¡Ya disponible! Investigación de Telegram 2025 — los principales insights del año 
Iain Davis
Ir al canal en Telegram
1 551
Suscriptores
+124 horas
+67 días
+4630 días
Carga de datos en curso...
Canales Similares
Nube de Etiquetas
Menciones Entrantes y Salientes
---
---
---
---
---
---
Atraer Suscriptores
junio '26
junio '26
+75
en 8 canales
mayo '26
+52
en 17 canales
Get PRO
abril '26
+71
en 10 canales
Get PRO
marzo '26
+129
en 10 canales
Get PRO
febrero '26
+40
en 2 canales
Get PRO
enero '26
+66
en 6 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '25
+102
en 6 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '25
+81
en 10 canales
Get PRO
octubre '25
+62
en 15 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '25
+12
en 4 canales
Get PRO
agosto '25
+8
en 2 canales
Get PRO
julio '25
+13
en 3 canales
Get PRO
junio '25
+67
en 8 canales
Get PRO
mayo '25
+16
en 4 canales
Get PRO
abril '25
+20
en 4 canales
Get PRO
marzo '25
+40
en 8 canales
Get PRO
febrero '25
+20
en 2 canales
Get PRO
enero '25
+85
en 19 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '24
+52
en 4 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '24
+35
en 4 canales
Get PRO
octubre '24
+26
en 3 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '24
+48
en 4 canales
Get PRO
agosto '24
+28
en 2 canales
Get PRO
julio '24
+52
en 4 canales
Get PRO
junio '24
+18
en 0 canales
Get PRO
mayo '24
+28
en 2 canales
Get PRO
abril '24
+17
en 0 canales
Get PRO
marzo '24
+33
en 1 canales
Get PRO
febrero '24
+45
en 8 canales
Get PRO
enero '24
+46
en 4 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '23
+46
en 12 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '23
+32
en 8 canales
Get PRO
octubre '23
+53
en 0 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '23
+47
en 0 canales
Get PRO
agosto '23
+46
en 0 canales
Get PRO
julio '23
+33
en 0 canales
Get PRO
junio '23
+61
en 0 canales
Get PRO
mayo '23
+43
en 0 canales
Get PRO
abril '23
+46
en 0 canales
Get PRO
marzo '23
+75
en 0 canales
Get PRO
febrero '23
+23
en 0 canales
Get PRO
enero '23
+70
en 0 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '22
+39
en 0 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '22
+237
en 0 canales
| Fecha | Crecimiento de Suscriptores | Menciones | Canales | |
| 27 junio | +3 | |||
| 26 junio | +1 | |||
| 25 junio | +1 | |||
| 24 junio | 0 | |||
| 23 junio | +1 | |||
| 22 junio | +2 | |||
| 21 junio | +1 | |||
| 20 junio | +1 | |||
| 19 junio | +1 | |||
| 18 junio | +1 | |||
| 17 junio | +1 | |||
| 16 junio | +1 | |||
| 15 junio | 0 | |||
| 14 junio | +2 | |||
| 13 junio | +2 | |||
| 12 junio | +3 | |||
| 11 junio | 0 | |||
| 10 junio | +2 | |||
| 09 junio | +3 | |||
| 08 junio | 0 | |||
| 07 junio | +3 | |||
| 06 junio | +2 | |||
| 05 junio | +6 | |||
| 04 junio | +6 | |||
| 03 junio | +11 | |||
| 02 junio | +17 | |||
| 01 junio | +4 |
Publicaciones del Canal
| 2 | https://archive.ph/GmFmg | 557 |
| 3 | https://archive.ph/Q49fe | 363 |
| 4 | Did somebody say Middle Eastern Union/Technate without saying Middle Eastern Union/Technate?
"What is emerging is...a gradual shift from externally mediated order toward regionally negotiated coexistence.
Past attempts at regional integration—from the Arab League to the Gulf Cooperation Council—have foundered...after postponing it for half a century, Middle Eastern leaders now must choose whether to build a regional architecture themselves or remain mired in crises that they are increasingly powerless to control." https://foreignpolicy.com/2026/06/24/iran-war-middle-east-us-china-military-economy-diplomacy/ | 313 |
| 5 | https://archive.ph/L1JIe | 401 |
| 6 | Now that more people are learning about (and despising) Peter Thiel, its time to revisit this minidoc on the relationship between Donald Trump, Peter Thiel and the Technocrats.
https://theconsciousresistance.com/trump-thiel-technocrats/ | 668 |
| 7 | Also read the China-Maxxing post (above) on my website: https://iaindavis.com/the-multipolaristas-china-maxxing/ | 716 |
| 8 | What is China-maxxing and why are the Multipolarista proponents of global governance engaged in it? What is the purpose of China-maxxing? Read here to find out.
https://iaindavis.substack.com/p/the-multipolaristas-china-maxxing | 1 522 |
| 9 | https://www.youtube.com/shorts/CHOETaboEsg | 979 |
| 10 | Ooh, goosebumps! | 664 |
| 11 | https://archive.ph/7s4dt | 1 184 |
| 12 | Leak Exposes Members of Peter Thiel's Secretive 'Dialog' Society
Article, Comments | 27 |
| 13 | Well, Disclosure Day bored me rigid. Very long winded build up to a load of hamfisted Hollywood melodrama trying, and failing, to be profound. Give me Cross of Iron any day. | 832 |
| 14 | This summer I am going on the road for a short speaking tour with Andrew Johnson and Richard D. Hall for a very worthy cause. Please check out the details and it would be great to meet up with any of you if you can make it. https://iaindavis.com/a-home-for-lewis/ | 1 808 |
| 15 | Wow. Okay I just got out of Disclosure Day and I will definitely be doing a video breakdown.
My initiat reaction is that something feels off. It definitely felt like predicting programming, preparing the public for some version of "disclosure" relating to aliens.
Personally, I believe in life from other places and dimensions etc. I know lots of people see this as demons and I don't know.
But the timing of this release with the ever increasing talk of UFO Disclosure definitely makes me feel like we are being prepared.
Miriam and I both feel uneasy and uncertain after watching it. Video coming soon. | 872 |
| 16 | Oh no! I'm mentally ill and suffering from PDS - Palantir Derangement Syndrome. https://archive.ph/91ikA | 2 494 |
| 17 | Occasionally, when I visit people, I am exposed to the BBC evening news. A coupe of weeks ago the BBC told me that the lovely hot, sunny weather I was enjoying was caused by "human-induced climate change." Can anybody tell me if the BBC is currently reporting that the cold, wet miserable weather I am presently fed up with is also caused by "human-induced climate change?" | 1 303 |
| 18 | It looks like another narrative shift is underway. This one needs picking apart. https://off-guardian.org/2026/06/07/quick-take-whats-up-with-cbdcs/ | 988 |
| 19 | wrt method - quite a few have asked me about AI and how I use AI.
first off, do not trust any AI. none can be trusted. they all have strengths and weaknesses. but you cannot allow any AI to take full control, because the amount of time you’ll spend ensuring it hasn’t subversively altered key sections is significant. you HAVE to drive the process.
wrt AIs, one of the primary uses i have for it is in postprocessing. i used to spend ages doing just grammar and spelling. off to AI that goes. drumming up the odd URL works as well - deepseek is great for locaing non-western URLs, especially academic papers.
but once the entire essay is done (apart from the final polishing pass), then i send it off to be ‘fact checked’, and that’s where AIs shine. again, do not trust anything they say, stay on top of the entire process.
i use upwards of 10 different AIs (opus, deepseek, gemini, venice, grok, …), each serve a distinct purpose. grok was handy, because it swiftly moves into ‘check the facts’ mode without you having to do much, whereas others will do immediately check other things for you.
so send the essay to 5 AIs, typically just “fact check this, but don’t worry about microscopics”, the latter because otherwise half of them wastes your time on precision of grammar, etc. leave those who are still on reddit to have such exciting discussions.
when the results come in, you assign a ‘clearinghouse AI’ instance for the meta-discussion. on some topics, opus is the best (but you have to put it in its place first, and 4.7 has taken a step backwards here), but venice is generally a valid alternative, glm5 is reasonable for the purpose (just dont use k2 which is ever the contrarian). its job is to take all the rendered verdicts from all the other AIs and sort the wheat from the chaff.
do this over a few rounds, and you end up with an essay which in essence cannot be shot down. don’t make substantial edits unless you’ve been convinced in the process, but polish, and perhaps just more accurately phrasing things so bad faith readings become harder.
regardless of what you do - do not assign chatgpt a lead role, because it WILL attempt to soften your material. even if you can point blank prove that <x> murdered <y>, if <x> is a protected specie then chatgpt will soften your text. every - single - time.
these days, after the main round is done, i add another round where pheripheral AIs (chatgpt, copilot, liner pro, …) - that’s where chatgpt and copilot comes in. they’re both in the little league because you cannot trust them to not go full soviet.
the output is essentially essays where even those who try to dismantle your argument for ideological reasons - marxists, especially - do everything to weasel around the core topic rather than engage, because they know they cannot win the debate. | 824 |
| 20 | Interesting from Escapekey. Personally, I don't use AI for virtually any research and not at all for writing. But I do use a free AI grammar checker before a human editors look at most of my content (sometimes not on Substack). I have also used DuckDuckGo AI search instead of Wikipedia for looking up things like dates, historical figures etc. So I am not going to be "holier than thou" and pretend I don't use AI at all. What do we all think about this? | 679 |
