ToreSays®+
Underreported. Documented. Not for the algorithm. The record lives here. The argument lives in the chat. @toresaysplusCHAT
Mostrar más📈 Análisis del canal de Telegram ToreSays®+
El canal ToreSays®+ (@toresaysplus) en el segmento lingüístico de Inglés es un actor destacado. Actualmente la comunidad reúne a 45 195 suscriptores, ocupando la posición 1 028 en la categoría Humor y entretenimiento y el puesto 648 en la región EEUU.
📊 Métricas de audiencia y dinámica
Desde su creación el невідомо, el proyecto ha mostrado un crecimiento acelerado, reuniendo a 45 195 suscriptores.
Según los últimos datos del 05 septiembre, 2026, el canal mantiene una actividad estable. En los últimos 30 días la variación de miembros fue de -720, y en las últimas 24 horas de -21, conservando un alto alcance.
- Estado de verificación: No verificado
- Tasa de interacción (ER): El promedio de interacción de la audiencia es 12.78%. Durante las primeras 24 horas tras publicar, el contenido suele obtener 10.21% de reacciones respecto al total de suscriptores.
- Alcance de las publicaciones: Cada publicación recibe en promedio 5 777 visualizaciones. En el primer día suele acumular 4 616 visualizaciones.
- Reacciones e interacción: La audiencia responde de forma activa: el promedio de reacciones por publicación es 0.
- Intereses temáticos: El contenido se centra en temas clave como survivor, iran, u.s, congress, evidence.
📝 Descripción y política de contenido
El autor describe el recurso como un espacio para expresar opiniones subjetivas:
“Underreported. Documented. Not for the algorithm. The record lives here. The argument lives in the chat. @toresaysplusCHAT”
Gracias a la alta frecuencia de actualizaciones (últimos datos recibidos el 06 septiembre, 2026), el canal mantiene la vigencia y un amplio alcance. La analítica demuestra que la audiencia interactúa activamente con el contenido, lo que lo convierte en un punto de referencia dentro de la categoría Humor y entretenimiento.
Carga de datos en curso...
| Fecha | Crecimiento de Suscriptores | Menciones | Canales | |
| 06 septiembre | 0 | |||
| 05 septiembre | +4 | |||
| 04 septiembre | +1 | |||
| 03 septiembre | +5 | |||
| 02 septiembre | +3 | |||
| 01 septiembre | +2 |
| 2 | Ah COZY - remember when AKBAR was doing things with COZY.TV - remember one of the haters calling themselves POOH COZY - ALSO fun little known titbit… someone with a COZY link with IP in ND tried to hack the page… funny how all those “MISFITS” tie together especially with the clown faces 🤡 | 2 029 |
| 3 | When they sit on a Cozy Couch!
That was the name of the first 'breakout room' made by Whims and when she told me about it, I came up with the idea to make a 'breakout room' for every state.
Whims and Jax worked fast and made those State Groups. She locked me out and she created 'Guardians', that she appointed for each room.
This is how the groups were corrupt from the start.
Later, when she 'pulled her pants down', all those Guardians became sus.
~Psy_Ops | 1 986 |
| 4 | P, C, U, S, C, R, P, A, A, G, Z, S, K, A, J, B, B, B, F, T, H, L, D, P, F, G, C, L, M, T, N, B, M, S, M, G, L, S, B, T, B, E, J, L
WHAT DO ALL OF THOSE HAVE IN COMMON | 1 921 |
| 5 | Sin texto... | 1 844 |
| 6 | Send all information you have and evidence to Webmaster@toresays.com please | 1 745 |
| 7 | UofF. Doesn't surprise me. I recently discovered we have a well organized group here called Gainesviile Immigrant Neighbir Inclusion Initative (GINI) and well organized with volunteers mostly UF employees and funded by ngo's. | 1 798 |
| 8 | But ‘muh B-drops - let’s use joker memes because we important right - we like hack and all that shit right and gossip like little bitches - we in positions snort snort GTFOH CLOWNS | 1 796 |
| 9 | BTW - can’t the CLOWNS 🤡 at least use a different script instead of recycling the same psychosis amongst different profiles coming across as cray cray - can’t the ex navy vets do better with their little psyop prodigies? Love bombing and attacking is soooo prehistoric - can’t you break free from your circle jerking to come up with something more original now instead of the same words coming out of different mouth pieces | 2 108 |
| 10 | . | 2 076 |
| 11 | @ToreSays
Many on the that call are faculty, check bio's
Lily:
Build the Base at the Workplace Justice Lab after working with Defend and Recruit, a project of Siembra NC, which helps groups across the country build strong ICE defense networks, run corporate campaigns, and pass municipal policies in support of immigrant communities.
https://smlr.rutgers.edu/wjl-ru/team | 2 111 |
| 12 | List of schools from the Zoom call. @ToreSays | 2 038 |
| 13 | Pig kidneys successfully transplanted into humans https://share.google/YIqlTSiwr7t8NzoF1
@ToreSays you taught us about this last 6 yrs...porcine cells.. so modified engineered kidney... is human becoming a pig? What is injected to stop the organ rejection? 🤢 | 2 085 |
| 14 | Imagine an argument was staged on purpose.
Just to time how fast A becomes B.
Some ears were already leaning in before the first word landed.
And the rats? They always come out of the woodwork.
Every. Single. Time. | 2 064 |
| 15 | https://youtu.be/aOZPBUu7Fro | 2 043 |
| 16 | Don’t think it went unnoticed.
When some of you thought there was an opening and decided to do your worst…
The sliding in the DMs. The thousands of messages.
The sudden reappearances in the comments.
The ridiculous little games.
The passing comments from the smiley joker face crew.
The whole “I’m so detached and unbothered” performance.
The absolute BS you posted on X.
We see that side of the network more clearly than most.
You try so hard to make out like you’re not associated with each other, don’t you? Even throwing your own under the bus for cover, trying to create distance.
Give it up already.
Tell me… was it the faction of your network being uncovered in Ohio that did it? Is that what triggered it all? Btw you didn’t “handle” it very well.
You showed your hand. | 2 080 |
| 17 | I’m not looking for people to suck up to me in the comments - I want you to read what I have said and really understand it. | 2 092 |
| 18 | You know, it doesn’t matter what someone has going on, and it doesn’t matter whether they’ve had a bad day taking it out on people who don’t deserve it is still a choice.
Being overwhelmed may explain someone’s behaviour, but it does not excuse cruelty, personal attacks or tearing apart another person’s character.
Your inability to regulate what you are feeling does not give you the right to use another human being as an emotional punching bag.
Other people are not responsible for carrying the consequences of emotions they did not create and behaviour they did not cause.
Whatever someone is going through, basic respect is not an unreasonable expectation and nobody should have to sacrifice their dignity just to accommodate somebody else’s chaos. | 2 152 |
| 19 | There is a particularly nasty kind of conflict where someone doesn’t simply misunderstand another person.
They misunderstand them, react to their own misunderstanding, and then use that misunderstanding as permission to tear the other person apart.
It can begin with something incredibly simple.
“I thought you wanted me to do this.”
Except instead of checking whether that assumption is correct, it rapidly becomes:
“You wanted me to do this.”
“You expected this from me.”
“You made me do this.”
“You caused this.”
And before the other person has even had a chance to understand what is happening, they are being attacked for something they never actually asked for.
But then comes the uglier part.
The person doesn’t stop at the supposed behaviour.
They go after character.
They become hostile.
They throw nasty descriptions around.
They assign motives that were never there.
They tell the other person what they supposedly think, what they supposedly wanted, why they supposedly behaved that way and, eventually, what kind of person they supposedly are.
A misunderstanding becomes an excuse for character assassination.
And when the person being attacked says:
“That isn’t what happened.”
“I never asked you to do that.”
“That wasn’t my intention.”
“You are completely misrepresenting me.”
The response isn’t curiosity.
It isn’t, “Maybe I misunderstood.”
It is more hostility.
More accusations.
More certainty.
They effectively say:
“No. I know what you meant.”
“I know what you wanted.”
“I know what you’re like.”
Think about the arrogance contained in that.
Someone becomes angry over their own interpretation of an interaction and then appoints themselves the ultimate authority on another human being’s personality.
They don’t merely attack what happened.
They attack who the person is.
And suddenly the person on the receiving end is expected to defend their entire character against a fictional version of themselves constructed during somebody else’s emotional outburst.
That is not normal conflict resolution.
Healthy conflict sounds like:
“I thought you were asking me to do something immediately and it overwhelmed me.”
Then the other person can respond:
“No, that wasn’t what I meant.”
And the misunderstanding can be resolved.
But when someone would rather attack, insult and define another person than entertain the possibility that their original perception was wrong, the conflict has stopped being about understanding.
It has become about making somebody else the villain.
There is also something deeply convenient about transferring responsibility this way.
“I chose to do something because I misunderstood you” becomes “You made me do it.”
“I became distracted” becomes “You distracted me.”
“I became furious” becomes “You made me furious.”
“I lost control of how I spoke to you” becomes “Your personality is the reason I spoke to you that way.”
Suddenly their choices disappear and somebody else’s supposed character becomes responsible for everything.
And perhaps the nastiest part is expecting the person who has just been verbally torn apart to accept the description.
As though being shouted at with enough certainty somehow makes an accusation true.
As though another person’s anger grants them access to somebody else’s mind.
As though cruelty becomes insight simply because it is delivered confidently.
It doesn’t.
People are entitled to say:
“You upset me.”
“I misunderstood you.”
“I felt pressured.”
“I’m angry.”
They are even entitled to walk away.
But nobody is entitled to take their own misunderstanding, turn it into fact, unleash their frustration onto another person, attack their character, invent their motives and then demand that the person accept:
“This is who you are.” No.
That is who you have decided they are. There is a difference.
And sometimes the most revealing part of an ugly interaction is watching someone become so committed to their version of another human being that they would rather destroy that person’s character than consider one uncomfortable possibility:
They might simply have been wrong. | 2 044 |
| 20 | Those are words.
Behaviour is data.
And sometimes the most uncomfortable discovery isn’t that people hated the lighthouse.
It’s that they loved the light.
There is a difference.
One values the person.
The other values what the person provides.
The distinction can remain invisible for years because highly capable people often continue contributing long after reciprocity has disappeared.
They assume that giving more will eventually produce balance.
More understanding.
More forgiveness.
More work.
More ideas.
More patience.
Another chance.
And another.
Until something seemingly small happens that isn’t actually small at all.
It is simply the final data point required for the pattern to become visible.
Then there is no dramatic revelation.
Just clarity.
The lighthouse looks at the ocean and realises: “I have spent years illuminating everybody else’s journey while neglecting my own.”
So the light doesn’t disappear.
It turns around.
And illuminates somewhere new. | 2 421 |
