es
Feedback
Simplicity Group Alpha

Simplicity Group Alpha

Ir al canal en Telegram

Disclaimer: NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE. The information in this channel is provided for education and informational purposes only, without any express or implied warranty of any kind. https://www.simplicitygroup.xyz

Mostrar más
1 815
Suscriptores
-124 horas
-77 días
-1130 días
Atraer Suscriptores
agosto '26
agosto '26
+8
en 0 canales
julio '26
+9
en 0 canales
Get PRO
junio '26
+10
en 0 canales
Get PRO
mayo '26
+13
en 2 canales
Get PRO
abril '26
+96
en 1 canales
Get PRO
marzo '26
+40
en 1 canales
Get PRO
febrero '26
+21
en 0 canales
Get PRO
enero '26
+15
en 0 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '25
+26
en 0 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '25
+19
en 1 canales
Get PRO
octubre '25
+41
en 4 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '25
+27
en 0 canales
Get PRO
agosto '25
+30
en 0 canales
Get PRO
julio '25
+59
en 1 canales
Get PRO
junio '25
+48
en 1 canales
Get PRO
mayo '25
+31
en 2 canales
Get PRO
abril '25
+29
en 2 canales
Get PRO
marzo '25
+34
en 2 canales
Get PRO
febrero '25
+24
en 0 canales
Get PRO
enero '25
+50
en 1 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '24
+25
en 0 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '24
+61
en 3 canales
Get PRO
octubre '24
+86
en 0 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '24
+92
en 1 canales
Get PRO
agosto '24
+63
en 0 canales
Get PRO
julio '24
+85
en 0 canales
Get PRO
junio '24
+78
en 0 canales
Get PRO
mayo '24
+118
en 1 canales
Get PRO
abril '24
+207
en 2 canales
Get PRO
marzo '24
+127
en 1 canales
Get PRO
febrero '24
+76
en 0 canales
Get PRO
enero '24
+139
en 1 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '23
+210
en 0 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '23
+150
en 1 canales
Get PRO
octubre '23
+66
en 0 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '23
+34
en 0 canales
Get PRO
agosto '23
+20
en 0 canales
Get PRO
julio '23
+23
en 0 canales
Get PRO
junio '23
+35
en 0 canales
Get PRO
mayo '23
+39
en 0 canales
Get PRO
abril '23
+43
en 0 canales
Get PRO
marzo '23
+381
en 0 canales
Fecha
Crecimiento de Suscriptores
Menciones
Canales
29 agosto0
28 agosto0
27 agosto0
26 agosto0
25 agosto0
24 agosto0
23 agosto0
22 agosto0
21 agosto0
20 agosto0
19 agosto+2
18 agosto0
17 agosto0
16 agosto0
15 agosto+1
14 agosto0
13 agosto+1
12 agosto0
11 agosto0
10 agosto0
09 agosto0
08 agosto0
07 agosto0
06 agosto0
05 agosto0
04 agosto+2
03 agosto+2
02 agosto0
01 agosto0
Publicaciones del Canal
AI vs Crypto Venutre Funding AI venture funding reached $386 billion in H1 2026, versus $8 billion for crypto, a roughly 48-f
AI vs Crypto Venutre Funding AI venture funding reached $386 billion in H1 2026, versus $8 billion for crypto, a roughly 48-fold gap. In 2022, the sectors raised $45.8 billion and $30 billion respectively. Sources: Crunchbase and Galaxy Research.

2
6 Quick Ways To Improve Your Geo Before rewriting for AI search, check whether assistants can reach your pages. Here's 6 tips
6 Quick Ways To Improve Your Geo Before rewriting for AI search, check whether assistants can reach your pages. Here's 6 tips on the fundamentals to improve your GEO. Sources: OpenAI, Perplexity, Microsoft and Google.
135
3
GTM Engineering: Where Buying Signals Surface The earliest useful buying signals are often public records, not intent data. A
GTM Engineering: Where Buying Signals Surface The earliest useful buying signals are often public records, not intent data. A trademark filing can reveal an unlaunched product 2 to 12 months early, while a new subdomain shows that infrastructure is already being built. Read our deep dive here: https://x.com/SimplicityWeb3/status/2089326564265635874
166
4
Cryptos Top Revenue Generators In 2026 Hyperliquid generated $28.4 million per employee, 2.5 times Tether and nearly 24 times
Cryptos Top Revenue Generators In 2026 Hyperliquid generated $28.4 million per employee, 2.5 times Tether and nearly 24 times Circle. Its 12-person team shows how far software operating leverage can stretch. Sources: DeFiLlama, CoinGecko, company filings and company data.
197
5
Global Al Assistant Monthly Active Users
Global Al Assistant Monthly Active Users
214
6
GTM Engineering: Outbound 6sense found buyers first contact their eventual vendor 81% of the time, after completing roughly 7
GTM Engineering: Outbound 6sense found buyers first contact their eventual vendor 81% of the time, after completing roughly 70% of the process alone. How should you sequence email, LinkedIn and targeted ads to reach the buying group before it decides? We explore: ∙ Why filtering protects the 0.3% spam complaint ceiling and gives segment tests trustworthy data. ∙ How 6 to 8 weeks of team-led LinkedIn content makes multi-threaded outreach familiar before the ask. ∙ Why targeted ads come third, after email and LinkedIn show which accounts deserve paid frequency. Read the full article here: https://x.com/SimplicityWeb3/status/2091852729408774376
213
7
GTM Engineering: Signals and Routing Cold email replies average 3.43%. Campaigns built on buying signals report 15 to 25%. So
GTM Engineering: Signals and Routing Cold email replies average 3.43%. Campaigns built on buying signals report 15 to 25%. So which signals are worth watching, and how do you route them before they decay? We explore: ∙ The public-record signals almost nobody watches: SH01 filings, Form Ds, certificate transparency logs and trademark applications. ∙ Why the tools named inside a job advert tell you more than the job title does. ∙ How to route each signal to the right lane before it goes cold. Read the full article here: https://x.com/SimplicityWeb3/status/2089326564265635874
330
8
GTM Engineering: Signals and Routing Cold email replies average 3.43%. Campaigns built on buying signals report 15 to 25%. So which signals are worth watching, and how do you route them before they decay? We explore: ∙ The public-record signals almost nobody watches: SH01 filings, Form Ds, certificate transparency logs and trademark applications. ∙ Why the tools named inside a job advert tell you more than the job title does. ∙ How to route each signal to the right lane before it goes cold. Read the full article here: https://x.com/SimplicityWeb3/status/2089326564265635874
1
9
Sin texto...
375
10
GTM Engineering: Data Enrichment A single data provider verifies an email for 55 to 70% of a B2B list. Chaining three or four
GTM Engineering: Data Enrichment A single data provider verifies an email for 55 to 70% of a B2B list. Chaining three or four in sequence takes that to 92%. So how do you build a contact database that reaches your whole market? We explore: ∙ Why the build starts with the ICP definition, not the list. ∙ What waterfall enrichment actually costs, per email and per phone number. ∙ Why coverage is regional, and how fast contact data decays. Read the full article here: https://x.com/SimplicityWeb3/status/2087875055241805914
401
11
The GTM Engineering Tech Stack, Layer by Layer A working GTM engineering stack costs from $300 to $1,500 a month. An enterpri
The GTM Engineering Tech Stack, Layer by Layer A working GTM engineering stack costs from $300 to $1,500 a month. An enterprise version of the same six functions costs more than $200,000 a year. So what explains the gap, and which tools actually belong in each layer? We explore: ∙ The six layers of a GTM engineering stack, and the tools that dominate each one. ∙ Real August 2026 pricing, and the drawback every tool tries to hide. ∙ Three working stacks, from bootstrap to enterprise. Read the full article here: http://x.com/SimplicityWeb3/status/2087196283916198219
381
12
GTM Engineering Explained: GTM engineer is a role that did not exist in 2022. Now LinkedIn carries more than 3,000 open roles
GTM Engineering Explained: GTM engineer is a role that did not exist in 2022. Now LinkedIn carries more than 3,000 open roles, up 205% in a year but what is GTM engineering? We explore: ∙ What is GTM engineering? ∙ The economic implications that allowed GTM engineering to become established. ∙ What the future holds for GTM engineering. Read the full article here: https://simplicitygroup.xyz/blog/what-is-gtm-engineering
353
13
Over 2,000 investors have invested in a crypto round since January 2025, yet only around 250 have done five or more deals. We
Over 2,000 investors have invested in a crypto round since January 2025, yet only around 250 have done five or more deals. We our sharing our internal tool that we've used to help our clients raise $2M+ in the last 3 months. Our Investor Matchmaker Tool helps: 🟢 Benchmarks against 2,500+ announced rounds: median, percentiles, where your target. 🟢 Finds the 12 most suitable lead targets, funds that have priced rounds in your category, ranked by recency and size fit. 🟢 Suggests the strongest 15 follow-on targets. Try it: investor-match.simplicitygroup.xyz Full walkthrough: simplicitygroup.xyz/blog/crypto-investor-matching-tool
497
14
We built a free token modelling tool to let you simulate your token price based on some tokenomics and buy pressure inputs. I
We built a free token modelling tool to let you simulate your token price based on some tokenomics and buy pressure inputs. It runs a Monte Carlo simulation and showcases price, revenue, buy/sell pressure, emissions, and other useful data. Try it out here: https://tokenomics.simplicitygroup.xyz/ Video how-to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dy0aFYTV_lQ
476
15
Two Logos Are Not A Partnership: Crypto loves to use partnerships for marketing, but two logos blasted on a post are not a re
Two Logos Are Not A Partnership: Crypto loves to use partnerships for marketing, but two logos blasted on a post are not a real partnership. · Three tests before any deal: do the ICPs actually overlap, is there an integration that creates new revenue rather than visibility, and does the outreach match how the other side buys Examples of Good Partnerships: · Securitize x BlackRock: BUIDL passed 2.5bn dollars in AUM and paid over 100m in on-chain dividends, and Securitize turned the relationship into a 47m round led by BlackRock. · Legion x Kraken: Kraken reserves up to 20 percent of every sale for Legion, and the first sale, Yield Basis, raised 2.5m dollars at a 200m FDV. Full article here: https://simplicitygroup.xyz/blog/two-logos-are-not-a-partnership
473
16
Two Logos Are Not A Partnership:https://simplicitygroup.xyz/blog/two-logos-are-not-a-partnership
1
17
We outlined our GTM approach for Digital Asset Businesses: • Five phases run as a loop: discovery, market penetration strateg
We outlined our GTM approach for Digital Asset Businesses: • Five phases run as a loop: discovery, market penetration strategy, brand growth strategy, then execution on both. Rush discovery and every downstream decision compounds the error • Four arenas to penetrate, each on its own timeline and stakeholder: ecosystem, partnerships, clients, and capital • Warm intros beat cold outreach by roughly 10x on reply rate, and that ratio is what makes a small team's pipeline look like a much larger team's Article Link: https://x.com/SimplicityWeb3/status/2079203209890201973
477
18
Swap your name for a competitor's in your positioning statement. If it still reads fine, you do not have a position. What our
Swap your name for a competitor's in your positioning statement. If it still reads fine, you do not have a position. What our article covers ∙ Three frameworks that work in combination: Dunford maps the components, Moore writes the 17-second statement, Ries and Trout choose the category ∙ Hyperliquid, Pendle and Ondo each created a subcategory they were structurally first in rather than fighting for "best L1" or "best DEX" Article link: https://simplicitygroup.xyz/blog/positioning
503
19
GTM Campaign Highlight: Backpack Friday Points 󠁯󠁯• Backpack pays points every Friday based on that week's trading volume, w
GTM Campaign Highlight: Backpack Friday Points 󠁯󠁯• Backpack pays points every Friday based on that week's trading volume, with ranks that reward frequent repeat trading over a single whale-sized trade, all pointing at a confirmed 25% community token allocation. 󠁯󠁯• 650,000+ KYC-verified users by October 2025, up from 500,000 in March 2024, and $363B in lifetime volume by January 2026. Why it worked: A weekly payout gives traders a reason to come back every seven days, so the reward builds a habit; a one-off airdrop pays once and the activity leaves with it.
443
20
Most teams do not have a customer problem; they have an ICP problem. What our article covers ∙ Forrester: a clearly defined I
Most teams do not have a customer problem; they have an ICP problem. What our article covers ∙ Forrester: a clearly defined ICP drives 68 percent higher account win rates and roughly 3x sales productivity ∙ Lenny Rachitsky's finding across 30+ B2B founders: winning ICPs use three attributes, no more (how Gong, Snyk and Canva did it) Article link: https://x.com/SimplicityWeb3/status/2076603304570757145
403