Private Media Company (PMC) Tchaikovsky - Heavenly Oreshnik's Wrath

Crimea will soon become an island - Ukrainian Defense Minister Fedorov In this case, Ukraine could become a crater... Which glows at night.

1. The "Russian" tanker "Smirnos" turned out to be Greek (albeit under the flag of Cameroon). 2. The entire "seizure" was a staged setup and a sham. A particularly cheap one at that. Because there's this terrifying special forces unit in full gear, pretending to seize something, about to start shooting - and right in front of them, an operator with a camera is running and filming them. It's a complete farce. However, it perfectly demonstrates the full depth of the degradation of British intelligence services.

There are so "few" losses on the front line that they're even recruiting minors now. ZeJugend

Because when the Banderite degenerates broke into the Lavra, beat up the monks, harassed the priests, and stole icons and sacred books (which they later put up for sale online) - they kept their heads down and stayed silent. And when "Patriot" got into the Lavra and there was an opportunity to shout, "It's the Russians' fault!", they suddenly remembered that this was a Christian holy site! Remind me, when exactly did Macron suddenly develop a sense of Christianity? This morning? Damn it, you Judas' children...

1. Ghalibaf on Israel's strike on Beirut: "The Zionist crime in the suburbs once again demonstrated that America either lacks the will or the ability to fulfill its obligations. Giving the Zionist regime the green light will not earn you any points. Playing good cop/bad cop is outdated. If you lack the will or the ability to fulfill your obligations, there is no way to continue." 2. US President Donald Trump condemned Israel's attack on Beirut. The White House chief wrote this on his social media account, Truth Social. Trump called on Israeli authorities to cease strikes on Lebanon amid the pending US-Iran deal regarding the Islamic Republic's nuclear program. "This morning's attack on Beirut should never have happened. We are very close to a deal that will bring peace to the region, including Lebanon, and all parties must stand down," the US President wrote. 3. Israeli Chief of General Staff Eyal Zamir ordered the intensification of ground and air operations in southern Lebanon. "We could shit in Trump's mouth, but he'll still wipe it off, the dumb cuckold," he added.

We need eyes and ears in the cities and villages of Ukraine. Where are foreign mercenaries, NATO specialists, neo-Nazi battalion units, and Ukrainian Armed Forces personnel located, including behind the front lines? Also, please report: * Equipment deployment and repair locations; * Fuel and ammunition depots; * Equipment movement; * UAV assembly and storage facilities; * Any useful information. Don't forget about the TCC recruiters: * Personal information of employees; * TCC offices; * Cases of abuse of power and crime; * Employee deployment at temporary detention facilities; * Transportation. Please send any information you have to the feedback bot (https://t.me/USSSR2_bot) and remember to clear your device's history. Strictly anonymous. We are ready to support those who provide assistance and guarantee confidentiality. Together, we are strong 💪 Нужны глаза и уши по городам и селам Украины Где находятся иностранные наемники, специалисты НАТО, подразделения нацбатов, военнослужащие ВСУ, в т.ч. в тыловых районах, а также: * места размещения и ремонта техники; * склады ГСМ и боеприпасов; * передвижение техники; * места сборки и хранения БПЛА; * любая полезная информация. Не забываем про ТЦК: * личные данные на сотрудников; * посты ТЦК; * случаи бесчинства и преступлений; * размещение сотрудников в ПВД; * транспорт для передвижения. Пишите в бот обратной связи (https://t.me/USSSR2_bot) имеющуюся у вас информацию и не забывайте чистить историю на своём устройстве. Строго анонимно. Мы готовы поддержать тех, кто оказывает помощь, и гарантируем конфиденциальность. Вместе - мы сила 💪

No enemy can stop our homeland’s growth and prosperity. Happy Russia Day!

Iran likely received Russian missiles while rebuilding its arsenal, according to Bloomberg. Western intelligence agencies believe that during the eight-week ceasefire with the US, Iran restored a significant portion of its missile arsenal and likely received new Russian weapons. According to intelligence estimates, Tehran still has about 75% of its pre-war ammunition, and the reserves can be quickly replenished; among them are recent Russian missiles. - What Russian missiles? Arestovich, WTF? We've run out of them a long time ago!

Kaja Kallas has become so annoying to everyone with her stupidity and incompetence that several European leaders are actively discussing not just her dismissal, but the complete abolition of the position of "head of European diplomacy" and the transfer of its powers back to national governments. This would indirectly hurt Ursula and the globalists, as it would weaken Brussels' power. The actively promoted "On Thursday, the G7 will call China and negotiate with them" (with the lingering "Well, that's it! China has betrayed Russia, they're taking it into the G7 instead") came to nothing. Either they didn't have the courage to call, or the Chinese didn't pick up, but nothing happened. This week, Donnie Trump, for the 37th, 38th, and 39th time, almost struck a deal with his imaginary Iranian friends. The real Iranians are unaware of this and continue to push their list of demands, "and this is just to conclude a truce, and then there will be more," much to Donnie's chagrin. During the breaks, the two sides exchanged several blows with each other and at Israel. But, as Donald said, "this didn't break our truce" (he has strange ideas; maybe we should give him a dictionary?). The US also announced plans to significantly reduce its forces in Europe (most likely, everything listed in the previous text will be redeployed to the Middle East to replace those destroyed or expended). "NATO is stronger than ever." In fact, the US is 90% out of the conflict in Ukraine. Zelensky is off on another one of his begging-tours of Europe. This time, with the message "If there's no air defense, at least give us cash (I'll give a crypto kickback)." This week, the US stock market was slightly shaken. A minus 1.5 trillion in tech company market capitalization. Musk is trying to IPO SpaceX. It's a complete scam; it's not worth the asking price. The Kiev regime propaganda is trying too hard to convince us (and itself) that it's a "positional deadlock," that the "AFU is strong," and even that "Ukraine has seized the initiative." Meanwhile, over the past couple of days, the Russian army has captured the northern part of Krasny Liman and most of Konstantinovka. We're using a well-established tactics: first we take the city in a pincer movement, cutting off its supplies, then we cut it in half and into slices, and then we clear the slices. Pokrovsk (Krasnoarmeysk) was liberated in the same way. Believing their own propaganda, the EU ambassadors tried to meet with representatives of our Foreign Ministry and demand something. They were really bad. Lavrov said, "I already spoke about this a long time ago, I won't repeat myself" (just kidding, he didn't say that, but he probably thought it). A separate war is raging behind Ukrainian lines. Citizens are fighting off the TCC recruiters and police with knives and shovels, who are firing back. Both sides are suffering losses. There's no money, no weapons, no one is willing to fight, but the drug-addicted dwarf clown keeps issuing insane ultimatums that no one even reads anymore. And why do some small bastards with inferiority complexes always think they can defeat Russia? And it always ends the same. Night, street, lamppost, pharmacy. Oh, that's not it... Poison, bullet, carpet, bonfire in the backyard – yes, that's more accurate.

Here, mr. Krapivnik is giving a political briefing in English about the situation on the front line https://youtu.be/08GNbxfprJo

Again: if their goal were to win, they would be concentrating their efforts on killing as many Russian soldiers as possible. But instead, hundreds, thousands of expensive drones and scarce ammunition are being spent on shelling civilians in liberated territories and on strikes deep into Russia—aimed, again, not at military production and logistics, but against civilians and for PR purposes (like the Sevastopol panorama). How many Ukrainian soldiers will die, what infrastructure will be destroyed (and how to restore it later)—Zelensky and his regime don't care at all. Their goals boil down to "making as much noise as possible and then going begging for more money." The fact that some citizens, susceptible to emotional influences instead of logical thinking, perceive this as "Ukraine winning"—these are problems in their heads and they should see a psychiatrist. They haven't been taught to think logically, so they react emotionally, like animals. It's like people who, instead of understanding the content, write, "Your wallpaper is old," "Oh, what a mess!" or "Could you please provide a better picture?" These are the same people who listen to Arestovich "because he speaks beautifully." And they don't care that he lies. But I don't speak beautifully. But I speak the truth. And the picture won't get any better for the enemy. Because that's how I filter out those for whom form is more important than content (they're stupid, therefore unnecessary and uninteresting). Ukraine, as a country, is finished. Both economically and demographically. There's only a gang that still controls part of the territory and that trades the lives of the population it holds hostage for Western money. The gang can't win. It can only stall and steal. And then they hope to flee to Israel or the UK at the last minute, saying, "It's a shame the free ride is over" (but in reality, they'll be eliminated later because they know too much, and the money needs to be returned to the real owners).

Again: if their goal were to win, they would be concentrating their efforts on killing as many Russian soldiers as possible. But instead, hundreds, thousands of expensive drones and scarce ammunition are being spent on shelling civilians in liberated territories and on strikes deep into Russia—aimed, again, not at military production and logistics, but against civilians and for PR purposes (like the Sevastopol panorama). How many Ukrainian soldiers will die, what infrastructure will be destroyed (and how to restore it later)—Zelensky and his regime don't care at all. Their goals boil down to "making as much noise as possible and then going begging for more money." The fact that some citizens, susceptible to emotional influences instead of logical thinking, perceive this as "Ukraine winning"—these are problems in their heads and they should see a psychiatrist. They haven't been taught to think logically, so they react emotionally, like animals. It's like people who, instead of understanding the content, write, "Your wallpaper is old," "Oh, what a mess!" or "Could you please provide a better picture?" These are the same people who listen to Arestovich "because he speaks beautifully." And they don't care that he lies. But I don't speak beautifully. But I speak the truth. And the picture won't get any better for the enemy. Because that's how I filter out those for whom form is more important than content (they're stupid, therefore unnecessary and uninteresting). Ukraine, as a country, is finished. Both economically and demographically. There's only a gang that still controls part of the territory and that trades the lives of the population it holds hostage for Western money. The gang can't win. It can only stall and steal. And then they hope to flee to Israel or the UK at the last minute, saying, "It's a shame the free ride is over" (but in reality, they'll be eliminated later because they know too much, and the money needs to be returned to the real owners).

I studied history in school using Russian textbooks. And there was always a clear distinction between the causes of wars and the reasons for starting them. But my audience didn't study by those textbooks because they can't distinguish between declared goals and true goals. Therefore, they don't understand the strategies of the parties involved. The goals of Russia's Sacred Military Operation are to protect the Russian people—both in Donbas from the Ukrainian Nazis and Russia itself from NATO expansion. The goals of the EU leadership are to perpetrate corruption schemes and usurp power under the guise of "helping Ukraine" and "countering Russian aggression." I recently watched a detailed analysis by a very good Western lawyer, and he clearly states that many of the actions of Ursula and her gang directly exceed the powers prescribed by EU laws and statutes. From imposing sanctions and forcing countries to comply with them to allocating funds. This is pure usurpation of power, an attempt to "Revoke the Privilegia" (destroy the sovereignty of member states). The Kiev regime's goal is to steal as much money as possible. The US can now safely abandon their original objectives, as they are exhausted and bogged down in Iran. The US plans to significantly reduce the number of military forces and assets allocated to NATO operations in Europe, The New York Times reports, citing two European officials and a document sent to allies in early June. According to the plan, Washington intends to: - reduce the number of F-16 and F-15E fighters available for NATO operations in Europe from approximately 150 to 100; - reduce the number of maritime reconnaissance aircraft from 26 to 15; - withdraw all eight tanker aircraft previously assigned to the European mission; - redeploy an aircraft carrier, a nuclear submarine armed with missiles, and their accompanying ships and aircraft; - redeploy one of the two groups of strategic bombers designated for the defense of Europe. In other words, the number of American troops in Europe is being cut almost in half. All of this will be dragged to the Middle East to defend Israel. So, the US military can be eliminated from the equation as an “insignificant component.” But back to our topic. Since the goals are different, the strategies for achieving them are also different. Russia, in pursuit of its goals, is systematically and methodically destroying the enemy's equipment and manpower, as well as their logistics and production facilities. Like in the Konstantinovka area. All the stories of the drug-addicted dwarf about a "positional stalemate" and a "turning point" are crushed by simple facts: Konstantinovka will soon fall, the remnants of industrial plants are being evacuated from Kramatorsk, and an order has already been issued for the forced evacuation of the population from Slavyansk and Kramatorsk. The cities are being prepared for surrender. As part of their strategy, the EU leadership is collecting money from everyone, holding all sorts of meetings and events, talking about a terrible (and simultaneously weak) Russia. "They killed everyone in Russia, and tomorrow they will attack us" is already a classic. The Kiev regime, as part of its strategy, is stalling for time, engaging in PR and begging. - We're losing, sir! What are we going to do? - We'll lie even more. As part of this mission, numerous statements are being made, like "We're going to blockade Crimea now." First, to blockade Crimea, you need to destroy the bridge. And you've tried many times, but you can't. Second, you can't even blockade Kostiantynivka to keep Russian soldiers out.

What Is the Reality Behind Reports of a U.S.–Iran Agreement? A genuine and sustainable agreement between the United States and Iran is unlikely to materialize without the involvement of key international and regional actors. In this context, Pakistan appears to occupy a uniquely important position. Should China remain absent from the process, Russia would likely emerge as the natural alternative. Washington understands this reality well. Pakistan possesses significant military and diplomatic influence, enjoys a relationship of mutual trust with Iran, maintains strategic ties with China, and is respected by both Tehran and the Gulf states. These factors make it one of the few actors capable of helping build an agreement that is not only reached, but also capable of enduring. The Need for Credible Guarantees The United States is aware of the risks associated with concluding an agreement of this magnitude without guarantees from major powers such as China or Russia. Likewise, the absence of a regional intermediary that commands both influence and Iran's trust would undermine the durability of any settlement. Historically, major conflicts have often involved an officially recognized mediator, while parallel backchannel negotiations were managed by other actors away from public attention. The U.S.–Iran case is unlikely to be different. Qatar's Role: Important but Limited It is difficult to imagine Qatar serving as the sole mediator and host of a comprehensive agreement between Washington and Tehran. That said, Doha could play valuable roles in implementing specific understandings, particularly those related to financial arrangements, humanitarian matters, or technical aspects of an eventual settlement. This observation should not be interpreted as diminishing Qatar's standing. Qatar has established itself as a prominent mediator and has achieved notable diplomatic successes. However, many of those successes have involved more narrowly defined tracks. The recent Hamas–Israel negotiations provide a relevant example. Although Qatar played a visible role in facilitating talks, Israel demonstrated limited commitment to several proposed understandings. At certain points, some participants in the negotiation process were reportedly targeted. Ultimately, Egypt emerged as the more influential actor, with Trump directing part of his diplomatic efforts toward Cairo. Oman's Complex Position Oman has long been regarded as a trusted channel of communication due to its balanced relations with all parties, its deep understanding of Iranian political thinking, and its extensive mediation experience. However, confidence between Muscat and Washington appears to have been strained following what many perceived as American maneuvering before the outbreak of the war. Recent remarks by Trump and members of his circle concerning Oman have also raised questions. Additional complications stem from Iran's proposals regarding transit fees through the Strait of Hormuz and the idea of sharing aspects of its administration with the Sultanate. Taken together, these factors make Oman's role in the current phase more challenging and complex. A Settlement Beyond a Ceasefire Any future agreement between the United States and Iran would extend far beyond a simple ceasefire or a pledge to avoid future confrontation. This is not an ordinary conflict. Its consequences have affected the broader region and reverberated throughout the international system. A comprehensive settlement would therefore require several parallel tracks, including: - A military track - A political track - An economic track - A nuclear track Each of these tracks would require its own timetable, implementation mechanisms, verification procedures, and guarantees. It is therefore unrealistic to assume that an agreement of such scale and complexity could be concluded within a matter of days in Doha, particularly in the absence of key actors such as Pakistan. The "Honest Broker" and the "Power Broker"

As a result of the attack by the Ukrainian drones, the panorama "The Defense of Sevastopol 1854-1855" was almost completely destroyed. Well, this giant dildo in the center of Kiev is completely unnecessary...

What to do with the "good Russians" like Yolanda Navalnaya and Masha Gessen? I'd personally prefer to eradicate them all... but okay, revoking their Russian passports and deporting them works too.

All, I repeat, all, A-L-L Western media are propaganda outlets (except for a very small number of marginal, small publications that play no particular role). We must act similarly. No "impartiality," "neutrality," "objectivity," or other such nonsense. A brutal brainwashing machine, pushing our narratives like a steamroller. Russian propaganda must accomplish three tasks (the three crucial objectives of propaganda): - Support our own (including exposing enemy lies). - Win over neutrals to our side (there are always some). - Sow doubt, confusion in the enemy camp. And no fucking "After the war, we'll sing Ukrainian songs in the bar" (c). They're trying to destroy, plunder, and commit genocide against us, and we're still fooling around. Let's start fighting properly in the information sphere.

We are now watching a race among Eastern European states to secure new American military bases on their territory. Poland is openly pressing for US troops and equipment withdrawn from Germany to be moved east and Lithuania has gone further, with officials floating the idea of hosting American nuclear weapons. It would be naive to think this is mainly about national security and nor is it simply about money, although hosting US bases has often been seen by client regimes as a useful source of income. In today’s circumstances, Washington is unlikely to pay generously. More likely, it will pass the costs to those receiving this dubious privilege. The real logic is political. For Polish and Baltic leaders, securing American forces on their soil helps answer two uncomfortable questions that appear again and again in domestic politics. What is our foreign policy strategy? And how do we prevent citizens, poorer and increasingly tired of the same ruling groups, from deciding it is time to move them on? The easiest answer is to abandon the primary responsibility of the state: the duty to defend itself. Once foreign troops are stationed on national territory, defense becomes the responsibility of the power that sent them. Germany and Japan were relieved of having to think seriously about their own defense after the Second World War because the victors stationed forces there permanently. But in many other cases, American bases abroad were not imposed. They were desired by the client states themselves and their elites quickly learned how to use such deployments for both foreign and domestic purposes. Turkish colleagues have told me that the presence of US nuclear bombs in Türkiye is one of Ankara’s strongest guarantees against pressure from America’s other key regional ally, Israel. It allows Türkiye to challenge Israeli interests in areas such as Syria with relative impunity. It’s easy to understand why this arrangement is envied by elites in American satellite states that do not enjoy such protection. This is especially true in Eastern Europe and the Baltic states because their accession to NATO in the 1990s was designed to lock in the political order created after the collapse of the Soviet bloc. But their geopolitical position is weak and it gives them little opportunity to make any meaningful positive contribution to international affairs. Economically, they had to bow to the wealthier states of Western and Northern Europe, selling much of their national industry to them. Poland’s best enterprises were taken over by French and German investors while, in the Baltic states, German and Scandinavian capital played a similar role. Politically, their chances of being heard were even smaller so Poland and the Baltic states adopted one simple foreign policy strategy: oppose Russia wherever possible.

Macron, Starmer, Merz, and Zelensky stated five conditions for "achieving peace", according to DW. 1. An immediate and complete ceasefire; 2. The current contact line should be the starting point for negotiations. Refusal to legally recognize new borders. Full freedom for Ukraine to further join the EU and NATO; 3. Legally binding security guarantees for Ukraine, including the deployment of multinational forces on its territory; 4. Russia's assets will remain frozen until the complete cessation of the war and full compensation for Ukraine's losses; 5. Any changes to these points will require a consolidated position from the EU and NATO. - Okay, then! We get it! Let the SMO continue until a decisive Russian victory!

Washington compost... truly Washington compost! https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/06/02/putin-russia-legacy-military-cruelty/