20 | “Who is the BCI to come between the students and me? The Bar Council of India has no business to order such inquiries against students” CJI Kant (Mihira Sood v. BCI, 14-Aug-2026, diary No. 49499/2026)
As the eve of India's Independence Day arrives, we prepare to celebrate our national freedom. Yet, as we stand on the threshold of August 15, we must pause and ask: are we truly free?
True freedom is not merely about hoisting a flag, but the liberty of thought, speech, and expression without fear.
A recent and unprecedented conflict unfolded at NALSAR University of Law in Hyderabad. Students there peacefully protested against the participation of Chief Justice of India, Suryakant, as the chief guest for their convocation.
The final-year students expressed deep concern that the Supreme Court had refused the urgent listing of a petition regarding violent police action against students.
To them, receiving degrees from a dignitary whose public conduct appeared to overlook state violence felt like a betrayal of the constitutional values taught at NALSAR.
In response, BCI Chairman Manan Kumar Mishra issued a startling circular on August 13.
This circular threatened to completely block the professional enrollment of the entire graduating batch of 2026 as advocates.
The BCI also directed the university's Vice Chancellor to submit a report within three days to identify the lead student protesters.
This was a direct assault on the students' fundamental right to livelihood and their freedom to practice a profession.
Now look at this, the Preamble and Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution guarantee every citizen the right to freedom of speech, expression, and peaceful protest.
An important thing to note here is the historic tolerance of the judiciary itself. In October 2025, a shoe was thrown at the then Chief Justice B. R. Gavai in open court.
Yet, Chief Justice Gavai magnanimously dismissed the shocking incident as a "forgotten chapter," choosing not to file any criminal complaint.
Contrast this with BCI's aggressive overreach, which the Supreme Court itself had to halt on August 14.
A Supreme Court bench, including Chief Justice Suryakant, Justice Jayamala Bagchi, and Justice V. Mohana, questioned BCI's jurisdiction.
The Chief Justice himself observed that even if the students were wrong, they had the right to protest, declaring it a matter between him and the students.
The court ordered that no action be taken against any student or teacher, forcing BCI to withdraw its controversial threat.
The result of this is a powerful reminder that our democracy remains alive not because of silent compliance, but because of the courage of our youth. When students studying the Constitution stand up to protect its spirit, they prove they are not a "burden" but the true custodians of our future.
As we celebrate our independence, let us remember that the true strength of our Constitution lies not merely in its written words, but in the courageous hearts of those who dare to defend it.
-- Sagar Badade (सागर बडदे) | 2 032 |
