¡Ya disponible! Investigación de Telegram 2025 — los principales insights del año 
0/0
Ir al canal en Telegram
0/0 = undefined A labyrinth of ideas, A diary of curiosities Bot: @contactzero_bot
Mostrar más📈 Análisis del canal de Telegram 0/0
El canal 0/0 (@error0error) en el segmento lingüístico de Árabe es un actor destacado. Actualmente la comunidad reúne a 10 613 suscriptores, ocupando la posición 8 688 en la categoría Religión y espiritualidad y el puesto 7 195 en la región Arabia Saudí.
📊 Métricas de audiencia y dinámica
Desde su creación el невідомо, el proyecto ha mostrado un crecimiento acelerado, reuniendo a 10 613 suscriptores.
Según los últimos datos del 04 julio, 2026, el canal mantiene una actividad estable. En los últimos 30 días la variación de miembros fue de 245, y en las últimas 24 horas de 5, conservando un alto alcance.
- Estado de verificación: No verificado
- Tasa de interacción (ER): El promedio de interacción de la audiencia es 13.68%. Durante las primeras 24 horas tras publicar, el contenido suele obtener 7.09% de reacciones respecto al total de suscriptores.
- Alcance de las publicaciones: Cada publicación recibe en promedio 1 452 visualizaciones. En el primer día suele acumular 752 visualizaciones.
- Reacciones e interacción: La audiencia responde de forma activa: el promedio de reacciones por publicación es 0.
- Intereses temáticos: El contenido se centra en temas clave como مُشَاعَرَة, رَجُل, ظِلّ, نِسَاءَة, اِبن.
📝 Descripción y política de contenido
El autor describe el recurso como un espacio para expresar opiniones subjetivas:
“0/0 = undefined
A labyrinth of ideas,
A diary of curiosities
Bot: @contactzero_bot”
Gracias a la alta frecuencia de actualizaciones (últimos datos recibidos el 05 julio, 2026), el canal mantiene la vigencia y un amplio alcance. La analítica demuestra que la audiencia interactúa activamente con el contenido, lo que lo convierte en un punto de referencia dentro de la categoría Religión y espiritualidad.
10 613
Suscriptores
+524 horas
+527 días
+24530 días
Archivo de publicaciones
10 613
On this note, one can divide philosophies into two classes:
• The practical, DIY philosophies that occupy themselves with the problems and daily life of the individual human. They serve as guides or advices along the troublesome journey of life. To this category belongs Stoicism, Buddhism, and some Nietzsche philosophy.
• The metaphysical, semi-religious philosophies that tell you what to believe in, and try to impose the author(s) design upon the world. These are more akin to religious tenets and political manifestos than to "self-help" books and fatherly guidance. To this category belongs Kant, Marx, and Berkeley.
10 613
واحد من أكثر الاستبيانات متعة🤝
خاصة بالأخير تبدي الاسئلة تاخذ منحى غير متوقع:
https://forms.gle/AN9JEbXcEP1MVYHy8
10 613
Appealing to common sense
"Appealing to the stone" is considered a logical fallacy; a failure of reason, but I find it to be very sensible and convincing. It's an appeal to common sense, to everyday, self-evident experiences that usually tend to get dismissed in philosophy and labelled as "ungrounded in reason," even though they are grounded in what is as compelling as reason: the familiar, practical experience of the world.
Just as common sense must be evaluated via philosophy to rid it of any flaws, so does philosophy need to be gauged in proportion to common sense to keep it rooted in reality and life. This appeal to common sense is vital for philosophy not to go astray in the roads of the fantastic, the unreal, and the nonsensical. Berkeley's idealism is known for its logical consistency and it's difficult to refute it logically. But that doesn't necessarily make it important nor useful, as Johnson's appealing to the stone shows us simply and elegantly how obsolete it is when we employ it in real life and use it anywhere outside philosophy textbooks.
10 613
Appealing to common sense
"Appealing to the stone" is considered a logical fallacy; a failure of reason, but I find it to be very sensible and convincing. It's an appeal to common sense, to everyday, self-evident experiences that usually tend to get dismissed in philosophy and labelled as "ungrounded in reason," even though they are grounded in what is as compelling as reason: the familiar, practical experience of the world.
Just as common sense must be evaluated via philosophy to rid it of any flaws, so does philosophy need to be gauged in proportion to common sense to keep it rooted in reality and life. This appeal to common sense is vital for philosophy not to go astray in the roads of the fantastic, the unreal, and the nonsensical. Berkeley's idealism is known for its logical consistency and it's difficult to refute it logically. But that doesn't necessarily make it important nor useful, as Johnson's appealing to the stone shows us simply and elegantly how obsolete it is when we employ it in real life and use it anywhere outside philosophy textbooks.
10 613
Appealing to the stone
Samuel Johnson—logically speaking—was making a fallacy (called 'appealing to the stone'). But I think he was pointing out to a very important notion that neither logic nor "good reasoning" seem to take into account: whether Berkeley's idealism is true or not, the stone would still be solid every time I kick it, and my leg would still hurt me.
When he said «I refute it thus», he wasn't creating a counter-argument within the same logical framework that Berkeley used to make his own argument (if he were doing so, then it would truly be a fallacy). He was standing outside the rigid confines of philosophy (in the fresh air of common sense), and dismissing Idealism's whole logical and philosophical framework as nonsensical, just like kicking a stone off the road.
10 613
هاي بالقرن الـ 18 اجة واحد إسمه جورج بيركلي كال: الوجود كله هو عبارة عن الله، والعقل. أمّا العالم الخارجي فهذا كله تصورات وخيالات تصنعها عقولنا وماكو أي شي مادي بالعالم؛ جسمك وبيتك والحجر والطير والشجر كلهن تصورات عقلية تصنعها عقولنا (الغير-مادية). يعني فلسفته (جان إسمها المثالية) هي بالضبط النقيض التام للمادية.
بوقتها أكو واحد من علماء عصره إسمه سامويل جونسون Samuel Johnson كاعد يم صديقه اللي دوّخه وثوله هلكد ما سولف ببيركلي وفلسفة بيركلي، لحد ما جونسون ضاج كلش وراح لحجر جبير وضربه جلاق وكال: I refute it thus (آني أنفي فلسفته بهذا الجلاق) بس فك مني ياخة. يقصد: إذا كلشي تصوّر عقلي وغير مادي، جا شلون اني كدرت أضرب هاي الحجارة؟
10 613
لنأخذ مثالًا بذلك المريض الذي جاء يلتمس العلاج بسبب شعورِه بالوحدة والعزلة، فكان يسهب أثناء الجلسات ويفيض في التعبير عن ازدرائِه واحتقارِه للآخرين. وكان متعنّتًا في هذه الآراء يُبدي مقاومةً كبيرةً تجاه مناقشتها، ناهيك تغييرها. فماذا كان مِن المعالج؟ كان يبرز له شكواه الأُولى ويقرنها بسلوكه حتى تتبيّن له مسؤوليته عن مأزقه الشخصي. وذلك بأن يذكره كلما أبدى احتقاره للآخرين: «وأنت تشكو الوحدة».
