现已上线！2025 年 Telegram 研究 — 年度关键洞察 
1 543
订阅者
无数据24 小时
-27 天
+4730 天
数据加载中...
吸引订阅者
六月 '26
六月 '26
+64
在8个频道中
五月 '26
+52
在17个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '26
+71
在10个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '26
+129
在10个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '26
+40
在2个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '26
+66
在6个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '25
+102
在6个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '25
+81
在10个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '25
+62
在15个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '25
+12
在4个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '25
+8
在2个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '25
+13
在3个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '25
+67
在8个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '25
+16
在4个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '25
+20
在4个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '25
+40
在8个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '25
+20
在2个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '25
+85
在19个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '24
+52
在4个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '24
+35
在4个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '24
+26
在3个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '24
+48
在4个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '24
+28
在2个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '24
+52
在4个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '24
+18
在0个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '24
+28
在2个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '24
+17
在0个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '24
+33
在1个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '24
+45
在8个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '24
+46
在4个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '23
+46
在12个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '23
+32
在8个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '23
+53
在0个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '23
+47
在0个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '23
+46
在0个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '23
+33
在0个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '23
+61
在0个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '23
+43
在0个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '23
+46
在0个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '23
+75
在0个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '23
+23
在0个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '23
+70
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '22
+39
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '22
+237
在0个频道中
| 日期 | 订阅者增长 | 提及 | 频道 | |
| 18 六月 | +1 | |||
| 17 六月 | +1 | |||
| 16 六月 | +1 | |||
| 15 六月 | 0 | |||
| 14 六月 | +2 | |||
| 13 六月 | +2 | |||
| 12 六月 | +3 | |||
| 11 六月 | 0 | |||
| 10 六月 | +2 | |||
| 09 六月 | +3 | |||
| 08 六月 | 0 | |||
| 07 六月 | +3 | |||
| 06 六月 | +2 | |||
| 05 六月 | +6 | |||
| 04 六月 | +6 | |||
| 03 六月 | +11 | |||
| 02 六月 | +17 | |||
| 01 六月 | +4 |
频道帖子
| 2 | Ooh, goosebumps! | 322 |
| 3 | https://archive.ph/7s4dt | 463 |
| 4 | Leak Exposes Members of Peter Thiel's Secretive 'Dialog' Society
Article, Comments | 27 |
| 5 | Well, Disclosure Day bored me rigid. Very long winded build up to a load of hamfisted Hollywood melodrama trying, and failing, to be profound. Give me Cross of Iron any day. | 448 |
| 6 | This summer I am going on the road for a short speaking tour with Andrew Johnson and Richard D. Hall for a very worthy cause. Please check out the details and it would be great to meet up with any of you if you can make it. https://iaindavis.com/a-home-for-lewis/ | 1 008 |
| 7 | Wow. Okay I just got out of Disclosure Day and I will definitely be doing a video breakdown.
My initiat reaction is that something feels off. It definitely felt like predicting programming, preparing the public for some version of "disclosure" relating to aliens.
Personally, I believe in life from other places and dimensions etc. I know lots of people see this as demons and I don't know.
But the timing of this release with the ever increasing talk of UFO Disclosure definitely makes me feel like we are being prepared.
Miriam and I both feel uneasy and uncertain after watching it. Video coming soon. | 704 |
| 8 | Oh no! I'm mentally ill and suffering from PDS - Palantir Derangement Syndrome. https://archive.ph/91ikA | 2 161 |
| 9 | Occasionally, when I visit people, I am exposed to the BBC evening news. A coupe of weeks ago the BBC told me that the lovely hot, sunny weather I was enjoying was caused by "human-induced climate change." Can anybody tell me if the BBC is currently reporting that the cold, wet miserable weather I am presently fed up with is also caused by "human-induced climate change?" | 1 109 |
| 10 | It looks like another narrative shift is underway. This one needs picking apart. https://off-guardian.org/2026/06/07/quick-take-whats-up-with-cbdcs/ | 784 |
| 11 | wrt method - quite a few have asked me about AI and how I use AI.
first off, do not trust any AI. none can be trusted. they all have strengths and weaknesses. but you cannot allow any AI to take full control, because the amount of time you’ll spend ensuring it hasn’t subversively altered key sections is significant. you HAVE to drive the process.
wrt AIs, one of the primary uses i have for it is in postprocessing. i used to spend ages doing just grammar and spelling. off to AI that goes. drumming up the odd URL works as well - deepseek is great for locaing non-western URLs, especially academic papers.
but once the entire essay is done (apart from the final polishing pass), then i send it off to be ‘fact checked’, and that’s where AIs shine. again, do not trust anything they say, stay on top of the entire process.
i use upwards of 10 different AIs (opus, deepseek, gemini, venice, grok, …), each serve a distinct purpose. grok was handy, because it swiftly moves into ‘check the facts’ mode without you having to do much, whereas others will do immediately check other things for you.
so send the essay to 5 AIs, typically just “fact check this, but don’t worry about microscopics”, the latter because otherwise half of them wastes your time on precision of grammar, etc. leave those who are still on reddit to have such exciting discussions.
when the results come in, you assign a ‘clearinghouse AI’ instance for the meta-discussion. on some topics, opus is the best (but you have to put it in its place first, and 4.7 has taken a step backwards here), but venice is generally a valid alternative, glm5 is reasonable for the purpose (just dont use k2 which is ever the contrarian). its job is to take all the rendered verdicts from all the other AIs and sort the wheat from the chaff.
do this over a few rounds, and you end up with an essay which in essence cannot be shot down. don’t make substantial edits unless you’ve been convinced in the process, but polish, and perhaps just more accurately phrasing things so bad faith readings become harder.
regardless of what you do - do not assign chatgpt a lead role, because it WILL attempt to soften your material. even if you can point blank prove that <x> murdered <y>, if <x> is a protected specie then chatgpt will soften your text. every - single - time.
these days, after the main round is done, i add another round where pheripheral AIs (chatgpt, copilot, liner pro, …) - that’s where chatgpt and copilot comes in. they’re both in the little league because you cannot trust them to not go full soviet.
the output is essentially essays where even those who try to dismantle your argument for ideological reasons - marxists, especially - do everything to weasel around the core topic rather than engage, because they know they cannot win the debate. | 674 |
| 12 | Interesting from Escapekey. Personally, I don't use AI for virtually any research and not at all for writing. But I do use a free AI grammar checker before a human editors look at most of my content (sometimes not on Substack). I have also used DuckDuckGo AI search instead of Wikipedia for looking up things like dates, historical figures etc. So I am not going to be "holier than thou" and pretend I don't use AI at all. What do we all think about this? | 612 |
| 13 | As I've been banging on about for a long time:
"Most people assume America’s decline and a multipolar world — power spread across the US, China, Russia, India, and others — weakens the Western establishment. Nothing could be further from the truth.
China uses the same sustainability disclosure frameworks. BRICS members apply the same ESG benchmarks. Russia is fully signed up to the Sustainable Development Goals. Belt and Road projects run on standards shaped at forums in Buckinghamshire and funded by Western foundations. The supposed alternative to Western leadership runs on standards Western-aligned networks designed, published through the United Nations, and adopted as if they emerged from open multilateral negotiation.
Almost all central banks participate in the Bank for International Settlements — the institution that hosts the NGFS secretariat, coordinates the Basel capital standards, and proposed the unified ledger. You can reject American foreign policy, but you cannot reject the BIS and remain part of the international financial system.
The forums at Waddesdon, Bellagio, and Sir Bani Yas don’t just set domestic policy for one country. They set global benchmarks that every country — aligned or not — must meet to take part in the international financial system. The goal isn’t to control one state. It’s to write the standards that all states adopt willingly.
You can oppose a superpower. You can’t oppose standards that every party accepted voluntarily — because each party thinks they’re impartial. They’re not. They were drafted by hand-picked participants in private settings, then published as international norms that bind everyone." https://escapekey.substack.com/p/illusions-of-a-multipolar-world | 573 |
| 14 | I thought Vanessa Beeley spoke very well and there was little she said that I disagreed with. I don't have the same Zionist focus as Vanessa, though I agree it is a very powerful influence. What struck me was her appeal to find common ground and that there is clearly a misunderstanding with regards to the arguments some of us are making about multipolarity. Personally I would welcome the opportunity to discuss this with her if she is interested. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KujYnSA2IBE | 1 314 |
| 15 |  Vanessa Beeley chatted to me about physical wars and online wars, from Israel, Gaza, Iran, to China and the importance of laughter as a coping mechanism.
Tonight on ukcolumn.org at 19:00 UK. | 820 |
| 16 | 19:00 Tonight. I'll certainly be watching. | 880 |
| 17 | Palantir has signed a multimillion-pound deal with all police forces in England and Wales to run the national firearms database.
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/technology-uk/article/palantir-police-forces-contract-sadiq-khan-l6bntmwp5
Follow @zeeemedia
Website | X | Instagram | Rumble | 845 |
| 18 | In an upcoming podcast episode with Vanessa Beeley, we speak about the persistant coordinated attacks we've had to endure for months now, from individuals in the 'independent journalism' space, including Hrvoje Moric, David Hughes, Michael Ginsburg (who is pro-Israel, as per his own words), Iain Davis, and others.
She doesn't hold back and it's time for us, on the receiving end, to hit back and continue hitting back. UK Column has already put out an article in which they rebut absurd allegations made by disgruntled former contributors who are part of the coordinated attack.
These individuals are on the wrong side of history and are trying to create a distraction from our real enemies.
https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/the-debi-evans-and-sandi-adams-allegations-a-rebuttal | 721 |
| 19 | I look forward to hearing their reasoned arguments. I'm well up for constructive criticism and open debate. Hopefully, this will be the start of one. | 732 |
| 20 | amusingly, i actually laid out the same argument over here wrt financial surveillance
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/how-to-fix-cbdcs-and-why-they-wont?utm_source=publication-search | 796 |
